logo
The Senate just voted to block California's gas car ban

The Senate just voted to block California's gas car ban

Yahoo23-05-2025

For nearly 60 years, California has enjoyed the ability to set its own standards governing air pollution from automobiles, as long as they're more stringent than the federal government's. This rule, written into the Clean Air Act, was meant to recognize the state's longstanding leadership in regulating air emissions.
The U.S. Senate undermined that authority on Thursday when it voted 51 to 44 to revoke a waiver the Environmental Protection Agency approved allowing the Golden State to implement and enforce a de facto ban on the sale of gasoline-powered cars by 2035. The Senate also rescinded waivers allowing California to set stricter emissions standards for new diesel trucks, and mandating the adoption of zero-emission trucks.
Environmental groups quickly decried the votes, saying that California's standards are essential to protecting public health and achieving nationwide emissions reduction targets. The rules are seen as a sort of national benchmark since automakers don't create separate product lines: one for California and another for everyone else. A provision in the Clean Air Act also allows other states to adopt the Golden State's standards; 16 states and the District of Columbia have adopted many of the rules established by the California Air Resources Board.
'These standards are vital in protecting people from the vehicle pollution which causes asthma attacks and other serious health problems,' said Dan Lashof, a senior fellow at the nonprofit World Resources Institute, in a statement.
On a wonkier level, however, legal and policy experts objected to the way Senators rescinded California's waiver: They used the 1996 Congressional Review Act, or CRA, a law enacted to allow Congress to overturn some federal actions with a simple majority, rather than the usual 60 votes. Two government watchdogs said the act did not apply to the state's waiver.
'Republicans twisted the Senate's own rules,' Joanna Slaney, vice president for political and government affairs at the nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund, said in a statement. UCLA Law professor Ann Carlson warned in a blog post ahead of the vote that Congress 'may be opening up a Pandora's box it can't close,' and that 'there will be no limit on using the CRA to overturn all kinds of actions that the act doesn't cover.'
At the heart of the controversy is whether the air pollution waiver that the EPA granted to California last year qualifies as a 'rule' under the CRA. Both the Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan oversight agency, and the Senate parliamentarian, a nonpartisan appointee tasked with interpreting Congressional rules and procedures, issued advisory opinions earlier this year saying that it doesn't. Republican Senator MIke Lee of Utah appeared to agree with this interpretation: A one-pager on a bill he proposed to repeal California's waiver said that the exemptions 'cannot be reviewed under the Congressional Review Act because the waiver granted by EPA is not a rule as that term is defined in the CRA.'
Party leaders don't usually contravene the parliamentarian's guidance. If they do, they run the risk of their opponents doing the same when they are in power. 'Republicans should tread carefully today,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat from New York, told NPR on Thursday. California Senator Alex Padilla said in a statement that 'radical Republicans' had 'gone nuclear on the Senate rulebook.'
'It won't be long before Democrats are back in the driver's seat again,' Padilla added. 'When that happens, all bets will be off. Every agency action that Democrats don't like — whether it's a rule or not — will be fair game, from mining permits and fossil fuel projects to foreign affairs and tax policies.'
Dan Farber, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, told Grist that the Senate's capricious interpretation of the CRA means it could be used to rescind waivers from the Department of Health and Human Services allowing states to modify Medicaid requirements, or broadcasting licenses issued by the Federal Communications Commission. The act could also be used to revoke pollution permits that the EPA grants to states.
He clarified, however, that the Senate only nullified specific waivers in California affecting the sale of gasoline-powered cars. It did not repeal provisions in the Clean Air Act that allow the EPA to issue new waivers, as long as they're not 'substantially the same' as the rescinded ones. 'I think that California still has the power to put forward, and EPA has the power to approve, different emissions regulations in the future,' Farber said. 'Changing the deadlines by a few years could be enough.'
California's current standards require 35 percent of new cars sold within the state to be zero-emissions by 2026, ratcheting up to 100 percent of new sales by 2035. President Donald Trump revoked California's waiver allowing such regulations in 2019, during his first term, but that move was challenged in court and the waiver was restored by the Biden administration.
Although automakers have previously backed California's air pollution standards, industry groups cheered the vote on Thursday. John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group, said in a statement that the Senate deserved 'enormous credit.'
'The fact is these EV sales mandates were never achievable,' he said. 'Automakers warned federal and state policymakers that reaching these EV sales targets would take a miracle, especially in the coming years when the mandates get exponentially tougher.'
California Attorney General Rob Bonta objected to the Senate vote and vowed to challenge it in court. 'Reducing emissions is essential to the prosperity, health, and well-being of California and its families,' he said in a statement. Governor Gavin Newsom said undoing his state's air pollution rules risked 'ced[ing] American car-industry dominance to China.'
This story was originally published by Grist with the headline The Senate just voted to block California's gas car ban on May 22, 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Early voting begins today for mayor and other NYC primary races: here's what to know
Early voting begins today for mayor and other NYC primary races: here's what to know

New York Post

time15 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Early voting begins today for mayor and other NYC primary races: here's what to know

The Big Apple's future is on the line as early voting kicked off Saturday morning ahead of the June 24 primary election — as New Yorkers are now deciding whether the city will take an even more drastic shift leftward. Nearly all of the 11 Democratic candidates running for mayor of the liberal metropolis have been tripping over themselves on the campaign trial, trying to convince voters they're best equipped to take on President Trump. New York City's 5 million registered voters can cast early votes in the mayoral primary and other races citywide by dropping by polling sites through June 22, with the polls open most days from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. except June 17 and June 18 (10 a.m. to 8 p.m.) and June 20 (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.). 3 Former Governor Andrew Cuomo leads the pack of candidates for NYC mayor Matthew McDermott Ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo heads the crowded mayoral field, leading in nearly every poll, but socialist Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani has been narrowing the gap in recent weeks and is close behind. The winner will be a huge favorite heading into November's general election with Dems outnumbering Republicans six to one in NYC. Voters who flocked to an early voting site at the University Settlement Campos Plaza Community Center in the East Village were split on who they want to see become the city's next mayor. 'Cuomo!' declared Charles Sturckun, a 74-year-old attorney. 'He has managerial experience. You need somebody to stand up to Washington. I go for experience.' But Sarah Schulman, a 66-year-old professor, said she's backing Mamdani. 'I think he's fantastic. He will keep ICE out of our city. I also like his free transportation plan and extending rent control.' Hank Sheinkopf, a longtime Democratic consultant, said a Mamdani win would swing the city 'all the way to the left' to become the People's Republic of New York. With Mandani in charge, the NYPD would likely be gutted, social-services spending would skyrocket, and City Hall would be in locked in a futile battle with Albany and Washington to secure funds for the socialist's pie-in-the-sky campaign platforms like free buses and city-run grocery stores, warned Sheinkopf. 'It would be the beginning of the permanent revolution,' said Sheinkopf, adding Mamdani's chances of winning hinge on whether his strong base of younger New Yorkers comes out and votes. 3 Zohran Mamdani has been a top contender for City Hall amidst a crowded field. / MEGA Cuomo would be all but a shoo-in to capture the Democratic line if it wasn't for the rank-choice voting system implemented in 2021 for primary races for NYC posts. Voters can select up to five candidates per race — and in the order they choose. If no candidate tops 50% of 'first-choice' votes, the candidate with the smallest number of votes is knocked out of the race. Then, that candidate's second-choice votes get spread across the remaining candidates. The last-place finisher in this round gets eliminated. The process repeats itself until two candidates remain, and the person with the most votes wins. 3 Early voting in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor begins Saturday. Robert Miller The Working Families Party – which caters to socialists and the Democrats' far left majority – is actively using rank-choice voting to thwart Cuomo's candidacy. The WFP endorsed Mamdani as its top choice in mayoral race but is also calling on voters to select Comptroller Brad Lander second, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams third and Brooklyn Sen. Zellnor Myrie fourth. The party is also urging voters to leave Cuomo off their ballots. Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat not related to the speaker, is skipping the primary and running as an independent in November's general election, as is lawyer and former federal prosecutor Jim Walden. There's no Republican mayoral primary, but Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa is the presumptive nominee after securing endorsements from party leaders in all five boroughs. Besides the mayor, also on the line are party nominations for the citywide offices of comptroller and public advocate, the City Council's 51 seats, the borough president and district attorney posts in each of the five boroughs, and lower-level state and city posts. With Lander running for mayor, Brooklyn Councilman Justin Brannan and Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine head a slate of four candidates vying to capture the Democratic nomination to replace Lander. Two long-shot political newcomers – Peter Kefalas and Daniel Maio — are vying for the Republican line. Public Advocate Jumaane Williams is seeking re-election and will be opposed in the Democratic primary by Queens Assemblywoman Jenifer Rajkumar and Wall Street investor Marty Dolan. Gonzalo Duran, a former U.S. Marine, has already locked up the Republican line. East Village voters said they weren't willing to back disgraced ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner's political comeback bid. 'Oh no! I have a daughter,' said Aokeeyba Taylor, a 51-year-old building superintendent who voted for Sarah Batchu, a former aide for ex-Mayor Bill de Blasio, in the local City Council race over Weiner and three other candidates. 'You're sexting a 15-year-old girl pictures of yourself?' added Taylor, referring to Weiner being sentenced to 21 months in prison in 2017 for sexting a minor.

Trump shares enthusiasm for DC military parade ‘RAIN OR SHINE'
Trump shares enthusiasm for DC military parade ‘RAIN OR SHINE'

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump shares enthusiasm for DC military parade ‘RAIN OR SHINE'

President Trump on Saturday shared his enthusiasm for the day's festivities despite expected rainy weather conditions. 'OUR GREAT MILITARY PARADE IS ON, RAIN OR SHINE,' Trump wrote Saturday morning on Truth Social. 'REMEMBER, A RAINY DAY P[A]RADE BRINGS GOOD LUCK,' he wrote. 'I'LL SEE YOU ALL IN D.C.' Saturday marks the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, 248th anniversary of the adoption of the U.S. flag and the president's 79th birthday. Rain and thunderstorms are forecast for the afternoon in the nation's capital. Many of the festivities — from a wreath laying ceremony to an Army fitness competition to the highly-anticipated military parade — will take place primarily on the National Mall. The National Weather Service estimates a 30 percent chance of precipitation throughout the day as of Saturday morning, but heavy rainfall is most likely for the first 90 minutes or so of the parade. A flood watch will also be in effect. More than 6,000 soldiers dressed in modern and historic uniforms from every major conflict involving the U.S. military will march in the parade, which is estimated to cost more than $45 million. The Army also unveiled that tanks, artillery weapons, tactical vehicles and aircraft would be included in the day's events. In an earlier post Saturday, Trump wrote 'This is a big day for America!!!' He also wished his followers a 'HAPPY FLAG DAY.' The celebration comes as demonstrations, including those organized by the 'No Kings' movement, are expected across the U.S. in opposition to Trump's robust immigration agenda and his use of the military to quell protests. The organization is notably not rallying in Washington — billing it as a somewhat boycott of the military parade. The president earlier this week sought to deter protestors from disrupting the events, vowing they would be met with 'very big force.' When asked Thursday about the 'No Kings' protests, he quipped, 'I don't feel like a king.' 'I have to go through hell to get stuff approved,' he added, referring to many of his priorities that require Congressional approval. The turmoil comes after the Trump administration mobilized National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles earlier this week to crack down on protests taking place in the city against immigration raids. State and local officials, as well as law enforcement, have pushed back on the use of the military to quell the unrest, decrying it as an unnecessary step. Trump has in response doubled down on their decision in recent days, suggesting California officials should be thanking him.

Mexican Senate president says LA is essentially Mexico: I'd ‘pay for the wall' if it ceded US southwest
Mexican Senate president says LA is essentially Mexico: I'd ‘pay for the wall' if it ceded US southwest

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mexican Senate president says LA is essentially Mexico: I'd ‘pay for the wall' if it ceded US southwest

Mexico would pay for the U.S. border wall if the border were redrawn to match the 1830s, when much of the American Southwest belonged to Mexico, the country's Senate president quipped this week. Gerardo Fernández Noroña spoke in Spanish in Mexico about the U.S. federal immigration raids in Los Angeles, which have sparked violent riots and protests featuring demonstrators waving Mexican flags on U.S. soil. Critics, including senior Trump advisor Stephen Miller, have branded scenes of people waving the Mexican flag as evidence Los Angeles is "occupied territory." In that regard, Noroña recounted telling President Donald Trump privately in New York in 2017 that Mexico would build and pay for the border wall he wants — under one condition. Maxine Waters Torched By Feds For 'Taunting' Guardsmen And 'Spewing Lies' About Riots, Trying To Enter Jail "We'll do it according to the map of Mexico from 1830," Noroña said, producing a cartogram. "This is what the United States was in 1830, and this was part of Mexico. Read On The Fox News App "I was at Trump Tower when President-elect Donald Trump said ... I said, 'Yes, we'll build the wall. Yes we'll pay for it, but we'll do it according to the map of Mexico from 1830." The cession of that amount of territory would account for at least 48% of the U.S. electoral vote, a standardized measure of population density. 'I Call It A Rebellion': Maxine Waters' History Of Enflaming Crowds From Rodney King To Today The member of the left-wing Morena Party lamented that Mexico was "stripped" of about one-third of its territory via the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which ended the Mexican-American War. The U.S. won that war but also suffered steep losses, including former Tennessee Rep. Davy Crockett's last stand at the Alamo. The treaty established rights for people who lived in what was Mexican territory that was about to be governed only a few months later in 1849 by President Zachary Taylor, a decorated commander of that war. "We settled there before the nation now known as the United States," Noroña said, claiming the treaty was "not respected." He claimed disaffected residents of Laredo, Texas, established Nuevo Laredo on the Mexican side of the Rio Grande because they did not want to be Americans. "With this geography, how can they talk about liberating Los Angeles — and California — the U.S. government; liberate from whom?" he said. "[For] Mexican men and women, [that has] always been their homeland." The top official then claimed Angelenos do not need to know how to speak English because of the historic prevalence of Spanish there. "This is part of the U.S., yes, and the U.S. government has the right to implement whatever immigration measures it deems appropriate. But they have no right to violate the dignity of migrants ... no right to subject them to suffering, persecution and harassment."Original article source: Mexican Senate president says LA is essentially Mexico: I'd 'pay for the wall' if it ceded US southwest

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store