George Santos' former treasurer sentenced to probation over bogus campaign finance reports
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. (AP) — George Santos ′ former campaign treasurer was sentenced Wednesday to three years' probation for her role in fabricating campaign finance reports for the disgraced ex-congressman from New York.
Nancy Marks was also ordered to pay more than $178,000 in restitution by U.S. District Court Judge Joanna Seybert.
The veteran Long Island political operative, who resigned as Santos' campaign treasurer in 2023,
pleaded guilty
to federal conspiracy charges last year.
'I thought I had found a friend in George Santos,' she said Wednesday. 'But everything about him was a lie. I thought it was a true friend and a true person. He was not.'
She has admitted to helping Santos inflate his campaign donations during the 2022 election cycle in order to hit the fundraising thresholds needed to qualify for backing from the national Republican Party.
Prosecutors say Marks filed campaign finance reports that listed a number of false donors, including at least 10 members of her family and Santos' family.
The reports to the Federal Election Commission and the GOP National Committee also falsely claimed Santos had loaned his campaign $500,000 when in reality he didn't have the money to make that kind of loan.
Marks faced up to five years in prison. In a filing ahead of Wednesday's hearing, prosecutors had recommended the Shirley resident be sentenced to 18 months in prison and ordered to pay more than $178,000 in restitution.
Marks' lawyers filed their sentencing request under seal, meaning it wasn't revealed prior to her appearance in Central Islip federal court.
Marks worked on more than 150 Republican campaigns on Long Island, including for the current head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Lee Zeldin, during his successful campaigns for Congress and a failed gubernatorial run.
Santos was
sentenced last month
to more than seven years in federal prison after
pleading guilty
to federal wire fraud and aggravated identity theft.
He's due to report to prison July 25.
Sam Miele, a former fundraiser for Santos, was
sentenced in March
to one year and one day in prison for his role in the campaign fraud, which included impersonating a high-ranking congressional aide.
Santos served less than a year in Congress before becoming just the
sixth member
of the House to be ousted by colleagues after it was revealed he'd fabricated much of his life story.
The political unknown had painted himself as a successful business owner who worked at prestigious Wall Street firms, when in reality he was struggling financially.
The revelations led to congressional and criminal inquiries into
how he had funded his campaign
.
___
Follow Philip Marcelo at
twitter.com/philmarcelo
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
7 minutes ago
- New York Post
How Trump special envoy's move to bring Tate brothers to US caught president unaware
WASHINGTON — White House special envoy Ric Grenell caught President Trump off-guard when he advocated for the notorious Tate brothers to travel to Florida while awaiting trial in Romania earlier this year, leaving administration insiders frustrated and questioning Grenell's motives. In mid-February, Grenell, 58, approached Romanian Foreign Minister Emil Hurezeanu on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference and convinced him to release accused sex traffickers Andrew and Tristan Tate into US custody as they await trial on charges including rape and human trafficking in eastern Europe — without notifying anyone else in the administration, according to multiple sources and Hurezeanu's own admission. 'We learned about the Tate brothers after the fact,' a high-ranking White House source told The Post last week. Advertisement Grenell's actions — both in the matter of the Tates and in other delicate situations — exemplify the problems raised by special envoys, who play roles similar to ambassadors and assistant secretaries of state but often do so without the obligation to obey a formal chain of command and while carrying added responsibility as the president's personal representative. 'This was yet another example of Grenell going outside the chain of command to pursue his own goals, rather than the president's,' a source close the the White House familiar with discussions told The Post. 3 President Trump (right) walks with special envoy and interim Kennedy Center executive director Ric Grenell March 17. AP Advertisement On Feb. 27, 11 days after the Munich conference wrapped, the Tates, who were born in the US, touched down in Fort Lauderdale on a private jet. The same day, Trump hosted British Prime Minister Kier Starmer and was asked whether the president's administration had 'pressured' Romania to hand over the accused sexual predators. 'I don't know. You're saying he's on a plane right now?' a visibly confused Trump asked. 'I just know nothing about it. We'll check it out, we'll let you know.' Shortly after, when Starmer spoke about the brothers facing investigation in the United Kingdom, the president said to him, perplexed: 'You're aware? You're aware of this? I didn't know anything about it.' Risky game Advertisement While much of the media scorned Trump's comments, White House officials confirmed the president's surprise and bewilderment — and rounded on Grenell for putting the commander in chief in a tight spot. 'President Trump is on recording saying he know nothing about the Tate brothers' flight to Florida, so why did Ric Grenell even raise the issue with a Romanian official?' a source close the the White House familiar with discussions told The Post. 3 Andrew Tate, left, and his brother Tristan outside a Romanian police station May 21. AP The Tates' release caused bipartisan blowback — with big GOP names like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) as well as conservative media personalities Ben Shapiro and Megyn Kelly speaking out against the White House. Advertisement It also sparked a congressional inquiry by House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), who penned a letter asking the State Department to what extent the US government was involved in Romanian officials' decision to release the brothers. Almost immediately after the letter — which cc'd Grenell — was sent to the State Department, the envoy called to 'berate' a Raskin staffer, saying 'you're going to ruin my reputation,' according to a person familiar with the conversation. The interaction was first reported in early April by NOTUS. 'The State Department has failed to answer the Committee's questions and address our concerns,' the person said. 'All we have received was a short, non-substantive response from the State Department more than a month after the letter was sent.' While the blowback over the release has died down, the question that has puzzled Grenell's critics remains: Why risk the administration's credibility on Andrew and Tristan Tate? Grenell, a former ambassador to Germany and acting director of national intelligence, has been open about his support for the Tate brothers, whose followers among the far-right include longtime Trump confidant Roger Stone and Paul Ingrassia, the newly appointed head of the Office of Special Counsel. Andrew Tate has similarly expressed support for Grenell, tweeting the day before his release from Romania that the envoy is helping Trump 'sav(e) America along with the entire western world by extension.' Grenell also has extensive experience in eastern and southeastern Europe, dating back to at least his role facilitating peace talks between Serbia and Kosovo during Trump's first term. 'Was this motivated by a personal, political or business interest, or is he just a Tate Brothers fanboy?' asked a former friend of Grenell's. 'Either is a massive red flag.' Advertisement In a comment to the Financial Times in February, Grenell acknowledged his support for the Tates, 'as evident by my publicly available tweets' But he has since scrubbed all posts about the brothers, including a retweet of Stone crediting Grenell for 'securing the release of the Tates.' However, a Grenell associate says he kept up ties with the Tates even after their return, sitting ringside when the brothers made an appearance at the UFC 313 card in Las Vegas on March 8. 'Not Ric's job to make sure State knows' Since the Tate fiasco, Grenell has continued to ruffle feathers in his various roles, sounding a rare discordant note in an administration whose key players seem to be mainly on the same page. Advertisement 'It's like Festivus inside the White House, and the airing of the grievances is heavy on Grenell,' said one source close to President Trump, referencing an episode of the classic sitcom 'Seinfeld.' Last month, Grenell — in an apparent attempt to apply lessons from the Tate incident — briefly mentioned to Trump that he had reached a deal with Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro to return an American detainee, but left key White House and State Department officials without any clue of his foreign dealings, according to senior administration officials. 'State Department was intentionally left in the dark, as was Rubio,' confirmed Tactic Global lobbyist Caroline Wren, who told The Post she helps Grenell with his public relations and worked on the Venezuela initiative with him. 'It's not Ric's job to make sure State knows.' Advertisement 3 Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro speaks to Iranian officials in Caracas last month. via REUTERS Wren did not elaborate on why the department was left out of the loop, but Grenell had asked Maduro to free Air Force veteran Joe St. Clair as a sign that the dictator was willing to work with the Trump administration, multiple sources say. In return, Grenell suggested to Maduro that Trump would extend Chevron's license to import Venezuelan oil — but that was news to the administration, which has consistently supported the president's desire to expire the license May 27, according to senior officials. Some far-right influencers — such as firebrand Laura Loomer and many of Grenell's closest associates, including Wren — say the license should be extended to block China from cornering the Venezuelan oil market. Advertisement When The Post contacted Grenell May 15 to ask whether he was holding discussions with Caracas about extending the Chevron license, Grenell directed another lobbyist — former Rep. Aaron Schock (R-Ill.) — to contact The Post to push the China angle. Schock, who according to Wren also helps Grenell with PR, also consults for South Florida oil magnate Harry Sargeant, whose license to operate his oil-trading company in Venezuela was canceled by Trump's anti-Maduro policy, a former friend of Sargeant's told The Post. Schock did not reply to a request for comment on his association with Sargeant, whom Wren called a 'good friend' she 'talks to all the time.' Sargeant, however, denied that Schock or Grenell were advocating on his behalf. On a more ominous note, law enforcement sources say Grenell's deal with Maduro to return a single detainee could encourage Caracas officials to direct the Tren de Aragua cartel to kidnap more Americans for use as bargaining chips to reduce US sanctions. The FBI has said that the Venezuelan dictator controls the brutal cartel recently listed as a foreign terrorist organization. The same day the Chevron oil license expired, the State Department issued a stark travel warning to Americans, urging them not to visit Venezuela due to risk of wrongful detention, torture, kidnapping and crime. Closer to home, Grenell — who is also president and interim executive director of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts — caused another firestorm when he dismissed center vice president Floyd Brown May 28 after Brown refused to disown comments promoting 'traditional marriage' and criticizing the influence of gay staffers in the Republican party. 'The only explanation is the one given to me at the time of my firing: 'Floyd, you must recant your belief in traditional marriage and your past statements on the topic, or you will be fired,'' Brown posted to X May 29. 'Needless to say, I refused to recant and was shown the door. My beliefs are much more common to Biblical Christianity.' As multiple sources pointed out, the firing appeared to run counter to Trump's main reason for appointing Grenell, who is openly gay, in the first place: To rid the DC venue of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion policies. 'From being rebuked on the Chevron license, to his connection to the Tate Brothers, to allegations of firing a Kennedy staffer over Christian beliefs, Ric Grenell keeps finding new and creative ways to embarrass himself and those around him,' a source close the the White House familiar with the situation said. The State Department, Romanian Foreign Ministry, Schock, Grenell and an attorney for the Tates did not respond to requests for comment.
Wall Street Journal
10 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘Proof' Review: Finding Truth in Numbers
Thomas Jefferson's first draft of the Declaration of Independence read: 'We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable . . . ' It was supposedly Benjamin Franklin who suggested instead announcing the truths to be 'self-evident,' as though they were fundamental mathematical axioms providing an incontestable foundation for the new republic. The idea of self-evident truths goes all the way back to Euclid's 'Elements' (ca. 300 B.C.), which depends on a handful of axioms—things that must be granted true at the outset, such as that one can draw a straight line between any two points on a plane. From such assumptions Euclid went on to show, for example, that there are infinitely many prime numbers, and that the angles at the base of an isosceles triangle are equal. If the axioms are true, and the subsequent reasoning is sound, then the conclusion is irrefutable. What we now have is a proof: something we can know for sure. Adam Kucharski, a professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, takes the reader on a fascinating tour of the history of what has counted as proof. Today, for example, we have computerized proofs by exhaustion, in which machines chew through examples so numerous that they could never be checked by humans. The author sketches the development of ever-more-rarefied mathematics, from calculus to the mind-bending work on different kinds of infinity by the Russian-German sage Georg Cantor, who proved that natural integers (1,2,3 . . . ) are somehow not more numerous than even numbers (2,4,6 . . .), even though the former set includes all the elements of the latter set, in addition to the one that contains all odd numbers. My favorite example is the Banach-Tarski paradox, which proves that you can disassemble a single sphere and reconstitute it into two spheres of identical size. Climbing the ladder of proof, we can enter a wild realm where intuitions break down completely. But proof, strictly understood, is only half the story here. Abraham Lincoln, Mr. Kucharski relates, taught himself to derive Euclid's proofs to give himself an argumentative edge in the courtroom and in Congress. Yet politics is messier than geometry; and so the dream of perfectly logical policymaking, immune to quibble, remains out of reach. What should we do, then, when a mathematical proof of truth is unavailable, but we must nonetheless act?
CNN
10 minutes ago
- CNN
Live updates: Trump and Musk escalate public feud over agenda bill
Update: Date: Title: Elon Musk says Trump would have lost the election without him Content: Elon Musk said President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans would have lost the 2024 election without his support. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said in a post on X. Musk was responding to Trump's statement in the the Oval Office today that he didn't need the tech billionaire to win the election. 'I would have won Pennsylvania regardless of Elon,' Trump said. 'I'm very disappointed with Elon.' Musk spent more than $290 million on the 2024 election, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission. The massive sum was rivaled by only a handful of competing mega donors. Update: Date: Title: Republican senators downplay Musk pressure campaign Content: Republicans senators are so far brushing off Elon Musk's call to his massive social media following to turn up the heat on Republican elected officials. 'I don't know,' GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina told CNN when asked if his office was receiving more pressure. 'Nobody is calling me.' GOP Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio also said that he has not received an uptick of constituent calls, telling CNN, 'No. I mean, honestly, as you know, most normal people don't watch the inconsistencies of how the sausage is made.' He said that usually those that do call have only seen 'misinformation' about the bill. 'There's a difference in mandatory spending and discretionary spending. So once we explain to them what we're actually doing, they buy into the whole process.' Asked about Musk's influence and platform, and how that could affect support for Trump's agenda, Moreno shot back: 'President Trump has the biggest platform on earth, and the platform that he's advocating for is to prevent that $4 trillion tax increase, fund our military, secure our border and strengthen Medicaid.' GOP Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama said 'nah' when asked if he felt like he was under more of a spotlight since Musk made a direct ask to his followers to call elected officials. 'The deal is not done. We got three more weeks. And it will change many times between now and three weeks from now,' Tuberville said. GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has been publicly opposing the legislation, said: 'I'll say in my office, most of the calls, the vast majority, are voting no. But my guess is that's not coming from either my supporters or President Trump's supporters. I take that seriously. I look at it.' Update: Date: Title: Trump is the "key person" to end war in Ukraine, says German chancellor Content: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that President Donald Trump is the 'key person' to bring about an end to the war in Ukraine 'by putting pressure on Russia.' 'We both agree on this war and how terrible this war is going on, and we are both looking for ways to stop it very soon. And I told the president … he is the key person in the world who can really do that now by putting pressure on Russia,' Merz said. The German leader reiterated his country's steadfast commitment to Ukraine, adding that the horrific images from the battlefield are caused by 'Russian weapons against Ukraine.' 'Ukraine is only targeting military targets, not civilians, not energy infrastructure. So this is the difference, and that's the reason why we are trying to do more on Russia,' Merz added. Update: Date: Title: Elon Musk live-posts responses to Trump during bilateral meeting Content: In a stunning real-time response on X, Elon Musk responded to President Donald Trump's comments about him after the tech billionaire slammed his signature legislation. Musk, until recently a White House special employee who oversaw the administration's cost-cutting efforts, denied Trump's claim that the Tesla CEO knew the inner workings of the president's so-called 'big beautiful bill.' Musk also countered that the elimination of America's electric vehicle tax incentives has nothing to do with his opposition to the massive domestic policy bill. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk wrote. 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' Musk said in a separate post. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' Update: Date: Title: Trump sidesteps on Russia sanctions and compares Ukraine war to children's fight Content: President Donald Trump declined to offer specifics on sanctions on Russia during a meeting with German Chancellor Merz in the Oval Office. 'It's in my brain, the deadline, when I see the moment where it's not going to stop,' Trump said, and then looked on to Merz, saying, 'I'm sure you're going to do the same thing.' Trump then added, 'we'll be very, very, very tough,' when pressed about sanctions on Russia. 'And it could be on both countries to be honest. You know, it takes two to tango,' Trump said. Without directly addressing whether he would impose Russian sanctions, the president described a conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, in which he said he gave an analogy likening the war to a playground fight. 'Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy. They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don't want to be pulled, sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.' Trump continued: 'And I gave that analogy to Putin yesterday, I said, president, maybe you're going to have to keep fighting and suffering a lot, because both sides are suffering before you pull them apart, before they're able to be pulled apart.' Update: Date: Title: Trump says US will 'hopefully' have a deal with EU Content: President Donald Trump on Thursday struck a positive tone on a potential trade deal with the European Union during a meeting at the White House with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'We'll have a good trade deal,' Trump said. 'I guess that will be mostly determined by the European Union, but you're a very big part of that, so you'll be involved,' Trump said to Merz. Trump's major tariffs on the EU, including a threatened 50% tariff, have been delayed until July 9. Germany is still impacted by tariffs including Trump's 25% tariff on autos, which is in effect. The president said that 'hopefully' there will be a trade deal, or the United States will 'do the tariffs.' 'I mean, I'm okay with the tariffs, or we make a deal with the trade, and I guess that's what we're discussing,' he said. Trump's optimistic remarks came hours after the president separately spoke with Chinese President Xi Jinping on a phone call. Investors and economists have been on edge about the impact of the president's trade war. Wall Street in recent weeks has started to bet that Trump will back down on his most aggressive trade war threats. That's spawned the phrase TACO trade, which stands for Trump Always Chickens Out. US stocks were in the green during the meeting between Trump and Merz. The Dow rose 130 points, or 0.3%. The S&P 500 was also up 0.3% and the Nasdaq Composite was up 0.5%. Update: Date: Title: Trump says he's "very disappointed" in Musk, confirming their deteriorating relationship Content: President Donald Trump appeared to confirm the deterioration of his relationship with Elon Musk, saying he was 'very disappointed' in the tech billionaire, who exited his top advisory role at the White House and subsequently railed against the president's sweeping tax and spending package. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office less than one week after the two exchanged effusive praise on Musk's last day. Since then, Musk has strongly criticized what Trump calls his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' that has passed the House and faces an uncertain path forward in the Senate, calling the bill, which is a major Trump priority, a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump and Musk have not spoken since Musk lashed out at the legislation, a source familiar with the dynamic told CNN. 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Trump said. The president predicted that though Musk had not personally attacked him, he could soon. 'I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' Trump said. Kristen Holmes and Hadas Gold contributed to this post. Update: Date: Title: Trump says he and Xi 'straightened out complexity' of trade deal in phone call Content: President Donald Trump said Thursday that trade talks with China remain on track and that he and Chinese President Xi Jinping 'straightened out any complexity' after a long-awaited phone call earlier in the day. 'We had a very good talk, and we've straightened out any complexity. This is very complex stuff, and we straightened it out,' Trump said from the Oval Office after welcoming German Chancellor Friedrich Merz to the White House. 'I think we're in very good shape with China and the trade deal,' Trump said. 'We're going to just make sure that everybody understands what the deal is.' The president added that he expected to be traveling to China at some point. 'By the way, he invited me to China, and I invited him here. We both accepted. So I'll be going there with the first lady at a certain point, and he'll be coming here, hopefully, with the first lady of China.' Update: Date: Title: Trump explains why Egypt not part of travel ban after Egyptian national's antisemitic attack in Boulder Content: President Donald Trump said Thursday that Egypt was not included in the list of countries subject to a new travel ban because he believes the country '(has) things under control.' CNN previously reported that Trump made the final decision to sign the proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado. The suspect in the attack was an Egyptian national. Asked why Egypt was not one of the banned countries unveiled on Wednesday, Trump said, 'Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control. The countries that we have don't have things under control.' The travel ban, Trump added, 'can't come soon enough. Frankly, we want to keep bad people out of our country. The Biden administration allowed some horrendous people, and we're getting them out one by one, we're not stopping until we get them out.' The countries included, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said Wednesday, 'include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information.' Update: Date: Title: Trump says he thinks Harvard is 'starting to behave' Content: President Donald Trump said Thursday he thinks Harvard is 'starting to behave,' suggesting the university would be handing over a list of international students attending the school. 'Harvard didn't want to give us that list. They're going to be giving us the list now. I think they're starting to behave, actually, if you want to know the truth,' he told reporters in the Oval Office while meeting with German leader Friedrich Merz. On Wednesday, Trump signed a proclamation suspending international visas for new students at Harvard University. The proclamation temporarily blocks the entry of nearly all new international Harvard students under visas most use to study at US universities or participate in academic exchange programs. Trump on Thursday was asked if he would allow Chinese students into US universities after speaking with Chinese leader Xi Jinping earlier in the day. 'Chinese students are coming. No problem. It's an honor to have them, frankly. We want to have foreign students but we want them to be checked, you know. In the case of Harvard and Columbia and others – all we want to do is see their list. There's no problem with that,' the president said. Update: Date: Title: NOW: Trump greets German chancellor at White House Content: President Donald Trump is meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the White House. It's the first time the two are meeting in-person and comes amid a series of high-stakes International issues. Update: Date: Title: Lawmakers respond to Trump administration's travel ban Content: Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley and Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin, leaders on the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, shared contrasting perspectives on the travel ban that the Trump administration imposed on 12 countries last night. Grassley, the GOP chair of the committee, said the president was within his rights to impose the ban, referencing national security priorities and 'some terrorist attacks we've had in the United States.' Grassley said he is 'very comfortable' with Trump's proclamation, 'because the president's number-one responsibility is the national security of the United States. And I don't know what the basis was for him making that decision, but I assume it's come because of some terrorist attacks we've had in the United States.' Trump made the final call on signing the proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, according to a White House official. He was considering it beforehand, but Sunday's assault put it into motion faster. Grassley continued, saying 'not only that, but it's a foreign policy issue, and you know how the Constitution gives the president of the United States wide sway in foreign policy.' Durbin, meanwhile, criticized the move, saying, 'I don't understand it.' 'The president said this situation, terrible crime in Boulder, was the reason for this. The individual in Boulder was from Egypt,' the Illinois Democrat said. 'The president did not include Egypt on his list of nations of people we don't want in the United States. I can't follow his thinking on this at all.' Update: Date: Title: Trump proclaims Xi call had "very positive conclusion" on trade issues Content: President Donald Trump concluded a long-awaited 90-minute telephone call with President Xi Jinping of China, saying he was encouraged that ongoing trade tensions could soon be resolved. Calling the conversation 'very good,' Trump said follow-up talks would occur 'soon' between the countries' economic teams, and that Xi invited him to visit China. 'During the conversation, President Xi graciously invited the First Lady and me to visit China, and I reciprocated. As Presidents of two Great Nations, this is something that we both look forward to doing,' Trump wrote. Trump said the call focused almost entirely on trade, without touching on other geopolitical issues like an Iran nuclear deal or the Russia-Ukraine war. The call 'resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. He singled out the issue of rare earth minerals — which China had placed restrictions on — as an area where he made progress with his counterpart. 'There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products,' Trump wrote. Update: Date: Title: Democratic lawmakers criticize Trump's travel ban as discriminatory Content: Democratic lawmakers slammed President Donald Trump's proclamation to ban travel from several countries to the US. Here's what they've said: Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar, the first Somali-American in Congress, blasted Trump's policy, comparing it to the president's first term, when he barred travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations from coming to the US. 'This discriminatory policy is beyond shameful. Just like his first Muslim Ban, this latest announcement flies in the face of basic morality and goes directly against our values. This racist policy will not make us safe, it will separate families and endanger lives. We cannot let it stand,' Omar said in a post on X. California Sen. Adam Schiff posted on X: 'This is Trump's reckless first term travel ban all over again. Just like before, Trump's expanded ban on travelers from around the world will not improve our national security and will only further isolate the U.S. from the rest of world. Bigotry is not a national security strategy.' Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington pointed to economic harm due to the ban and suggested it would lead to a dangerous precedent. 'Further, banning people fleeing dangerous countries like Afghanistan — a country where many people are in danger due to their work assisting the U.S. military — the Congo, Haiti, and Sudan will only further destabilize global security,' Jayapal said in a statement posted on her social media. Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey said Trump's travel ban won't make America safer, saying in a post on X: 'We cannot continue to allow the Trump administration to write bigotry and hatred into U.S. immigration policy.' Update: Date: Title: Trump and Xi speak in long-awaited trade call, source says Content: President Donald Trump held a phone call with China's Xi Jinping, a person familiar with the matter said, as the two leaders tussle over trade policy. The White House did not immediately confirm the call, which was also reported by Chinese state media. Remember: Tensions have been rising between the two sides in the weeks after they agreed to a 90-day trade truce last month, which hit pause on their tit-for-tat escalation of tariffs. Trump last week accused China of 'violating' the agreement — a charge Beijing has denied, while it accused the US of taking steps to 'seriously undermine' that consensus. US officials had signaled in recent days that a call between the two leaders could help jump-start progress in expected upcoming trade talks, which had appeared to stall following the initial truce reached in Geneva. Update: Date: Title: Trump issues travel ban on 12 countries Content: President Donald Trump signed a proclamation yesterday evening to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks. The ban will fully restrict entry of nationals from the following 12 countries: People from these seven countries will have partial restriction: The proclamation includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, certain visa categories and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. The president made the final call on signing the proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, according to a White House official. He was considering it beforehand, but Sunday's assault put it into motion faster. Trump said in a video posted yesterday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world.' Update: Date: Title: Republicans downplay impact of Musk blasting Trump's signature legislation Content: Elon Musk lashed out yesterday at President Donald Trump's agenda bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' Both GOP leaders and White House officials are downplaying the actual impact of the tech billionaire's outburst, even as some vent frustration with Musk behind the scenes. White House officials, while annoyed by the matter, said they ultimately did not believe the comments would impact how senators vote on Trump's prized bill. Two administration officials even went as far as suggesting Musk's opposition could actually help Trump's measure, given how toxic the Tesla CEO has become over the course of his time in Trump's orbit. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune both evinced no worry whatsoever that it would change Republicans' minds or sink the massive border, tax and spending cuts package. While several GOP senators had been expressing doubts about the bill for weeks, none cited new concerns over Musk's comments. Republican leaders remain bullish that they can deliver the legislation to Trump's desk by July 4 — an ambitious timeline. Watch more from CNN's Kaitlan Collins: Elon Musk lashed out at President Donald Trump's agenda bill — which the president is pressuring GOP senators to support — calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' CNN's Kaitlan Collins reports. #cnn #news Update: Date: Title: Speaker Johnson says he will put DOGE spending cuts on House floor next week Content: Speaker Mike Johnson said yesterday that he will put the White House's spending cuts request on the House floor next week. 'Next week, we will put the rescissions bill on the floor of the House and encourage all our Members to support this commonsense measure,' Johnson said in a joint statement with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer and House Republican Chair Lisa McClain. The White House earlier this week sent the $9.4 billion spending cuts request — known as 'rescissions' — to Congress as it seeks to formalize the Department of Government Efficiency's slashes to federal funding. If the package comes to a vote, it can clear both the House and the Senate with a simple majority, meaning Republicans can advance it without Democratic support. Johnson said Monday that he expects there may be 'multiple' such packages coming to the hill in the next few months. 'It's a big priority for me,' Johnson said. Update: Date: Title: Senate leader sets ambitious timeline for vote on Trump's domestic policy bill Content: Senate Majority Leader John Thune is setting an ambitious timeline for a vote on President Donald Trump's domestic policy bill, with the goal of sending it to Trump's desk by July 4 after senators make changes to the House bill. 'I think we're on track — I hope, at least — to be able to produce something that we can pass through the Senate, send back to the House, have them pass and put on the President's desk by the Fourth of July,' Thune told CNN. He added his chamber would amend the House bill, but said 'it will have to be tracked fairly closely, obviously, with the House bill,' citing House Republicans' 'fragile majority' and how they had to strike a 'delicate balance' in the House GOP conference to adopt the package last month. However, Thune did acknowledge that 'there are some things that senators want added to the bill, or things that we would do slightly differently,' than the House. Pressed on whether he would consider overruling the parliamentarian if she objects to anything in the package, which must abide by strict budget rules, Thune insisted that 'we're not going there.' Thune also indicated that the Senate could move on sanctions against Russia before July 4, but noted that they are working with the Trump administration on timing so as not to disrupt negotiations. The resolution, led by Sens. Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal, currently has over 80 co-sponsors in the Senate.
