
New Study Published in JAMA Network Open Finds Procedural Prescription Denials Can Increase Acute Care Utilization and Spending in Medicaid
SAN FRANCISCO, CA / ACCESS Newswire / January 30, 2025 / A new study published in JAMA Network Open has found that while procedural prescription denials curb immediate drug costs, some denials result in increased acute care utilization and costs, which outweigh any short-term savings.
A procedural prescription denial occurs when a prescription is rejected due to administrative or procedural issues rather than medical necessity. Common reasons for procedural prescription denials include a patient requesting a refill too early, exceeding medication quantity allowed per prescription, being prescribed a medication not covered in the plan formulary, or being prescribed a medication that requires a prior authorization, among others.
In this large study of 19,725 Medicaid enrollees, researchers found that patients experiencing procedural prescription denials had a higher risk of physiologically related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations compared with those without a denial in the subsequent 60 days. Denials in six medication classes were associated with net total medical spending increases ranging from $624 to $3,016 in additional expense per patient per year.
'This study implies that helping patients promptly resolve procedural denials can reduce both acute care utilizations and unnecessary healthcare costs,' said Bhairavi Muralidharan, the lead author for the study and a data scientist at Waymark. 'Ultimately, early interventions reinforce the goal of every Medicaid program - to provide accessible, cost-effective care to vulnerable populations.'
Rising prescription costs in Medicaid have led many pharmacy benefit managers and health plans to implement procedural denials as a cost-containment measure. When patients are unable to obtain medications due to a prescription denial, they may be hospitalized or visit the ED due to an exacerbation of their chronic conditions. For example, a patient suffering from seizures may end up in the ED if their anti-seizure medication is denied. A previous study from Waymark published in the American Journal of Managed Care found that nearly 40% of ED visits and hospitalizations in Medicaid could be avoided through timely access to primary care, including medication support.
'There is a huge opportunity to reduce unnecessary acute care utilization and costs in Medicaid,' said Jeffrey Tingen, co-author of the study and a Clinical Pharmacist Lead at Waymark. 'This research shows that proper medication management, which includes addressing procedural prescription denials, can reduce avoidable ED visits and hospitalizations in the Medicaid population.'
Researchers analyzed Medicaid data in two different states (n=19,725, Virginia and Washington). The study included patients with at least one pharmacy claim during the study period (January 1 to July 31, 2023) and focused on the 20 most commonly prescribed medication classes out of a total of 390. For each medication class, patients were assigned to either the exposure group (defined as having ≥ 1 procedural denial for a given medication class during the study period) or a control group (defined as having 0 denials for that class). The two groups were matched based on demographic features, clinical history and other aspects of medical care. Researchers evaluated acute care events (an ED visit or hospitalization) and associated costs within a 60-day period following the prescription denial, verifying whether the denial was medically related to the reason for the acute care event.
'While earlier studies have shown that procedural prescription denials are more common in Medicaid than other forms of insurance, empirical research on the effect of these denials on healthcare utilization and long-term costs is scarce,' said Sadiq Y. Patel, VP of Data Science and AI at Waymark. 'These findings can help Medicaid health plans inform their policy decisions, including formulary, coverage, prior authorization requirements, claim denials and approvals, and payments based on drug classes.'
Waymark's multidisciplinary care team includes clinical pharmacists and pharmacy technicians who help patients access and manage their medications, including proactively contacting them to help resolve procedural denials. For example, Waymark's pharmacy team routinely fills out prior authorization forms and works with providers to mitigate the risk of a procedural denial. In collaboration with Waymark's community health workers, these teams complete 'weekend tuck-ins' on Thursdays and Fridays to ensure patients have necessary medications, reducing the likelihood of an acute exacerbation over the weekend. A 2024 study published in NEJM Catalyst found that Waymark reduced all-cause hospital and ED visits by 22.5% for rising-risk patients in its first year of service.
The full article titled 'Procedural Prescription Denials and Risk of Acute Care Utilization and Spending Among Medicaid Patients' was published in JAMA Network Open. The authors of this article are Bhairavi Muralidharan, MSE of Waymark; Sanjay Basu, PhD, MD of Waymark; Jeffrey Tingen, MBA, PharmD of Waymark; and Sadiq Y. Patel, PhD, MS, MSW of Waymark.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
AMA: Doctors And Patients Hurt By ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
The American Medical Association says legislation wending its way through the Republican-controlled ... More Congress would 'take us backward' as a country by cutting health benefits for poor and low-income Americans, the group's president said Friday, June 6. In this photo, the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, June 3, 2025. Photographer: Eric Lee/Bloomberg The American Medical Association says legislation wending its way through the Republican-controlled Congress would 'take us backward' as a country by cutting health benefits for poor and low-income Americans. Meeting for its annual policy-making House of Delegates this weekend in Chicago, the AMA is rallying physicians to thwart the legislation now before the U.S. Senate. Legislation known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that narrowly passed the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives two weeks ago 'would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $793 billion and that the Medicaid provisions would increase the number of uninsured people by 7.8 million,' a KFF analysis shows. 'We have to turn our anger into action,' AMA President Bruce A. Scott, M.D. said in a speech to AMA delegates Friday. 'I know our patience is being tested by this new administration and Congress.' The AMA said it has launched a 'grassroots campaign targeted at the Senate' in hopes of making changes to the legislation. The AMA is the nation's largest physician group with more than 200,000 members. 'The same House bill that brings us closer to finally tying future Medicare payments to the rising costs of running a practice, also takes us backwards by limiting access to care for millions of lower-income Americans,' Scott said. 'Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act are literal lifelines for children and families for whom subsidized health coverage is their only real option. We must do all we can to protect this safety net and continue to educate lawmakers on how best to target waste and fraud in the system without making it tougher for vulnerable populations to access care.' Scott, an otolaryngologist from Kentucky, said the Medicare physician payment system is broken and Congress hasn't addressed – as an increasing number of states have – prior authorization, the process of health insurers reviewing hospital admissions and medications. Prior authorization delays needed treatment and puts patient health in jeopardy, doctors say. 'I'm angry because the dysfunction in health care today goes hand in hand with years of dysfunction in Congress,' Scott added. 'I'm angry because physicians are bearing the brunt of a failed Medicare payment system. And while our pay has been cut by more than 33 percent in 25 years, we see hospitals and even health insurance companies receiving annual pay increases.' Meanwhile, the AMA says cuts to physician payments are pushing more physicians away from private practice and exacerbating the nation's doctor shortage. A recent analysis by AMN Healthcare shows only two in five physicians are now in doctor-owned private practices. And Americans in most U.S. cities face waits of at least one month before they can see certain specialists. 'Congress needs to know there is no 'care' in Medicare if there are no doctors," Scott said.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: A smarter, fairer way to fund Medicaid for people like me
In 2004, I broke my neck and became a quadriplegic. I was 24 years old and completely paralyzed below my shoulders. Without Medicaid, I wouldn't have survived those early years — let alone gone on to earn a law degree. But I also wouldn't have stayed poor as long as I did. That's the problem with how Medicaid currently works for people with disabilities. To keep Medicaid, you often have to stay below poverty-level income and asset thresholds. Want to work? You risk losing your coverage. Want to save for a car? Not so fast. We need a Medicaid model that guarantees coverage for vulnerable populations and recognizes both the dignity of independence and the value of work. Here's my proposal: shift the primary responsibility for funding Medicaid to the states, while the federal government reimburses the states for Medicaid spending on: • Children in low-income families • Low-income elderly adults • People with disabilities ages 16-64 who are either progressing students (full reimbursement) or working (reimbursement up to the amount of their taxable income) The states would be required to provide Medicaid coverage for all people with disabilities regardless of income, assets, and work or student status, but both the states and federal government could require people with significant income to obtain private supplemental insurance — relieving states of some Medicaid costs. This plan does three essential things. First, it aligns financial incentives. Under current rules, the states have little reason to invest in helping disabled adults live meaningful lives, including pursuing education or working. Under this model, the more someone earns or pursues valuable education, the more their state receives in federal reimbursements. Helping disabled adults enter and remain in the workforce becomes not just morally right but also financially sound. Second, this plan unleashes human potential. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the 2024 labor force participation rate for people with disabilities ages 16-64 was a tragically low 40%, compared to 78% for those without disabilities. The unemployment rate among people with disabilities was 8%, more than double the less than 4% rate of those without disabilities. These disparities aren't simply the result of individual limitations — they reflect a system that undermines work for people with disabilities, trapping them in poverty and limiting their potential. My plan removes that disincentive. Third, this plan brings fiscal discipline to Medicaid. In 2024, total Medicaid spending was over $900 billion, with about two-thirds covered by the federal government and one-third by the states, according to the National Association of State Budget Officers. We can target those funds better. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation's 2021 data, adults with disabilities ages 18-64 account for about one-third of Medicaid spending. My proposal would incentivize states to use Medicaid to help people with disabilities to pursue education, employment and independence, while encouraging state-led innovation to deliver those services more efficiently. States are better equipped to tailor care programs. They are 'laboratories of democracy.' With clearer authority and direct financial incentives rewarding their success, states will be free to pursue innovative care models: consumer-directed services, telehealth, supported employment or customized in-home care, whatever works best for the people of their state. Critically, this approach also elevates education as a path out of dependency. If a student with disabilities is making 'substantial academic progress' — a term that could be precisely defined in federal regulation — their state would qualify for full reimbursement of their Medicaid costs. This rewards long-term investment in human potential and acknowledges the added effort it takes to pursue education while managing a serious disability. For someone like me, this is more than policy — it's personal. Medicaid made my education possible. But the rules also penalized me for every financial step forward. That's not just inefficient — it's inhumane. We can do better. We can fund Medicaid in a way that values work, education and independence — while targeting federal dollars more precisely and empowering states to find better ways of delivering care. Let's stop trapping people with disabilities in poverty and start treating them as full participants in our economy. Let's build a Medicaid system that sees us not as burdens, but as investments.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) Soared On Thursday
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR) stands against other best-performing stocks on Thursday. Oscar Health snapped a five-day losing streak on Thursday, jumping 10.6 percent to close at $15.65 apiece as investors resorted to bargain-hunting while waiting for more concrete developments on the Trump administration's Medicare Advantage review. Earlier this year, lawmakers passed a $5-trillion tax-and-spending package that shaves as much as $900 billion in Medicaid, which servers over 70 million low-income households. A close up of a patient and a healthcare professional engaging in conversation, showing the company's commitment to patient care. Now, Senate Republicans to broaden savings by looking for supposed inefficiencies in the Medicare program for senior citizens. In the first quarter of the year, Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR) registered a 55-percent increase in attributable net income of $275 million versus the $177 million registered in the same period last year. Revenues rose by 42 percent to $3.046 billion from $2.142 billion year-on-year. Overall, OSCR ranks 5th on our list of best-performing stocks on Thursday. While we acknowledge the potential of OSCR as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data