What Is the I.C.C.? What to Know After Hungary's Announced Withdrawal
Hungary's announcement on Thursday that it would withdraw from the International Criminal Court drew attention to the judicial body and raised questions about its reach.
The government of Prime Minister Viktor Orban announced its decision to withdraw just hours after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel arrived for a visit.
The court has issued a warrant for Mr. Netanyahu's arrest on accusations of 'intentionally and knowingly' depriving Gaza's population of food, water, fuel and medicine. Mr. Netanyahu's office rejected what it called 'absurd and false accusations.'
Here is what to know about the court and its efforts to enforce justice internationally.
What is the I.C.C.?
The I.C.C., established under a 1998 treaty, is the world's highest criminal court.
It has the jurisdiction to investigate and try people for what it describes as 'the gravest crimes of concern' to the world: war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression. But the court cannot enforce its rulings and relies on its member states to detain people who are accused of crimes.
The court draws its jurisdiction from the Rome Statute, a treaty ratified by 125 countries. The statute formally commits its signatories to arrest a wanted person who enters their soil, but members do not always comply.
The court is based in The Hague, a Dutch city that is a hub for international law and justice. The International Court of Justice, which handles civil disputes between countries and is part of the United Nations, is also based there.
The I.C.C. cannot try any suspects in absentia. Instead, it relies on member states to enforce its rulings with actions like making arrests, freezing assets and surrendering suspects to The Hague, where the I.C.C. has a detention center.
Former President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines is currently in I.C.C. custody after being recently arrested in his country on charges of crimes against humanity.
Which countries are not members of the court?
Some of the world's most powerful countries, including the United States, China, Russia, India and Israel, are not members of the court. They do not honor its arrest warrants or hand their citizens over for prosecution.
Hungary would be the first European Union country to withdraw from the court. Under the Rome Statute, Hungary's decision would not take effect for a year.
'Hungary remains under a duty to cooperate with the I.C.C.,' Fadi El Abdallah, the court spokesman, said in a statement on Thursday.
Burundi and the Philippines have both pulled out of court, in response to the I.C.C. prosecutor opening an investigation against their leaders. The court has said that Mr. Duterte is being prosecuted because the offenses he is accused of took place before his country's withdrawal took effect, although his lawyers have contested that argument.
Who has been prosecuted by the court?
The court says that it has issued 60 arrest warrants. About half of those people are 'at large'; the others are either dead or detained.
In November, the court issued arrest warrants for the leaders of Israel and Hamas. On the Israeli side, the warrants were for Mr. Netanyahu and his former defense minister, Yoav Gallant. The court also issued a warrant for Muhammad Deif, a Hamas leader, who was later killed in an Israeli strike.
In March, the Filipino authorities arrested Mr. Duterte.
The court issued arrest warrants for President Vladimir V. Putin and another Russian official in 2023. It argued that they both bore criminal responsibility for the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
The court also issued arrest warrants for four other Russian officials.
Mr. Putin made his first visit to an I.C.C. member state in September, but the country, Mongolia, warmly welcomed him with a red carpet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Intercept
an hour ago
- The Intercept
Netanyahu and Trump Are Trying to Have It All
Israeli strikes left homes and residential buildings destroyed in Tehran, Iran, on June 13, 2025. Photo: SABA/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty In the early morning hours of June 13, Israel launched an attack that had been prophesied in some form or another for nearly 20 years: a full-blown assault on Iran's nuclear program and, in a move that shocked many observers, its entire military structure. The top brass of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and of Iran's Armed Forces as a whole, has been assassinated. Critical nuclear facilities at Natanz and Fordow were bombarded with the intent to destroy. On Friday, Iran retaliated with multiple rounds of ballistic missiles in the heart of Tel Aviv, targeting Israel's Ministry of Defense and reportedly other military bases in the area. Israel's justification for its attack hinged again on the specter of the 'preemptive strike.' It's a mythos dating back to the fiction that Egypt was planning an imminent attack on Israeli forces in 1967, and thus Israel was justified in 'preemptively' destroying Egypt's military power and occupying the Sinai, the Golan, the West Bank, and Gaza. Here, the stakes are treated as just as high. Videos from the Israeli military extoll that they are fighting for the West's future and that they had 'no other choice' but to act against an existential threat — not just against the State of Israel, but against every country within range of Iran's vast missile arsenal. Israel's propaganda machine has been running full steam, lobbing claims about the amount of weapons-grade uranium Iran allegedly possesses, how many nuclear bombs it could thus produce, and how urgently Israel needed to strike at a perceived moment of weakness. This cavalcade almost obscures the extent to which the narrative surrounding the outbreak of this war has become one obscene contradiction, in which what one sees from President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can mean everything to everyone. By finally igniting the war the Israeli establishment has been dreaming of for decades, Netanyahu can both work toward achieving the long-term goal of subjugating the region and, in the short term, shift domestic and international attention away from the horrors his military is committing in Gaza. Now the focus will be on war with Tehran, the capital of an adversary unparalleled in the Western mind. Reservists can be called up en masse not to do another tour in what is known to be an untenable quagmire, but for a higher cause — one that has not yet proven un-winnable. Any prevailing concerns about religious parties in the Knesset overthrowing the Netanyahu cabinet can be put aside, as can worries about his corruption trial or his desire to overhaul the judiciary. Even the growing fear that Israel's war machine is destroying its reputation can be overlooked for now. How, the thinking goes, can Israel be a pariah state if it is working in full coordination with the United States for its own self-defense? By casting this new warfront as a bold move to preempt a fictional attack from a nonexistent nuclear bomb, Netanyahu can even confer the benefits of being a supposed peacemaker driven to reluctant action. He will be boosted by the narrative that he is the one pushing for a deal that was good for Israel, despite trying to assassinate one of the primary negotiators, Rear Adm. Ali Shamkhani, in one of the strikes on Tehran. Trump, for his part, is also attempting to play both sides. Despite Netanyahu's statement claiming U.S. coordination on the attack, Secretary of State Marco Rubio claimed it was a unilateral Israeli decision but one, of course, that America fully supported. Even so, Trump's communications since the attack have indicated nothing short of full, unbridled support, acting as if he had no hand in an assault that achieved all of America's preexisting objectives. Like Netanyahu, Trump can continue to claim he still wants a diplomatic solution: for Iran to return to talks. After all, the 'hardliner's' are 'all DEAD now,' as he wrote on Truth Social, so they should accept terms before it is too late. Both the faux anti-war crowd who backed Trump and the pro-war hawks have gotten what they wanted at the same time: an America supposedly uninvolved in difficult regime change wars that unleashed a proxy as an attack dog to slaughter Iranians however it sees fit. The deceit that has led to this moment has been open and unabashed. 'Trump and his aides were only pretending to oppose an Israeli attack in public,' Barak Ravid writes in Axios, 'and didn't express opposition in private. 'We had a clear U.S. green light,' one claimed.' The question remains now how long this massive contradiction in messaging can sustain itself. A potential war with Iran has always been the quagmire of all quagmires, a maelstrom which all previous U.S. and Israeli administrations have avoided speeding into. Now that the bombs are falling, it's clear the sails have been set. Can such a ship survive reality?
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nuclear threat wasn't the only reason Israel attacked Iran
Why did Israel attack Iran? Certainly, it was worried about the threat of a nuclear weapon being developed. But it's also becoming clearer that there was a second reason - that this is about laying the ground for regime change in Tehran. Follow latest: Because, hours after his country launched its first, surprise attack, the message from Benjamin Netanyahu couldn't be clearer - Iranians, he said, should overthrow their "evil and oppressive regime". He said Israel's attack would "pave the way for you to achieve your freedom". On the one hand, he would say that, wouldn't he? The Iranian government does not recognise the legitimacy of the Israeli state and has called for its destruction, while funding proxy groups that have attacked - including Hamas, Lebanese Hezbollah, and the Houthis in Yemen. But perhaps this time there is more than just wishful thinking. Although it's very hard to gauge the level of opposition in Iran, it seems likely the majority of the population of 90 million are at least disenchanted with the regime. Living standards have fallen and supplies are running short. While tens of billions of dollars have been spent on a nuclear programme, electricity is being rationed and cooking gas is running low. Priority is being given to those who are close to the regime, notably the members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a branch of the Iranian army that is fiercely loyal to the ruling regime. The IRGC are crucial in propping up Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country's 86-year-old supreme leader. Not only do they offer military power, but also domestic surveillance, intimidation and secret policing in order to stifle dissent. So for any opposition to emerge, let alone flourish, the IRGC would need to be degraded - and that is precisely what Israel has done, targeting its senior leaders as well as regular army, so far, has been left alone. Israel's gamble is that a majority of the rest of the military harbour the same dislike of the IRGC as the wider population. It was no coincidence that Netanyahu quoted the expression "woman, life, freedom", which was a rallying call during the 2022 protests in Iran - eventually suppressed by the IRGC. It is very hard to believe that a coherent, public opposition movement will burst into life any time soon. Iranians are well aware their regime will respond with brutality against any attempted uprising. Instead, dissidents seem to be biding their time and waiting to see if Israel continues its assaults, and whether they can sense genuine signs that the regime is starting to struggle to maintain control. If the cracks emerge, then regime change - or at least an attempt - is possible. Possible, but not certain. "They will do anything to stay in power, and when other uprisings have happened, they've been successfully suppressed," one Middle East diplomat tells me. "And there is no unifying leader ready to step in. Even if there is regime change, it could be a military takeover rather than a popular uprising." Read more: And that leaves one final question - if Khamenei did feel his grip on power was failing, might he still have the time, desire and power to resort to final, desperate military actions? The truth is, we don't know. At the moment, the Middle East is a region full of unanswerable, high-risk questions.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Weekend: Iran-Israel conflict sends oil price soaring as markets reel
It's been a week of big international headlines, mostly bad. On Friday the world woke up to news that Israel had launched a co-ordinated assault on Iranian nuclear sites and military facilities, killing two of the country's most senior commanders in the process. The attacks – the first of many to come according to Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu – sparked an immediate retaliation from Iran. Oil prices shot up as traders pondered the possibility of Iran disrupting the flow of crude through the Strait of Hormuz or striking its Gulf neighbours' oilfields as it has done in the past. Unsurprisingly, gold prices benefited too, while stock markets didn't fare so well. A day earlier, a London-bound aeroplane came down barely a minute after take-off in Ahmedabad, India, killing all but one of the 242 passengers on board. The tragedy is a major setback for Boeing (BA), maker of the 787 Dreamliner involved, whose shares had been on a tear this year as its new boss tried to turn things around after a string of safety-related incidents. The plane maker's stock price took an immediate hit, falling almost 5%. Closer to home, finance minister Rachel Reeves delivered her eagerly awaited spending review, promising to put Britain on the path to "national renewal". Healthcare and defence were at the heart of the plan, with the NHS getting a £29 billion annual boost and the defence budget set to rise to 2.6% of GDP from the current 2.3%. There was an ambitious commitment of £39 billion to social housing, a £14.2bn investment pledged to the Sizewell C nuclear plant and a host of transport and infrastructure projects in cities outside London. But the optimistic tone of the announcements was undermined somewhat the very next day when official figures revealed the UK economy had shrunk by 3% in April, far more than the contraction expected by analysts. Reeves admitted it was a blow, as the government banks on spurring economic growth to fund its bold spending plans. Let's take a closer look at these and other stories from an eventful few days. Boeing stock slumps after deadly Air India plane crash It was reportedly the first deadly crash involving a Boeing 787 Dreamliner since its launch 14 years ago. Boeing's shares had gained more than 20% this year on the heels of a massive company turnaround following a brutal 2024 sparked by a "door plug" incident on an Alaska Airlines (ALK) flight. Five years prior to that the plane maker had suffered a serious crisis when two fatal crashes exposed critical flaws in the 737 Max 8 jet's software, leading to a 20-month global grounding of the aircraft. UK economy shrinks by 0.3% in April The shock reading for April came a day after chancellor Rachel Reeves unveiled a raft of pledges in the government spending review. The biggest contributor to the fall in GDP was a 0.4% drop in services output, while production output slumped 0.6%. The contraction came as an increase in employer national insurance contributions and the national minimum wage, which were announced in the autumn budget, came into place in early April. Professor Joe Nellis, economic adviser to accountancy and advisory firm MHA, said: "This is not an ideal scenario for the chancellor. The sustainability of her spending promises is critically dependent on changing this — kickstarting the economy to grow GDP and collect more revenue through tax receipts. "Without this, the chancellor may be forced into unwanted – and unpopular – tax increases in the autumn budget to keep public finances on track." Oil prices surge as Israel strikes Iran Iran has threatened to hit US assets in the region as part of its retaliation, even as secretary of state Marco Rubio warned against such a move. Rubio claims Israel took "unilateral action" and the US was not involved in Friday morning's strikes. Iran is the third-largest oil producer within the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), trailing only Saudi Arabia and Iraq, with output exceeding 3 million barrels per day. 'We can probably expect a temporary slowdown in oil tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz,' Ed Hirs, senior fellow at the University of Houston, said in an interview with Yahoo Finance. Tehran has repeatedly threatened to block the strait, a vital chokepoint through which as many as 20 million barrels of oil pass each day. Gold hits nearly two-month high as Israel attack spurs demand Gold prices shot up as the massive escalation of Middle East conflict spurred demand for traditional safe-haven assets. "Gold surged past resistance around $3,400 on news of the airstrikes, and further upside could be in-store should the escalation continue," said Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade. The rally has been further underpinned by growing expectations of monetary policy easing in the US. Recent data showing elevated jobless claims and muted producer price inflation have increased speculation that the Federal Reserve could cut interest rates, making non-yielding assets such as gold more attractive to investors. The UK's rental boom is over Rental price growth has slowed significantly, according to the latest figures from Zoopla, with the average rents for new lets agreed 2.8% higher in April than the same time a year ago. That's less than half of the average rental growth in April 2024, which stood at 6.4%, and the lowest growth in nearly four years. The slowdown is a result of weaker rental demand and growing affordability pressures, rather than an increase in supply, Zoopla said. The chancellor is determined that Wednesday's spending review won't come with a tax sting in the tail. Unfortunately, that pledge is resting on some very fine margins. If the government achieves the growth it wants and a potential funding gap emerges, taxes are likely to be in the frame. Columnist Sarah Coles, a personal finance analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, examined the possibilities: Why Rachel Reeves' spending review may lead to tax rises Recent industry studies put the cost of a "moderate" retirement at £31,700 per year and a "comfortable" retirement at an eye-popping £43,900 per year. But before you throw your hands up in despair, take time to think about what you want or need from your post-career years – is it lots of travelling or something more sedate? You may find that what you need differs massively from these figures: How far will your pension go as retirement costs soar? Find more personal finance gems here UK inflation and interest rates will be the main focus in terms of economic data. Markets will be watching Wednesday's UK inflation reading for any signs of a cool off after April's jump to 3.5%, later revised to 3.4% due to an error in car tax data. The higher-than-expected figure was driven mainly by large increases in household bills. With that in mind, the Bank of England is expected to keep interest rates on hold at 4.25% on Thursday as it tries to keep price increases in check. The US Federal Reserve is due to announce its next interest rate decision next week too. The Fed is expected to keep rates on hold once again at its meeting on Wednesday, maintaining the 4.25%-4.50% range. On the company earnings front, investors will be keeping an eye on the latest results from US-listed consultancy firm Accenture (ACN), given the company narrowed its revenue growth guidance for the year and warned of the impact of federal spending cuts in its previous quarterly update. On the London market, Berkeley (BKG.L) is due to report, with focus expected to be on whether the housebuilder has any updates cash return plans. Premier Inn-owner Whitbread is another FTSE 100 (^FTSE) company due to update on its performance, following a slower start to year for its UK business. The Beach Boys frontman, widely regarded as a genius, left a gaping hole in the rock royalty family this week when he passed away at the age of 82. The troubled songwriter, who formed the band with his brothers, cousin and a friend in 1961, will always be remembered for his ability to craft sublime melodies, his innate gift for soaring harmonies and his relentless drive for studio perfection. The Beach Boys' 1966 Pet Sounds is frequently cited as one of the greatest albums ever made. Here's one of the best songs ever made, from that very album. Farewell Brian! Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
