Hungary's LGBTQ+ community reels under Orban's new laws, Pride ban
Vivien "Vivi" Winkler, 27, and Laura "Lau" Toth, 37, attend a protest against the banning of the annual Pride march and curbing the rights of assembly in Budapest, Hungary, April 1, 2025. REUTERS/Marton Monus
Photography by Marton Monus
Reporting by Krisztina Than and Marton Monus
Filed: June 26, 2025, 8 a.m. GMT
Lau and Vivi, a young lesbian couple in Hungary, often hold hands walking through Budapest's streets. However, Lau has started to have troubling second thoughts about this show of affection since the government ramped up its anti-LGBTQ+ campaign.
Right-wing Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who casts himself as a defender of what he calls Christian values from Western liberalism and whose supporters are mostly rural conservatives, has passed several laws affecting the lives of Hungary's LGBTQ+ community over the past decade.
These include banning a change of gender in personal documents, legislation that effectively halts adoption by same-sex couples, and a law banning the use of materials in schools seen as promoting homosexuality and gender transition.
In March, parliament passed a law that created a legal basis for police to ban Pride marches, key events for the LGBTQ+ community worldwide in campaigning for rights, celebrating diversity and highlighting discrimination. Orban's Fidesz party said Pride could be harmful to children and so protecting them should supersede the right to assemble.
'Somehow unconsciously, I started to think whether I should dare to hold Vivi's hand in front of a child now,' said Lau (Laura Toth), 37, a DJ and sound technician working in Budapest's vibrant club scene. 'This does not mean I will not hold her hand now, but something started to work inside me.'
Her partner, 27-year-old Vivien Winkler, says it is surreal that they should feel they are doing something wrong if they hug or kiss each other in the street, as they are in love and could even marry down the line - though in another country. Hungary has never allowed gay marriage, only civil unions.
The couple fell in love two years ago. With their dog, they have moved into a cosy flat full of books and photos, and have set up a small studio in one room, where Lau makes her own music. She is set to release a track which she calls 'a queer love song'.
Along with love, they also found true inspiration in each other.
'This LP is about my personal coming out story,' she said with a knowing smile, as this was not easy for her growing up in a town in eastern Hungary.
With the help of therapy, she finally came out 2-3 years ago, first to her grandma, who was more accepting than her parents.
Vivien had a similar experience with her grandparents in Budapest who were very quick to embrace Lau as a member of the family.
They are happy together and both regularly DJ in clubs. But they feel the air is thinning for LGBTQ people. 'We are continuously discussing that we may need to move abroad next year,' Vivien said.
Defying the ban
Orban told his supporters in February that Pride organisers 'should not even bother' planning the event this year. Some saw this as a tactic to hold on to conservative votes - in 2026 he faces elections, and a new opposition party poses a serious challenge to his rule.
'We've defended the right of parents to decide how their children are brought up, and we've curbed views and fashions that are against nature,' the veteran leader said in May.
Passage of the new law allowed police last week to ban the 30th Pride march due on June 28. However, Budapest's liberal mayor said the march will be held on that date nonetheless, as a municipal event celebrating freedom, allowing it to circumvent the ban.
Thirty-three foreign embassies including those of France, Germany and Britain, although not the United States, have backed the event.
'Pride will not ask for permission: this is a protest,' the Budapest Pride organisers have said.
Lau and Vivi have attended Pride marches before but said this year's will be especially important.
Laszlo Laner, 69, was an organiser of Budapest's first Pride in 1997 and played an active role in Hungary's gay movement after the collapse of the communist regime in 1989.
'I think we will have the largest crowd so far, not only of LGBTQ+ people and sympathizers but also... those who march for democracy, freedom of speech and the right to assemble,' he said.
Hungarians were mostly accepting of the LGBTQ+ community, he added. This has been underpinned by polls. A survey by pollster Median in November 2024 made for HATTER society, a Hungarian LGBT+ group, showed 53% of Hungarians said it was acceptable for two men to fall in love, and 57% said the same about two women. About 49% would support same-sex marriage.
People in Hungary are a lot less negative towards LGBTQ+ people than the government is trying to suggest, said Zsolt Hegyi, 57, who is gay and has never attended Pride but will join the march now.
Events like Pride can help people who struggle to come to terms with their feelings to open up, he said. 'They can get some encouragement that the world will not collapse after their coming out.'
Living authentically
Ballroom culture, which originated as a safe and inclusive space for Black and Latino LGBTQ+ individuals in New York, also offers a safe space in Budapest, with its regular balls, where participants compete with dances in various categories.
In Turbina, an arts and inclusive community space in the heart of Budapest, over a hundred people gathered on March 15 for a ballroom event where participants donned costumes inspired by iconic queer personalities.
Iulian Paragina from Romania, a dental technician who has lived in Budapest for four years, acted as Master of Ceremony and also danced.
'As a queer person, one of the biggest challenges is simply having the courage to live authentically,' Iulian said.
'Personally, I used to feel relatively safe in Budapest, up to a point...Today, our voices are being silenced, it's through banning Pride, limiting freedom of expression, or pushing harmful narratives.'
The gradual erosion of LGBTQ+ rights has had a chilling effect on the community, said Armin Egres Konig, 25, who is trans and non-binary, and works as a social worker for the rights group HATTER society.
Konig was personally affected by the 2020 law which made it impossible for transgender people to legally change their gender, as it was enacted before their coming out.
While Konig found an inclusive and accepting community at university, they find being trans can be difficult in everyday life.
'In the world out there, it is very hard to be a trans person, and I faced harassment in the street.'
The Wider Image
Photography and reporting: Marton Monus
Reporting: Krisztina Than
Photo editing and design: Nat Castañeda
Text editing: Alexandra M. Hudson
LICENSE THIS STORY
Follow Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
27 minutes ago
- NBC News
Supreme Court set to issue rulings on birthright citizenship and 5 other cases on its final day
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is set to conclude its nine-month term on Friday with a flurry of rulings including a closely watched case concerning President Donald Trump's attempt to end automatic birthright citizenship. The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has six cases left to decide of those in which it heard oral arguments in the current term, which began in October. Other cases are on such issues as voting rights, religious rights and health care. The one that has attracted most attention is the birthright citizenship dispute, which focuses not on the lawfulness of the proposal but whether federal judges had the power to block it nationwide while litigation continues. What the court says about so-called nationwide injunctions could have wide-ranging impacts, with judges frequently ruling against Trump on his broad use of executive power. The court also has the option of side-stepping a decision on that issue and instead taking up the merits of the plan. Birthright citizenship is conferred under the Constitution's 14th Amendment, which states: 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.' The longstanding interpretation of the provision as understood by generations of Americans, including legal scholars on the left and right, is that anyone born on U.S. soil is an American citizen with a few minor exceptions, including people who are the children of diplomats. Along with birthright citizenship, the other five cases the court has to decide concern: Whether conservative religious parents can opt their elementary school-age children out of LGBTQ-themed books in class. Long-running litigation over whether congressional districts in Louisiana are lawful. A law enacted in Texas that imposes . A challenge to the Affordable Care Act's preventive care task force. A Federal Communications Commission program that subsidizes phone and internet services in underserved areas. The justices typically break for the summer and return for a new term in October, although they will still likely have to continue acting on cases that reach them on an emergency basis. Such cases have been reaching the court with increasing frequency since Trump took office.
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump administration slaps down UK after MPs pass assisted dying bill
The Trump administration has lashed out at the UK after MPs passed Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill - accusing Britain of 'standing for surrender and death'. The president's State Department said the US 'reaffirms the sanctity of life' in an attack on the Labour MP's Terminally Ill Adults Bill. 'The western world should stand for life, vitality and hope over surrender and death,' it said in a social media post from its Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour. It said the bill is 'euphemistically' said to be for terminally ill adults, but described it instead as 'state-subsidised suicide'. The attack comes a week after the bill, which would legalise assisted dying for those diagnosed with a terminal illness, passed with a slim majority of just 23 votes. Those with fewer than six months to live would be able to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel including a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist. The bill is now heading to the House of Lords for further scrutiny, where it is set to face more opposition. The US intervention came after Sir Keir Starmer slapped down Wes Streeting for raising concerns over how assisted dying would be funded if it becomes law. The prime minister said he was 'confident we've done that preparation' and that it is his job to 'make sure the bill is workable, and that means workable in all its aspects'. Last week's crunch assisted dying vote, which saw the bill narrowly pass by just 23 votes, came after months of impassioned debate, culminating in a tense third reading debate on Friday. Ms Leadbeater described the passing of the assisted dying bill at third reading as a 'result that so many people need'. The Spen Valley MP added: 'When you've spent as much time as I have with people who have got experience of losing loved ones in very difficult circumstances, and you've spent time with terminally ill people who are just asking for choice at the end of their days, then this is absolutely the right thing to do.' Among the MPs who backed the bill were the prime minister and his predecessor, Rishi Sunak. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, health secretary Mr Streeting and deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, meanwhile, voted against. The passage of the bill in parliament has put the UK at odds with the US, and marks the second time the State Department has criticised Britain under Sir Keir. The department's human rights arm previously warned of its 'concerns about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom' after the prosecution of anti-abortion campaigner Livia Tossici-Bolt.
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK PM Starmer's authority tested as domestic struggles overshadow summit diplomacy
LONDON, June 26 (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was asked in parliament on Thursday why he had not appeared in front of lawmakers for the past two weeks. His answer was simple - he had been busy with international affairs. The question underlines Starmer's awkward position - just a year after winning one of the biggest election victories in British history, his audience abroad is much less hostile than the one at home, where his party is divided over welfare reforms. With Starmer's Labour Party lagging behind Nigel Farage's right-wing Reform UK in opinion polls and the prime minister's own popularity tumbling, more than 100 of his lawmakers are threatening the biggest parliamentary rebellion of his premiership to kill off the government's plans to reform the welfare system at a vote due next week. On a trip to the NATO summit in The Hague this week, Starmer, 62, sat alongside U.S. President Donald Trump for talks and shared hugs and handshakes with other world leaders but was noticeably tetchy when asked if the rebellion brewing at home showed a lack of political judgment on his part. "I am comfortable with reading the room and delivering the change the country needs," he said as he vowed to lead his party into the next national election, which is not due until 2029. Downing Street officials say the vote is shaping up to be the biggest test of Starmer's authority to date. Were he to suffer his first parliamentary defeat, or were the government to pull the vote or make big compromises, his leadership would be undermined. More fundamentally, the officials say the reforms to save money and encourage more people back into work are an essential part of what Starmer sees as a decade-long project to fix Britain's problems. Annual spending on incapacity and disability benefits already exceeds the country's defence budget and is set to top 100 billion pounds ($137 billion) by 2030, according to official forecasts, up from 65 billion pounds now. Ministers are in talks with lawmakers to offer compromises to ensure the legislation is passed next Tuesday. One key area under discussion concerns the number of people who would lose access to benefits designed to cover disability-related costs. One of Starmer's ministers, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters he thought a deal to see off the rebellion would eventually be reached. But a Labour lawmaker, who also asked not to be named, said the government's best option would be to pause the legislation and rework it, adding that he would not vote for changes that could push tens of thousands of people into poverty. "People are very, very upset at the way the government has handled this," the lawmaker said. The decision to cut payments to some of the most vulnerable in society is particularly painful for politicians in the centre-left Labour Party, which founded the state-run National Health Service and traditionally sees itself as the protector of the country's welfare state built after World War Two. Rebels may have been encouraged after the government reversed another unpopular policy - cutting payments to millions of pensioners to help them pay energy bills each winter. Starmer told parliament on Thursday he wanted the "values of fairness" to be at the heart of his reforms and attempts to reach a consensus would continue over the coming days. ($1 = 0.7277 pounds)
