ED raids in Gujarat, Maharashtra in ₹100-cr cyber ‘fraud' case
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Wednesday (June 25, 2025) conducted searches in Gujarat and Maharashtra as part of a money laundering probe against fraudsters, who allegedly committed cyber crimes like digital arrests and illegally transferred funds of more than ₹100 crore abroad, official sources said.
The raids were conducted in Surat and Ahmedabad in Gujarat and in Mumbai by the Ahmedabad zonal office of the federal probe agency under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
The money laundering case stems from a 2024 Gujarat Police FIR against Makbul Doctor, Kaashif Doctor, Bassam Doctor, Mahesh Mafatlal Desai, Maaz Abdul Raheem Nada and some others, the sources said.
The accused are alleged to have been involved in cheating the general public through various cyber frauds such as fake USDT trading (crypto currency), digital arrests, threatening innocent individuals by sending fake notices of law enforcement agencies etc., they said.
Cyber frauds like 'digital arrests' and fake summons or notices sent in the name of police or investigative agencies have led to duping of a number of persons over the last few years as the victims are forced to stay on video calls over Internet-based social media platforms with the scammers extorting money from them by threatening action by law enforcement agencies.
The ED, according to the sources, suspects that funds obtained from the victims through this cyber fraud were collected in bank accounts which were opened by either using KYC of dummy persons or forging identity documents.
Such illicit funds were converted into crypto currency through various 'Angadiya' or hawala operators and they are suspected to have remitted more than ₹100 crore funds abroad in the recent past, the sources said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
44 minutes ago
- NDTV
Senior IAS Officer Summoned By Anti-Corruption Bureau In Formula E Race Case
Hyderabad: Special Chief Secretary in Telangana, Arvind Kumar, has been summoned by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) on July 1 in connection with the Formula E race case. The ACB is probing into alleged irregularities related to the Formula E Race, which was organised when BRS working president KT Rama Rao was the municipal administration and urban development minister. Arvind Kumar has been named as an accused in the FIR registered by the ACB, alongside former minister KT Rama Rao and retired HMDA engineer BLN Reddy. Mr Kumar had informed the state government earlier that he transferred the funds under the directions of the then minister, KT Rama Rao. Whereas, KTR said he took the decision to conduct the games, but procedural details have to be taken care of by officers. In January, Arvind Kumar was questioned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) regarding allegations of violations in the transfer of funds for conducting the Formula E race in Hyderabad. The agency is investigating whether there were any violations of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) or if money was laundered through the transfer of funds to Formula E Operations (FEO). The investigator asked about the bypassing of rules and regulations in transferring foreign currency from the Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA) bank accounts. They also questioned why no approval was obtained from the state Cabinet or the Finance department to transfer funds. Arvind Kumar, the then Municipal Administration department special chief secretary, reportedly told the ED that the then Municipal Administration and Urban Development (MAUD) minister KT Rama Rao instructed him to make the payment immediately, "as any disruption to the Formula E race would damage the state's brand image." The ED further questioned why RBI guidelines were not followed during the fund transfer and sought clarification on Arvind Kumar's interest in approving the payment from HMDA accounts without a proper agreement with the race organisers.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
In Bangladesh, Dispute Over 10 Taka Gets Father-Son Duo Trapped In Blasphemy Tangle, Jailed
The blasphemy charge arose out of a petty financial dispute after a self-declared Imam of a local mosque refused to pay the barber duo for their services On Sunday, a new row erupted in Bangladesh when 69-year-old Paresh Chandra Shil and 35-year-old Bishnu Chandra Shil—a father-son barber duo—were dragged from their salon in Lalmonirhat district, 325 kilometers from capital Dhaka, and thrashed publicly on allegations of showing disrespect to the Prophet. But the Sils, both of whom are now behind bars, have a different tale to tell. According to them, at the heart of the accusation is a dispute over 10 taka (currency in Bangladesh). Diptirani Roy, Bishnu's wife, said: 'When my sister-in-law came, she insisted that we must go and find out the truth behind the incident. We went to jail and asked them what really happened. How did it spiral out of control? Both my husband and my father-in-law told me it is because of 10 taka. They asked the complainant for payment for their service but he refused to pay up. An argument ensued and while leaving their shop, the man threatened my father-in-law with dire consequences. My father-in-law and my husband are innocent." News18 spoke to local sources in Bangladesh who backed Roy's claim. Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities too confirmed Roy's allegation that the blasphemy charge is due to a petty financial dispute. The organisation has also confirmed the customer's name to be Md Abdul Ajiz, a self-declared Imam of a local mosque. A viral video is evidence enough to suggest how even a 69-year-old wasn't spared by the mob. Bangladesh-based rights organisations like Bangladesh Mahila Parishad, Ain o Salish Kendra (ASK), Naripokkho, and Shujan (Citizens for Good Governance) have expressed deep concern over the incident and issued a statement warning of 'mob culture" in the country. After Bangladesh's former prime minister Sheikh Hasina fled to India on August 5, 2024, there were reports of large-scale violence against minorities, resulting in even deaths. Hindus, who make up about 8 per cent of Bangladesh's population of 170 million, bore the maximum brunt of it and many would argue they continue to do so in the form of legal harassment like the Sils are facing. The Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council estimates that communal violence has affected at least 52 of the country's 64 districts since August 5. The targeted attacks made even Prime Minister Narendra Modi appeal for 'safety and protection" of Hindus as well as other minorities in Bangladesh last year. The attacks also caught the attention of the office of the United Nations Secretary-General who called for the violence in the country to be 'tamped down" and condemned any 'racially based attacks" last year.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
'Undermines Autonomy Of Legal Profession': SC On Cops Summoning Lawyers Over Client Advice
Last Updated: The SC said allowing police or probe agencies to directly summon lawyers for advising clients was a "direct threat" to the independence of justice administration The Supreme Court on Wednesday raised concerns over the probe agencies and police being allowed to summon lawyers for advising clients. It said this can have a 'chilling effect" and would seriously undermine the autonomy of the legal profession. Observing this was a 'direct threat" to the independence of justice administration, a bench of Justices KV Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh explained how the legal profession was an integral component of the process of administration of justice. 'Permitting the investigating agencies/police to directly summon defense counsel or advocates who advise parties in a given case would seriously undermine the autonomy of legal profession and would even constitute a direct threat to the independence of the administration of justice," the bench said. The order came when the court was hearing a plea of a Gujarat-based advocate, challenging an order of the high court passed on June 12. The bench framed a couple of questions in the matter and said it directly impinged on the administration of justice 'to subject a professional… when he is a counsel in the matter… prima facie appears to be untenable, subject to further consideration by the court". 'Some of the questions which arise for consideration are: (1) when an individual has a association with a case only as a lawyer advising the party, could the investigating agency/prosecuting agency/police directly summon the lawyer for questioning?" the bench asked. 'Assuming that the investigating agency or prosecuting agency or police have a case that role of the individual is not merely as a lawyer but something more, even then, should they be directly permitted to summon or should a judicial oversight be prescribed for those exceptional criteria?" The bench further said 'what is at stake is the efficacy of the administration of justice and the capacity of the lawyers to conscientiously, and more importantly, fearlessly discharge their professional duties". WHAT IS THE SC ORDER? The SC was hearing a plea of a Gujarat-based advocate, challenging an order of the high court passed on June 12. The high court had refused to quash a notice summoning the lawyer before the police in a case against his client. The top court, however, directed the state not to summon him till further orders and stayed the operation of the police's notice issued to him. The bench also issued notice to the Gujarat government, asking for its response. It noted an agreement was executed in June last year between two persons in a loan transaction. In February, one of them got an FIR registered against the other following which the accused was arrested. The court noted the petitioner before it was engaged as a lawyer by the accused and he moved a bail application on behalf of his client before a sessions court in Ahmedabad. The accused was granted bail. But, a police notice in March summoned the lawyer to appear before police within three days. WHY IS THIS SIGNIFICANT? The issue assumes significance as the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on June 20 directed its investigating officers not to issue summons to any advocate in a money laundering investigation being carried out against their client, adding that exception to this rule could only be made after 'approval" by the agency's director. The ED's statement came in the wake of the lawyer-client privilege linked controversy stemming from its summons to senior SC lawyers Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal. The counsel had offered legal advice to Care Health Insurance Limited (CHIL) on the employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) given to Rashmi Saluja, former chairperson of Religare Enterprises. The summons were condemned by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA), calling it a 'disturbing trend" that struck at the very foundations of the legal profession. The bar bodies urged the Chief Justice of India (CJI) to take suo motu cognisance of the matter. Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 25, 2025, 21:57 IST News india 'Undermines Autonomy Of Legal Profession': SC On Cops Summoning Lawyers Over Client Advice
