
From Peru to the papacy – meet Pope Leo XIV
Chicago-born Pope Leo XIV is the first American pontiff with deep missionary roots in Peru.
A trusted ally of Francis, he led the powerful Dicastery for Bishops before his election.
Known for his quiet leadership, he bridges reformist and traditional views within the church.
Robert Francis Prevost, the first pope from the United States, has a history of missionary work in Peru but also a keen grasp of the inner workings of the church.
The new Leo XIV, a Chicago native, was entrusted by his predecessor Francis to head the powerful Dicastery for Bishops, charged with advising the pontiff on new bishop appointments.
The sign of confidence from Francis speaks to Prevost's commitment as a missionary in Peru to the 'peripheries' - overlooked areas far from Rome prioritised by Francis - and his reputation as a bridge-builder and moderate within the Curia.
The 69-year-old Archbishop-Bishop emeritus of Chiclayo, Peru, was made a cardinal by Francis in 2023 after being named prefect of the dicastery, one of the Vatican's most important departments - and a post that introduced him to all key players in the church.
Vatican watchers had given Prevost the highest chances among the group of US cardinals to be pope, given his pastoral bent, global view, and ability to navigate the central bureaucracy.
Italian newspaper La Repubblica called him 'the least American of the Americans' for his soft-spoken touch.
His strong grounding in canon law has also been seen as reassuring to more conservative cardinals seeking a greater focus on theology.
'Can't turn back'
Following Francis's death, Prevost said there was 'still so much to do' in the work of the church.
'We can't stop, we can't turn back. We have to see how the Holy Spirit wants the church to be today and tomorrow, because today's world, in which the church lives, is not the same as the world of ten or 20 years ago,' he told Vatican News last month.
'The message is always the same: proclaim Jesus Christ, proclaim the Gospel, but the way to reach today's people, young people, the poor, politicians, is different,' he said.
Born on 14 September 1955, in Chicago, Prevost attended a minor seminary of the Order of St Augustine in St Louis as a novice before graduating from Philadelphia's Villanova University, an Augustinian institution, with a degree in mathematics.
After receiving a master's degree in divinity from Chicago's Catholic Theological Union in 1982 and a doctorate degree in canon law in Rome, the polyglot joined the Augustinians in Peru in 1985 for the first of his decade-long missions in that country.
Returning to Chicago in 1999, he was made provincial prior of the Augustinians in the US Midwest and later the prior general of the order throughout the world.
But he returned to Peru in 2014 when Francis appointed him as apostolic administrator of the Diocese of Chiclayo in the country's north.
Nearly a decade later, Prevost's appointment in 2023 as head of the dicastery came after Canadian Cardinal Marc Ouellet was accused of sexually assaulting a woman and resigned for age reasons.
The Vatican later dropped the case against Ouellet for insufficient evidence.
Prevost also serves as president of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Taking Your Phone To A Trump Protest Could Have Alarming Consequences
This weekend, Hina Sabatine will protest President Donald Trump's administration in Los Angeles and they won't bring their usual phone. 'We're protesting the administration, which is a lot scarier [than previous protests I've attended], because we've seen how Trump can lash out,' Sabatine said. For this upcoming protest, 'I'm bringing a burner phone which doesn't have my Touch ID or my face scan.'Sabatine is one of many who are rallying against Trump at thousands of expected 'No Kings' protests scheduled across the nation this weekend to reject authoritarianism and to counter Trump's military birthday parade celebration Saturday, according to the movement's website. These marches follow ongoing protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids targeting who has marched for a free Palestine and Black Lives Matter over the last decade, said they are now adding additional layers of phone security in response to Trump deploying the National Guard to Southern California. In addition to using an old Android phone with just a memory card for taking videos, Sabatine will also be putting that phone in a special pouch, known as a Faraday bag, that can block cell and Wi-Fi signals. 'Given that I am an immigrant, I'm just going to just do all the extra steps,' they said. Should you do the same? Many of us rely on our phones to travel and find our friends in crowds, but they can also reveal more about us than we would want ― especially to authorities. That's why one of the big questions you need to ask yourself is whether you should bring your phone to a protest. 'We get this question a lot, and I think it really depends,' said Anu Joshi, an American Civil Liberties Union's staffer who has led multiple 'Know Your Rights' trainings for the 'No Kings' marches. 'What we encourage people to do is just to consider the potential risks.' Your phone can track your real-time location, and you might not want federal authorities or law enforcement to be able to look up that you were at a protest through a potential subpoena.'Even if it's in airplane mode, there's a chance that your movements can be tracked,' Joshi said. 'The only way to ensure that you aren't being tracked through your phone is not bringing it at all.'That's because 'when you move, your phone is connecting to various cell phone towers. The most surefire way of preventing that from happening is turning your phone off,' said Alejandro Ruizesparza, one of the co-directors at Lucy Parsons Labs, a Chicago-based group of technologists and activists that runs digital security training said when they protest, they turn their phone off before they even leave their home, so it's less easy for cellular data to help determine where they were going that day. The other downside to bringing your phone is if it gets confiscated by officers, the data within it may get used against you. 'If you are detained or arrested, then your phone could be taken from you. And law enforcement has wide use of a number of forensic extraction devices,' said Bill Budington, an Electronic Frontier Foundation senior staff extraction devices can reveal private information, such as whether you attended a protest, your communications with sources and social media posts on sensitive topics, for example. 'And so those devices, especially if they're being used on an older device or a device that hasn't had operating system security updates in a while, will be able to more readily extract all sorts of information,' Budington said. If you don't want to leave your phone at home, you can leave it in your car, so that it 'becomes harder to pinpoint your whereabouts at any point,' Joshi suggested. Or leave it off during the protest. 'This should ideally prevent some level of tracking and the creation of data linking you to these protests,' Ruizesparza said. Although not bringing a phone at all makes it harder for surveillance, 'realistically, most of us want to have someform of communication and find it difficult to leave a phone behind,' Ruizesparza said. In these cases, privacy experts strongly recommend disabling biometrics like fingerprint recognition and Face ID if you bring your phone to a protest. That's because, in general, a memorized passcode has stronger legal protections against a court order compelling you to unlock or decrypt your phone. But when you enable biometrics logins, you may compromise your Fifth Amendment privilege against being compelled to incriminate yourself. 'As a practical matter, the protection is better too,' added Budington. 'Because if you are in a situation where you're detained, then regardless of a situation legally, a officer might be able to unlock your device without your consent just by taking your fingerprint and pressing it against the touch ID or showing it to your face.' Disabling biometrics can vary by device, but for Android 12 and later devices, you can enable Lockdown mode to temporarily disable fingerprint and facial recognition. For iPhones, you can go to Settings, find 'Face ID & Passcode' and turn 'iPhone Unlock' off. 'We really encourage people to disable those [biometrics] and instead to use a strong numeric or alphanumeric password to unlock your phone, to ensure that no one can unlock your phone without your consent,' Joshi said. As for tracking concerns, airplane mode is 'pretty good,' and can mitigate dangers of having your real-time location tracked by ads, Budington can also buy additional tech to help you block your location signal, but there are pros and cons. Faraday bags can help block signals 'a little bit more than airplane mode,' Budington said, especially if you forget to turn off certain settings. But he cautioned that by bringing one, 'you will reduce your ability to plausibly deny that you're part of the protest.'These are basic phone security considerations, but there are longer primers that can help you strategize how to secure your phone before and after protests. For example, 'if you take pictures at protests, you should take some extra time to blur out faces and possibly remove metadata. Signal actually has a blurring feature built in,' Ruizesparza noted. Above all, don't wing it. Creating a gameplan before a protest takes time and sometimes difficult conversations but 'ultimately, secure practices don't just keep the individual safe, but also keep the collective network around the individual secure as well,' Ruizesparza said. 'Practical safety and security is a simple act of solidarity.' And it gives you and your friends the reassurance that if 'it hits the fan, there's something we can do,' Ruizesparza said. So before you ask the question of whether or not you should bring your phone, ask, 'Am I going with someone? And will people know what to do ifsomething happens?' Ruizesparza said. Take it from Sabatine. Right now, they are planning to be the only one in their protest group who will have a burner phone, so that their friends can go phone-less. Beyond writing phone numbers of each other and of lawyers on their arms, Sabatine is also telling their parents and friends about their location for the protest, so someone knows where they will be. If it wasn't for the increased military presence in Los Angeles, 'I don't know if I would have gone the extra mile for security or safety,' Sabatine said. 'But because the forces are now different, I think that's what's making people pivot their action plans a little bit more and erring on the side of safety.' Does Border Patrol Have The Right To Go Through Your Phone? Here Are The Alarming Facts. There's 1 Way To Combat Trump's Immigration Crackdown — And It's Getting More Popular Why You Can (And Should) Opt Out Of TSA Facial Recognition Right Now


New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
Once-Powerful Illinois Democrat Sentenced to 7.5 Years in Prison
Michael J. Madigan, once among the most powerful figures in Illinois politics, was sentenced on Friday to 7.5 years in prison and a $2.5 million fine for his role in a bribery scheme born of the old Chicago political machine, which traded government access and contracts for jobs and favors. Mr. Madigan, a Democrat, was convicted in federal court in February of 10 criminal counts that included conspiracy, bribery and wire fraud. The jury in the case, which deliberated for 11 days, delivered a split verdict, acquitting him on seven more charges he faced, including attempted extortion. He has denied any wrongdoing, and testified during the trial that he was simply trying to help his constituents. On Friday, Mr. Madigan addressed the court before the sentence was read. 'I'm truly sorry for putting the people of the state of Illinois through this,' he said. 'I tried to do my best. I am not perfect.' Before reading the sentence, Judge John Robert Blakey of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois admonished Mr. Madigan, saying that he gave false testimony during the trial as 'part of a willful attempt to mislead the jury.' 'You lied,' he said. 'You did not have to. You had a right to sit there and exercise your right to silence. But you took that stand and you took the law into your own hands.' Mr. Madigan, 83, was indicted in March 2022, accused of soliciting bribes from Commonwealth Edison, an electrical utility known as ComEd. Prosecutors said the utility hired associates of Mr. Madigan as subcontractors who performed little or no work, in exchange for his support of state legislation that benefited the company. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Fox News
12 hours ago
- Fox News
Trump Polls Best on...Immigration
The Left is going to be furious over the latest polling on immigration… I'm Tomi Lahren, more next. By the looks of the overtaken streets in deep blue cities like LA, Chicago and New York, you may be tempted to think the president is underwater on his handling of illegal immigration…but NOPE! Actually, according to recent polling by CBS/YouGov 54% of US adults approve of the deportation effort compared to 46% who disapprove of it. This survey was conducted prior to the LA raids and riots but I'd venture to guess after looking at the absolute anarchy in the streets, foreign flags, and utter disregard for the rule of law, the approval numbers might actually tick UP! Of all the measures, President Trump polls BEST on immigration! This polling shouldn't be surprising, Donald Trump RAN on, and I argue, WON on immigration and mass deportations. He promised the largest mass deportation effort in American history to correct the Biden open border invasion and now he's following through. Democrats would be wise to adjust their radical open border views but I won't count on that one! I'm Tomi Lahren and you watch my show 'Tomi Lahren is Fearless' at Learn more about your ad choices. Visit