Top Kremlin aide says Trump ‘not sufficiently informed' about Ukraine after US president lashes out at Putin
CNN — A top Kremlin aide has accused
A top Kremlin aide has accused Donald Trump of being 'not sufficiently informed' about the situation in Ukraine after the US president said Russian leader Vladimir Putin was 'playing with fire.'
Putin aide Yury Ushakov was reacting to Trump's Truth Social post on Tuesday, in which the president said: 'What Vladimir Putin doesn't realize is that if it weren't for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD. He's playing with fire!'
Ushakov, a former Russian ambassador to Washington who was part of the negotiating team that Moscow sent to Saudi Arabia to meet US officials earlier this year, then questioned the accuracy of the information Trump receives.
'Trump says a lot of things. Naturally, we read and monitor all of this. But in many ways, we have come to the conclusion that Trump is not sufficiently informed about what is really happening in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian confrontation,' Ushakov told Russian state TV channel Russia-1.
Ushakov said that Trump appeared to be unaware of what he called 'the increasingly frequent massive terrorist attacks Ukraine is carrying out against peaceful Russian cities,' and suggested Trump only sees Russia's strikes, reiterating Moscow's false claim that it is 'striking exclusively at military infrastructure or the military-industrial complex.'
Ushakov's remark – made to a favored Kremlin correspondent – came just after Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov declined to comment on the Trump statements during a call with reporters.
Far from striking only military targets, Russia has recently intensified its aerial campaign against civilian targets in Ukrainian cities.
Dozens of civilians have been killed by Russian drone and missile strikes against residential areas in the past few weeks.
According to a tally compiled by CNN using Ukrainian Air Force data, four of the five largest drone attacks launched by Russia since the beginning of the full-scale war all came over the past two weeks.
At least 14 civilians, including three children from one family, were killed in Russian air attacks over the weekend.
The funeral for the three siblings – 8-year-old Stanislav Martynyuk, his sister Tamara, 12, and Roman, 17 – was held in their hometown of Korostyshiv in central Ukraine on Wednesday.
Hundreds of people, many in tears, filled the town square as their three white coffins were brought in. A local music school, where the trio studied, rang the 'last bell' for them, a nod to the traditional long bell sounded for the graduating class at the end of their last school year.
After Russia launched the attack that killed the Martynyuk children, its largest ever aerial assault on Ukraine, Trump accused the Russian leader of having gone 'absolutely CRAZY.'
'I've always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY! He is needlessly killing a lot of people, and I'm not just talking about soldiers. Missiles and drones are being shot into Cities in Ukraine, for no reason whatsoever,' Trump posted on Truth Social.
The spat between Trump and Moscow escalated on Tuesday when the former Russian president and prime minister-turned-security-official Dmitry Medvedev responded to Trump's threat by saying: 'I only know of one REALLY BAD thing — WWIII. I hope Trump understands this!'
Medvedev served as the head of state when Putin had to step down to become prime minister due to a constitutional limit on the number of presidential terms one can serve – a limit that has since been lifted, guaranteeing the possibility that Putin can be president for life.
As the former prime minister and president of Russia, Medvedev was once among the most influential Russian officials, but he has become an increasingly fringe figure in recent years, known mostly for social media outpourings of hate and propaganda.
Trump's special envoy for Ukraine and Russia Keith Kellogg called Medvedev's comments 'reckless.'
'Stoking fears of WW III is an unfortunate, reckless comment,' he said on X, adding that the United States is still waiting for Russia's ceasefire proposal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wakala News
5 hours ago
- Wakala News
Colleges are slightly less diverse as admissions officers seek ways to adapt post-affirmative action
The full impact of the Supreme Court's June 2023 ruling that colleges can't consider race in admissions may not be known for years. But a CBS News analysis of enrollment records shows the first class of freshmen since the high court's order is a little less diverse than the class before it. College admissions experts say there are signs campuses will trend toward less diversity at the same time some universities are facing intensifying pressure from the Trump administration to eliminate diversity programs and remove international students. CBS News gathered first-year enrollment data from 116 colleges and universities, 76 of which considered race in admissions before the Supreme Court ruling. The data showed the share of underrepresented minority students among those schools decreased by about 2 percentage points from fall 2023 to fall 2024. Underrepresented minority students include Hispanic, Black, Indigenous or Pacific Islander students. These are groups that have historically had disproportionately lower rates of college admissions. Among the 35 schools that did not previously consider race in admissions, the share of underrepresented minority students remained roughly the same, suggesting the ruling may have influenced diversity on campus. Five schools did not report whether or not they considered race in admissions. CBS News found the drop in diversity was even sharper at the most elite colleges and universities. At 17 schools that accept less than 10% of applicants, the share of minority students fell nearly 5 percentage points. This includes schools like Dartmouth, Princeton, Cornell, Brown and Tufts. Despite this, the most selective schools still had a slightly higher share of underrepresented minority students than other institutions we collected data from. While the one-year drop itself seems small, the fall 2024 semester was the first time the percentage of underrepresented minority students had decreased since at least 2015. Black students experienced perhaps the most significant one-year shift. At the 76 schools that previously considered race in admission but no longer do, the average share of Black students dropped from 6.4% in fall 2023 to 5.3% in fall 2024, the lowest level in the data collected since at least 2015. Early data 'sends up a warning flag' Dominique Baker, an associate professor of education and public policy at the University of Delaware, said it's still too early to draw any concrete conclusions from this data. 'We like to look at trends over a longer period of time, because in any given year, we could see a blip that goes up, a blip that goes down,' Baker said. But if the trend continues over four years — by the time these students are seniors — it could mean the campuses they attend will be significantly less diverse. For Baker, this 'sends up a warning flag.' 'We're now starting to see … early indicators that we might be seeing a negative trend developing in the share of students of color who are attending, particularly the underrepresented minority students that you all are talking about attending more selective institutions,' she said. She pointed to research out of California, one of the nine states that had banned affirmative action prior to the Supreme Court ruling. A 2020 study found that enrollment among Black and Latino students at UCLA and UC Berkeley, the more selective campuses in the University of California system, fell by 40 percentage points after voters outlawed race conscious admissions (the state ban passed in 1996 and went into effect in 1998). It concluded that California's ban on affirmative action exacerbated socioeconomic inequities among Black and Brown students. Desmond Kuhn, an 18-year-old sociology and urban studies major at Columbia University who identifies as African American, said the Supreme Court ruling happened as he was starting to apply for college. 'It's very discouraging and also makes it harder to reach a lot of these, especially private elite universities, because a lot of generally Black and Hispanic communities don't have the same resources as, say, White and Asian communities,' Kuhn said. He said he saw the difference in resources between his predominantly Black high school in the suburbs of Detroit and the predominantly White private boarding school where he retook his SAT. Columbia University published first-year enrollment numbers for fall 2024, but in a different format than the federal data collection, which we used in our analysis. In Columbia's reporting, the percentage of students who self-identified as Black or African American dropped from 20% for the class of 2027, to 12% for the class of 2028. (In this reporting method, students can identify with more than one race, whereas in the federal data, students could only pick one.) Columbia declined to provide CBS News data in the same format used for the analysis of other schools, so the university is not included in our overall findings. Other factors at play Across all schools, the share of students who did not report their race in enrollment records (and were classified as 'unknown') grew significantly — the largest spike since at least 2015. While the data suggests the start of a downward trend in the share of underrepresented minority students at colleges and universities, the jump in the 'unknown' category means the racial makeup of the class of 2028 could be different than what is being reported. If many of the students who did not report their race were White, then the share of White students would be higher than the reported data might suggest, lowering the share of underrepresented minority students. But if the students who did not report their race were Black or Hispanic, then the share of Black or Hispanic students may be higher than what is reported. 'That's part of the really, really big challenge of … charting and thinking through who is currently enrolling at colleges and universities after the Supreme Court decision,' Baker said. Tom Delahunt, the vice president for strategic recruitment and enrollment at Southwestern University in Texas, said the drop in underrepresented minority students could also be because of problems with the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA, that were at play while the future fall 2024 freshman class would have been making decisions about if and where to go to college. Typically, students can apply for the FAFSA on Oct. 1 each year. But in 2023, the form wasn't available until Dec. 30. As a result, schools couldn't offer financial aid on time because they did not have the FAFSA information, forcing students to wait for delayed offers. 'Delays, glitches, and other issues led to a 9% decline in submitted FAFSA applications among first-time applicants, and an overall decline of about 432,000 applications as of the end of August,' said a report from the Government Accountability Office. Delahunt said that many of the students who had delayed FAFSAs would likely only make decisions about schools if their families had the money to go ahead without knowing how much they were going to have to pay. But many underrepresented minority students may come from poorer families that could not afford to guess how much college would cost. Impact of diversity on campus Experts said studies have found diversity of all kinds, not just racial diversity, is essential to students' education. 'These studies don't say that students of color benefit from diverse learning environments. White students also benefit. Every student benefits from a diverse learning environment,' Baker, from the University of Delaware, said. Jennifer Levine, a first-year student at Stanford University who is half Asian and half Jewish, agreed. She participates in a residential humanities program, where she lives with the same students she takes classes with, a group she described as predominantly White. The uniformity, she said, makes for 'a worse learning space.' 'I think that all academic environments are made better with more opinions, more experiences, people who have different sets of knowledge,' she told CBS News. 'For me as someone who's not Black reading Toni Morrison, I can't offer my perspective on that in the sense of race.' Stanford's first-year class has roughly half as many Black students this year compared to last year. Austin Shaw, one of those Black freshmen, said he can see the difference. He lives in a dorm that is themed around the Black diaspora, so many Black students choose to live there. 'All of us are very tight because we're literally like half of the Black freshman population,' he said of his dormmates. 'But when you go out into class, it's a completely different vibe.' Shaw said that about half of the students in his high school in Los Angeles were Black. One of the reasons he chose Stanford over other California schools was that it had a higher proportion of Black students. 'You become an expert on the subject of being Black, or you feel like you have to represent, or you feel like you have to talk for your community,' he said. 'When I was in high school, where half of the class would be Black, you wouldn't have that expectation.' Other ways to ensure a diverse student body Delahunt, of Southwestern University, said this ruling, along with other restrictions on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, have made his job harder. He said his goal is to try to ensure that the student body reflects the community around it in Georgetown, Texas, just north of Austin. This is so 'when they leave … they are ready for the next step of entering into society as a contributing member of society, that they understand how to work together. That we're going to have differences, and that's OK. How to work through those differences, how to work together to solve problems,' Delahunt said. Now, without being able to see race and ethnicity on admissions forms, he must rely heavily on recruiting from high schools where he knows the population of the school is reflective of the mix of students he wants to come to Southwestern. 'Our job hasn't changed. Maybe the way we do it has to change a little bit. But our goals are the same,' Delahunt said. Richard Kahlenberg, director of the American Identity Project at the Progressive Policy Institute, said that if schools were to consider socioeconomic status instead of race, they could still increase diversity on campus. Kahlenberg testified on behalf of Students for Fair Admissions in support of the ruling ending affirmative action. With data obtained through the legal process, he and an economist ran dozens of admissions simulations and found that considering socioeconomic status and ending preferential admissions for legacy students could increase diversity at Harvard and the University of North Carolina while maintaining academic caliber. 'If there were some universities that did not see declines in racial diversity, as we know there were some, then it's incumbent upon those institutions that saw larger drops to learn what happened,' Kahlenberg said. He added that universities and colleges have argued that this method would be far more expensive, as it would increase the amount of financial aid the schools have to provide. 'It's not that race-neutral alternatives are ineffective, it's that they cost more money,' he said. Some schools have increased socioeconomic diversity. UNC increased the number of students with federal Pell Grants to nearly a quarter of the class. Both Yale and Dartmouth's first-year classes had the highest-ever share of first-generation and low-income students, all while increasing their share of underrepresented minority students. All diversity, equity and inclusion efforts are at risk As universities adapt admissions processes to maintain diversity, they risk butting heads with an administration that is seeking to end all diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. The Department of Justice announced at the end of March that it is investigating four California universities to assess their compliance with the Supreme Court's ruling. University of California schools, which have not been allowed to use race as a factor in admissions directly since voters passed Proposition 209 in 1996, recently moved from using test scores and GPA for admissions to a ' comprehensive review ' process. That process looks 'at multiple factors beyond courses and grades to evaluate applicants' academic achievements in light of the opportunities available to them and the capacity each student demonstrates to contribute to the intellectual life of the campus,' according to the University of California's admissions website. UC admissions for underrepresented minority students has increased since the initial drop following Prop 209, with the nine universities admitting the largest share of underrepresented minority students in its history in 2021. But the schools' student bodies are still less diverse than the California population or the cohort of high school graduates who meet UC admissions requirements. Underrepresented minorities make up about 32% of the UC fall 2024 freshman class. But they make up 46% of Californians and more than half of the state's high school graduates who meet the minimum academic requirements to get into UC schools. However schools choose to adapt, ignoring race in wholistic admissions entirely is unrealistic, said Levine, the mixed-race Stanford freshman. 'Parts of your identity can't be separated from your field of study, from your interests, from what you do,' she said. 'My identity is tied to the kinds of things I'm interested in, what I wrote my essays about to get into college. Taking out my race from that is not going to take away the fact that that is part of who I am.'
Daily News Egypt
9 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
China accuses US of ‘seriously violating' trade truce, vows countermeasures
China said on Monday the United States is 'seriously violating' a trade truce between the two countries, days after a similar accusation was levelled at Beijing by US President Donald Trump, signalling renewed tension between the economic powers, the Financial Times reported. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce stated on Monday that Washington is 'seriously violating' the truce and pledged to 'take strict measures to defend its interests.' The ministry added that the United States has imposed 'a series of discriminatory and restrictive measures in recent weeks, which undermined the trade agreement signed in Geneva, and harmed China's legitimate rights and interests.' In the statement, the ministry threatened to continue 'taking strong and firm measures' to protect 'China's legitimate rights' if the United States insists on 'going its own way, and harming Chinese interests.' 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new trade frictions (…) and instead of reflecting on its actions, has made baseless accusations against us of violating the agreement,' the ministry continued. Among the US measures cited in the statement were warnings against the global use of Huawei Technologies' chips, a halt on sales of chip design software to Chinese companies, and the cancellation of visas for Chinese students. China and the United States had agreed during talks in Geneva in early May to an accord that would temporarily reduce mutual tariffs, which had reportedly risen as high as 145%. Trump: China Violated the Agreement Earlier on Friday, US President Donald Trump said China had 'completely violated' the agreement, as US officials have grown increasingly frustrated with the slow pace of rare earth metal exports across the Pacific since the 12 May agreement. Trump told reporters he hoped to resolve the dispute via a telephone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping, an idea he has proposed several times in recent months but which has not yet materialised. US officials had believed the 12 May agreement, which stemmed from the early May talks in Geneva, would ease Chinese export restrictions on rare earths that were revealed in early April. However, China has maintained its export system while slowly approving shipments to the United States, according to reports. These vital metals are widely used in US automotive, electronics, and defence supply chains, and the slow pace of exports to the United States poses an increasing threat of work stoppages in the US manufacturing sector. Under the agreement between China and the United States, both sides suspended most tariffs, a move welcomed by investors and businesses worldwide. However, since the Geneva accord, Beijing has continued its slow process for approving export licences for rare earths and other elements necessary for manufacturing cars and chips, among other items. Earlier this week, the US administration took steps to cancel entry visas for Chinese students and also suspended the sale of some vital technologies to Chinese companies. Subsequently, China urged the United States to end 'discriminatory restrictions' against it, calling for cooperation in maintaining the 'consensus' reached during the high-level talks in Geneva.
Daily News Egypt
9 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
New Russia-Ukraine talks in Turkey follow major cross-border attacks
The Turkish city of Istanbul is set to host a second round of negotiations between Russian and Ukrainian delegations on Monday, hours after Kyiv reportedly launched a significant drone attack on four military airbases deep within Russia, and Moscow conducted what was described as its largest barrage across Ukraine since 2022. An Ukrainian foreign ministry spokesperson announced on Monday the arrival of an Ukrainian delegation in Istanbul for the talks. Meanwhile, the head of the Russian delegation, Vladimir Medinsky, stated that Russia had received a memorandum of understanding from Ukraine regarding a peaceful settlement of the conflict, written in both Ukrainian and English, according to the RIA Novosti news agency. A Turkish foreign ministry source told the agency that Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan will chair the negotiations after delivering an opening address, adding that Turkish intelligence chief Ibrahim Kalin will also participate in the discussions. Istanbul previously brought the two sides to the table in May, marking their first meeting in three years. The city is scheduled to host their second meeting at 1:00 PM local time (10:00 GMT) at the Çırağan Palace. Medinsky arrived in Istanbul on Sunday leading the Russian delegation, the same team that participated in the previous round. The Ukrainian delegation has been expanded from 12 to 14 individuals, though its leader, Defence Minister Rustem Umerov, remains unchanged. In the first round of negotiations, both sides agreed to a large prisoner exchange, '1000 for 1000 prisoners,' presented detailed perspectives on a potential ceasefire, and agreed to continue negotiations. The countries announced that the agreed-upon prisoner exchange was completed on May 25. Moscow Remains Reserved Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrei Rudenko stated that Moscow hopes for 'more tangible results' from the second round of talks. Speaking to the Sputnik news agency on the sidelines of the 'Russia and China: Cooperation in the New Era' conference, Rudenko added, 'We expressed hope to our friends in Beijing that the upcoming round of talks with Ukraine in Istanbul (…) will yield more specific, clear agreements and more tangible results.' Separately, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov indicated that the Russian delegation is 'ready to present a memo on the settlement to the Ukrainian delegation.' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, however, said Moscow considers it 'wrong to disclose its negotiating positions via the media.' Russian news agencies had earlier quoted the Russian Foreign Ministry as saying that Lavrov discussed with his US counterpart Marco Rubio on Sunday the prospects for a settlement in Ukraine and the Russian-Ukrainian talks scheduled for Monday in Turkey. Proposed Roadmap Earlier on Sunday, a document seen by Reuters revealed that Ukrainian negotiators participating in the talks would present the Russian side with a proposed 'roadmap' to achieve a permanent peaceful settlement to the three-year war between the two countries. The proposed roadmap begins with a complete ceasefire for at least 30 days, followed by the return of all prisoners held by both countries, along with Ukrainian children who were moved to Russian-controlled territories. This would then be followed by a meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The roadmap stipulates that Moscow and Kyiv, with the participation of the United States and Europe, will work to formulate conditions upon which both countries can agree to end the ongoing war. Ukrainian officials said a few days ago that they had sent the roadmap to the Russian side ahead of the scheduled talks in Istanbul. The framework conditions put forward by Kyiv in the document are very similar to those previously presented, including no restrictions on Ukraine's military strength after a peace agreement is reached, no international recognition of Russian sovereignty over parts of Ukraine that have come under Moscow's control, and the payment of reparations to Ukraine. The document also stated that negotiations regarding territory would begin from the current position of the frontline. These conditions differ sharply from the demands announced by Russia in recent weeks. Ukrainian Attack Reported As the parties prepared to meet in Istanbul, the Russian Ministry of Defence announced on Sunday that Ukraine had carried out drone attacks on military airbases in Russia's Murmansk, Irkutsk, Ivanovo, Ryazan, and Amur regions, and that some aircraft had caught fire. The Ukrainian attacks reached deep into Russia's northwestern, southwestern, and eastern regions. Ukrainian social media accounts stated that the Ukrainian army had conducted a large-scale operation using drones against Russia. The Financial Times reported that the Ukrainian attack targeted four military airbases deep inside Russia, which were used to launch strategic bombers for air raids, noting that the attack was 'one of the most daring operations since the war began.' In a report published on Sunday, the newspaper quoted a Ukrainian official as saying that 'more than 40 aircraft have been damaged so far,' indicating that the attack targeted four Russian military airbases in 'one coordinated operation' thousands of kilometres from the frontline. The official added that 'planes caught fire at the Belaya airbase, located in southeastern Siberia about 5,500 kilometres east of the Ukrainian border, and at the Olenya base in the Kola Peninsula near Murmansk, in addition to the Dyagilevo airbase about 200 kilometres southeast of Moscow, and the Ivanovo base located 300 kilometres northeast of the Russian capital.' He continued: 'The attack hit 34% of strategic cruise missile carriers at Russia's main airfields.' A video, reportedly captured by a Ukrainian reconnaissance drone and published by the same official, showed a Russian airbase engulfed in flames while drones were attacking a number of aircraft. Russian Shelling On the other side, Russia launched a massive drone attack early on Sunday, described as the largest since 2022, deploying 472 drones across Ukraine, according to the Ukrainian Air Force. Reports indicated explosions in the cities of Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia, while air defences were activated over Kyiv. The Ukrainian Air Force stated that Russia also launched three ballistic missiles and four cruise missiles, noting that strikes were recorded in 18 different locations. A missile attack on a military training camp in the east of the country reportedly killed 12 people and injured more than 60 others. Ivan Fedorov, the governor of the Zaporizhzhia region, said that Russian shelling and an air attack killed four people in areas outside the city of Zaporizhzhia in the south. The Ukrainian Ground Forces did not disclose the location of the attack or the type of missile used. Following the incident, the Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces, Mykhailo Drapatiy, announced his resignation. In a statement, he said: 'The absence of clear accountability, and impunity are a fatal feature of the army that I tried to eradicate in the Ground Forces, but if tragedies recur, my efforts were not enough.'
