As old powers retreat, the Gulf steps up in global health
https://arab.news/6see6
As the 78th World Health Assembly gathers this week in Geneva, global health funding and governance are at an inflection point. For decades, Western donors — particularly the US — have dominated the agenda. That era is ending.
In the opening days of President Donald Trump's second term, executive orders again withdrew US support for the World Health Organization's core budget, slashed funding for pandemic preparedness and prohibited federal agencies from collaborating on climate-linked health research. These reversals reopen vulnerabilities exposed by COVID-19, even as new global threats — such as pandemics, antimicrobial resistance and climate-driven illness — grow more urgent.
The retrenchment runs deeper. The UN's AIDS program recently announced cuts of up to 50 percent in staffing and country coverage. Memos circulating within donor circles hint at a larger reshuffling of global governance — including in health. And yet, for all the institutional uncertainty, global health remains indispensable. Strong health systems are not just a moral imperative — they underpin sustainable development, economic stability and geopolitical resilience.
Health spending already represents about 10 percent of global gross domestic product. But more than half the world's population — about 4.5 billion people — lack access to basic services. For pandemic preparedness alone, the funding gap remains at an estimated $10.5 billion annually, much of it in low- and middle-income countries.
Amid this leadership vacuum, a new axis of influence is emerging from an unexpected quarter: the Gulf.
Gulf Cooperation Council countries are not merely stepping into a donor role — they are reshaping what global health leadership looks like in a multipolar world. With capital, coordination and strategic clarity, nations like the UAE and Saudi Arabia are moving from the margins to the center of the global health architecture.
In March, the Mohamed Bin Zayed Foundation for Humanity launched in Abu Dhabi with the goal of reaching 500 million people across Asia, Africa and the Middle East. The foundation, building on the UAE's earlier work through the Reaching the Last Mile initiative, focuses on system strengthening, innovation and measurable impact. Its benchmark for success is lives saved — not dollars pledged.
That same mindset underpins the Beginnings Fund, an initiative backed by the UAE, the Gates Foundation, Delta Philanthropies and others, which aims to prevent 300,000 maternal and newborn deaths across 10 low-income countries by 2030.
These are not abstract commitments. They represent a deliberate shift away from bureaucratic, process-heavy aid toward outcomes-based, data-driven investment in health systems.
The Gulf is also establishing itself as a convening force in global health diplomacy.
GCC countries are not merely stepping into a donor role — they are reshaping what global health leadership looks like in a multipolar world.
Matthew Miller
Saudi Arabia has quietly become one of the WHO's most important contributors. Since 2018, it has donated more than $385 million, supporting health operations in conflict-affected regions including Palestine, Ukraine, Somalia, Syria and Yemen. The Kingdom ranked among the WHO's top 20 donors over the past six years and was the fourth-largest contributor to thematic funds in 2022-23.
In February, Riyadh hosted the International Humanitarian Forum, where Saudi Arabia reaffirmed a $500 million commitment to UNICEF and the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. This was more than symbolic. It was a signal of strategic intent.
Abu Dhabi, too, has become a focal point for global health discussion. Its annual Global Health Week convenes government officials, health ministers, CEOs and scientists to discuss topics ranging from artificial intelligence to antimicrobial resistance and sustainable life sciences investment. This year's event featured 13 health ministers, several major pharmaceutical firms and the visible presence of UAE sovereign wealth funds — all aligned around a vision of preventive, precision-based and tech-enabled health systems.
The WHO will this week debate revisions to the International Health Regulations and new rules on pandemic preparedness. What the moment calls for is not just more funding — it is a different kind of leadership.
The GCC countries are not alone in seeking a more inclusive, representative global health order. But their model — rooted in delivery, backed by capital and framed by a pragmatic, forward-looking vision — is gaining traction, particularly among countries that have long felt marginalized by legacy institutions.
These nations could host a WHO collaborating center or convene a permanent South-South forum to help redistribute governance power. They are already taking action. Through the G20, Saudi Arabia has supported the WHO's digital health strategy, workforce development programs, vaccine certification systems and campaigns to combat health misinformation — many of them shaped by lessons from the COVID-19 response.
The UAE, meanwhile, played a leading role during COP28, hosting the first-ever Health Day and advancing a joint declaration linking climate and health policy. The country is investing in early-warning systems, genomics and the training of a new generation of global health diplomats. These are not vanity projects. They are the building blocks of a new system — one oriented around results, not rhetoric.
The retreat of traditional donors leaves not only a gap, but a chance to build better. The Gulf model — regional capital, measurable outcomes and an openness to innovation — offers a new template, one that could be adapted well beyond the region.
As ministers and delegates meet in Geneva this week, they will debate how to future-proof global health. But in many ways, that future is already unfolding — in Abu Dhabi, Riyadh and beyond. The question is no longer whether the Gulf is rising in global health. It is whether the rest of the world is ready to keep pace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Sudan's collapsing healthcare system a global emergency
Sudan is currently grappling with one of the worst humanitarian and public health crises in the world, as its healthcare system is collapsing under the weight of ongoing civil conflict. The war, which erupted in April 2023 between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, has inflicted immense damage on the country's medical infrastructure. Over the past two years, the violence has destroyed more than 250 hospitals and healthcare facilities, either through direct bombardment or looting. At least 60 percent of pharmacies and medical warehouses have been looted, burned or rendered inoperable. Medical professionals have fled or been killed and those who remain are often targeted or are unable to safely reach their workplaces. Basic medical supplies, electricity, clean water and fuel are scarce or nonexistent in many parts of the country. The breakdown of health services has not only left millions without access to essential care but has also created ideal conditions for deadly disease outbreaks to spread unchecked. Amid this destruction, the World Health Organization and the UN have raised alarms about the spiraling health emergency. Sudan now faces simultaneous outbreaks of cholera, malaria, measles and dengue, diseases that are being exacerbated by the collapse of sanitation systems, unsafe water sources and overcrowded refugee camps. More than 20 million people — almost half the country's population — are in urgent need of medical care. Immunization campaigns have been halted and the absence of preventive medicine has led to the rapid reemergence of diseases once under control. The WHO has recorded at least 156 attacks on healthcare workers and facilities since the war began and these attacks continue to impede even the most basic humanitarian responses. The UN has called Sudan one of the world's largest and most-neglected emergencies, noting that more than 12.4 million people have been displaced and famine is either present or imminent in several areas. Children are especially vulnerable: millions face severe malnutrition, lack access to medical care and are increasingly at risk of exploitation, trafficking and death. If this crisis continues without immediate intervention, Sudan faces an impending humanitarian catastrophe that will have devastating consequences for its people for generations to come. The complete collapse of the healthcare system means that diseases will spread without resistance, maternal and infant mortality will surge and chronic illnesses will go untreated. With hospitals destroyed and doctors in hiding or exiled, even the simplest medical emergencies can become fatal. With hospitals destroyed and doctors in hiding or exiled, even the simplest medical emergencies can become fatal Dr. Majid Rafizadeh The loss of educational and training institutions also means that rebuilding the health sector will take decades, even under optimal conditions. Famine, disease and the psychological trauma of war are already corroding the foundations of society, deepening poverty and dismantling any remaining trust in institutions. If the fighting persists, the country could be left with an entire generation deprived not only of healthcare, but of security, education and hope. The consequences of the collapse of Sudan's healthcare system will not remain contained within its borders. The conflict has already displaced more than 3.3 million people into neighboring countries such as Chad, South Sudan, Egypt, Ethiopia and the Central African Republic. These nations, already burdened with fragile health systems and limited resources, are now under immense strain as they attempt to care for large numbers of malnourished and sick refugees. Infectious diseases like cholera, which thrive in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions, pose a serious threat to regional public health. The breakdown in immunization coverage could result in the cross-border spread of measles and polio, undermining years of health progress in the region. Moreover, the protracted instability in Sudan risks destabilizing the entire Horn of Africa, a region already vulnerable to political fragmentation, insurgency and environmental stress. The global implications of Sudan's health emergency are equally urgent. The ongoing collapse of Sudan's health system and the humanitarian vacuum it creates serve as a dire warning about the fragility of global health security. As we have seen with past pandemics and regional crises, diseases that emerge or expand in one part of the world can quickly spread beyond borders, especially when response efforts are delayed or under-resourced. Moreover, the normalization of attacks on healthcare workers and facilities during armed conflict threatens the sanctity of international humanitarian law. If such violations continue with impunity in Sudan, they could set a precedent for future conflicts, eroding the principles that protect civilians and aid workers globally. The lack of a coordinated international response not only reflects a failure of political will, it also undermines collective commitments to global health and human rights. What is urgently needed is a decisive, coordinated and sustained international response. The first and most pressing step is the implementation of an immediate ceasefire. This would allow for the safe establishment of humanitarian and health corridors — zones where aid organizations can deliver medical supplies, provide vaccinations and treat the wounded without threat of violence. These corridors are essential for saving lives in the short term, especially in regions that have been cut off from aid for months. The UN, the WHO, Doctors Without Borders and other agencies require not only funding but also guaranteed security to operate effectively. Immediate airlifts of medicine, surgical equipment, vaccines and food must be prioritized. Equally important is the political pressure on both warring factions to cease attacks on healthcare infrastructure, in accordance with international humanitarian law. Beyond these urgent interventions, the international community must work in collaboration with the African Union, the Intergovernmental Authority on Development and key regional actors to forge a pathway toward a permanent ceasefire and political resolution. This includes building upon the Jeddah Declaration, which was signed in May 2023 under the auspices of the US and Saudi Arabia. The declaration outlined commitments by both warring parties to protect civilians, allow humanitarian access and refrain from targeting civilian infrastructure. Though the declaration has largely been violated, it remains one of the few frameworks for negotiation that has gained international recognition. Revitalizing the Jeddah process, expanding the number of mediating parties and ensuring local community representation are vital steps toward lasting peace. Without a stable political solution, humanitarian aid alone will never be sufficient. In conclusion, Sudan's health crisis has reached a catastrophic stage and the situation demands the world's immediate and undivided attention. The country's healthcare system is not merely under stress — it is actively disintegrating. Millions are at risk of dying not only from bullets and bombs but from preventable diseases and starvation. The consequences of inaction will reverberate far beyond Sudan's borders, threatening regional health, stability and security. The international community must act now — decisively and urgently — to implement a ceasefire, open health corridors and reengage in meaningful diplomacy. Failure to do so will not only doom millions in Sudan but will mark yet another tragic instance of global neglect in the face of a preventable disaster. • Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated Iranian American political scientist. X: @Dr_Rafizadeh
Asharq Al-Awsat
17 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
UN Says ‘Deliberate' Choices ‘Systematically' Depriving Gazans
The UN aid chief said Wednesday that recent "horrifying scenes" of Gazans being killed while seeking food aid were the result of "deliberate choices that have systematically deprived" them of essentials to survive. A US and Israeli-backed group operating aid sites in the Gaza Strip announced the temporary closure of its facilities on Wednesday, with the Israeli army warning that roads leading to distribution centers were "considered combat zones". The announcement by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation follows a string of deadly incidents near the distribution sites it operates. On Tuesday, 27 people were killed in southern Gaza when Israeli troops opened fire near a GHF aid site, with the military saying the incident was under investigation. "The world is watching, day after day, horrifying scenes of Palestinians being shot, wounded or killed in Gaza while simply trying to eat," UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said in a statement. "Emergency medical teams have confirmed treating hundreds of trauma cases. Yesterday alone, dozens were declared dead at hospitals after Israeli forces said they had opened fire. "This is the outcome of a series of deliberate choices that have systematically deprived two million people of the essentials they need to survive." He echoed the call by UN chief Antonio Guterres for immediate independent investigations, saying they were not isolated incidents, and the perpetrators must be held accountable. "No-one should have to risk their life to feed their children," said Fletcher. The GHF began operations a week ago, but the UN and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with it over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives. Meanwhile the United Nations has described the amount of aid allowed into Gaza, after Israel partially lifted a more than two-month total blockade, as a trickle. "We must be allowed to do our jobs: we have the teams, the plan, the supplies and the experience," said Fletcher, the UN under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs and emergency relief coordinator. "Open the crossings -- all of them. Let in life-saving aid at scale, from all directions. Lift the restrictions on what and how much aid we can bring in. "Ensure our convoys aren't held up by delays and denials. Release the hostages. Implement the ceasefire."
Al Arabiya
20 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
‘This is the Final Solution': Norman Finkelstein clashes with Israeli general over Gaza
To die of hunger... or die trying to get food? The UN has described the new aid delivery regime in Gaza as a 'death trap.' Over consecutive days - civilians have been killed waiting for food aid. Israel, with the backing of the US, is delivering aid through a private company - bypassing traditional humanitarian groups. For days, Gazans have reported being shot at as they scramble to access the limited supplies. Israel denies firing at innocent civilians. It's the latest escalation in a seemingly endless humanitarian crisis. And it could just be the last straw for some of Israel's supporters. Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert - who we'll hear from shortly - now believes Israel is committing war crimes. The senseless deaths are adding to already mounting pressure on Israel... There's a distinct change in some of the language we're hearing - even from Tel Aviv's staunchest allies. The rhetoric - and public opinion - is certainly starting to change. On Counterpoints we'll ask: If Israel is weaponizing food and if that was always part of its war plan? Will this force the US to renew a push for peace? And if we can expect more Israeli allies to speak out?
