Jagannath Dham refers to Puri only: Gajapati Maharaja Dibyasingha Deb
BHUBANESWAR /PURI: Puri Gajapati Maharaja Dibyasingha Deb on Monday urged the authorities of Jagannath temple at Digha in West Bengal to desist from naming the shrine as 'Jagannath Dham' or 'Jagannath Dham Cultural Centre'.
Names such as 'Jagannath Dham', 'Purushottama Kshetra', 'Shreekshetra' and 'Neelachala Dham' refer to Puri and cannot be used for any other place where 'Chaturdha Daru Vigrahas' (four wooden idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra, Devi Subhadra, and Lord Sudarshan) have been consecrated, said the Puri king in a release.
Following the Digha temple controversy, Deb, who is the chairman of the Shree Jagannath Temple Managing Committee, sought the opinion of the Mukti Mandap Pandit Sabha of Srimandir on the matter. According to the Mukti Mandap, the 'moola peetha' of Shree Jagannath Mahaprabhu is Puri, also called Purushottama Kshetra, he said.
Refering to 'Shree Purushottama Kshetra Mahatmyam' contained in 'Vishnava Khanda' of Skanda Purana by Maharshi Veda Vyasa, the Gajapati said a plain reading of the scripture will leave no doubt that it is only Puri which can be called as Shree Jagannath Dham and not any other place or temple because Puri is the eternal holy abode of the Lord. Also, Brahma Purana, Neeladri Mahodaya and other sacred scriptures conclusively establish that Puri is the abode of Lord Jagannath.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
In DMK-BJP bout over a religious festival, why Pawan Kalyan finds himself at the centre
A Hindu outfit's plan for a religious festival in Madurai on June 22 is at the centre of a political and legal standoff in Tamil Nadu, with the BJP accusing the DMK-led state government of 'deliberately trying to obstruct the event' after it sought to scale down the 11-day event because of concerns about crowd management. 'The venue is private and secluded, and restrictions on speakers and crowds are unnecessary. The event will be successful,' BJP state president Nainar Nagendran said , adding that ahead of the polls, the 'DMK fears the momentum that the event will gain'. Nagendran said the 'Muruga Bakthargalin Aanmeega Maanadu' (spiritual conference of Murugan devotees) being organised by the right-wing Hindu group Hindu Munnani might attract large crowds as Andhra Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan, a popular actor, may be invited. 'His massive fan base in the southern districts, coupled with the spiritual nature of the event, is likely to attract thousands of people beyond initial estimates,' he said. The event is planned on the outskirts of Madurai, with the itinerary including daily pujas, distribution of prasadam, public recitations of the Kanda Shashti Kavacham and Thiruppugazh, apart from cultural performances. In addition to the Andhra Deputy CM, BJP leaders are also reportedly mulling over inviting Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath, with top party sources saying Shah had already given an 'informal approval' to explore his availability for the event. According to the state secretary of the Hindu Munnani, S Muthukumar, police permission was sought to use microphones and amplifiers, but it was rejected over concerns about crowd management. He also alleged that a police team visited the site, where the miniatures were being made, and warned volunteers and artisans to stop their work. This is not the first time the BJP has tried to centre its Tamil Nadu outreach over Lord Murugan. In 2020, then state BJP chief L Lurugan attempted to begin the Vel Yatra — modelled on the party's rath yatras in north India — from Chennai despite the state government denying permission to it. While Tamil Nadu is steeped in Hindu symbols, the Hindutva politics of the BJP has historically failed to resonate in a state shaped by anti-Brahmin, anti-Hindi, and anti-Hindutva movements. As Lord Murugan is a cultural icon unifying Tamils beyond party lines, the BJP's move is seen as one to enter the emotional and spiritual mainstream of Tamil society. Lord Murugan is one of the most worshipped deities in Tamil Nadu and is considered a Tamil God deeply entrenched in households across caste and class lines, particularly among the backward communities. Revered in Tamil Shaivism, the 'Arupadai Veedu' represents the six sacred abodes of Lord Murugan: Thiruparankundram, Thiruchendur, Palani, Swamimalai, Thiruthani and Pazhamudircholai. Each shrine marks a significant event in Lord Murugan's mythological journey: his marriage, triumph over demons, and devotion to knowledge and justice. The temples attract millions of devotees annually and are considered central to Tamil Hindu identity. The battle over the event has also played out in court. A day after Amit Shah urged people to gather in large numbers for the event, the DMK government on Monday informed the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court that it would allow the installation of six miniatures of 'Arupadai Veedu' only for three days as against the 11 days initially planned. 'We do not want another situation like the recent stampede in Bengaluru,' the state government told the court. The police's concerns A senior police officer told The Indian Express that red flags about crowd management emerged after the Hindu Munnani, in its first request, told the police that five lakh devotees were expected and then brought down the number to two lakh and later to 50,000 after follow-up questions regarding logistics and crowd management were asked. The Madurai Police's cautious approach likely stems from two recent incidents that led to deaths: the air show at Chennai's Marina Beach last October and the Bengaluru stampede this month during celebrations of the Royal Challengers Bangalore winning the IPL title. 'The Marina air show was only one-and-a-half hours with no stalls. Yet, five people died. If we allow 10 days of pujas, darshans and crowd flow, we fear things could spiral out of control,' the police officer said. The Tamil Nadu government also argued that the Hindu Munnai had failed to provide adequate responses to the police's questions, even as the right-wing body claimed it had submitted all the required information. After hearing the arguments from both sides, Justice B Pugalendhi directed the Hindu Munnani to file a fresh response while telling the police to take a final call on the matter by June 12. The court allowed the group to continue building miniatures but said no religious rituals could be held at the site till further orders. The next hearing in the case is slated for June 13. A senior officer involved with the preparations said the Arupadai Veedu are being brought in and are operating as full-fledged temples with regular pujas. 'Setting up these temple replicas itself will attract huge crowds as thousands of devotees will throng for darshan. This has forced us to impose restrictions,' he said.
Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
Lord Rama devotees want AP govt to set up Anna Canteen in Bhadradri town
Bhadrachalam: Devotees of Lord Rama have requested that the Andhra Pradesh (AP) government establish an 'Anna Canteen' in the temple town of Bhadrachalam. In this regard, A K Srinivas, a devotee from Andhra Pradesh, made a request to Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu stating that the AP government was unable to establish an Anna Canteen in Telangana State. Instead, he suggested that Telugu devotees would benefit from its establishment on the village of Yetapaka, which is bordering AP and is only 4 km from the Temple of Lord Rama and the road that connects it to the Parnasala temple. He stated that sponsors are also prepared to provide space for the Anna Canteen to be established in this temple village. Srinivas requested the AP CM to consider setting up the Anna canteen for devotees. He also recalled how the TDP government in unified Andhra Pradesh created the temple town of Bhadrachalam and in that spirit, consider the request. The town, which is on the border of Telangana and quite close to Andhra Pradesh, attracts a number of devotees from AP who visit it for Lord Rama's darshana and others who come from various locations for their everyday tasks. Devotees who travel to Bhadrachalam also visit Parnasala Temple, a historic location under the control of Lord Rama temple that connects the 14-km Alluri district to the AP highways. In this regard, they requested for the setup of the canteen that would offer them an opportunity to have affordable meals on their journeys.
Scroll.in
2 days ago
- Scroll.in
TMC MP Saket Gokhale publicly apologises to ex-diplomat, 10 months after Delhi HC order
Trinamool Congress MP Saket Gokhale on Tuesday issued a public apology to former diplomat Lakshmi Puri in compliance with a July 2024 Delhi High Court order about a series of defamatory comments that he had posted on social media in 2021. In the apology, Gokhale said that a series of tweets that he put about Puri on June 13, 2021 and June 23, 2021 contained 'wrong and unverified allegations' about property that she had purchased. — Saket Gokhale MP (@SaketGokhale) June 9, 2025 In July 2024, the Delhi High Court ruled that Gokhale made 'incorrect, false and untrue' allegations about Puri, including claims that she had purchased property in Switzerland with disproportionate assets. Puri had sued Gokhale, alleging that his social media posts were 'defamatory, malicious and based on false information'. In its verdict, the court had ordered Gokhale to apologise in a leading English daily and on his X handle. He was also directed to pay Rs 50 lakh in damages. Gokhale subsequently sought to recall the July 2024 order, arguing that it was issued ex parte, or in his absence, after his counsel stopped appearing. Meanwhile, Puri approached the High Court to demand that the order be enforced. She also filed a contempt of court case against Gokhale for not complying with the order. In response, Gokhale's lawyer proposed submitting an apology in a sealed cover until his plea challenging the High Court's order was decided. However, Justice Anish Dayal on May 9 dismissed the request and ordered Gokhale to issue a public apology in two weeks – or by May 23. After repeated non compliance, on May 28, the court issued a show cause notice to Gokhale asking why he should not be sent to jail for failing to comply with its orders. 'If you don't publish then we will issue orders of detention,' the court had said. Puri, a former assistant secretary-general at the United Nations and wife of Union minister Hardeep Singh Puri, had filed the defamation case in 2021. She argued that her reputation was tarnished by Gokhale's 'reckless and false allegations' regarding an apartment in Geneva. Gokhale had questioned how Puri could afford the property on her income as a former Indian Foreign Service officer on deputation to the UN Conference on Trade and Development. He had also tagged Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in his posts, calling for an Enforcement Directorate inquiry in the matter.
