Brazil set to reshape internet law as Supreme Court favours stricter rules on X, TikTok and Meta platform
BRASILIA, June 12 — Brazil's Supreme Court reached a majority yesterday in favor of toughening social media regulation, in a groundbreaking case for Latin America on the spread of fake news and hate speech.
The South American country's highest court is seeking to determine to what extent companies like X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook are responsible for removing illegal content, and how they can be sanctioned if they do not.
The judges' final ruling will create a precedent that will affect tens of millions of social media users in Brazil.
At issue is a clause in the country's so-called Civil Framework for the Internet—a law in effect since 2014 that says platforms are only responsible for harm caused by a post if they ignore a judge's order to remove it.
By Wednesday, six of the court's 11 judges had ruled in favor of higher accountability, meaning sites should monitor content and remove problematic posts on their own initiative, without judicial intervention.
One judge has voted against tougher regulation, and four have yet to express an opinion.
'We must, as a court, move in the direction of freedom with responsibility and regulated freedom, which is the only true freedom,' Judge Flavio Dino said during Wednesday's session, broadcast online.
Not doing so would be like 'trying to open an airline without regulation in the name of the right of free movement,' he added.
Google, for its part, said in a statement that changing the rules 'will not contribute to ending the circulation of unwanted content on the internet.'
Coup plot
Alexandre de Moraes, one of the court's judges, has repeatedly clashed with X owner Elon Musk and various right-wing personalities over social media posts.
The review is taking place in parallel with the Supreme Court trial of far-right former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is alleged to have collaborated on a coup plot to remain in power after his 2022 election defeat.
Prosecutors say Bolsonaro's followers used social media to lie about the reliability of the electoral system and plot the downfall of successor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Last year, Moraes blocked X for 40 days for failing to comply with a series of court orders against online disinformation.
He had previously ordered X to suspend the accounts of several Bolsonaro supporters.
Musk and other critics say Moraes is stifling free speech, and US President Donald Trump's administration is weighing sanctions against the judge, whom Bolsonaro accuses of judicial 'persecution.'
Lula, who emerged the victor in the tightly-fought 2022 election against Bolsonaro, is advocating for 'accelerating regulation' of online platforms. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
3 hours ago
- Barnama
Economic News Reporting Skills Pivotal As Tariffs Dominate Global Headlines
United States (US) President Donald Trump's shocking 'Liberation Day' announcement on April 2 to impose debilitating tariffs on 168 countries, including Malaysia, precipitated what was surely almost exclusive coverage of tariffs internationally for the trade war he started as a result. KUALA LUMPUR, June 13 (Bernama) -- Journalists are keenly aware that knowledge in business and economics reporting is a pivotal component in covering domestic, regional and international issues competently, with tariffs now dominating global headlines. And if the sudden imposition of tariffs was not enough, the daily flip-flops by the Trump administration, the 90-day pause, the US Federal court ruling the tariffs unlawful, the appeals court reinstating them, and the on-and-off trade tension between economic superpowers, the US and China, have only added to the overall confusion. Ironically, even American politicians supporting Trump's policies did not fully comprehend what they were and how they would raise the prices of goods for which American consumers would ultimately pay. Undeniably, journalists from all over scrambled to Google searches seeking information on tariffs, which are actually taxes or levies imposed on imports into the US. But there is no time to complain, and neither can we complain, for it is incumbent upon us to tell the story to the world not only daily but on a real-time basis. More often than not, we are called upon to do too many things. This is a lot for journalists in Malaysia and elsewhere to digest. As the common adage goes, journalists can be 'a jack of all trades and master of none.' This entails reporters who cover other beats to apprise themselves of what tariffs mean, their impact on economies, on business and break them down to explain in simple terms how it affects the everyday lives of global citizens. Veteran business journalist and former editor of Malaysian Business and Focus Malaysia, Charles Raj, opines that knowledge of business and economic news in reporting is important, as nearly every area of journalism today involves it. For example, crime and court reporters will need to be familiar with business and finance when reporting on commercial crime stories and financial and business-related court cases, said Charles, who has been a journalist for 40 years and is now a media consultant. Even reporters on the political beat must understand data on economics, gross domestic product (GDP) or growth figures, trade and financial statistics as well as investments, he told Bernama ahead of the National Journalists' Day (HAWANA) 2025 themed "Journalism in the New Era: Embracing AI, Safeguarding Ethics' to be officiated on June 14 by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Business journalism specialisation makes career shifts more achievable But there is a silver lining to all this. 'A business reporter has a faster route to specialisation on economics, finance, markets, commodities and corporate moves which lead to stronger access to influential sources,' says Datuk Yong Soo Heong, the president of the Malaysian Press Institute (MPI). 'The analytical skills and understanding of business and industry through business reporting make career shifts into communications, investor relations, financial public relations or even corporate strategy roles more achievable,' he said. Yong, who is the former general manager of the Malaysian National News Agency (Bernama), with a total of 42 years of experience in journalism, 30 of which were in business journalism, quipped that 'this niche expertise also leads to higher salaries.' Some business reporters transition into greater editorial leadership roles or jobs with global relevance because business stories like the ongoing tariffs issue have major international dimensions, he said. Looking back, the Asian financial crisis in 1998, where Malaysia imposed capital controls to insulate the ringgit against excessive market speculation, can be considered a watershed event for reporters of that era. The fact that it affected life not only in Malaysia but regionally as well forced even general news reporters who were more adept at covering politics, education, sports, health, and accidents to also cover business and economics news, for these issues now made headlines on a daily basis. Initially, it was incumbent mainly on the business reporters who cover markets to churn out economic news stories on the financial difficulties, lay-offs, corporate closures and bailouts to tide the country over the financial crisis. It was a crisis indeed as higher prices and costs were the adverse results from the ringgit's plunge to as low as RM5.20 at one point against the US dollar in the foreign exchange market, then affecting all and sundry. No longer could one attempt to write banking and financial news and not know that when the ringgit's numerical figures go up vis-à-vis other currencies comparatively, it means its value has actually depreciated and not the other way around. Like court reporting, economic news reporting can be somewhat intricate, demanding a certain amount of understanding of economic and trade policies. Those covering the Prime Minister's beat have to be well read on how markets function, the intricacies of the forex market, how currencies are traded, interest rate fluctuations, takeovers and mergers, bonds and sukuk issuance, as well as GDP and inflation data, which eventually evolved into politically sensitive matters. As stock markets roiled and companies closed down, Malaysian journalists brought news to the people of the measures taken by the government to mitigate the impact of the economic crisis and reassure the public. Obviously, the ensuing higher costs from costlier imports impacted the everyday life of Malaysians, for which daily reports were the order of the day. For instance, parents financing their children's overseas education suddenly found themselves in a financial quandary, having to pay almost double for the fees overnight. This was due to the marked depreciation of the ringgit against a basket of foreign currencies, which included the US dollar, British pound, major European currencies like the Deutschemark, as well as the Japanese yen and Australian dollar – destinations frequented by Malaysian students seeking tertiary education overseas. Street vendors and gig workers must understand how money moves, as it affects all Veteran broadcast journalist and Bernama TV English Current Affairs producer, Gerard Ratnam, said there was a time when business news was just for boardrooms. 'But today, even the street vendor or gig worker needs to understand how money moves as it affects all of us. 'Take the word 'tariff' for example, and how it has become coffee shop talk. It is interesting to see how everyday people talk about it — and that is why business reporting is more important than ever, because today everyone needs to be in the know,' he said. Just recently, it could be anybody's guess that the most-written and quoted word at the 46th ASEAN Summit and related summits with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and China, as well as ASEAN Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meeting in May, chaired by Malaysia, would undoubtedly have been 'tariffs.' The advantages that reporters nowadays have compared with their counterparts during the 1998 Asian financial crisis were the wide availability of information on the Internet, serving as vital background material. Transcription apps and AI chatbots are modern-day tools for journalists Technological advances such as electronic mail or emails, WhatsApp social media services on their mobile phones, transcriptor applications whereby volumes of audio recordings can be converted into written text within a matter of minutes, come in handy to facilitate the dissemination of news quickly on a real-time basis. Even more useful is the availability of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots such as ChatGPT that can write news stories for the reporter in a matter of seconds, which many reporters of the days gone by might argue as killing journalistic creativity and worse still, smacking of plagiarism - a taboo in journalism. Nevertheless, that is a topic for a later debate, but it is undoubtedly a new era for journalism, thanks to technology and AI. But now what matters most to journalists, both seasoned practitioners as well as newbies, is to arm themselves with knowledge to comprehend business and economic news, trade tensions, free trade agreements and import levies. By better understanding what is happening to the world due to the imposition of tariffs, they can write their stories in as simplistic a manner as possible and demystify complex issues, and in the process adhere to the often-used adage in newsrooms that even housewives should understand the most intricate of issues affecting the economy. As media practitioners celebrate HAWANA 2025, new reporters and students bent on pursuing journalism as a career might ask how one becomes a specialist in economic news and business reporting. The tools are similar to other journalistic disciplines, which include expanding one's knowledge via constant and voluminous reading, making contacts, writing as much as possible and as often as possible, but most importantly, being passionate about journalism by treating it as a vocational calling. -- BERNAMA BERNAMA provides up-to-date authentic and comprehensive news and information which are disseminated via BERNAMA Wires; BERNAMA TV on Astro 502, unifi TV 631 and MYTV 121 channels and BERNAMA Radio on FM93.9 (Klang Valley), FM107.5 (Johor Bahru), FM107.9 (Kota Kinabalu) and FM100.9 (Kuching) frequencies. Follow us on social media : Facebook : @bernamaofficial, @bernamatv, @bernamaradio Twitter : @ @BernamaTV, @bernamaradio Instagram : @bernamaofficial, @bernamatvofficial, @bernamaradioofficial TikTok : @bernamaofficial
Borneo Post
3 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Judge orders Trump to return control of National Guard to California
A man stands in front of a row of California National Guard members and waves a combination US and Mexican flag during ongoing protests in response to federal immigration operations outside the Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles, on June 12, 2025. — AFP photo LOS ANGELES (June 13): A judge has ordered Donald Trump to return control of the California National Guard to the state, saying the president's decision to deploy them to protest-hit Los Angeles over Governor Gavin Newsom's objections was 'illegal.' 'His actions were illegal … He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith,' US District Judge Charles Breyer wrote of the president in the ruling, seen by AFP. However, he paused the order until 12pm local time (1900 GMT) Friday — and the White House almost immediately launched an appeal that could make it all the way to the Supreme Court. 'Donald Trump will be relieved of his command at noon tomorrow,' Newsom said in televised comments after the ruling was issued. 'He is not a monarch, he is not a king, and he should stop acting like one,' the 57-year-old Democrat said. Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard — a reserve force — and deploy them in California over the objection of the state governor was one not taken by a US president since 1965. The Republican has argued he did so because protests in Los Angeles against immigration raids ordered by his administration had gotten out of control, and the city was 'burning.' But Newsom and local law enforcement have stated repeatedly that there was no need for the deployment, and the protests have been mostly peaceful and contained to a few city blocks — albeit tarnished by some spectacular violence, including the torching of several cars. Critics have accused Trump — who also deployed 700 active Marines to the sprawling city — of exaggerating the crisis and exceeding his authority to conduct a power grab. Breyer's 36-page opinion said the violence fell 'far short' of the 'rebellion' Trump described to justify calling in the guardsmen. There was 'no evidence of organized, as apart from sporadic or impromptu, violence' during the protests, which first broke out in Los Angeles on Friday, he said. 'Nor is there evidence that any of the violent protesters were attempting to overthrow the government as a whole; the evidence is overwhelming that protesters gathered to protest a single issue — the immigration raids.' Breyer also wrote that he was 'troubled' by the implication that 'protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion.' There was no immediate reaction from the White House to the ruling. — AFP california Charles Breyer donald trump Gavin Newsom US National Guard
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Judge orders Trump to return control of National Guard to California: ruling
Los Angeles, United States: A judge has ordered Donald Trump to return control of the California National Guard to the state, saying the president's decision to deploy them to protest-hit Los Angeles over Governor Gavin Newsom's objections was 'illegal.' 'His actions were illegal ... He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith,' US District Judge Charles Breyer wrote of the president in the ruling, seen by AFP. However, he paused the order until 12 pm local time (1900 GMT) Friday -- and the White House almost immediately launched an appeal that could make it all the way to the Supreme Court. Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard -- a reserve force -- and deploy them in California over the objection of the state governor was one not taken by a US president since 1965. The Republican has argued he did so because protests in Los Angeles against immigration raids ordered by his administration had gotten out of control, and Los Angeles was 'burning.' But Newsom and local law enforcement have stated repeatedly that there was no need for the deployment, and the protests have been mostly peaceful and contained to a few city blocks -- albeit tarnished by some spectacular violence, including the torching of several cars. Critics have accused Trump -- who also deployed 700 active Marines to the sprawling city -- of exaggerating the crisis and exceeding his authority to conduct a power grab. Breyer's 36-page opinion said the violence fell 'far short' of the 'rebellion' Trump described to justify calling in the guardsmen.
