Alabama bill seeks to expand prenatal Medicaid coverage
HB 89, sponsored by Rep. Marilyn Lands, D-Huntsville, proposes 60 days of prenatal Medicaid coverage for low-income pregnant people, aimed at improving health outcomes. (Getty)
Alabama lawmakers have reintroduced a bill to provide prenatal care to low-income pregnant people for up to 60 days during pregnancy.
HB 89, sponsored by Rep. Marilyn Lands, D-Huntsville, aims to improve maternal and infant health outcomes by expanding access to prenatal care. It would provide 'presumptive Medicaid eligibility' for pregnant people, allowing them to receive Medicaid coverage for up to 60 days before formal approval of their Medicaid applications.
'Our maternal healthcare outcomes are among the worst in the country, infant mortality as well,' Lands said in an interview Monday. 'This bill, in particular, seems like it's one that a lot of people would see as a first step toward improving outcomes in this state. It's not going to have much of a cost associated with it, and the cost savings potential is pretty amazing.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Alabama has long struggled with high maternal mortality rates and poor infant health outcomes. Alabama's infant mortality rate increased to 7.8 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2023, the highest since 2016. Alabama's infant mortality rate jumped from 6.7 per 1,000 live births in 2022 to 7.8 per 1,000 live births in 2023, a statistically significant increase and above the national provisional rate of 5.6 for the same period. Low birth weight and preterm births remain key risk factors.
Additionally, 143 of the 1,112 babies born on average each week in Alabama are born preterm, defined by the CDC as births that happen before 37 weeks of pregnancy. Of those, 22 babies a week are born 'very preterm,' or under 35 weeks gestation. The earlier a baby is born, the higher the risks for breathing problems, feeding difficulties, cerebral palsy, developmental delay, or vision and hearing problems.
While some lawmakers expressed concerns about funding, Rep. Terri Collins, R-Decatur, said she supports the bill not only because it may potentially save the state money in the long run but also because it 'promotes children being born healthier, and mothers being able to take care of themselves.'
'I think that the healthier we can have our babies, and the mamas are taken care of, the better it is for our state, and so I am supporting this bill,' Collins said.
Although a fiscal note was not attached to the legislation, Lands said that it was estimated to be around $1 million. Both Lands and Collins said that it could be an overestimation, but the state's share of Alabama's Medicaid budget, expected to exceed $1 billion in the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1, could pose a challenge.
'When you're on a budget committee, and you're actually looking at every single expenditure, it's a hard thing to include an increase in a budget when you know you're already at the line,' Collins said.
Lands said that the bill could have a cost-savings potential of over $400 million, not included in the original $1 million potential cost, by reducing preterm births. Alabama has 58,000 births per year, with 12.9% being preterm, costing an average of $60,000 per birth.
'We were calculating a reduction in what we thought would be an achievable reduction in preterm births, and what that would look like. So it's pretty big,' Lands said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 dozen House Republicans urge Senate GOP against ‘budget gimmicks,' deficit increases
More than three dozen House Republicans are warning Senate GOP leaders against approving additional deficit increases or using 'budget gimmicks' to count additional savings in the 'one big, beautiful bill' of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities. 'As the Senate considers changes, we remain unequivocal in our position that any additional tax cuts must be matched dollar-for-dollar by real, enforceable spending reductions,' the 37 members, led by Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.), said in a Tuesday letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), adding that the principle is the 'cornerstone' of the budget resolution framework passed by the House and is the 'minimum standard for our support.' The letter further asserted that the members would consider 'genuine savings only' as established by that House resolution. 'Offsets must come from permanent reforms that make the budget more sustainable, not timing shifts or other budget gimmicks,' the letter said. Among the signatories are House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), House Republican Conference Vice Chair Blake Moore (Utah), and many members of the House Freedom Caucus, including its chair, Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.). The Senate is currently considering and expected to make changes to the House-passed megabill that includes extension of tax cuts that Trump signed into law in 2017; boosts to border, deportation, and defense funding; and new restrictions on Medicaid and food assistance programs that are projected to result in millions of individuals losing their health insurance. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the proposed tax cuts in the plan would decrease revenues by more than $3.6 trillion over a decade, while measures to cut federal spending — including reforms to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — would reduce outlays by $1.2 trillion over the same period, resulting in a net deficit increase of $2.4 trillion. Several matters under consideration in the Senate would add to the deficit impact of the bill. Some GOP senators are unhappy with provisions to terminate clean energy tax breaks, while others are objecting to the around $800 billion in cuts to Medicaid through provisions like increased work requirements and $267 billion in cuts to food assistance through provisions like making states share the cost of the program for the first time. 'A reconciliation bill that relaxes fiscal discipline reflected in the House-passed bill would invite higher borrowing costs and undermine the economic growth that Americans need to maximize opportunity,' the 37 House GOP members said in the letter. 'We urge Senate leadership to keep the reconciliation measure compatible with the House framework while seizing every opportunity to deepen savings.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Axios
34 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Inside Trump's polling on the "big, beautiful bill"
The White House provided Senate Republicans with the raw numbers on how the different elements of the " one big, beautiful bill" are playing with the public, insisting that many of the proposals are 80-20 issues. Why it matters: The detailed polling amounted to an argument for why senators should pass the bill – and then a roadmap on how to sell it. But it also showed that some proposals are massively more popular than others, indicating that much of the political battle about the bill will be a contest on how to define it. Between the lines: The poll largely focused on topics that Republicans want to discuss, like taxes and immigration. Democrats will focus on the bill's other elements, like its deep cuts to Medicaid. White House deputy chief of staff James Blair presented on the polling, as Punchbowl News first posted on X. ✈️ 🍼 By the numbers: The most popular parts polled at more than 80% approval, according to an image of one of the presentation slides obtained by Axios. Modernizing air traffic control: 82% in favor to 10% opposed Providing a 15% tax cut to working families: 82% - 10% Increasing the child tax credit to $2,500: 81% - 12% Ending taxes on tips polled 77% - 18% Cutting taxes on overtime pay: 74% - 18% 💰🚔 The least popular elements polled at more than 50% support: Making Trump's tax cuts permanent to avoid a 22% tax increase: 53% to 34% opposed Hiring more ICE/border patrol officers: 55% - 40%. Ending federal coverage of gender-affirming care: 54% - 39%. Ending Medicaid benefits for unauthorized immigrants: 52% - 39% Zoom out: Fundraising, and the Republicans challenges in keeping pace with the Democrats, was also discussed in the meeting. Despite the NRSC breaking records, NRSC Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.) also warned that senators' fundraising — for the committee and their own campaigns — remained behind Democrats, according to sources familiar with what was said. He pointed out how GOP committees are being out-raised by their Democratic counterparts at the House, Senate and national level. "We've always been behind the Democrats," Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) told us, adding, "if you look at the numbers, Tim has been doing a great job."
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Democrats join faith leaders to denounce Trump's budget bill
1 of 6 | Sen. Cory Booker, D-NY, said Tuesday he "transformed my agitation into legislation," as faith leaders and lawmakers gathered for a 'Moral Budget Vigil' at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., to urge protection of Medicaid, SNAP and other vital programs. Photo by Aaron Schwartz/UPI | License Photo June 10 (UPI) -- Democratic senators joined hundreds of faith leaders on the Capitol steps Tuesday in Washington, D.C., to denounce SNAP and Medicaid cuts in President Donald Trump's massive budget proposal. The event -- called the "Moral Budget Vigil" and organized by the Georgetown University Center on Faith and Justice, Sojourners, Skinner Leadership Institute and the National African American Clergy Network -- included prayers, song and scripture. A meeting with Democratic senators followed. Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia, who is also a reverend at Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, criticized the budget for "giving wealthy people a tax cut." "Show me your budget and I'll show you who you think matters and who does not -- who you think is dispensable," Warnock said. "My mind and my imagination and my heart had been arrested by the heartbeat of children who should not lose their food and who should not lose healthcare in order to give wealthy people a tax cut." The budget, which the White House calls the "Big, Beautiful Bill," cleared the U.S. House in May by a narrow margin. It would make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent and could add trillions to the national debt, according to analysts. Faith leaders claim the bill would also cut Supplemental Nutrition Assistant Program -- or SNAP -- and Medicaid coverage for millions of low-income children, families and people with disabilities. Trump has said he only wants to eliminate "waste, fraud and abuse" from the Medicaid program and would not make direct cuts to benefits. The bill also calls for changes to SNAP by imposing stricter work requirements. The Rev. Jim Wallis, who advised the Obama administration, called the budget plan a "big, bad bill," which he argued would "take 60 million people off of health care." Democratic Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware claimed the bill "literally takes the food from the mouths of hungry children to pass an enormous tax cut for the very wealthiest and is the definition of an immoral bill before this Congress." Warnock, who calls it the "Big Ugly Bill," recounted how he protested another Trump budget bill eight years ago with prayer and song inside the Capitol rotunda. "As I stood there, I said then what I want to say today: That a budget is not just a fiscal document, it is a moral document." Warnock was arrested during that protest in 2017 and credited the Capitol Police for being professional. "Here I am eight years later, having transformed my agitation into legislation," Warnock added. "I'm here today because I still know how to agitate -- I still know how to protest. I'm not a senator who used to be a pastor. I'm a pastor in the Senate." "If we raise our voices together, we can beat this."
