New solar panel farm planned for farmland
An energy company is proposing to build a solar farm in the Kent countryside.
SSE Renewables has opened a non-statutory consultation on the Shepway Energy Park project, which will span six sites in Romney Marsh, near Newchurch.
Local residents said they were concerned about the loss of farmland and feared the scheme would destroy the landscape.
According to SSE's project brochure, the scheme will "make a significant contribution towards the UK meeting its net zero targets". The company were contacted by the BBC.
SSE also said in its brochure that solar farms improved food security by addressing climate change and created new income streams for farmers.
The company says the scheme is considered a nationally significant infrastructure project and it will apply to the government, rather than the local council, for development consent in due course.
The current consultation runs until 13 June.
In addition to 200 megawatts (MW) of solar panels, the proposal also involves building a 400MW battery storage facility.
Amanda Farrant, who leads the campaign group Hands Off Our Marsh, told BBC Radio Kent she was concerned about disruption from construction vehicles.
Energy security and food security "can't come at the expense of each other", she added.
Ms Farrant, whose home borders the site, said the plans would "industrialise our village".
"I don't mind solar but just not so much of it in one place. It's huge. This is 1,000 acres of farmland," she added.
A spokesperson for SSE said: "We are in the early stages of defining the project and we are carrying out a full assessment of any impacts to the local area. Through this project we will proactively aim to implement positive improvements such as Biodiversity.
"Our proposals for Shepway Energy Park will not only help generate more renewable power in the UK and make a significant contribution towards meeting net zero targets but also deliver against local priorities around tackling climate change and generating more electricity from renewable sources.
"We look forward to this opportunity to engage with the local community on our plans during this consultation."
The Shepway Energy Park consultation comes after energy firm Low Carbon announced a proposal for an even bigger solar farm near Old Romney in November.
A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesperson said solar projects had "a rigorous planning process" where community views and environmental impacts are considered.
Follow BBC Kent on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
Proposed solar farm could power 140,000 homes
Plans for huge Kent solar farm rejected
Battery farms are 'emerging risk', says fire chief
Why more mega solar farms are coming to the countryside
Shepway Energy Park
SSE Renewables
Hands Off Our Marsh
The Planning Inspectorate
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
2 hours ago
- Fast Company
How Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' threatens to make U.S. energy dirtier and more expensive
When it comes to energy policy, the ' One Big Beautiful Bill Act '—the official name of a massive federal tax-cut and spending bill that House Republicans passed in May 2025 —risks raising Americans' energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions. The 1,100-page bill would slash incentives for green technologies such as solar, wind, batteries, electric cars, and heat pumps while subsidizing existing nuclear power plants and biofuels. That would leave the country and its people burning more fossil fuels despite strong popular and scientific support for a rapid shift to renewable energy. The bill may still be revised by the Senate before it moves to a final vote. But it is a picture of how President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans want to reshape U.S. energy policy. As an environmental engineering professor who studies ways to confront climate change, I think it is important to distinguish which technologies could rapidly cut emissions or are on the verge of becoming viable from those that do little to fight climate change. Unfortunately, the House bill favors the latter while nixing support for the former. Renewable energy Wind and solar power, often paired with batteries, are providing more than 90% of the new electricity currently being added to the grid nationally and around the world. Geothermal power is undergoing technological breakthroughs. With natural gas turbines in short supply and long lead times to build other resources, renewables and batteries offer the fastest way to satisfy growing demand for power. However, the House bill rescinds billions of dollars that the Inflation Reduction Act, enacted in 2022, devoted to boosting domestic manufacturing and deployments of renewable energy and batteries. It would terminate tax credits for manufacturing for the wind industry in 2028 and for solar and batteries in 2032. That would disrupt the boom in domestic manufacturing projects that was being stimulated by the Inflation Reduction Act. Deployments would be hit even harder. Wind, solar, geothermal, and battery projects would need to commence construction within 60 days of passage of the bill to receive tax credits. In addition, the bill would deny tax credits to projects that use Chinese-made components. Financial analysts have called those provisions ' unworkable,' since some Chinese materials may be necessary even for projects built with as much domestic content as possible. Analysts warn that the House bill would cut new wind, solar, and battery installations by 20% compared with the growth that had been expected without the bill. That's why BloombergNEF, an energy research firm, called the bill a ' nightmare scenario ' for clean energy proponents. However, one person's nightmare may be another man's dream. 'We're constraining the hell out of wind and solar, which is good,' said Representative Chip Roy, a Texas Republican backed by the oil and gas industry. Efficiency and electric cars Cuts fall even harder on Americans who are trying to reduce their carbon footprints and energy costs. The bill repeals aid for home efficiency improvements such as heat pumps, efficient windows, and energy audits. Homeowners would also lose tax credits for installing solar panels and batteries. For vehicles, the bill would not only repeal tax credits for electric cars, trucks, and chargers, but it also would impose a federal $250 annual fee on vehicles, on top of fees that some states charge electric-car owners. The federal fee is more than the gas taxes paid by other drivers to fund highways and ignores air-quality and climate effects. Combined, the lost credits and increased fees could cut projected U.S. sales of electric vehicles by 40% in 2030, according to modeling by Jesse Jenkins of Princeton University. Nuclear power Meanwhile, the bill partially retains a tax credit for electricity from existing nuclear power plants. Those plants may not need the help: Electricity demand is surging, and companies like Meta are signing long-term deals for nuclear energy to power data centers. Nuclear plants are also paid to manage their radioactive waste, since the country lacks a permanent place to store it. For new nuclear plants, the bill would move up the deadline to 2028 to begin construction. That deadline is too soon for some new reactor designs and would rush the vetting of others. Nuclear safety regulators are awaiting a study from the National Academies on the weapons proliferation risks of the type of uranium fuel that some developers hope to use in newer designs. Biofuels While cutting funding for electric vehicles, the bill would spend $45 billion to extend tax credits for biofuels such as ethanol and biodiesel. Food-based biofuels do little good for the climate because growing, harvesting, and processing crops requires fertilizers, pesticides, and fuel. The bill would allow forests to be cut to make room for crops because it directs agencies to ignore the impacts of biofuels on land use. Hydrogen The bill would end tax credits for hydrogen production. Without that support, companies will be unlikely to invest in the seven so-called hydrogen hubs that were allocated a combined $8 billion under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law in 2021. Those hubs aim to attract $40 billion in private investments and create tens of thousands of jobs while developing cleaner ways to make hydrogen. The repealed tax credits would have subsidized hydrogen made emissions-free by using renewable or nuclear electricity to split water molecules. They also would have subsidized hydrogen made from natural gas with carbon capture, whose benefits are impaired by methane emissions from natural gas systems and incomplete carbon capture. However it's made, hydrogen is no panacea. As the world's smallest molecule, hydrogen is prone to leaking, which can pose safety challenges and indirectly warm the climate. And while hydrogen is essential for making fertilizers and potentially useful for making steel or aviation fuels, vehicles and heating are more efficiently powered by electricity than by hydrogen. Still, European governments and China are investing heavily in hydrogen production.
CBS News
7 hours ago
- CBS News
Bay Area solar owners could see tax credits slashed under Trump's spending bill
The budget bill being debated in Congress could have serious implications for a lot of industries, but some are saying it could be a disaster for the residential solar industry. Solar companies are already hurting from reductions in government subsidies, but a threat to eliminate the federal solar tax credit could be putting the industry on the verge of collapse. Solar power itself is a proven technology with a lot of benefits to offer as a clean, renewable source of energy. But right now, a lot of energy is going into just keeping the business alive. "I think the industry is going to go through some very hard times," said Severin Borenstein, faculty director at UC Berkeley's Haas Energy Institute. He said rooftop solar has gone through a lot of changes in the last few years, with the State reducing how much solar system owners are credited for the energy they produce. But lately things have been improving. "2024 was back to 2021 levels, so they had really recovered from a drop," said Borenstein. "But now, with what the Trump administration is doing, I think there's a lot of concern. There were already a lot of rooftop solar companies that had pretty tenuous financing and were having a hard time. And I think this is pushing some of them over the edge." He was talking about a Republican effort in the budget bill to eliminate the 30 percent federal tax credit given to people who install solar systems on their homes. That, along with the tariffs being imposed by President Trump, has solar industry insiders calling foul. "It's really sad to see solar energy being caught in partisan crosshairs," said Brad Heavner, executive director of the California Solar and Storage Association. "The sun is not Republican or Democrat. The need for more electricity is not Democrat or Republican. We need more energy in America and Congress has a role to play in making that happen." But right now, the role Congress is playing is to restrict rooftop solar, along with other renewable energies, in favor of older sources like fossil fuels and coal. The effect has already been devastating, with solar companies going bankrupt across the country. On Monday, solar giant Sunnova Energy filed for protection and last week, Solar Mosaic, a major lender in the business, also went belly up. But Gordon Johnson, founder of a research firm studying the industry, said the companies may have brought it on themselves simply by the way they did business. He said some misrepresented their costs to lenders in what he compared to a Ponzi Scheme. "The solar industry in the US is in a state of significant disarray. And it's not something that could not have been predicted," said Johnson. "They perpetually issue debt. These companies are always issuing debt. As soon as they can't issue debt, and they can't plug that hole of the actual cost of the system versus what they show Wall Street, they quickly go bankrupt." Higher interest rates and equipment cost inflation have also figured into the mix. One analysis found that, nationwide, more than $14 billion in clean energy and electric vehicles have been cancelled or delayed as a result. The prospects for the industry aren't good right now, but Joe Osha, an analyst for investment banker Guggenheim Securities, said rooftop solar should not be confused with the overall solar energy market. "In megawatt terms, I can tell you that the residential solar business, as visible as it is, is only a tiny fraction of the solar generation that gets added into this country each year," said Osha. "The vast majority of it are these large utility-scale solar farms. I don't see any scenario under which that utility-scale solar business collapses." That leaves residential solar twisting in the political wind. And experts are saying small companies that have been the backbone of California's solar revolution will have a hard time staying in business.
E&E News
19 hours ago
- E&E News
AI's energy demand ratchets up pressure on Republicans
Meeting the historic escalation of U.S. electricity demand led by data centers will require wind and solar power that President Donald Trump is steering the nation away from, energy executives and members of Congress said during a POLITICO Energy Summit in Washington on Tuesday. 'If it's not renewables, what's it going to be?' said John Ketchum, CEO of NextEra Energy, the Florida-based power company. But the argument that renewables and battery storage can be deployed has not moved the White House from an agenda that pins the electric grid to coal and natural gas and reverses course on clean energy technology. At the POLITICO summit, industry executives and members of Congress said the approach to energy backed by Trump and conservative Republicans is making it harder to power Silicon Valley's AI tech companies as they race against China. Advertisement 'The president is in charge,' said Jarrod Agen, director of the National Energy Dominance Council created by Trump. 'The president has not focused on wind and solar.' Some speaking at the POLITICO summit lamented that Trump's aversion to sources other than fossil fuels and nuclear reactors undermine another Trump goal: lowering energy prices. 'We're in a constrained supply environment and an increased demand environment,' said Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee ranking member Martin Heinrich. 'People's electricity bills all over the country are going to go up. What I can guarantee you is in the next election and the election after that Republicans are going to own increased energy prices.' Utah Republican Sen. John Curtis said changes should be made to a House-passed tax, energy and security bill that would quickly phase down investment and production tax credits included in the Democrats' 2022 climate law — potentially leading to the cancellation of major energy and industrial projects. 'Investors have invested billions of dollars based on the rules of the road, and you have employees who have set careers based on these things,' Curtis said. If the U.S. wants to be energy dominant, Curtis said, 'let's not crush any of it.' The tech industry on Tuesday also urged Republicans to make specific changes to the megabill now in the Senate. In a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), the Data Center Coalition — a trade group that includes Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services and others — called for a 'pragmatic approach' to help power data centers. 'As demand for data center services continues to rise, timely access to affordable and reliable power is and will continue to be the pacing challenge for the industry,' said the letter. 'With thoughtful and targeted changes to [the legislation], the U.S. can maintain its leadership in AI, while simultaneously committing to long-term fiscal responsibility.' The tech industry letter calls for extending the time companies have to receive 'tech-neutral' tax credits. Under the Inflation Reduction Act, many of the credits could be claimed through 2032. But even with the support of moderate Senate Republicans, it's unclear how much can be put back into the House bill as congressional leaders push for passage by next month. Meanwhile, since taking office, Trump has ordered aging coal- and gas-fired power plants to stay open. 'We need to keep those functioning until we get the rest of the resources on line,' said Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Trump has directed DOE to analyze the impact of plant closings on electric reliability, a prelude to more emergency orders to keep them running. NextEra's Ketchum said keeping coal plants open for longer wouldn't 'make a dent' in the demand coming from data centers, advanced manufacturing, electric cars and other segments of the economy. A report by DOE's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in December estimated that data center demand could climb to as high as 12 percent of total electricity use in 2028 — almost tripling what it is today. Other estimates have put overall U.S. electricity demand rising by as much as 25 percent by 2030. Natural gas has been a focus of the administration. But that's also not a short-term solution to demand growth. Scott Strazik, chief executive of GE Vernova, which builds large gas turbines, told an investor conference last month that the company's order book for turbines for delivery in 2028 is filling up and other orders are geared toward 2029 and 2030. The price of those gas turbines has also gone up significantly. New nuclear plants, another option for data center power, is much further out. U.S. technology leaders, committed to reducing the impact of their data centers on greenhouse gas emissions, say they'll power gas centers with natural gas but also invest in renewable power to offset their carbon emissions. John Bistline, senior program manager at the Electric Power Research Institute, said in an interview that slashing tax incentives for clean energy projects could cut investment by as much as half. But he said deployment of wind and solar along with storage would grow but at a slower pace. Analysts have not worked out how heavy tariffs on steel, aluminum and other energy infrastructure components would impact generation expansion.
