Tsunoda baffled after qualifying last in Spain
BARCELONA, May 31 (Reuters) - Yuki Tsunoda was lost for an explanation after qualifying last for Sunday's Spanish Grand Prix while Red Bull teammate Max Verstappen secured third place on the starting grid.
It was the third Formula One weekend in a row that the Japanese, drafted in from Racing Bulls after two races as replacement for New Zealander Liam Lawson, had failed to make the top 10 shootout.
In Imola he had started in the pit lane after a big crash in the first phase of qualifying and in Monaco lined up in 12th place.
"Since FP1 (first practice) this weekend something has felt off, and it's a pretty tough result as we've tried everything," said Tsunoda.
"We've struggled with grip issues and the feeling of the car eating through the tyres all weekend. We tried to solve the issue as much as possible but I don't think we were able to cure it.
"We've tried multiple setups this weekend and it's strange because my lap today at the end of Q1 (the first phase of qualifying) was pretty clean... the pace didn't match when I was feeling more confident in the car."
Team boss Christian Horner said Tsunoda, who is out of contract at the end of the season when engine partners Honda are leaving Red Bull to start a new era with Aston Martin, had struggled.
"We went up a little on the downforce to try and help him but it's difficult to understand, we will need to have a look at it," added Horner. "Unfortunately, he will have quite a bit to do tomorrow to make his way up the pack."
While Tsunoda felt the pain, Racing Bulls' French rookie Isack Hadjar -- who has been touted as a possible replacement from the junior team -- continued to shine with ninth place on the grid.
Horner told reporters on Friday, when asked about future plans, that it was still early days for Tsunoda at Red Bull.
"He's still settling in. He's been in Q3, scored points, he's scored points from the pit lane. He's had a few incidents as well, so he has a long way to go. We'll decide. We've got plenty of time on our side," he added.
"I think the only thing that we can do is give him time and support and try and get a set-up that he's got confidence in. Driving these cars is all about confidence, and that's what he needs to find.
"I think he'll get there. He's fast. He's just got to piece it all together. We keep seeing flashes of performance. We just need to see him put it all together. I think he's capable of that."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
From Labour on winter fuel payments to a tractor encounter: Edith Pritchett's week in Venn diagrams
From Labour on winter fuel payments to a tractor encounter: Edith Pritchett's week in Venn diagrams – cartoon
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
Blood donation: Rare blood donors wanted to help sickle cell patients
"I wouldn't say it's quite like a superpower but I do think it's amazing that something that you just happened to be born with can help so many people."Speaking inside the busiest blood donation centre in Europe, Julia Gryn, from Thornton Heath in south London, has popped into donate after 27-year-old is just one of about 100 donors on the NHS Blood and Transplant's (NHSBT) Rare Donor Panel. Out of about 800,000 blood donors, those on the panel make up just 0.01%.Speaking at London's West End Donor Centre on Margaret Street, she said: "I think it's really, really amazing that I can actually help someone with a genetic disorder." She added: "It's crazy to think that a single blood donation can help to save up to three lives." Julia's blood is rare because she lacks several of the most common antigens across multiple blood group the 350 known antigens, her unique combination does not include the K, M, S, Fya and Jkb, all of which are frequently found in the general blood type is especially important for those with sickle cell, a genetic blood disorder whereby patients develop antibodies against several blood types making it harder to find matching blood. Julia, who has donated blood since she was a teenager, was invited to join the Rare Donor Panel in May 2020, early in the Covid pandemic. "At the time, I thought my blood was completely ordinary," she joining the panel, she said it felt different from her regular donations."It feels much more personal. I'm told when a specific patient needs a closely matched donation, and I book in around that. Knowing there's someone waiting who needs exactly what I can give makes the experience feel more direct and meaningful."She added: "During my first donation, one of the team members told me that in their seven years working there, I was the first rare blood donor they'd encountered. That really stuck with me."Blood donation is an amazing thing - most people can do it, and it makes such a big difference." Dr Chiara Vendramin, speciality doctor in donor medicine for the panel said donors like Julia were difficult to find."Julia is a very special donor. She has been amazing through the several years that she has been donating."Rare donors are very important and they play a crucial role in our organisation because they allow us to meet the really complex blood requirements that we have for specific patients."Most of the blood of these blood requirements are for those with sickle cell disease."As for Julia, what would her message be to those worried about donating?"I would say it's honestly not as scary as some people think."I do get some of my co-workers and friends asking 'how does it go, is the needle really big?' Honestly, you don't even pay attention to it, it goes so quickly."Everyone is always so kind and I would say it's a small thing that you can really do to help and save lives."
The Guardian
44 minutes ago
- The Guardian
I got British citizenship via the five-year route. Labour's new 10-year rule will cause untold pain
There are many lies told by politicians when it comes to immigration in the UK, but none is bigger than the claim that it's all too easy. Too easy to enter Britain; too easy to be given handouts; too easy to acquire citizenship. The UK is presented as an inert country, passively receiving future Britons that it does not charge, test or, indeed, invite. The government's latest raft of policies to deal with the 'failed experiment' of 'open borders' is heavily influenced by this lie, as it is intended to make things harder for immigrants. One of those policies went broadly under the radar, a small technicality amid Keir Starmer's unsettling rhetoric, but it will have serious consequences. That policy is extending the period you're required to be settled in Britain before you can get permanent residency, and then citizenship, from five years to 10 years. As someone who became naturalised under the five-year route, my stomach sank when I saw the news. There is no automatic route to citizenship in the UK for foreigners, not through marriage to a British citizen or even birth on British soil to non-British parents; there has long been a residency requirement component. The 'settlement' route to citizenship is – or was – open to those who have worked and lived in the country legally for five continuous years, and their dependants. After that five years, one can apply for 'indefinite leave to remain' (ILR). After a minimum of a year on that status, one can apply for naturalisation, and then a British passport. If the government's new policies come to pass, the route to settlement will now take a minimum of 11 years, not including any time spent in Britain as a student or on other visas that don't count towards the settlement component. I know from experience that five years are already one long trial of keeping jobs against all odds and fighting sudden changes in the law. Doubling that time has ramifications that encompass everything from professional security to that supposed holy grail of immigration anxieties, 'integration'. The panic about settlement is misinformed by temporary patterns and faulty premises. After Brexit and the pandemic, the need to support struggling health and care sectors led to a short-term increase in work visas. And what counts towards immigration numbers includes category errors, such as students, as well as an underlying assumption that all those who enter on long-term visas with a potential for settlement will remain. A report from 2023 indicates that, of those on work routes in 2018, only 38% still had valid or indefinite leave to remain five years later. By this measure, not all workers and their families, not even half, are likely to remain in the UK and apply for citizenship – the punitiveness of the extension is disproportionate to the pain it will inflict. It is particularly gratuitously cruel as the 10-year limit will be applied retroactively. Those who came to the UK based on the understanding that naturalisation was an option, and made big life arrangements on that basis, now find themselves literally unsettled. Once the proposed new rules were announced, I received a flurry of correspondence and calls. 'I feel it is unfair,' Christine (not her real name), a skilled worker who was one year away from securing ILR, told me. 'Moving to a new country is not a life decision that anyone takes lightly,' she said. These are people who are keenly aware that they have no recourse to public funds and risk having to pack up and leave if they lose their jobs. Christine understood that uncertainty was part of the deal – but thought it could be weathered if she followed the rules, with the promised reward at the end of being 'accepted into British society'. Vulnerability is a point that recurred in conversations. Even for those happy in their work, the prospect of being in bondage to their employer for double the anticipated time seized them with a sense of precariousness. Workers' visas are tied to their employers. They can't just leave or look for another job, unless the new employer is willing to take on the cost and effort of sponsoring them. The new rules limit career prospects, and will expose people to the whims of bosses and employers. Every bad day at work becomes not just that, but a worry that your whole life in the UK may be over. Long-term sickness becomes not just a health calamity, but an existential one. Then there is the cost and administrative burden. Each extension or renewal of a visa can cost up to almost £2,000, in addition to the £1,035 annual NHS surcharge that migrants need to pay (on top of national insurance contributions). Over a period of 10 years, a family of four could pay almost up to £35,000 in health surcharges alone. There are other potential cascading costs. Children without ILR, for example, will enter the university system as overseas students, and may be treated as such for fees purposes. Many of these human consequences have not been thought through. We know this because one chilling aspect of the new policies is the lack of specificity beyond the headline summary. The extension comes with the caveat that some people will qualify 'sooner based on criteria yet to be decided', and that there will be a 'consultation' later this year. To anyone who has dealt with the Home Office, this working-it-out-as-you-go-along language augurs the sort of unclear process that one immigrant in the throes of challenging a Home Office error once told me was akin to 'climbing a crumbling staircase'. Above all, the rule changes show how little our politicians really care about integration. They constantly cite it as the epitome of what earns the right to be in the country and accuse immigrants of not holding up their end of the bargain. But being stuck on work visas for year after year amounts to the opposite of integration. It means you can't vote, cannot have recourse to public funds if needed, cannot fully lean in to British society and participate with a sense of safety and belonging, as you're constantly trying to minimise costs in case a change in circumstances means relocating. The policy creates a tier of second-class worker, a sort of migrant labourer welcomed for their work and paying of taxes, but shut out from the privileges enjoyed by British nationals. That's the real cost of this shortsighted and heartless change. Those who come to the country and build a life, have or bring children, become part of the fabric of society, and work continuously throughout their naturalisation time might soon be prevented for more than a decade from having a relationship with the British state that is defined by anything more than fear and anxiety. If there were ever a 'failed experiment', this is it. Nesrine Malik is a Guardian columnist
