logo
‘The Annihilation of Fish' Review: A Gem That's Worth the Wait

‘The Annihilation of Fish' Review: A Gem That's Worth the Wait

New York Times13-02-2025

Obediah Johnson — the lost-and-found soul played by a magnificent James Earl Jones in 'The Annihilation of Fish' — has a barrel chest and a voice that sounds like it emerged, warmed and polished, from unfathomable depths. It's an instrument that many know from 'Star Wars' and 'The Lion King,' in which Jones voiced two of the most totemic fathers in movies. Yet the eloquence of his basso profundo was also instrumental in lesser-known works like 'Annihilation,' Charles Burnett's deeply humane, singular view from the margins that is receiving a theatrical release 26 years after its first public screening at a film festival.
It seems shocking that it's taken this long for the film to hit theaters given Burnett's elevated standing; his masterful 'Killer of Sheep' (1978) is a milestone in American cinema and his reputation long established. There are a number of reasons that 'The Annihilation of Fish' didn't reach the world earlier. Among other things, genuine independent filmmaking, the kind that transcends formula and expectations and comes without corporate sponsorship, has always been difficult to market. And Burnett, whose filmography includes 'To Sleep With Anger' (1990), a neo-Gothic tale about a Southern interloper that slips between drama and comedy, has always defied compartmentalization. He can't be pigeonholed.
'The Annihilation of Fish' similarly evades classification, genre and otherwise. The movie is often gently funny, though occasionally lurches into boisterous excess, with jolts of slapstick and glints of ticklish nonsense. At the same time, there's a strong current of melancholy running throughout the story, which complicates and occasionally destabilizes its comedy. There are moments here when you laugh but aren't sure if you should, and instances when you wonder (and worry) if you're laughing with the characters or at them, and whether it matters. Most movies prompt you about when it's time to laugh and to cry; not this one.
Written by Anthony C. Winkler, the film tells the tale of Obediah — he goes by Fish — a Jamaican immigrant who's long lived in a mental facility in New York and claims to be bedeviled by an invisible demon he calls Hank. The demon pops up unexpectedly, as imps tend to do, and Fish keeps him in check by wrestling him. They're grappling in church soon after the movie opens, a tussle that ends with Fish being abruptly ousted from his group home. 'It was like Pearl Harbor,' he protests to a functionary, 'sneak attack!' No matter. Soon, he is out the door with his suitcase and headed West, where his story begins in earnest.
Fish ends up in that vexed paradise known as Los Angeles, where he moves into a modest, dilapidated apartment building run by a friendly eccentric, Mrs. Muldroone (a winning Margot Kidder). With its lush garden and stained, peeling interior, the building is the sort of place you can imagine the likes of Nathanael West and David Lynch making poetically dark use of. By contrast, Fish settles in with the pragmaticism of someone who must make do with what little life has afforded him: He spruces up his new apartment, transforming squalor into a home. Not long after, he meets Poinsettia (Lynn Redgrave).
The trickiest character in the movie, Poinsettia is introduced sometime before she and Fish meet; you know she's important to his story from how Burnett cuts between them, like an anxious matchmaker. A loud, aggressively flamboyant figure given to voluble yowling and mewling, Poinsettia lives in San Francisco and claims to be in a relationship with the invisible and very dead Giacomo Puccini, a fixation that involves some strained comedy. Things improve when she too leaves for Los Angeles (before she does, Burnett tucks in an allusion to 'Vertigo,' a classic of mad love), where she moves into the apartment across from Fish's.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Embraces Authoritarianism for ‘Les Misérables' Moment
Trump Embraces Authoritarianism for ‘Les Misérables' Moment

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Embraces Authoritarianism for ‘Les Misérables' Moment

Watching from the audience in the Kennedy Center, Donald Trump would no doubt identify with the protagonist in Les Misérables. Jean Valjean is, after all, a felon who rebuilds his life. He owns a factory and becomes mayor. He finds redemption. With Melania at his side, and the seats filled with donors who have paid up to $2 million each to join the president, Trump's world is more cosseted. Less Cosette. Inside the reconstituted center no longer resembling anything Kennedy (RFK Jr. notwithstanding), all talk of revolution is confined to the stage and a bygone era in 19th-century France. And Valjean remains one step ahead of the law. Trump is chairman of the Kennedy Center board he has personally picked. He is the king. The audience is there at his favor, as is his Cabinet and the Republican lawmakers who have bent to his will. Outside, though, the people aren't singing. They are beginning to fight. For generations, Los Angeles has been an enduring symbol of American optimism. The promised land of sun-kissed beaches and Hollywood dreams. On the day Beach Boy Brian Wilson died, downtown L.A. was under curfew, and Marines and National Guard troops walked the streets. Six days of rioting on the West Coast put the entire country on edge. The city with fire seared into its consciousness was once again in flames. It represented the perfect opportunity for the president who would be king. Trump is always the main character of his own story, and he has found the perfect way to move the plot along from last week's Tesla car-wreck of a squabble with Elon Musk. The Democratic Party was outfoxed and out-hought when it was forced to defend the deported Maryland dad, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, with a history that is questionable at least. Now, Trump was doubling down on the 'insurrectionists' protesting against the ICE raids that have turned 7-Elevens and Home Depots around the nation into no-go zones for minorities. The Authoritarian Show was playing to Trump's core audience. Karoline Leavitt called the L.A. protests 'left-wing riots.' Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Trump buddy, called in the National Guard—just in case. The president also presented a heavily politically oriented MAGA rally to troops at Fort Bragg on Tuesday. A military parade to celebrate Trump's 79th birthday and the Army's 250th anniversary will rumble around Washington, D.C. on Saturday as a reminder of the president's power. He likes strong men. He considers himself one. Parades are what they do. But not everyone is buying it. California Governor Gavin Newsom sees Trump more as a Star Wars villain, making his autocratic move. Newsom believes this is the time for his close-up, but he is insistent that bringing in the military is over the top. It's Trump's latest production, Law and Order: Special ICE Unit. 'Deploying military forces and conducting militarized ICE raids in immigrant neighborhoods is not about public safety,' said Arturo Flores, Mayor of Huntington Park. 'It is about political theater that is rooted in fear.' On Tuesday, 86 protesters were arrested during an anti-ICE demonstration in Chicago. There have been disturbances in Dallas, New York, and Washington, D.C. Activists across the country are planning protests on Saturday as part of the 'No Kings' movement. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt walked out of her press briefing when she was pressed about the 1st Amendment. The spokeswoman for the White House didn't want to discuss free speech. She was asked earlier if she thought Trump saw himself as a king. 'The president views himself as the president of the United States of America,' she said. 'This is a constitutional republic.' Fine words, indeed. It's a popular misconception that Victor Hugo based his epic 1862 novel, Les Misérables, on the French Revolution of 1789. He actually used the June Rebellion of 1832, when a group of revolutionaries tried to overthrow the French government. More than 100,000 Parisians raised barricades and rioted in the hopes of overthrowing the newly established King Louis Philippe. They were ultimately crushed by 20,000 National Guard troops and 40,000 regular army soldiers drafted into the capital. The show of power was successful, at least for a while. In 1848, the monarchy fell after Louis Philippe sought to hand the throne down to his 9-year-old grandson. It was the beginning of the Second French Republic. 'King' Donald is taking a calculated risk in ignoring the First Amendment. But in suppressing democracy in such brazen fashion, he may be risking the future of America's 236-year republic.

STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER Comic Shows the Force Ghost Army Moment We Never Got in the Movie — GeekTyrant
STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER Comic Shows the Force Ghost Army Moment We Never Got in the Movie — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time10 hours ago

  • Geek Tyrant

STAR WARS: THE RISE OF SKYWALKER Comic Shows the Force Ghost Army Moment We Never Got in the Movie — GeekTyrant

For years, Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker fans have debated what could've made that climactic final battle hit harder. Now, thanks to the final issue of Marvel Comics' adaptation of the film, we finally get to see a powerful scene that was cut from the film… Rey standing side by side with an army of Jedi Force Ghosts. The moment in the movie where Rey declares herself 'all the Jedi'? It hits differently when you can actually see those Jedi with her. Back in 2019, the film ended with Rey facing off against Emperor Palpatine, bolstered only by the voices of Jedi from the past including Yoda, Obi-Wan, Mace Windu, Ahsoka Tano, and more. And while hearing those familiar voices gave longtime fans a chill, the comic takes it one step further. Writer Jody Houser and artist Will Sliney go all in, putting those Jedi right there with Rey, fully visible as a Force Ghost army. The scene delivers a visual representation of generations of Jedi standing behind the young Jedi warrior. This is a moment Lucasfilm once considered including in the film, but for a variety of reasons, it never made it to screen. Interestingly, its omission may have benefitted other Star Wars stories down the road. Seeing Qui-Gon Jinn (Liam Neeson) return in Obi-Wan Kenobi , or Anakin Skywalker ( Hayden Christensen ) appear as a Force Ghost in Ahsoka , likely wouldn't have had the same weight if they'd already popped up alongside Rey. Chris Terrio, who co-wrote the film with J.J. Abrams, once touched on this exact subject. Regarding the film's ending, he said: 'We absolutely discussed who would be there at the end. It's not as though those Force ghosts will never appear to Rey now that she really is the first of the new Jedi. 'I think she has all of those Jedi behind her. J.J. was pretty clear about the idea that he didn't want to take away from the moment of Leia finally appearing as a Force ghost and the twins finally being together.' In regard to that final scene on Tatooine, he added: 'This might be in the novelization, but we talked a lot about how Leia lost her home. Alderaan is gone. So, she could never take Luke to see where she grew up as a princess, but Luke could've taken Leia to see where he grew up as a farmer. 'But, the twins never got to Tatooine together (to visit Luke's childhood farm). So, the idea of seeing the twins together after the sabers are laid to rest felt like it was something that was very moving to me and J.J.' That emotional thread certainly had merit. But from a fan perspective, seeing Rey, flanked by the spirits of Obi-Wan, Aayla Secura, Kanan Jarrus, Mace Windu, Yoda, and more, standing against Palpatine, is the kind of Star Wars moment fans live for. So while The Rise of Skywalker might never get a "special edition" to bring this to screen, the comic book fills in the gap. At least we get to see it visually brought to life in comic book art form. 'THE LAST HOPE OF THE RESISTANCE! REY races to confront PALPATINE, but can she stop him before the FINAL ORDER devastates the galaxy? Hope comes from unexpected places as the RESISTANCE makes its last stand!'

Disney has filed an AI lawsuit that could shift the future of entertainment
Disney has filed an AI lawsuit that could shift the future of entertainment

Boston Globe

time10 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Disney has filed an AI lawsuit that could shift the future of entertainment

As AI rapidly develops, tech companies have raced to build and monetize tools that generate Hollywood-grade images and videos. Now these tools are poised to transform moviemaking and the entertainment industry in coming years, experts say, and this lawsuit represents a bid by some of Hollywood's giants to secure their place in that future. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'It's sort of a 'finally' moment,' said Chad Hummel, principal at the Los Angeles office of the law firm McKool Smith. Previously, entertainment giants had stayed on the sidelines even as researchers documented how AI tools could be used to generate apparently infringing content. Now they've entered the fray in a big way. Advertisement Midjourney is one of a handful of AI generators that has captured the world's imagination by letting users spin up images on demand. What started as a novelty quickly became a major source of online content, as people used Midjourney and other generators such as OpenAI's Sora and Stable Diffusion to generate everything from memes to pornography to reimaginations of popular characters from movies and TV. Advertisement But the resulting images don't come from a vacuum - the AI models are trained by ingesting millions of words and images from across the internet, including copyrighted work from individual artists and entertainment studios. AI companies claim that their generators are spitting out entirely new creations and that the training data falls under 'fair use' according to copyright law. Artists and midsize media companies have pushed back, saying the AI is stealing their work. Disney and Universal's lawsuit frames the issue as a matter of good versus evil, calling Midjourney 'a bottomless pit of plagiarism.' AI industry advocates counter that legacy media companies are standing in the way of a technological advance that could unleash a wave of creativity. Midjourney did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday. In the suit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the companies allege that Midjourney 'seeks to reap the rewards' of Disney's creative work by selling an AI image service that 'functions as a virtual vending machine, generating unauthorized copies of Disney's and Universal's copyrighted works.' Indeed, AI-generated content depicting beloved - and copyrighted - characters such as Mario, Shrek or Winnie the Pooh has circulated online, at times going viral on social media and spawning a new approach to fan art. Star Wars junkies, for instance, no longer have to comb the web for stories and visuals based on their favorite characters - they can use an AI video generator to create an original 11-minute Star Wars movie with photorealistic sets and characters. AI video still isn't advanced enough to produce passable full-length films or TV shows, Washington Post tests found. Advertisement That might be why copyright holders waited to file lawsuits against AI video generators, said James Grimmelmann, a law professor at Cornell University. While AI audio can now produce songs that sound human-generated, AI video hasn't made that leap, he said. OpenAI's Sora, for example, can only generate content roughly a minute long. And although the speed and fluency is a remarkable improvement compared to older models, it doesn't offer the kind of fine-grained controls directors and studios need, according to Grimmelmann. But production companies are already using AI for preproduction brainstorming, special effects and on-screen images. The quality of AI-generated content has improved rapidly since OpenAI first released its image generator DALL-E in 2021, with companies including OpenAI and Google now offering video generators to the public. Many believe it's a matter of time before content that's entirely AI generated makes its way into mainstream entertainment. SAG-AFTRA, the union representing film and TV actors, has struck deals with voice AI companies allowing actors to license their voices, and this week the union reached a tentative agreement with a collection of video game companies to pay actors if their voices or likenesses appear in AI-generated games. 'Patience and persistence has resulted in a deal that puts in place the necessary A.I. guardrails that defend performers' livelihoods in the A.I. age,' the union said in a blog post Monday. Meanwhile, a new class of AI start-ups such as Moonvalley and Runway are already working with Hollywood studios to integrate AI into the production process, the companies have said. This lawsuit is the latest in a barrage by rightsholders - including artists, authors and media companies - alleging infringement by AI firms. Among the highest-profile cases is one filed by the New York Times against OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT. At the same time, many are signing multimillion-dollar licensing deals with AI firms granting them full access to their content - for a price. (The Washington Post has a content-sharing deal with OpenAI.) Advertisement The Disney and Universal suit takes a different tack from other lawsuits, demanding that Midjourney filter what it generates rather than avoid scraping the studios' intellectual property altogether. 'This one seems more aimed at establishing the kind of expectations that copyright owners have of non-AI platforms: You need to take down obvious copies of our works,' said Grimmelmann. What the movie studios don't want, according to Hummel, is for tech firms to be able to cut them out of the equation by training models on their work without having to pay for it. 'This is not going to be Hollywood trying to shut down generative AI,' Hummel said. 'It's about compensation.' Already, many visual artists are feeling the effects of AI's entry, said Jon Lam, a video game artist and creators rights activist. He said he has watched his circle of professional contacts struggle to find work when AI can replicate different art styles with the click of a mouse. Wednesday's lawsuit was 'a huge confidence boost' for creatives like Lam hoping for an upset that stops film, TV and video game studios from drawing on artists' work without paying them, he said. A win for Disney and Universal wouldn't necessarily protect artists in the entertainment industry from getting replaced by AI, said Ben Zhao, a professor of computer science at University of Chicago who helped build Glaze, a software tool that protects visual art from AI mimicry. But it could drastically limit the material that AI tools can draw from, he said. Without fresh data, AI generators would regurgitate the same visual ideas over and over, Zhao said, making them less useful for production companies. In that sense, both AI companies and entertainment studios rely on artists who produce new work and make a living wage. Advertisement Some tech industry leaders have argued that creating tools such as ChatGPT would be impossible if they couldn't be trained on copyrighted data - and that requiring AI companies to pay every creator would stall an AI boom that promises vast economic benefits. Studios such as Disney and Universal should embrace AI video rather than suing to stop it, said Adam Eisgrau, who leads a program on AI, creativity and copyright for the Chamber of Progress, a center-left trade group that represents technology companies including Midjourney. 'My initial reaction is that the movie industry has a long history and a short memory,' Eisgrau said. He compared the lawsuit to one decades ago in which studios sued the makers of videocassette players and lost - which he said was 'lucky for them,' because they ended up profiting greatly from the technology. Meanwhile, each step forward for AI video is met with rapt attention from fans of the tech. A clip posted Sunday in the Reddit forum r/aivideo showed a short trailer for a nonexistent movie - one with visual references starkly similar to science fiction series such as Star Wars. 'Please turn this into a feature film. It would be freaking crazy,' one commenter said. 'That's the plan!' replied the poster. Advertisement - - - Nitasha Tiku contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store