On 80th anniversary of VE Day, these photos show everyday life in 1945 Britain
From rationing to bomb shelters and, eventually, celebrating peace - this photo series captures life for those at the end of wartime Britain.
An estimated 50,000 people headed to Piccadilly Circus and nearby Trafalgar Square to celebrate the end of the Second World War on 8 May 1945, which was declared a national holiday in a radio broadcast the day before. (Getty)
The UK is celebrating the 80th anniversary of VE Day with official events, flypast, street parties and commemorative concerts taking place across the UK.
During four days of celebrations and pageantry for VE day, or Victory in Europe Day, the UK has been marking the 80th anniversary of the end of the Second World War in Europe.
Thousands of events have been taking place across the UK on public streets but also at special landmarks like Stonehenge, which will play host to beacon lightings, and the Tower of London, which has an art installation of 30,000 ceramic poppies.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Read more: The VE Day 2025 celebrations near you and how to get involved
VE Day celebrates the formal acceptance by the Allies of Germany's unconditional surrender of its armed forces on Tuesday, 8 May 1945.
Brits were told over radio broadcast on 7 May that the war in Europe had ended and VE Day would be a national holiday that would take place the next day. The Second World War formally ended on 2 September 1945, when Japan signed formal surrender documents.
So, as millions of Britons commemorate that historic moment today, Yahoo News's photo series below looks back 80 years at what life was like in 1945 Britain - and how the country celebrated the end of war.
The demolition of one of the remaining shelter bunks in a London underground station at the end of the Second World War. (Getty Images)
Although the war in Europe ended in May 1945, rationing of many products continued for years. And even though some items, such as fish, were not rationed, their availability and price were affected by the war. Here people queue outside a fishmongers at Elephant and Castle, south London, on 17 August 1945. (Getty Images)
London was bombed more heavily and more often than anywhere else in Britain during the Blitz, with many homes left damaged and destroyed. In bomb-scarred Battersea, south London, these children celebrated VE Day among the ruins of their homes. (Getty Images)
Schoolboys clamber up a fence at Oval in London to watch a cricket match. Many sports were halted during the war, with first-class cricket cancelled from 1940-44. This is likely the first time these children would have seen a match at this stadium. (Getty Images)
The 'tunnel rats', a group of maintenance men who kept Britain's railways in working order, enjoy a tea break on 20 October 1945. Britain's Victorian rail network was heavily relied upon during the war, needing a large workforce to maintain. (Getty Images)
Essex was targeted regularly by bombing raids due to its proximity to London and large coastline. Here, crowds of holidaymakers gather on the beach at Southend-On-Sea during the August holiday, 1945. (Getty Images)
Sugar, sweets and chocolate were all rationed from 26 July 1942 when people had a weekly ration of just two ounces (57g) of sweets or chocolate. This changed over time with sweet rationing ending in 1953. (Getty Images)
A huge poster, considered to be the largest in the world at the time, covering one side of Birmingham Town Hall, asking the city to raise £10m during Warship Week in order to 'adopt' a battleship. (Getty Images)
The Blitz had taken a heavy toll on London and it would take years to rebuild many parts of the city. Here a young boy is pictured holding a stuffed toy while sitting by ruins of building during the Second World War bombing of London, in January 1945. (PA/Alamy)
Residents in Islington, north London, have a tea party in the street on 21 May 1945 to celebrate the first Whitsunday (Pentecost) of peacetime. (Getty Images)
Soldiers returning to their friends and family at a London railway station, on 21 April 1945. Around 4.2m British servicemen and women were demobilised between June 1945 and December 1946, many leaving returned home with injuries, both physical and psychological. (Getty Images)
Rationing remained in effect until the 1950s. Here, Mrs Whitman, mother of sixteen, studies the family's ration books to work out what she can buy. (Getty Images)
Once the VE Day celebrations were over the country and its people still faced a number of economic challenges with the national debt increasing after the UK spent £7bn, or a quarter of the national wealth, on the war effort. Traffic in a street in Reading, Berkshire, circa 1945. (Getty Images)
Children's sport and education suffered during the war, with one in five of the country's schools damaged by bombing, hundreds being requisitioned by the government and many young teachers and coaches called up to the forces. Here a boxing instructor coaches his young pupil in the Hughes of London boxing pavillion at a Lancashire fair, in 1945. (Getty Images)
Post-war Britons struggled financially as the economy recovered. Here, women buy scarves recycled from RAF escape maps in a London shop in December 1945. (Getty Images)
A row of army ambulances still being manufactured at the Austin factory in Birmingham, on 11 August 1945. But beside them are a line of new post-war 10 horsepower Austin cars for civilian use. Car factories like Longbridge, in Birmingham, were crucial during the Second World War, shifting production from civilian vehicles to military vehicles and ambulances. (Getty Images)
Bathers at Tower Beach in London. (Getty)
Children in Brixton, south London, visit a public library located in their air-raid shelter. (Getty Images)
An east London small holders restocking sale in February 1945, where punters bought rabbits, chicks, hens and goats for their spring restocking. Many are keen judges of the livestock offered and much bargaining is done. Many who have surplus birds and animals bring them along for sale or exchange. (Getty Images)
How did Britain celebrate VE Day in May 1945?
Thankful to see the end of conflict in Europe, Brits took to the streets in their millions on Tuesday, 8 May 1945.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Spontaneous celebrations were held on local roads and famously in Trafalgar Square and at Buckingham Palace, where the Royal Family joined the estimated 100,000 revellers from the balcony.
Around the country, 42 million Brits revelled in impromptu street parties that took place with homes decorated with Union Jack flags and bunting bought without having to use ration coupons.
The UK had lost an estimated 384,000 military personnel in combat and had 70,000 civilian deaths, with some forces still fighting in Asia until August.
In Manchester, thousands of jubilant people gathered in Albert Square to listen to the prime minister's address, while in Liverpool, Castle Street was packed with crowds who were addressed by the city's lord mayor.
Impromptu tea parties sprung up across the country in celebration on 8 May, like this party pictured in Bristol. The south-west English city was targeted by the Nazi German Luftwaffe multiple times during the Second World War, most devastatingly during the Bristol Blitz of 1940 and 1941.
The jubilation and relief spilt over into the street with an estimated one million heading to central London to join the celebrations. This crowd was pictured swarming all over a lorry on VE Day in the capital. (Getty Images)
Members of the Auxiliary Territorial Service (ATS) are pictured here driving through Trafalgar Square in a service vehicle during the VE Day celebrations in London. The ATS was the women's branch of the British Army and whilst initially limited to roles such as cooks, clerks, storekeepers and drivers by 1943, about 56,000 women were serving with anti-aircraft units. (Getty Images)
Allied soldiers and others read copies of the hot-off-the-press Stars and Stripes military newspaper, announcing Germany's surrender, in London on 7 May 7 1945. The news was announced by radio newsflash that day, before celebrations began on 8 May. (Getty Images)
Lights atop the Palace of Westminster, including the Ayrton Light on Big Ben, were turned off to aid in the blackout regulations during the Second World War. Here the lights can be seen going back on at the during the VE Day celebrations in May 1945. (PA/Alamy)
Work patterns changed hugely during the war years with many women stepping into occupations typically held by men. Here woman celebrate VE Day in Manchester on 8 May 1945. (PA/Alamy)
Huge crowds gathered in George Square in Glasgow to sing and dance, and in Cardiff ration coupons were pooled to fund parties.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Read more: Town criers to lead more than 300 regional VE Day celebrations
Anticipation was high after a news flash interrupted regular radio programming on the evening of 7 May, announcing that prime minister Winston Churchill would brief the nation and a national holiday was declared for the following day.
St Paul's Cathedral survived two direct hits during the Second World War. The first bomb exploded at the east end of the building in October 1940, and another over the North Transept in April 1941. Here the UK's most famous cathedral is floodlit during the VE Day celebrations on 8 May 1945. (Mirrorpix)
Victory celebrations in central Birmingham on 15 May 1945. The city, a major industrial hub during the Second World War, arranged for a parade a week after VE Day. (Getty Images)
A happy group of revellers march down a London street on VE Day. London suffered heavily during bombing raids and revellers were only too keen to sing and dance together, joining conga lines in the streets, while strangers hugged and kissed. (Getty Images)
An Australian solider during VE Day celebrations on 8 May 1945. Many Australian soldiers served in the defence of Great Britain, including military personnel with the Australian Army, Royal Australian Navy, and Royal Australian Air Force. (Getty Images)
The next day, Churchill made a rousing radio broadcast from Downing Street, officially announcing the end of the war in Europe, before making his way to Buckingham Palace.
During the speech, repeated by actor Timothy Spall during the 80th anniversary celebrations in London on Monday, he told Brits: "This is not victory of a party or of any class. It's a victory of the great British nation as a whole."
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
As London danced and cheered, King George VI gave a speech, broadcast from bomb-scarred Buckingham Palace, thanking those 'who bore arms so valiantly on land and sea, or in the air, and all civilians who, shouldering their many burdens, have carried them unflinchingly without complaint".
Princess Elizabeth, the future Queen Elizabeth II, and her sister also Princess Margaret left the palace and walked incognito among the crowds to take part in the celebrations.
A postcard of a children's VE Day party held in Cornwall Grove, Chiswick, London, on 8 May 1945. The parties were often held in streets and roads, with these postcards produced afterwards in commemoration of VE Day. (PA/Alamy)
Pictured is an original VE Day postcard of tea party in Stanstead Abbotts, East Hertfordshire. Many houses displayed bunting and flags in a wave of patriotism after the war ended. (PA/Alamy)
Millions of people rejoiced after hearing of the German surrender, relieved that the war was finally over. Here jubilant people are dancing in the streets on VE Day on the 8 May 1945. (PA/Alamy)
The vast crowd outside the Ministry of Health, where PM Winston Churchill and his war cabinet members waved to the cheering thousands. (PA/Alamy)
Crowds of people also turned out to celebrate VJ Day (Victory over Japan Day), with some climbing on the Victoria Memorial on The Mall outside Buckingham Palace in Westminster, London, on 15 August 1945. VJ Day is the day Imperial Japan surrendered, bringing the Second World War to an end. (Getty Images)
Pictured are jubilant nurses celebrating VE Day in Liverpool on 8 May 1945. Thousands of Liverpudlians headed to Castle Street who were addressed by the Lord Mayor of Liverpool. (PA/Alamy)
VE Day was declared a public holiday on 7 May by radio broadcast, so many families and neighbours arranged spontaneous parties like this one pictured in Dunstan Street, Netherfield, Nottinghamshire, May 1945. (PA/Alamy)
On VE Day, PM Winston Churchill and members of the House of Commons informally attended a Thanksgiving Service at St Margaret's Church, London, England, amid cheering crowds. (PA/Alamy)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Table Manners And Etiquette Are Quite Different - Here's How
These days, the words "etiquette" and "manners" are used more or less interchangeably. Maybe etiquette is seen as a fancier set of manners -- the kind of fork-crossing, tea-stirring social cues you should learn lest you embarrass yourself in high society -- but for most people, they're seen as two words that mean "polite behavior." But in truth, these two words have distinct definitions: etiquette refers to the rules of social behavior, while manners refer to the way we abide by those rules. The foundations of etiquette, as Emily Post herself will remind you, are to be honest, respectful, and considerate. When you ask someone to pass you the salt at the dinner table, you're not making a request any reasonable person will say no to, but you ask all the same. Why? Because you're considerate of the fact that you're sitting at the dinner table as equals, and that it's not your place to issue an order. To do otherwise would be disrespectful -- so you say please, even if you aren't actually sitting at the table as equals. (King Charles III would probably say please if he asked you to pass the salt, wouldn't he?) Saying "please pass the salt" is the manner, while the ethos of respect and consideration that prompts it is etiquette. Read more: Here's How You Should Be Sharpening Serrated Knives This difference explains why some of the classic examples of etiquette you see in movies may seem bewildering to the modern eye. Does it really matter if you use your salad fork to eat the main course? Is it really such a travesty if you don't put your fork and knife in the proper position when you've finished eating? If you rest your elbows on the table when you eat, are you no better than swine in the eyes of society? The answer to these questions, of course, is no, because we don't live in an Edith Wharton novel. But these manners reflected the way different eras interpreted the code of etiquette. The rule against elbows on the table originated in medieval times, when people ate together at large rectangular tables and a pair of elbows in the wrong place could knock over a few goblets. The rules concerning cutlery communication came about as a way to let the servers know the status of your meal without interrupting your conversation with the other diners. And the array of different forks was nothing but a way of signifying social status. Nowadays, these rules may be less important in most settings while others, like ordering on-menu whenever possible or avoiding stacking your plates to make things easier on your waiter, become more important. But the etiquette -- the reasoning behind these rules -- remains the same. For more food and drink goodness, join The Takeout's newsletter. Get taste tests, food & drink news, deals from your favorite chains, recipes, cooking tips, and more! Read the original article on The Takeout.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman's Boyfriend Was 'Cut Off' by His Family for Choosing to Be with Her — but Now She's Not Sure She Even Wants Him
A 26-year-old woman says her boyfriend has been "cut off" by his family after he chose to move in with her — and she's now unsure if she wants to be with him She says he moved in with her and her daughter after several months of dating, and she now feels 'constantly overwhelmed' The woman sought advice on a popular community forum, where a number of people told her she needs to end the relationshipA woman says that her boyfriend has been 'cut off' by his family for his decision to move in with her — but now she's not even sure she wants to be with him. The 26-year-old detailed her experience on a forum on the U.K.-based community site a platform where women can seek advice from other women about interpersonal dilemmas. In her post, the woman says that she is in a 'fairly new relationship' with a 22-year-old man she's known online for 'years.' The woman explains that they only met in person in late 2024, but things 'progressed quickly' after that. She says he recently moved out of his mom's home to move in with her and her eight-year-old daughter — a decision that led to him being 'cut off' by his family due to cultural reasons. The problem? The woman says she is feeling overextended and is now having second thoughts about whether or not living together was the right move. 'I keep having thoughts like, 'Should he really live here?' and 'Am I better off alone so I can focus on myself and my child?' ' she confesses in the post. The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! 'I love him, but I'm also constantly overwhelmed,' she continues, before adding that her daughter has special needs and the majority of the mental load of maintaining the household falls on her. 'I'm mentally and physically burned out, trying to hold everything together. I feel like I never get proper alone time or space to reset,' the original poster (OP) says, adding, 'I'm often irritated around him for no clear reason, even if he's not doing anything wrong.' 'I don't want to lose him, but I feel disconnected, and I don't know how to tell what's burnout vs. what's a sign that this isn't working,' she says, while also saying that they both have 'trust issues' due to 'things that happened between us before.' 'Has anyone else been in this in-between place — loving someone, but not sure if being together is helping or hurting right now? How do you figure out what you actually need when everything feels too full to think clearly?' she asks at the end of her post. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The vast majority of commenters provided tough love to the OP, with many stating that they believe she moved in with her boyfriend much too soon — and that she should course-correct as soon as possible. 'You shouldn't be moving someone you barely know in with your [daughter]. Even if your child wasn't in the picture, though, it's a new relationship. You have enough on your plate. Ask him to leave," said one person. 'Oh, you have gone about this completely the wrong way, I'm afraid,' said someone else. 'Your relationship has alienated him from his family, which is going to put immense pressure on you both.' They added, 'I think you should tell him that he needs to go back [to] his family and end the relationship with you.' 'It's a ludicrously unwise decision to move in a man you hardly know with your young daughter. This is not the behavior of a mature parent making good decisions for her child,' said someone else. Read the original article on People


Fox News
11 hours ago
- Fox News
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle 'feared' King Charles delayed their kids' passports over royal titles: report
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle reportedly "feared" that the lengthy delay in the issuance of U.K. passports for their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, was due to King Charles III's alleged opposition to the use of their royal titles. According to the Guardian, the couple considered changing their family's last name to Spencer due to their "sheer exasperation" over the unexplained months-long wait for the legal documents. Per the outlet, the 40-year-old Duke of Sussex had a face-to-face discussion with his uncle, Earl Charles Spencer, about the idea of taking his late mother Princess Diana's surname for his family. However, the idea of the prospective name change was dropped when the passports for Harry and Meghan's son Archie, 6, and daughter Lilibet, 4, arrived almost six months after their applications were first submitted. According to the Guardian, the standard waiting period for passports in the U.K. is three weeks. "There was clear reluctance to issue passports for the kids," a source close to the Sussexes told the outlet. According to a source that spoke with the Guardian, British officials were allegedly "dragging their feet because the passport applications included the titles HRH (His/Her Royal Highness) for both children." The source went on to claim that "the king hadn't wanted Archie and Lili to carry the titles, most of all the HRH, and the British passports, once created, would be the first and perhaps the only legal proof of their names." Fox News Digital has reached out to Buckingham Palace for comment. A representative for Buckingham Palace told the Telegraph that they strongly deny that Charles or palace officials had any involvement in the delay regarding the passports for Archie and Lilibet. The spokesperson told the outlet, "No," when asked if the palace made any suggestion or raised any objection to the children's passports being issued with the HRH titles. Meanwhile, the source told the Guardian that "Harry was at a point where British passports for his children with their updated Sussex surnames (since the death of Queen Elizabeth II) were being blocked with a string of excuses over the course of five months." The source continued, "Out of sheer exasperation he went to his uncle to effectively say: 'My family are supposed to have the same name and they're stopping that from happening because the kids are legally HRH, so if push comes to shove, if this blows up and they won't let the kids be called Sussex, then can we use Spencer as a surname?'" Fox News Digital confirmed that Harry did have a meeting with Earl Spencer in which they discussed the name change. However, a source said that earlier reports that Earl Spencer told the Duke, "the legal hurdles were insurmountable," and his uncle "advised him against taking such a step" were "wholly inaccurate." A spokesperson for the duke told Fox News Digital, "We do not comment on private issues pertaining to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's children." According to the Guardian, the Sussexes faced multiple delays while trying to obtain their children's passports. The outlet reported that the children's passports were finally issued shortly after the couple's lawyers sent a letter to the U.K.'s Home Office in which they threatened to submit a data subject access request. Per the Guardian, the request "could have revealed details of the delays – and the nature of any behind-the-scenes discussions between British officials responsible for issuing the documents." Earlier this week, People magazine reported that Archie and Lilbet have Mountbatten-Windsor listed as their last names on their birth certificates. However, the family now uses Sussex as their last name, just as Harry was known as "Harry Wales" during his childhood when his parents held the titles of Prince and Princess of Wales. It's a tradition within the royal family for children to take their parents' titles as a surname. Harry and Meghan no longer use their HRH titles since stepping down as working royals in January 2020. At the time, Buckingham Palace said in a statement, "The Sussexes will not use their HRH titles as they are no longer working members of the Royal Family." However, the Sussexes announced in 2023 that their children would keep their HRH titles and the royal family's website updated their line of succession to include Prince Archie of Sussex and Princess Lilibet of Sussex, listed right after their father. "The children's titles have been a birthright since their grandfather became monarch. This matter has been settled for some time in alignment with Buckingham Palace," a spokesperson for the Sussexes confirmed to Fox News Digital at the time. According to the Guardian, "Prince Harry wants to keep the HRH titles for his children so that when they grow older they can decide for themselves whether they want to become working royals, or stay out of public life."