US states seek to roll back LGBTQ+ rights like never before
First in the firing line among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans are trans rights. PHOTO: REUTERS
US states seek to roll back LGBTQ+ rights like never before
BERLIN - US states are on track to introduce a record number of Bills restricting LGBTQ+ rights in 2025, with conservatives targeting hot topics from Pride flags to bathroom bans.
First in the firing line among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans are trans rights, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
'It seems like our new normal in the United States is simply having over 500 pieces of legislation really attempting to push transgender people specifically out of public life altogether,' said the ACLU's Gillian Branstetter in a video call.
Texas leads the way among US states in proposing anti-LGBTQ+ laws, with the ACLU tallying the total of hostile Bills nationally at 575 as of April.
The targets of the hostile Bills range from drag acts to trans athletes, child custody laws to ID cards and the scope of state health benefits offered to LGBTQ+ Americans.
Proponents of the new Bills say these pieces of legislation will protect children as well as women and girls from the rise of what they call 'gender ideology'.
'The right in the US is finding trans people to be politically useful,' Ms Diana Adams, executive director of the non-profit Chosen Family Law Center, told Context/the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
'They are scapegoating this group that's around 1 per cent of the US population and making them the focus of distraction and propaganda.'
Texas is debating a first-of-its-kind Bill that would make it a felony to claim a gender different to the sex assigned at birth in any dealings with government or an employer.
'Gender identity fraud' - which could be punished with two years in jail and a US$10,000 (S$12,960) fine - is the latest in a wave of anti-LGBTQ+ Bills to emerge since 2020 as social conservatism gained increasing traction among voters.
'We've seen an increase in the variety of attacks on trans people living in Texas,' said Mr Jonathan Gooch, a spokesperson at the LGBTQ+ non-profit Equality Texas.
Movement Advancement Project (MAP), an LGBTQ+ think tank, said about 92 per cent of state Bills that target LGBTQ+ Americans do not pass. But even when Bills are voted down, activists say their very existence can stir hatred and spur discrimination.
'When lawmakers and public officials use this anti-trans rhetoric, it does have real-world consequences whether or not the Bills are passed,' Gooch said.
Equality Texas reported an uptick in LGBTQ+ hate crimes between 2022 and 2023, the latest data available - be it the bullying of students, harassment of teachers or prohibition on householders flying Pride flags.
'New normal'
The Bills come as President Donald Trump launches a battery of measures against LGBTQ+ Americans, from executive orders scrapping the recognition of gender-neutral passports to a ban on the use of federal funds to 'promote gender ideology'.
Texas tops the ACLU list of states proposing anti-LGBTQ+ Bills, with 88 laws under consideration, followed by 39 in Missouri, 29 in West Virginia, and 26 in Oklahoma.
Bills are not just growing in number, said Mr Logan Casey, director of policy research at MAP, but also widening in scope.
In 2017, North Carolina rolled back the country's first state law banning trans people using their chosen restroom. The volte face followed public opposition to the law, after which Texas conservatives gave up on their plans for a similar ban.
But now, Republican lawmakers across the country are passing the same sort of bathroom Bills, citing the need to protect women in single-sex spaces.
And they are not stopping there.
In March, Utah scored a US first by prohibiting the flying of Pride flags at schools and government buildings, while Iowa became the first US state to remove gender identity protections from its civil rights code a month earlier.
In Georgia, a Bill introduced in February would, if enacted, stop trans state workers from getting hormone therapy under their state health insurance.
A Bill proposed in New Hampshire would let the state detain trans people in correctional or mental health facilities that match their sex at birth; Alabama is debating a Bill protecting educators who refuse to use a student's preferred name.
Experts in the field say the legislative efforts underway to curtail LGBTQ+ rights may not translate into many new laws - but could well shape social attitudes among ordinary Americans.
'What they're trying to pass is an idea,' said LGBTQ+ university researcher Diego Garcia Blum. 'They're trying to dissuade people that this is natural diversity ... into thinking that this is some kind of foreign and malicious ideology.' REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
34 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump can abolish national monuments, US Justice Department says
FILE PHOTO: A vehicle rides on a highway past a pair of buttes known as the Bears Ears in Bears Ears National Monument outside Blanding, Utah, U.S., October 22, 2023. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart/File Photo President Donald Trump has the power to abolish two national monuments in California established by his Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, as well as any others created by past presidents, according to a newly released legal opinion from a key adviser within the U.S. Department of Justice. The May 27 document, which was released on Tuesday, reversed a 1938 legal opinion and sets the stage for the Republican president to eliminate federal protections for potentially millions of acres of land previously designated as national monuments. National monuments are created by presidents in recognition of a site's cultural, historical or scientific importance, while national parks are created by Congress largely to protect outstanding scenic features or natural phenomena. Lanora Pettit, who heads the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, was asked by the White House to provide a new opinion as Trump considered whether to reverse Biden's decision in January in his final days in office to designate two California sites that hold significance to Native American tribes as national monuments. The Chuckwalla National Monument preserves more than 624,000 acres just south of Joshua Tree National Park. The Sattitla Highlands National Monument protects 224,000 acres where the dormant Medicine Lake volcano carved craters and lava tubes. Biden had relied on the Antiquities Act of 1906, a law that has been invoked by numerous presidents to designate over 100 national monuments. A 1938 opinion by Attorney General Homer Cummings, who served under Democratic President Franklin Roosevelt, has been long cited as constraining the ability of presidents to undo past designations. But in a 50-page legal opinion, Pettit concluded that the Antiquities Act gives presidents not only the power to establish national monuments on federal lands but also to determine that they never were or no longer are deserving of those protections. The White House has also asked Pettit to consider whether the Justice Department should disavow Cummings' prior opinion. She said it should, writing that the law's silence about whether a president could revoke a predecessor's designation of a monument should be understood as meaning he has such authority. "Thus, for the Antiquities Act, the power to declare carries with it the power to revoke," Pettit wrote. The legal opinion did note that since the earliest days of the Antiquities Act, presidents have 'from time to time diminished' the land set aside to protect monuments. Trump, in his first term, had reduced the size of the Bears Ears National Monument by 85% and the Grand Staircase-Escalante monument by half, both in Utah. Biden restored both monuments to their former size. But no president has abolished a national monument. It was unclear if and when Trump would revoke the monument status for the two California sites or any other monuments. Asked about the new legal opinion, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields in a statement cited the need to "liberate our federal lands and waters to oil, gas, coal, geothermal, and mineral leasing." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Chancellor Merz's remaking of Germany
The relationship between the Germans and US President Donald Trump has long been characterised by antipathy, says the writer. PHOTO: REUTERS All foreign leaders coming to Washington must now pass an ordeal: sitting in the White House's Oval Office next to Mr Donald Trump and facing a gaggle of shouting American journalists. Anything can happen. Sometimes, the US President is content to discuss domestic American matters; in this case, the visiting foreign leader suffers no harm and is left to admire the garish gold decorations Mr Trump has now stuck all over the Oval Office. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
China's Li says US-China reach framework on trade, will report back to leaders
[LONDON] China's Vice-Commerce Minister Li Chenggang said on Tuesday that the Chinese and the US negotiating teams had agreed a framework on trade after two days of talks, and would take that back to their leaders. 'The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting,' Li told reporters. REUTERS