logo
20 months after residents forced to evacuate, troubled Edmonton condo sells for $5.1M

20 months after residents forced to evacuate, troubled Edmonton condo sells for $5.1M

Yahoo20-05-2025

A north Edmonton condo evacuated nearly two years ago over fears the building could collapse has been sold.
The long-awaited sale will offer some financial reprieve to previous residents of Castledowns Pointe, which has sat vacant since September 2023.
Harmani, an Alberta-based developer and rental company, purchased the property for $5.1 million with plans to repair the existing structure and rent its 83 units once reconstruction is complete.
When it was first put on the market in mid-2024, it had been listed for just under $17 million.
The deal, approved in Edmonton's Court of King's Bench, closed on April 21.
Condo board president Susan Strebchuk said the sale is a welcome sign of closure for its former residents but added there's still a long road ahead.
"There is relief that it's going to be done, but it's not," Strebchuk said.
The sale proceeds will take months to be distributed, with owners not likely to see anything until October or November, Strebchuk said.
And their share will be a "drop in the bucket" against the mounting costs they've paid for repairs, condo fees and mortgage payments on homes that were no longer habitable, Strebchuk said.
"The damage that's been done to either your financial standing — or even your ability to move on from this — is not going to be recovered through whatever funds you will get," Strebchuk said.
Debts to the condo board will be settled before any proceeds from the sale are distributed to owners, she said.
"There is still lots of work to do," Strebchuk said. "We will all be very relieved when we're done."
The problems with Castledowns Pointe, constructed in 1999 at 12618 152nd Ave., first surfaced in March 2023 after a fire ripped through the fourth floor.
Investigators assessing the damage discovered dangerous structural flaws unrelated to the fire damage. The building does not match the architectural designs on record and does not comply with the building code.
In September 2023, when the extent of the structural issues was made clear in an engineering report, evacuation orders were issued.
Residents were given hours to leave their homes over concerns that the building might collapse.
In January 2024, owners opted to sell and cut their losses rather than attempt to repair the building. The building and land went on the market early last summer with an asking price of $16,950,000.
The court-sanctioned sale has been a long, complicated process.
An unconditional offer of $6.25 million from Cormode and Dickson Construction Ltd. was accepted but faced delays as the Edmonton construction company sought repeated extensions.
Then, a flood in January 2025 caused more than $500,000 in damages, and the deal collapsed altogether.
A clause in the offer contract allowed the company to walk away. With their offer rescinded, the building was placed back on the market.
An offer from Harmani Sale Inc. was accepted by the condo board and approved by the court last month. As part of the deal, some proceeds from the sale will be held back to cover the cost of flood repairs.
Harpreet Singh, co-founder of Harmani Rentals, said the company is eager to start work as soon as city permits are approved. The company will work closely with engineers and city officials to assess how the building's flaws can be fixed.
He expects reconstruction will take at least 18 months before the building will be added to Harmani's portfolio of rental buildings. That timeline could change once crews start ripping out walls and investigating hidden parts of the structure.
"There are certain areas of the building that we want investigated to make sure the structural solution that we're planning with our engineers, and with the City of Edmonton, works," Singh said.
"The key is safety and structure first and then we will go from there."
A previous assessment estimated it would cost more than $7 million to shore up the existing structure.
The Harmani group of companies has previously taken on other problematic properties, including foreclosed buildings and sites shuttered due to health violations, he said.
Even with the added cost and complication, they're eager to "revive the property," Singh said, adding there will be "no shortcuts" on safety and the company will be transparent with the public and future tenants.
If the structural issues are deemed too severe to repair, they will demolish and rebuild, Singh said.
"This is a high-profile situation. There are structural issues and there's safety concerns. Those need to be addressed," he said.
"As a developer, we need to make sure that everybody is safe in the building, that the building is safe. And if it isn't, we're going to knock it down."
Once sale proceeds are distributed, the condo board will dissolve. Strebchuk said there are no plans to pursue a lawsuit for the financial losses suffered by owners.
As Strebchuk reflects on the loss of her home, there is a pang of anger and disbelief.
Strebchuk said Alberta needs to better protect condo owners, ensure inspectors are more tightly regulated, and that builders responsible for structural flaws can be held liable.
She said the case should have brought about change but, instead, she feels owners have been forgotten.
"We all wish that this never happens to anybody else," she said. "But, through all of this, we haven't seen anything that has changed that would protect owners.
"And that's a little bit of a bitter pill for us to swallow."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

See Purdue's 50-year plan to transform downtown Indianapolis campus with high-rises
See Purdue's 50-year plan to transform downtown Indianapolis campus with high-rises

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

See Purdue's 50-year plan to transform downtown Indianapolis campus with high-rises

Over the next 50 years, Purdue University plans to transform its downtown Indianapolis campus into an urban hub with high-rise buildings hosting up to 15,000 students, according to a new master plan. Today, Purdue's 28-acre sliver of land wedged between Indiana Avenue and Michigan Street on downtown's west side — roughly the same acreage as the parcel on which Lucas Oil Stadium and its south parking lot sit — is home to three parking garages and five expansive parking lots. A conceptual master plan approved by Purdue's Board of Trustees June 6 envisions 16 new buildings on that site, featuring 4.5 million square feet and about 3,500 student beds. With leasing agreements at nearby apartments, Purdue expects to offer students more than 5,300 beds downtown. The plan foresees an increase in Purdue's student enrollment in Indianapolis from about 2,800 in fall 2024 to 15,000 by fall 2075. Despite the dense development, the plan sets aside about 60% of the downtown acreage for open spaces where students can gather and walk, according to Maryland-based architecture firm Ayers Saint Gross, which designed the 50-year master plan. Construction on the campus' main building, the 15-story Academic Success Building near the intersection of West and Michigan streets, began this April. The $187 million facility with classrooms, lab space, dining halls and student housing will be complete around May 2027. The long-term plan comes as Purdue and Indiana University in Indianapolis jostle for position on the west side of downtown following the 2024 split of the two schools' joint urban campus, IUPUI. As Purdue updates its plans, IU has allotted hundreds of millions of dollars to build multiple major facilities, including an 11-story School of Medicine building and a 4,500-seat athletics center, on its downtown campus in the next few years. IUPUI split: Indiana Ave. fell as IUPUI rose. After Purdue and IU split, can they help renew the Avenue? After the IUPUI division, IU retains most of the 536-acre downtown campus and enrolled more than 25,000 students in fall 2024. IU also owns the 28-acre wedge of land where Purdue will expand between Indiana Avenue to the north, Michigan Street to the south and Blake Street to the west. Purdue has signed a 100-year lease to use the property. Purdue is expanding into Indiana's capital city in part to ease the strain on housing and other facilities at the West Lafayette campus, which now enrolls an all-time high of more than 55,000 students. University leaders have also announced partnerships with Indianapolis-based science and engineering firms like animal health company Elanco and race car manufacturer Dallara. 'Rather than a single hub, Purdue is weaving into the fabric of the city's innovation and industry corridors," David Umulis, Purdue's senior vice provost for Indianapolis, said in a statement, "expanding from downtown all the way to the northwest side of Indianapolis." Email IndyStar Reporter Jordan Smith at JTsmith@ Follow him on X: @jordantsmith09 This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: What's in Purdue's 50-year plan for downtown Indianapolis campus

Debate heats up as Ocean City wind farm moves forward
Debate heats up as Ocean City wind farm moves forward

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Debate heats up as Ocean City wind farm moves forward

The Maryland Department of the Environment has made a final determination to approve permits for Baltimore-based US Wind Inc. to build the first large-scale offshore wind project near Ocean City. According to MDE, 'The proposed construction and commissioning of the offshore wind project would not cause violations of any applicable air pollution control regulations.' The decision, issued Friday, is the latest move in a multi-year, controversial effort to bring the plan to fruition. U.S. Wind has proposed 114 turbines that would be about 11 miles from shore at their closest, according to documents filed by the company with the Maryland Public Service Commission. The project would deliver 1,710 megawatts with turbines about 10 miles from Ocean City, according to its Maryland PSC application. The build-out would occur in several phases, with the first turbines intended for operation in 2028, according to the commission document. Opponents of the project, who include Ocean City Mayor Richard Meehan, argue that the wind farms could harm the environment and wildlife, degrade air quality and damage the region's tourism economy by marring the beach view. 'It is unconscionable to believe that the Maryland Department of Environment is ignoring pre-established permitting deadlines and fundamentally ignoring every shred of feedback offered by those who will be directly involved if this poorly conceived and potentially disastrous offshore wind project is allowed to move forward,' Meehan said in a statement Friday, following the MDE decision. 'The entire economy of our coastal resort town is dependent on tourism, our eco system, and commercial fishing, all of which will be significantly impacted if hundreds of these giant eyesores are constructed 10 miles from our beaches.' In October, the town of Ocean City filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the wind farm that is closest to beginning construction along its shoreline. The ongoing suit alleges that the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management violated federal law when it approved the construction plan for US Wind's project. There are several groups circulating petitions against the wind farms, including nonprofit Save Ocean City and Indian River High School Engineering Students Class Of 2025 & 2026. Ocean City resident Spencer Rowe said he is concerned about the environmental impact of the wind farms. 'In my experience, more and more people are starting to question the proposed wind farms, although many of them are not motivated enough to sign [petitions],' Rowe said in an email to The Baltimore Sun. 'Traveling [around] town, one sees a lot of bumper stickers and restaurant signs displaying opposition messages. I talk to a lot of people about this, and nearly everyone is opposed now that they are learning more about all the detrimental impacts, both to the offshore environment and to our priceless viewshed.' Maryland has made significant investments in wind energy in recent years. The US Wind project is projected to create 13,000 jobs and net more than $6 billion in economic benefits. For fiscal year 2025 alone, $5 million was allocated to build a wind energy workforce and supply chain. Under state law, Maryland must reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2045. The state also aims to develop up to 8,500 megawatts of offshore wind energy by 2031. Despite some expressing environmental and economic concerns, others continue to support the development of offshore wind farms. In a letter to The Sun, Berlin resident Larry Austin Ryan outlined 10 reasons why people should not sign a petition recently sponsored by the Town of Ocean City to push wind turbines more than 26 miles off Maryland's coast. 'Wind power is the fastest growing energy industry in the world! Jobs in wind turbine technology are also one of the fastest growing areas of employment in living wage jobs,' Ryan wrote. 'The Ocean City area is guaranteed 60 jobs and there will be many more jobs in Salisbury and Baltimore in the manufacture and distribution of wind turbines and their components. With the addition of this many jobs, more visitors will have more discretionary income allowing them to enjoy the fruits of their labor in Ocean City.' 'Electricity produced by offshore wind will supply more than 750,000 homes and businesses on the Eastern shore,' Ryan added. 'It will ensure a large-scale improvement of our already inadequate electrical grid here on the shore and avoid a surcharge to Maryland ratepayers for having to import electricity from out of state. This will allow continued economic growth for all the shore in the 21 st century.' A petition to review MDE's decision must be filed by July 14 in the circuit court for the county where the permit application indicates the proposed activity will occur. 'The permits were issued after a thorough review of US Wind's application and following a public process,' an MDE spokesperson said in an email Saturday. 'Due to significant public interest, the Department of the Environment extended the time for the public to provide input. All feedback was carefully reviewed.' Aside from public debate, US Wind's project is facing legal and political hurdles. On May 5, Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown sued President Donald Trump's administration for freezing the development of offshore wind energy projects. Brown and a coalition of 17 attorneys general allege that the executive order threatens states' abilities to secure affordable energy sources, meet the increasing electricity demand, meet climate goals and disrupt billions of dollars in infrastructure and supply chain investments, according to the lawsuit. 'The president's actions violate federal law and will make it harder for us to help Marylanders keep the money they make. One of the best strategies for driving down utility costs is ramping up clean energy production through wind power,' Gov. Wes Moore said in a statement at the time. 'At a moment when families are feeling the strain of high energy bills, we should focus on cutting red tape, not halting critical infrastructure projects.' Have a news tip? Contact Todd Karpovich at tkarpovich@ or on X as @ToddKarpovich.

Road near bottlenecked I-77 Lake Norman exit to close for highway widening
Road near bottlenecked I-77 Lake Norman exit to close for highway widening

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Road near bottlenecked I-77 Lake Norman exit to close for highway widening

Crews will temporarily close a road near a Lake Norman-area retail center anchored by Belk, Kohl's and Big Lots for the $249 million N.C. 150 widening project, state highway officials said Friday. Portestowne Way in Mooresville will be closed 8 a.m.-4 p.m. Monday, June 9, through Thursday, June 12, so crews can safely install a storm drain at the N.C. 150 intersection, according to the N.C. Department of Transportation. That's just east of Interstate 77 exit 36. Drivers will be detoured from Portestowne Way to Forester Street and Corporate Center Drive, and back onto N.C. 150. Crews plan to widen 15 miles of N.C. 150 from just west of the U.S. 21/N.C. 150 interchange in Mooresville to N.C. 16 Bypass in Catawba County. A 5.5-mile stretch from Greenwood Road in Terrell on the lake to U.S. 21 in Mooresville is under construction. Charlotte-based contractor Blythe Development LLC is expanding the highway from four to six lanes, officials said. Part of the stretch includes the old two-lane bridge over the lake. An additional bridge will carry westbound traffic, from Mooresville into Catawba County. Improvements to the bottlenecked I-77/N.C. 150 exit 36 interchange are planned.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store