
Will we ever see real action on chronic pain and drug deaths?
When Scotland declared a "national emergency" on drug deaths in 2019, the public was promised urgent action. Instead, what we received was an empire of taskforces, consultative collaboratives, stakeholder networks and endless glossy reports and strategy documents. The response to a human catastrophe was to create a self-replicating bureaucracy.
In chronic pain, real patients were locked out of decision-making for two years, while officials congratulated themselves on "participation".
In addiction recovery, real lived-experience voices were excluded in favour of state-funded charities and compliant partners who echoed official policy while deaths soared to record levels.
In both cases, participation was a stage-managed performance – a theatre of inclusion designed to give the illusion of action while obstructing real change.
The Drug Death Taskforce, the MAT Standards Collaborative, the "National Mission", the countless "action plans" and "frameworks" – all absorbed years of time and tens of millions of pounds. But frontline detox beds remained closed. Residential rehabs were starved of funding. Choice in treatment was narrowed, not expanded. And the Right to Recovery (Scotland) Bill – which would have guaranteed people legal access to treatment options – was met with bureaucratic hostility and delay.
Exactly as with chronic pain, those who challenged the system – whether patients, advocates or independent charities – were either silenced, excluded, or had their funding threatened. This is not accidental. It is structural.
It is the deliberate management of public outrage through consultation fatigue, policy jargon and bureaucratic complexity, while shielding officials and ministers from accountability.
In both cases, the Scottish Government's own guidelines on transparency, participation and human rights are being openly breached.
In both cases, ministers speak the language of rights and inclusion while presiding over systems that actively exclude the very people they claim to represent.
How many more must die before Scotland confronts the uncomfortable truth? That we have built a public sector culture more skilled at managing public relations than at saving lives. That we have spent vast sums funding consultative industries while starving direct services.
Scotland urgently needs a reckoning: a rebalancing of power in favour of patients, families, and front-line practitioners.
Real independent oversight. Real accountability. Real choice in treatment.
For those of us who have lived through these failures, it is already too late for many we loved. But it is not too late to light a fire under the culture of bureaucratic complacency that allowed it.
Chronic pain patients. Addiction recovery advocates. Bereaved families. We are not separate battles. We are one fight: the fight for a Scotland that values life over bureaucracy.
Annemarie Ward, CEO, Faces & Voices of Recovery UK, Glasgow.
• The Scottish Government is under increasing pressure to address a crisis that is affecting many communities ("Organisations demand urgent action over rising alcohol deaths", The Herald, May 1). More than 70 organisations are imploring John Swinney to take significant action, and rightfully so.
The Government must accept responsibility for failing to tackle alcohol misuse, which has reached alarming levels under its watch. It is time for a comprehensive strategy that goes beyond mere rhetoric.
Immediate investment in public health initiatives, combined with effective community support, could make a transformative difference.
Our society must not allow another generation to suffer the consequences of inaction. Action is needed now, because every life matters.
Alastair Majury, Dunblane.
A sonnet on the sexes
At last some common sense on the ongoing, perverse focus on this issue from Eric Begbie ("Why all the fuss about sex and gender?", Letters, May 1).
Brother and Sister, a sonnet by George Eliot, puts it in a lovely descriptive nutshell.
In the first two lines, indistinguishable as infants: "I cannot choose but think upon the time/When our two lives grew like two buds that kiss."
But soon, "He was the elder and a little man/Of forty inches, bound to show no dread.
"And I the girl that puppy-like now ran,/Now lagged behind my brother's larger tread."
The poet was, of course, Mary Ann Evans.
Murdo Grant, Rosemarkie.
The VAR killjoys
As a football fan for 60-plus years I thought that VAR would enhance the game. Sadly no.
During Wednesday night's excellent Inter v Barcelona Champions League match VAR intervened to chalk off an Inter match-winning goal for offside. By three inches!
These ridiculous offside decisions are ruining the beautiful game.
Football is all about goals and entertainment. However I'm sure that there are those who agree with the reported remark by Bobby Williamson: "If you want entertainment go to the cinema."
Roy Gardiner, Kilmarnock.
Is VAR in football detracting from the entertainment? (Image: PA)
A lack of Scottish TV
Homes Under The Hammer is credited as a BBC Scotland production, yet each month only about one property in Scotland is featured. The presenters are all very interesting but only one is a Scot.
I note that there is concern over the cost of costume dramas. To my recollection there haven't been any Scottish ones for many years.
River City, which gives pleasure to many people, must cost a fraction of what EastEnders does, and should be spared.
Margaret Pennycook, Glasgow.
Pint to ponder
Donald M Manson's letter (May 1) regarding those of hard of hearing, reminds me of my late mother who would often ask me to get her some semi-skilled milk.
Malcolm Parkin, Kinross.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
14 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
UK to legislate for UN High Seas Treaty by end of year
Marine Minister Emma Hardy said on Tuesday that the Government will introduce a bill to enable ratification of the pact to establish protected areas in international waters. The ocean treaty, which was agreed by 193 countries two years ago, will not come into force until ratification by 60 countries, but just over half of that number have done so. The UK Government is among those that have been previously criticised by environmentalists for not yet ratifying the treaty or announcing a timetable to introduce the legislation required. The Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said the treaty will provide the 'first legal mechanism for the creation of protected areas in international waters', helping to conserve marine life in parts of the ocean outside national jurisdiction – which is approximately two-thirds of the world's ocean. Ms Hardy said: 'Our oceans are dying. Without urgent action, they will be irreversibly destroyed. 'That is why the UK will introduce legislation by the end of the year to ratify the High Seas Treaty, a landmark in protecting marine life around the globe.' The announcement comes as the third UN Ocean Conference began in France on Monday. Governments, business leaders, scientists and campaigners are attending the environmental summit in Nice where the spotlight will be on the commitments individual governments make to reduce the impact on their territorial waters, such as banning the practice of bottom trawling in marine protected areas (MPAs). Bottom trawling and other forms of destructive fishing are permitted in UK waters but conservationists have long been campaigning for a full ban across all marine protected areas. Defra said the Government has proposed to ban bottom trawling in more MPAs in English waters. The department said MPAs will 'help conserve rare, valuable and important marine life of the high seas, enhancing their resilience to stressors such as unsustainable fishing and industrial activities, helping them to recover faster'. There are 181 MPAs, including three highly protected marine areas (HPMAs), covering 93,000 square kilometres or 40% of English waters. The UK also joined more than 90 countries at the conference in reiterating its commitment to agreeing a Plastic Pollution Treaty when negotiations resume in Geneva in August.


North Wales Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Reeves to promise investment in ‘renewal' as she unveils spending plans
The Chancellor is expected to announce big increases in spending on the NHS, defence and schools as part of a spending review set to include £113 billion of investment thanks to looser borrowing rules. She will also reveal changes to the Treasury's 'green book' rules that govern which projects receive investment in an effort to boost spending outside London and the South East. Arguing that this investment is 'possible only because of the stability I have introduced' after the October budget, Ms Reeves is expected to say her spending review will 'ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities'. She will say: 'The priorities in this spending review are the priorities of working people. 'To invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off.' Among the other announcements expected at the spending review is £39 billion for affordable homes over the next 10 years as the Government seeks to meet its promise of building 1.5 million homes by the next election. The Treasury said this would see annual investment in affordable housing rise to £4 billion by 2029/30, almost double the average of £2.3 billion between 2021 and 2026. A Government source said: 'We're turning the tide against the unacceptable housing crisis in this country with the biggest boost to social and affordable housing investment in a generation, delivering on our plan for change commitment to get Britain building.' The Chancellor has also already announced some £15.6 billion of spending on public transport in England's city regions, and £16.7 billion for nuclear power projects, the bulk of which will fund the new Sizewell C plant in Suffolk. But the spending review is expected to set out tough spending limits for departments other than health, defence and education. Although Ms Reeves is reported to have agreed to an above-inflation increase in the policing budget, this is thought to have come at the expense of cuts in other parts of Home Office spending. And sources close to London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan have expressed concern that the spending review will have nothing for the capital. Ahead of the spending review, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned that any increase in NHS funding above 2.5% is likely to mean real-terms cuts for other departments or further tax rises to come in the budget this autumn. The Chancellor has already insisted that her fiscal rules remain in place, along with Labour's manifesto commitment not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. She will say on Wednesday: 'I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. 'These are my choices. These are this Government's choices. These are the British people's choices.'


North Wales Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Emergency workers to get greater protection from racial abuse in house calls
The Government said it would close an existing loophole that allows people to get away with racial and religious abuse towards police, fire and ambulance workers making house calls. The measures were tabled on Tuesday as amendments to the Government's Crime and Policing Bill. It is currently illegal to racially or religiously abuse anyone in public, but this does not extend to behaviour within a private home under the Public Order Act 1986. The gap was originally designed to ensure that laws allowing police to keep public spaces free from serious disorder did not overstep into private conversations held in homes. The Home Office said the law has left 'emergency workers vulnerable and unprotected to racial and religious-based abuse and harassment during house calls', and 'unable to hold the perpetrators to account for their behaviour'. The department added that 'reports of emergency workers being abused for their race or religion while in private homes have increased'. Under the change, those abusing emergency workers in any setting could face a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment. Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson said emergency workers 'should never have to tolerate abuse due to their race or religion while simply doing their job'. Dame Diana added: 'By closing this loophole, we're sending a clear message that racial and religious abuse directed towards those who serve our communities will not be tolerated.' Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said the new measures would 'crack down on perpetrators'. Mr Streeting added: 'Our emergency workers carry out lifesaving work every day and deserve to feel safe from violence or intimidation. 'Anyone who violates this core principle brings shame on themselves and will feel the full force of the law, wherever they are.' Andy Rhodes, director of the National Police Wellbeing Service, said the amendment would 'better protect officers and staff who are there to protect the public'. Mr Rhodes added: 'Sadly, the role they play means they can often be faced with some incredibly challenging and hostile situations, especially in private homes, and over time this can take a toll. 'The protection of our officers and staff is a clear priority for all police chiefs. Hate crime has a devastating impact on individual victims and racial and faith-based discrimination against officers or emergency workers cannot be tolerated in any form.' Minister for Fire Alex Norris said the Government 'stands firmly behind emergency service workers and will not tolerate abusive behaviour towards those risking their lives to keep us safe'.