
Farage accuses Sarwar of sectarianism after defending ‘racist' by-election advert
Nigel Farage has accused Anas Sarwar of 'sectarianism' after the Scottish Labour leader said that a Reform UK advert was 'dog-whistle racism'.
The by-election campaign advert used clips of a speech by Mr Sarwar in which he said he wanted more people from South Asian backgrounds to stand for election.
The clips were preceded by the caption 'Anas Sarwar has said he will prioritise the Pakistani community', a phrase Mr Sarwar did not use.
On Tuesday, the Reform leader defended the attack ad and said Mr Sarwar's speech had 'introduced sectarianism into Scottish politics'.
But his intervention came shortly after his party's candidate in the Holyrood by-election admitted Mr Sarwar did not use the words 'prioritise the Pakistani community' and the phrase was a 'quote from us'.
Ross Lambie vehemently denied 'misleading people', arguing that prioritising the Pakistani community was what the 'whole speech is about'.
Mr Sarwar was joined by SNP First Minister John Swinney in accusing Reform UK of racism but Mr Farage doubled down on his party's claims at a keynote speech in London.
He played the advert to the audience and insisted that all his party had done was to 'put out the exact words spoken by him [Sarwar] without any comment'.
Mr Farage argued that the attacks from Labour and the SNP demonstrated that 'maybe we're getting something right' and that 'we are winning' the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, which is being held on June 5.
Support for Reform is said to be strong on the doorstep, with Labour facing the threat of being pushed into third place, in a major political humiliation. Mr Farage is due to visit the campaign trail next week.
The advert has been running on Facebook and Instagram since May 12 and cost Reform £15,000. It is estimated to have been viewed around 600,000 times.
It featured video clips of a speech Mr Sarwar delivered in 2022 at an event celebrating the 75th anniversary of Pakistan's independence.
In one section, he said: 'Pakistanis need represented in every mainstream political party in Scotland and across the UK'.
Another excerpt featured Mr Sarwar stating that 'the days where South Asian communities get to lead political parties and get to lead countries is upon us'. However, he did not directly state he would prioritise the Pakistani community.
Mr Sarwar was born in Glasgow to Pakistani Muslim parents and his father, Mohammad Sarwar, became the UK's first Muslim MP when he was elected to represent Glasgow Govan in 1997. He was later the governor of Punjab in Pakistan.
After playing the advert at the Reform event, Mr Farage said: 'So it was Anas Sarwar that introduced sectarianism into Scottish politics. Making it perfectly clear his priority was to a certain section of the community.
'All we've done, all we've done is to put out the exact words spoken by him without any comment, we've said nothing, just that we will represent the people of that constituency.
'And the fact that they, having chosen to go down the sectarian route, choose to throw accusations back at us, says to me that we are winning.'
Threat of libel action
Mr Lambie, who defected from the Tories to Reform in March, accepted that Reform had used the phrase rather than Mr Sarwar but denied this was racist, telling BBC Radio Scotland that Reform was 'advertising Anas Sarwar's own words', adding: 'We're not misleading people at all.'
He threatened Mr Swinney with libel action if the First Minister repeated his accusation that the advert was racist and suggested Mr Sarwar had complained about the advert to 'deflect' attention from Labour's 'car crash' campaign.
Mr Lambie said Reform had highlighted the speech because it demonstrated that the Left wanted to build a 'two-tier society', with people being given preferential treatment if they belonged to a minority group.
The South Lanarkshire councillor said Nigel Farage's party believed that 'people should be in a position of power based on their merit and their contribution to society'. He added that 'we shouldn't be trying to foist various minority groups' into prominent roles.
Mr Sarwar last week accused Reform of 'dog-whistle' racism over the advert, which he said 'seeks to question my identity, question my loyalty and question my belonging in Scotland'.
Mr Swinney this week accused Reform of launching a 'racist attack' on Mr Sarwar and of trying to 'deceive' voters with the advert.
'Scummy tactics'
He also joined Labour in urging social media giant Meta, which operates Facebook and Instagram, to remove the advert from its platforms.
Aisha Mir, the Liberal Democrat candidate in the by-election said the video was 'scummy tactics.'
Responding to Mr Farage's comments Mr Sarwar said 'This is a blatant attempt from Nigel Farage to try and poison our politics here in Scotland. I have fought against sectarianism all my adult life.
'I was working in Scotland's NHS while Nigel Farage was on the gravy train in Brussels, and now I am trying to change our country while he tries to divide it.
'Nigel Farage is a poisonous man who doesn't understand Scotland, doesn't care about Scotland, and that's why Scotland will reject him.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
M&S website resumes online orders six weeks after cyber-attack
Marks & Spencer has reopened its website to shoppers, six weeks after it was forced to halt online orders after a cyber-attack. The retailer said on its website that customers 'can now place online orders with standard delivery to England, Scotland and Wales'. Deliveries to Northern Ireland 'will resume in the coming weeks'. 'We will resume click and collect, next-day delivery, nominated-day delivery and international ordering in the coming weeks,' it said. The retailer is estimated to have been losing about £25m in online clothing and homewares sales a week after it was forced to stop taking orders on its website within days of 'threat actors', thought to be a hacking collective known as Scattered Spider, gaining access to its systems over the Easter weekend. The company expects the hack to cost it up to £300m in profits this year, although about half of that is expected to be offset by insurance and other measures. It has previously said disruption to its website could last until July, and some online services are not expected to restart immediately. Shoppers have been able to browse online, as well as shop in M&S's physical stores using cash or cards for most of the period since the hack. However, stocks of food and clothing in stores have also been affected, meaning that M&S has lost out during a busy period for retailers as a warm, sunny spring has driven an unexpected rise in household spending. M&S has also admitted that some personal information relating to thousands of customers – including names, addresses, dates of birth and order histories – was taken in the cyber-attack. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Stuart Machin, the chief executive of M&S, has said he expects the retailer to recover 'at pace' helped by bringing forward investment in its IT systems and website as part of the systems rebuild forced on it by the hackers. The attack on M&S emerged days before cyber-attacks were reported by the Co-op and Harrods. More recently, the sportswear brand Adidas and the lingerie group Victoria's Secret have also been targeted.


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Readers' Letters: Reform's policies are not far right, they're common sense
Reform has plenty to offer moderate voters, says reader Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... David Hamill (Letters, 9 June) writes that Reform is preaching 'far right poison' while the new Hamilton MP, Davy Russell, stated that 'the poison of Reform is not us', although 7,000 of his constituents voted for Reform. Anas Sarwar has described Nigel Farage as a 'pathetic little man'. Inflammatory language has no place in political debate I doubt if any of the Farage haters have ever looked at Reform's policies, which are available for all to read online in a 28-page document. They challenge much of the current policy consensus across Labour, the SNP and the Conservatives and I suppose that is what so enrages those who do not believe that this consensus has failed Britain and Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The party's aspirations include cutting migration, with the UK already having a population density of 300 people per square kilometre; stopping the Bank of England paying £35 billion a year in quantitative easing interest; lifting the income tax starting rate to £20,000; cutting the 6,700 EU laws still in use hindering growth; abolishing corporation tax for 1.2 million SMEs; scrapping net zero, saving billions; reforming the NHS to cut waiting times, but keeping it free at the point of use; putting bobbies back on the beat; removing transgender ideology from schools; and reviewing diversity, equality and inclusion policies. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage and Deputy Leader Richard Tice at a press conference in Aberdeen last week (Picture:) These are not far right polices, there are simply sensible policy proposals which much of the electorate regard as common sense. Too many of our politicians fear to speak out against their party policies which they know are wrong. William Loneskie, Oxton, Lauder, Berwickshire Denial duo What do David Hamill and First Minister John Swinney have in common? Following the Hamilton election they are both in denial. Mr Hamill says 'three-quarters of the voters in Hamilton want nothing to do with the pernicious, far-right poison preached by Reform' but neglects to say that 87 per cent of the electorate didn't vote for the SNP. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Swinney says 'the SNP is in the process of recovery', but with a swing away from the SNP of 16.8 per cent, what does he think will constitute a full recovery? Bruce Proctor, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Turn the tide Ian Murray MP wants to 'turbocharge' the economy with nuclear power (your report, 9 June). A far cleaner, cheaper, low-tech way to cut electricity prices would be to harness the tides. A 2021 paper to the Royal Society claimed that a Severn Barrage alone could supply 6-7 per cent of UK demand; sling road/rail across the dams and it's a double bonus. Scotland, with its indented coast, would be ideal for such projects, in particular the Black Isle firths, where the boost to the northern economy would be significant, and the Invergordon to Nairn drive cut by a whopping 15 miles. George Morton, Rosyth, Fife Nuclear nod A long time ago I used radioactive isotopes to study smallpox and an antiviral agent that had the potential to stop it in its tracks. Ever since I have made it my business to evaluate the safety of nuclear reactors and nuclear waste, and have concluded that with the exception of the Soviet Union, our obsessional attention to safety in their design and use means that it has not been possible to ascribe any health harm to humans from them, unlike coal waste at Aberfan or oil extraction like Piper Alpha, or, worst of all, climate change-causing CO2 waste generated by burning fossil fuels. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So I consider the SNP and Greens' antinuclear policies based on arguments about safety (your report, 9 June) to be evidentially wrong. In any case, they will soon be overtaken by events. When the gas has run out and the wind doesn't blow, to prevent blackouts Scotland will be obliged to import electricity generated by nuclear reactors from England. Hugh Pennington, Aberdeen It's over, John In addition to points raised in The Scotsman's report on John Swinney's BBC Sunday Show interview (9 June) he was still touchingly clinging to the independence panacea, citing polls claiming 54 per cent support for the SNP. That doesn't stack up with Hamilton. On a turnout of 44 per cent the SNP got 30 per cent of the votes. That's only 14 per cent of the total electorate. Applying these numbers to the 4.3 million voters in Scotland their 2014 Indyref total of 1.6m votes plummets by one million to around 600,000. Come on John, you know it's over, so why not publicly announce you're jacking it in. Then Holyrood 2026 can be about which party has the best policies and candidates to halt our health, education, worklessness, Net Zero and public services nosedive. Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Who cares? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Otto Inglis (Letters, 9 June) writes an excellent assessment of the Hamilton by-election, but for all the analysis and comment, it should be noted that almost 56 per cent of the electorate could not be bothered to vote, so really don't care who represents them in the Scottish Parliament. Malcolm Parkin, Kinnesswood, Perth and Kinross Spad news The SNP have announced that their bill for Spad services in the previous year has been a jaw-dropping £1.7 million of our taxes. In any case, considering the party's image plunged to rock bottom in the period, they should be asking for their – our – money back. Alexander McKay, Edinburgh Do nothing I recall, many years ago, being on a course to help senior doctors to become managers in the NHS, as if there weren't enough of them already! We were taught that among the many actions that might be employed to solve any problem there was always the 'do nothing' option. I am currently suffering from a progressive and untreatable lung condition. I am in constant distress due to shortness of breath which is only partially relieved by Oxygen therapy. I can do little more physical activity than shuffle around my house and the condition is putting extra strain on my heart. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Last week, still being of sound mind, I obtained, with no problem, a form I can carry around which says that should I have a cardiac arrest, I do not wish to be resuscitated. Here is a perfect example of a problem where doctors can, without risk of retribution, apply the 'do nothing' option, while at the same time, not reneging on their Hippocratic oath, which says 'first do no harm'. While the assisted dying issue rages on, could not resuscitating be construed as doing just that, by the back door? (Dr) S R Wild, Edinburgh Reform Forces Introducing the Defence Review, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer repeated words he heard on HMS Vanguard, 'nothing works unless we all work together'. Money is short. The Defence Secretary John Healey spoke of 'defence reform' and he should question the need for three services. Most of the RAF's 30,000 personnel are in the UK, as are most of its 500 aircraft (including 46 support aircraft, 37 helicopters, 160 trainers, 90 gliders). The RAF has 75 per cent of all MoD aircraft and 50 per cent of frontline aircraft, the other half being Army or Navy. Only 20 per cent of RAF personnel have flying duties, most of its 'aviators' are ground crew or support staff, yet 20 per cent are officers – including 40 air marshals and 100 air commodores. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Most RAF operations support land forces, some support Maritime Britain. With 60 uniformed personnel for every aircraft, trainer and glider, the £10 billion-plus a year RAF, with its ten display teams, seems overmanned and under-employed. In times of plenty all this may be justifiable – it's not today. Defence costs too much to maintain three services. Unsentimental reorganisation of HM Forces would help make them 'battle-ready', providing huge savings, advancing the government's 'defence dividend'. There is no need for a separate air force. An army and navy with RAF air assets and personnel transferred would see defence emerge leaner and more cost-effective and, importantly, be operationally more efficient with no loss of air capability. 'Nato first' would be better achieved by the UK being tasked as the principal maritime power in the eastern Atlantic, the land powers of the Continent providing the principal armies. The Defence Review should prompt radical change here and in Nato. Lester May (Lieutenant Commander, Royal Navy – retired), Camden Town, London Power babies Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Rarely has the saying 'the love of money is the root of all evil' borne such lethal purchase than during the monumental falling out between Donald Trump and Elon Musk this past week. It seems a long time ago that Musk and his fellow oligarchs made up a billionaire front row for Trump's inauguration as president. Their fallout has been a long time coming, not helped by Musk's infamous Nazi-style salute on that occasion. He never recovered from the deserved barb that he was unelected, all the while wielding a hacksaw indiscriminately through whole swathes of US life in the notorious DOGE. It says everything about US politics that the Democrats would now even consider taking Musk's money. The whole affair stinks of two-uber rich big babies tossing their grown-up toys out of the pram. Ian Petrie, Edinburgh Write to The Scotsman


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
The signs from Labour are more welfare cuts in Spending Review
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (centre), Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (right) and Ed Miliband, Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary (left), during a visit to St Fergus Gas Terminal, a clean power facility in AberdeenshirePicture: Jeff J Mitchell/PA Wire This week's UK Spending Review presents a stark choice: a continuation of Westminster austerity or a long-overdue shift toward investment in people, services and the economy. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... So far, signs from the Labour Government suggest more of the same cuts that have already failed families for over a decade. As always, it is the most vulnerable in our society who will pay the price. With household bills high and public services already stretched, now is the time for serious, compassionate action. Yet Labour has refused to rule out real-terms cuts to affordable housing, police recruitment, and local government funding. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad At the same time, the UK Government is pressing ahead with damaging welfare reforms – including proposed cuts to disability benefits, the continuation of the two-child benefit cap, and delays to anti-poverty action like the long-promised child poverty taskforce. All of this risks worsening the cost-of-living crisis and driving already struggling families into deeper hardship, especially in communities already hit hardest by past austerity measures. The SNP has laid out a clear and achievable alternative. The Chancellor must fully reverse planned welfare cuts, protect public services and unlock investment in clean energy and economic growth. In particular, Labour must finally deliver full and immediate funding for Scotland's Acorn carbon capture project – a vital climate initiative that has faced years of Westminster delay. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The UK Government must also fully cover the cost of its increase to employer National Insurance, which threatens to drain frontline budgets in areas like health, social care and education. Scotland is already delivering targeted, effective support – and the evidence speaks for itself. According to new House of Commons Library research, nearly two million families across the UK would be lifted out of poverty if Labour adopted SNP policies: a UK-wide rollout of the Scottish Child Payment, scrapping the two-child cap, and ending the bedroom tax. Under the SNP, Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling. The Scottish Child Payment alone delivers £27.15 per eligible child per week – a direct boost to family incomes that is helping to turn the tide on child poverty across our communities. By contrast, the UK Government's own impact assessment shows that proposed cuts to disability benefits could push a further 250,000 people – including 50,000 children – into poverty. Families affected stand to lose £4500 a year on average. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And despite repeated calls from campaigners, Labour MPs have failed to back even basic reforms, like abolishing the two-child limit, voting against it in the House of Commons just last year – a decision that remains indefensible in the face of rising need. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has made clear that, without new revenue, the UK Government's current fiscal rules mean public spending will fall in real terms across most departments. That includes justice, local government and housing – all critical areas already under severe strain. If the Chancellor refuses to invest and clings to outdated austerity thinking, the consequences will be felt in every community across the UK for years to come. In Scotland, the SNP is focused on lifting people out of poverty and building a fairer, greener, more resilient economy. But we cannot shield families indefinitely from the consequences of Westminster choices. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour must use this Spending Review to deliver the funding and flexibility Scotland needs – not double down on the failed cuts that brought us here in the first place. MSP for Edinburgh Central and Constitution, External Affairs and Culture Secretary