Michael Saylor shoots his shot for Rogan spot: ‘Let's talk about Bitcoin'
Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor has publicly expressed interest in discussing Bitcoin on the world's most-listened-to podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience.
'Hey @joerogan, let's talk about Bitcoin,' Saylor said in a May 31 X post in response to a Joe Rogan fan account asking, 'Who's one guest you'd love to see Joe Rogan interview that he hasn't had on yet?' Saylor's post triggered excitement among the Bitcoin community
Saylor's post prompted speculation within the Bitcoin community. Popular Bitcoiner, The Bitcoin Therapist, said, 'This interview will shatter the internet.'
Crypto analyst Kook told their 164,200 X followers that 'Saylor is going to Bitcoin pill Joe Rogan.' Meanwhile, crypto commentator Brandon MacDougal said, 'For the first time ever, I'll be watching a Joe Rogan podcast if Saylor is there.'
Rogan has frequently discussed crypto and Bitcoin on his podcast and has made several pro-Bitcoin comments over the years. In an October 2023 episode with OpenAI co-founder Sam Altman, Rogan said that Bitcoin fascinates him the most of all cryptocurrencies.
'The real fascinating crypto is Bitcoin. That's the one that I think has the most likely possibility of becoming a universal viable currency. It's limited in the amount that it can be,' Rogan said.
'I love the fact that it's been implemented,' he added.
Although Rogan has yet to respond to Saylor's post, featuring a guest from the Bitcoin industry wouldn't be unfamiliar territory. Even in Bitcoin's early days, Rogan gave the topic airtime on his podcast.
Between 2014 and 2016, Bitcoin entrepreneur Andreas Antonopoulos made several appearances on Rogan's podcast when Bitcoin was still trading below $1,000.
Saylor's firm Strategy, holds 580,250 Bitcoin, worth $60.47 billion, according to Saylor Tracker.
Saylor recently speculated why Bitcoin's price is not yet $150,000. He said holders without a long-term outlook have been selling off while a new cohort of investors are beginning to enter the market.
'I think we're going through a rotation right now,' Saylor said on the Coin Stories podcast with Natalie Brunell on May 9.
Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/strategy-michael-saylor-bitcoin-conversation-joe-rogan-proposal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Crypto Insight
2 hours ago
- Crypto Insight
SEC's 2025 guidance: What tokens are (and aren't) securities
The US Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Corporation Finance (CorpFin) released a comprehensive statement on April 10, 2025, outlining what companies need to disclose when offering or registering crypto asset securities. This statement (the SEC's 2025 guidance) aims to reduce ambiguity regarding classifications of crypto tokens under US securities laws. It updates how the Howey test is used and introduces a clearer system to tell the difference between security tokens and non-security tokens. The Howey test is a decades-old framework used to determine whether a crypto asset qualifies as a security. Four criteria that the test applies are investment of money, an expectation of profit, a common enterprise and reliance on the efforts of others. A major highlight of the SEC 2025 guidance is the 'reasonable expectation of profit' criterion. The SEC emphasizes that if token buyers expect profits based primarily on the efforts of a centralized team or promoter, the token is likely a security. The SEC noted, 'Where entrepreneurial efforts drive price appreciation, tokenholders effectively invest in a common enterprise.' The guidance also introduces a three-pronged framework: Initial sale context: Whether the token was marketed as an investment Whether the token was marketed as an investment Ongoing use: If the token provides functional utility on a decentralized network If the token provides functional utility on a decentralized network Issuer influence: Degree of control retained by the founding team or foundation. Tokens with no expectation of profit, like Ether after the Merge, or stablecoins backed by real, transparent reserves, usually don't count as securities. But tokens tied to governance rights or revenue sharing could still be classified as securities, depending on how they work. Did you know? The Howey test was first used in 1946. Despite being older than the internet, it still shapes whether digital assets qualify as securities today. The SEC's 2025 rules say crypto tokens are likely securities if they act like investment contracts. This means tokens sold with promises of profits, driven by a central team's efforts, will be categorized as securities. The SEC's 2025 guidance outlines specific scenarios in which crypto tokens will likely be classified as securities. These typically involve projects that are still centrally controlled, promote profit expectations, or offer limited utility at the time of sale. Below are the common characteristics that may trigger securities classification: ICOs with profit-centric marketing: Tokens launched through initial coin offerings (ICOs) are a major target, especially when the project team markets them based on future price appreciation or project success. Tokens launched through initial coin offerings (ICOs) are a major target, especially when the project team markets them based on future price appreciation or project success. Profit-sharing governance tokens: Governance tokens that offer dividends, revenue sharing or protocol profits can be classified as securities due to their resemblance to traditional investment contracts. Governance tokens that offer dividends, revenue sharing or protocol profits can be classified as securities due to their resemblance to traditional investment contracts. Utility tokens with financial incentives: Even so-called utility tokens may qualify as securities if buyers are led to believe the tokens will increase in value or offer financial benefits. Even so-called utility tokens may qualify as securities if buyers are led to believe the tokens will increase in value or offer financial benefits. Legal precedents from court rulings: In the LBRY case (2023), the token was ruled an unregistered security. Similarly, the Ripple case determined XRP's institutional sales were securities, while public sales were not. Tokens with centralized control or pre-mining: The SEC warns that tokens that are pre-mined, centrally managed or promoted with value-growth promises lack decentralization and are likely to fall under securities regulation. In 2025, the SEC stressed that tokens controlled by a core team, pre-mined or limited in supply with promises of value growth will likely be securities. These tokens often aren't decentralized enough or lack user utility at the time of sale, reinforcing their classification under federal securities laws. The SEC's 2025 rules say crypto tokens aren't likely securities if they are used like tools or goods, not for making money. These tokens let you use a platform's services, like in-game items, digital access or nontransferable membership credits, and aren't pitched as investments. While the SEC's 2025 guidance focuses on investor protection, it also recognizes that not all tokens meet the criteria of securities. Tokens that are decentralized, utility-driven or serve non-investment purposes may fall outside the scope of securities laws. Below are key characteristics that reduce the likelihood of a token being classified as a security: Fiat-backed stablecoins with transparent reserves: Stablecoins that are 1:1 backed by fiat currency, regularly audited and designed for payments rather than investments are generally not viewed as securities by the SEC. Stablecoins that are 1:1 backed by fiat currency, regularly audited and designed for payments rather than investments are generally not viewed as securities by the SEC. Layer-1 utility tokens for network operations: Tokens like Ether, Solana and Avalanche are used to pay gas fees and validate transactions, not for profit-seeking. Their decentralized validator networks and functional utility lower the chances of being labeled securities. Tokens like Ether, Solana and Avalanche are used to pay gas fees and validate transactions, not for profit-seeking. Their decentralized validator networks and functional utility lower the chances of being labeled securities. Lack of profit marketing and central control: Tokens that aren't marketed with profit promises or don't rely on a central team for value growth are less likely to be securities. Their value is derived from network use, not speculation. Tokens that aren't marketed with profit promises or don't rely on a central team for value growth are less likely to be securities. Their value is derived from network use, not speculation. Decentralized and open-source governance: Projects that are community-driven, open-source and have distributed control over rewards or updates support non-security classification. These traits show the token functions as a digital tool, not an investment contract. Did you know? Under the 2025 guidance, tokens with genuine utility on decentralized networks may escape securities classification. It is a major shift from earlier years of the 'if it moves, it is a security' rule. The SEC's 2025 guidance for the crypto industry marks a pivotal moment, offering much-needed clarity on which tokens are classified as securities. It will reshape how projects launch, how tokens are traded and how platforms manage regulatory risk. For token issuers: Follow rules, register or change your approach The SEC's 2025 rules push token issuers to check whether their tokens count as securities. If tokens are promoted for profits or controlled centrally, issuers may need to register with the SEC or redesign tokens to focus on use and decentralization. Not following rules could lead to penalties, lawsuits or removal from platforms. New projects should plan for legal reviews from the start. For investors: Fewer tokens, but safer markets Investors might find fewer tokens available, especially if they are seen as unregistered securities. Tokens in legal trouble or those flagged by the SEC could be removed or restricted on exchanges. While this might limit quick-profit chances, it could make markets safer by cutting down on scams or risky projects. For exchanges: Stricter rules and more warnings Crypto exchanges, both centralized and decentralized, will likely set stricter standards for listing tokens, requiring more legal checks and more explicit risk warnings. US platforms may avoid tokens labeled as securities to steer clear of trouble. Exchanges might also need to register as securities brokers or alternative trading systems, raising costs and responsibilities. Did you know? The phrase 'reasonable expectation of profit' is the central point in the SEC's 2025 rules. If you expect a token's value to rise in the future and profit from it, it is a security. The SEC's 2025 rules still provide some confusion, especially for tokens that seem like both tools and investments. For example, governance tokens don't directly pay profits but affect decisions that boost protocol income. If tokenholders gain from rising prices due to treasury earnings, fees or staking rewards, they might be considered securities. Decentralized finance (DeFi) and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) make things trickier. Many DAOs act like decentralized companies, handling funds, giving out rewards or teaming up with businesses. This raises questions like when does a community-run project act like a centralized company, or does voting protect it from securities laws? To deal with this, legal opinions and SEC no-action letters are the key. A strong legal memo can support a project's claim that its token falls outside securities law, though it does not guarantee immunity. Meanwhile, SEC no-action letters, in which the agency agrees not to pursue enforcement, offer clarity but are rare and context-specific. The 2025 rules clarify, but classifying tokens depends on each case, needing careful steps through changing legal, tech and financial worlds. Legal and compliance experts appreciate the more explicit token classification rules, which help projects evaluate risks. However, many note that the guidelines still allow subjective interpretations, particularly regarding decentralization and governance tokens. Industry groups and developers worry the rules may hinder crypto innovation in the US. They argue that focusing on 'profit expectations' and issuer control might wrongly label decentralized projects as securities, even without active promoters. For example, Coinbase legal officer Paul Grewal stated in a letter to the SEC's Crypto Task Force on March 19, 2025, that some crypto activities, like token airdrops and selling tokens with clear uses, shouldn't be treated as securities transactions. He contended these activities don't involve raising money or promising profits based on a company's ongoing work, so traditional securities laws may not apply to these decentralized actions. At the 'SEC Speaks' event in May 2025, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce expressed concern about the commission's tendency to rely on enforcement actions rather than clear rulemaking. The SEC Speaks conference is an annual event where the SEC provides updates on its current initiatives and priorities. Peirce noted that this approach creates legal uncertainty and practical difficulties, complicating compliance for cryptocurrency firms and potentially hindering innovation. Supporters of the SEC's approach believe the guidance promotes investor protection and regulatory consistency, especially after years of confusion. Critics, however, see it as regulation by enforcement, claiming it burdens startups and creates legal uncertainty. For instance, legal analyst Jake Chervinsky noted that the SEC had indeed issued helpful guidance on crypto. Anderson PC, a boutique law firm, on the other hand, termed the SEC crypto guidance a flop, arguing that it wasn't clear who the rule applied to. The SEC's 2025 cryptocurrency guidelines differ significantly from the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation in their scope, structure and approach. The SEC's rules focus on applying the Howey test to determine what tokens are securities. Decisions about what tokens are and aren't securities are made on a case-by-case basis. On the other hand, MiCA provides a detailed legal framework that divides crypto assets into clear categories such as utility tokens, asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens. It sets specific licensing and operational rules for each category, ensuring clarity for issuers and service providers. Unlike the SEC, MiCA does not broadly assume all tokens are securities and focuses on consumer protection, market integrity and stablecoin regulation. Overall, while the SEC's approach is more enforcement-driven and investor-risk focused, MiCA is rule-based, offering a clearer compliance path for the European market. Source:
Crypto Insight
9 hours ago
- Crypto Insight
Russia's largest bank Sber offers up Bitcoin-linked bonds
Russia's largest commercial bank, Sber has launched a Bitcoin-linked bond product that tracks the cryptocurrency's change in price and the dollar-to-ruble exchange rate. The product is already available to qualified investors in the over-the-counter market, and Sber plans to list the product on the Moscow Stock Exchange in the future, the company formerly known as Sberbank said in a statement on May 30. The listing will ensure transparency, liquidity and convenience for a wide range of qualified investors, Sber added. Sber said the structural bond could allow holders to earn income from the change in dollar value in Bitcoin and the strengthening of the dollar against the Russian ruble. 🇷🇺 LATEST: Russia's largest bank Sberbank launches structured bonds tied to Bitcoin and USD/RUB, with $BTC futures set to list on Moscow Exchange June 4. — Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) June 2, 2025 The bank said that all transactions are carried out in rubles within Russia's regulatory framework, so investors don't need to rely on crypto wallets or unregulated platforms. Sber said it would also offer exchange-traded products providing exposure to crypto on its SberInvestments platform, starting with a Bitcoin futures product, which the bank said should be listed on June 4 once the Moscow Exchange officially launches the product. Russia's top bank gives the green light to crypto products Sber's move comes as Russia's central bank permitted financial institutions to offer certain crypto financial instruments to accredited investors on May 28. However, a key stipulation of the Bank of Russia's announcement was that financial institutions could not offer cryptocurrencies directly. The Moscow-based T-Bank, formerly Tinkoff Bank, rolled out an investment product tied to Bitcoin's price on the same day, referring to the product as a 'smart asset' that is issued through the Russian state-backed tokenization platform Atomyze. The central bank reported that Russian residents hold around 827 billion rubles ($9.2 billion) worth of crypto on centralized exchanges in its review of the first quarter of 2025. Inflows into Russian crypto platforms also rose 51% to 7.3 trillion rubles ($81.5 billion) over the same timeframe, the same report found. Bitcoin holds a 62% share on Russian crypto exchanges, followed by Ether at 22% and stablecoins like Tether and USDC. Source:
Crypto Insight
a day ago
- Crypto Insight
South Korea crypto industry to win no matter snap election outcome
South Korea's crypto scene will gain either way in the country's presidential elections, as both candidates have run on pro-crypto platforms, pledged to ease regulations and expand crypto access. South Koreans will head to the polls on June 3 to elect a new president in a snap election to replace Yoon Suk-yeol, who was impeached and removed from office over his attempt to declare martial law in December. Currently leading the polls is Lee Jae-myung of the center-left Democratic Party, who is up against staunch conservative and People Power Party nominee Kim Moon-soo. Lee has proposed legalizing spot crypto exchange-traded funds and wants to allow South Korea's $884 billion national pension fund to invest in cryptocurrency. He has also advocated for wider issuance of a stablecoin backed by the South Korean won as part of modernizing the country's financial system and stemming capital outflows. 'We need to establish a won-backed stablecoin market to prevent national wealth from leaking overseas,' he said during a policy discussion in May. 'I will create a safe investment environment so that young people can build assets and plan for the future.' Lee also aims to ease strict banking rules that require crypto exchanges to partner with licensed banks to offer fiat services. Kim also supports legalizing spot crypto ETFs and backed Lee's proposal, showing rare bipartisan alignment. He has also pledged to ease regulations and expand crypto adoption. Simon Seojoon Kim, the CEO of Seoul-based venture capital firm Hashed Ventures, told Bloomberg that with all the major candidates supporting pro-crypto policies, 'the country's crypto investors face a clear win regardless of the election outcome.' A Gallup Korea poll on May 28 showed 49% of respondents favoured Lee, while 36% said they would vote for Kim. Urgency for clear regulations The urgency for clear regulation stems from South Korea's high retail crypto participation. Stricter regulations were implemented in July 2024 to impose strict requirements on exchanges, including potential life sentences for criminal violations. On May 20, the country's Financial Services Commission finalized sweeping new measures, introducing new guidelines for nonprofit crypto sales and stricter listing standards for exchanges. South Korea's Democratic Party also launched a Digital Asset Committee focused on developing cryptocurrency policies and promoting industry growth in May. South Korea has one of the world's most active crypto markets, and daily trading volumes on crypto exchanges sometimes exceed the country's major stock indexes, with user numbers recently surpassing 16 million. Source:
