'Just naughty' or misunderstood? How mental disorders in migrant children can be misread
Back in Hong Kong, Wing Siu worked nine to 12 hours a day.
Like many other working mothers, she only saw her daughter for a short time after work each day during the week.
But that changed when the family moved to Australia in 2021.
"I became a full-time housewife," said Mrs Siu.
While she was busy adjusting to her new environment, Mrs Siu believed her 17-year-old daughter was also struggling, albeit silently, to adapt.
"Her English teacher was the first to mention it, and I thought it may be a learning issue like dyslexia. But after doing the assessments, she was diagnosed with ADHD.
"We were so shocked … we never expected that."
Experts said it was not uncommon for migrant parents to mistakenly attribute their child's behavioural problems to their struggles with adapting to a new environment.
Shurong Lu, a researcher from the University of Melbourne's School of Population and Global Health, told the ABC that parents might sometimes think their child is "just naughty" when they may have a neurodevelopmental disorder or a mental health condition.
"Sometimes they take even stricter parenting [approaches] and make the situation even worse,' she said.
ADHD, which stands for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by patterns of inattentive, impulsive, and sometimes hyperactive behaviour.
It can coexist with other disorders like autism, or mental health conditions like depression or anxiety.
Smruthy Nair, a psychologist who migrated from India, said the lack of words or phrases to describe ADHD or mental health conditions in some languages made it difficult for migrant children to express themselves and parents to recognise the symptoms.
The stigma around mental health conditions in some cultures also created a challenge, Dr Nair added.
"I come from a culture where you don't talk about your mental health openly, we seldom express negative emotions," she said.
"There is a lot of shame and stigma associated with it."
It was a feeling Takeo Kameoka could relate to.
After migrating to Australia from Japan after the Fukushima nuclear disaster, the then 11-year-old struggled with his new school environment but thought it was taboo to talk about his feelings.
He also didn't want to worry his parents after the move.
Now a clinical psychologist, Mr Kameoka said he recognised that he had symptoms of depression when he was a boy.
"[I] went through the early experiences of racism and discrimination, but lacked social support," he said.
Mr Kameoka said there was — and still is — a lack of information and education about mental health conditions in migrant communities, especially for more recent migrants.
A 2023 report from the National Mental Health Commission found more than 50 per cent of children in Australia with mental health conditions were not receiving professional help.
Mr Kameoka said current mental health education and training needed to be more culturally responsive.
"The lack of diversity in education and academia also just really is something that probably needs to change in the first place," he said.
But it's not just enough for providers of mental health services to employ people from multicultural communities, said Dr Nair.
"You need to work with communities, be open to learning, and embed this learning in communities, not just give them information," she said.
Kin Chan, a creative therapist and migrant parent, understands the importance of culturally responsive practice.
Since migrating to Australia from Hong Kong in 2022, he has been running events and seminars on mental health for immigrant families.
The workshops raise awareness around mental health challenges children face, and provide support to both children and parents.
Mr Chan said part of the issue was that migrant parents tend to focus on "solving the problem" rather than "understanding the problem".
"Children have to readapt completely to the local culture, the school's culture, the education system," said Mr Chan.
He said changes in family dynamics due to the move could have an impact on children's emotional wellbeing.
Mr Chan said not only did "children always learn from their parents", they also often mirrored their parents' emotions.
For example, if the parents feel anxious after moving to a new country, the children may feel anxious too.
When it comes to mental health, Nepalese migrant Reshma Manandhar is making sure her children are informed on the topic and feel comfortable asking for help.
"I have made it very clear, we talk about it openly at home," she said.
Mrs Manandhar's effort with her children was inspired by her own mental health challenge.
She experienced postnatal depression after the family moved to Australia in 2002.
Ms Manandhar said while children could access mental health support at school, migrant parents needed to "normalise" discussion.
"A lot more work needs to be done to take that stigma out of the mental health issue in a non-English speaking, diaspora community," she said.
"We have to normalise it and say, 'It's OK, you can get help'."
Mrs Siu agreed, adding that ADHD needed to be normalised in daily conversations, and not treated as something taboo or shameful.
She said friends and family can also play a supportive role by speaking about neurodivergence in a positive light.
To assist people with limited English language skills understand the signs and symptoms of mental health, AMES Australia has developed resources with Beyond Blue.
The resources also help those working with migrants to identify when a new arrival is experiencing a mental health issue, not just culture shock.
"It's another part of the orientation to Australian society and then our health system," said Lucia Halliburton from AMES, an organisation that helps migrants and others settle in Australia.
"And it definitely signals that positive mental health and discussing mental health is not stigmatised in Australia," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
25 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Crazy': $100,000 investment that turned into a multi-million dollar empire
A speedy response to an influencer getting her make-up bag confiscated at the airport reveals how much you need to hustle to connect with Gen Z these days. Michael Porter, 34, is a millennial to the core, but as the founder of the skincare brand Skin Control, he makes it his job to understand how to engage with Gen Z. The skincare brand was founded in 2018 and required over a $100,000 investment to get off the ground. It is now stocked in major retailers like Priceline and Chemist Warehouse. According to Mr Porter, a Skin Control product sells every five seconds. Despite the brand's success, Mr Porter is always looking for ways to connect with Gen Z, and they don't want to feel marketed to. They crave authenticity and content, so when former Love Island contestant Phoebe Spiller, 22, amassed hundreds of thousands of views on social media for sharing the chaos that ensured from planning a last-minute trip to Vegas, Mr Porter's interest was piqued. The influencer shared all her dramas, from not being able to find her passport to securing one last minute and getting ready to board her flight. Then, amongst the chaos, she admitted her cosmetics bag got confiscated. 'Umm, all my skincare was confiscated,' she shared on social media. Ms Spiller has over 170,000 followers on Instagram and has millions of likes on TikTok. When Mr Porter and his team saw that she had lost all her skincare at the airport, they decided to pounce. 'We basically saw Phoebe's story about her toiletries being confiscated, and then within 15 minutes, we had someone from our team in an Uber,' he told 'Being a small brand means we can jump on these moments, and we need to move quickly, so we're constantly on the look for viral moments that we can hijack in real time.' It paid off. Ms Spiller posted herself squealing in delight as someone from the Skin Control team arrived with a new cosmetics bag full of the brand's skincare. Mr Porter said that if you're a skincare brand in today's saturated market, you need to 'move quickly' and look beyond a trend. When it comes to Gen Z and Gen Alpha, Mr Porter said they are a 'tough' crowd to please because they don't fit traditional marketing targets. 'They don't want to be marketed towards they want to be part of a community,' he said. 'When we saw Phoebe telling her story, she was getting loads of views and bringing her followers on a journey with her and we want to be part of that conversation.' Mr Porter said at the end of the day that doing that stunt was less about making more sales and more about brand awareness. 'We saw a spike in sales and an influx in followers but it is about creating long-term brand awareness,' he said. The business owner explained that skin control sells really well, but they are focusing on creating a brand that people recognise. The brand is thriving and is now a multimillion-dollar business. Mr Porter said the growth and success have been 'crazy'. What he wants now is to build recognisability, and if that means getting someone in an Uber to save the nearest influencer, he'll do it!

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Australian deported from US after being grilled about Israel-Gaza views
An Australian writer says he was refused entry to the United States after being interrogated about his views on the Israel-Gaza war and articles he had penned on university protests. Alistair Kitchen, 33, was travelling to New York on Thursday to visit friends when he was detained for 12 hours at Los Angeles International Airport, before being deported back to Melbourne. Mr Kitchen told the ABC he was pulled from the line at customs and taken to a backroom where his phone was seized. "We both know why you're here," a border agent said, according to Mr Kitchen. When Mr Kitchen was a student at Columbia University in New York last year, he covered pro-Palestinian rallies on campus on his personal blog. "The officer that detained me said explicitly to me, 'The reason we have detained you is because of what you have written on the internet about the protests at Columbia'," Mr Kitchen said. For 45 minutes, Mr Kitchen said he was "interrogated" about his views on the conflict in the Middle East. "I was asked what I thought of Israel, what I thought of Palestine, what I thought of Hamas, what I thought of the students protesting," he said. "[I was asked] whether I have Jewish friends, whether I have Muslim friends, how I would resolve the conflict in the Middle East." Mr Kitchen said he then "made the mistake" of giving an officer his phone passcode, the content of which was downloaded by border agents. "I did it out of stress and fatigue and fear," he said. "[The officer] came out triumphantly and said, 'We found evidence on your phone, Mr Kitchen, of prior drug use'." As Mr Kitchen had not declared drug use on his Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) form, he said he was accused of misrepresenting himself. "I told him that 'yes, I have consumed drugs before. I lived in New York for six years where marijuana is legal. I've bought weed at dispensaries in the US'." "A question on a form that, I think we all know millions of Australians have answered in the same way as I have answered, was used as justification for making sure I didn't get back on US soil." Mr Kitchen was taken to immigration detention until he could be booked on a flight home. "I wouldn't wish it on anyone," he said. He described a basement with "fluorescent buzzing bulbs", a television, some instant noodles in a cup, and a guard. "Men and women are separated. You're not allowed to talk to each other. But most difficult is that you don't know how long you're gonna be in there," he said. "There was a woman bawling her eyes out, begging in the guard, 'Please just tell me how long I'm gonna be in here'. "He looked at her, with no sympathy, and said, 'I don't have any information for you'." The guard, according to Mr Kitchen, gestured to another woman, who was covered in blankets in the corner of the room and said she had been there for four days. The ABC requested comment from U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Eventually, Mr Kitchen was allowed to call the Australian consulate, which informed his mother of his detention but could not say when he would be sent home. Even after Mr Kitchen was deported, he was not allowed to get his phone back until more than 14 hours later when his Qantas flight arrived in Melbourne on Saturday. "I was hoping desperately to be able to call my mum, text my mum, text the people I was meant to stay with in New York," he said. "Instead, the phone was handed over to the lead flight attendant on my flight who told me that she would hang onto the phone and my passport until we landed in Australia." "The consulate said the attendant may give it back to you on the flight or they may choose to hold onto it, and we don't know when they choose and why they don't." Qantas declined to comment. The ABC understands US border agents handed airline staff a sealed envelope. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) said it provided consular assistance to an Australian denied entry into the US. "Owing to our privacy obligations we are unable to provide further comment," a DFAT spokesperson said. Just days ago, DFAT updated its advice for Australians travelling to the US to stress that entry requirements were "strict". "US authorities have broad powers to decide if you're eligible to enter and may determine that you are inadmissible for any reason under US law," DFAT's Smartraveller website reads. "US officials may ask to inspect travellers' electronic devices, emails, text messages or social media accounts."

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Ninth bottle shop proposed for Swan Hill as councils lose veto power
Victorian councils want to retain their power of veto over new liquor outlets in country towns, amid fierce debate about the links between family violence and access to alcohol. In Swan Hill, a northern Victorian town ranked fifth in the state for family violence, mother and foster carer Bec Wolfe-Charles is among those objecting to a proposed new bottle shop. She wants more play spaces in her neighbourhood where she can spend time with her daughter, Eloise, rather than another liquor store in a town that already has eight. But she worries the decision to approve the bottle shop is being taken out of local hands. From July 1, Liquor Control Victoria will take responsibility for liquor licence decisions, stripping local councils of the right to refuse planning permits. Swan Hill's local government area has a population of 21,000. The I Can Smell A Dead Duck company has applied for planning permission to open a ninth liquor outlet in the town, a bottle shop in a former furniture store. A spokesperson for the Department of Justice and Community Safety said there was no cap on the number of liquor licences allowed in one town and that Swan Hill residents will still have the opportunity to object to the application when Liquor Control Victoria puts it on public notice. Swan Hill Rural City Council Mayor Stuart King said councils should have more, rather than less, control over new liquor store applications and is concerned that city-based bureaucrats will not properly understand what the town needs. The owners of I Can Smell A Dead Duck have been contacted for comment. Women's Health Loddon Mallee chief executive officer Kellie Dunn said communities like Swan Hill were right to push back. "If they are voicing that it is not right for them and that they feel that there is a saturation [of alcohol outlets], the government really needs to listen to them as part of the planning process," Ms Dunn said. An independent review into a Dan Murphy's store in Darwin in 2021 heard that the chain liquor store's operator, Endeavour Group, disputed the link between new bottle shops and more violence. But public health researchers say the link is clear. Data from the addiction treatment centre Turning Point showed that since 2018, paramedics had been called to about two alcohol-related incidents per week in Swan Hill, and alcohol was the most common drug found in intimate partner violence. "The more alcohol that is around a community, or the higher the availability, the more domestic violence and other harms occur in that community," strategic lead Rowan Ogeil said. Dr Ogeil said victim-survivors from socio-economic disadvantaged areas like Swan Hill were three-and-a-half times more likely to have an ambulance respond to interpersonal violence involving alcohol or drugs. In 2015, the Royal Commission into Family Violence recommended that liquor licensing rules consider the role of alcohol in family violence. In a statement, a spokesperson for the Department of Community Justice and Safety said Liquor Control Victoria already considered social harms. If you need help immediately call emergency services on triple-0 A fortnight out from the change, the head of the Municipal Association of Victoria said there was no clarity on how "this major impact" would affect local government. "We will no longer be the people that determine whether the planning application is appropriate or not," MAV president Jennifer Anderson said. "A lot of councils may not be aware of the legislation. "But certainly, for those that are aware, like Swan Hill for example, it is a great concern because certain areas are known to have problems with alcohol, and so there may be areas where they have the knowledge to know this [application] is not appropriate." Cr Anderson said the MAV and its member councils had little knowledge of the new process under Liquor Control Victoria and the Department of Planning, other than that local councils could make a submission to Liquor Control Victoria if they wanted to. The Department of Planning has not provided a formal response to the ABC's queries. Additionally, liquor store applications that have a floor space of at least 750 square metres trigger a community impact assessment, the spokesperson said. The assessment measures the application against the area's social harms, such as the family violence rate, or the proximity to schools. At 628sqm, the proposed Swan Hill bottle shop does not need a formal harm assessment to be done. The harm assessment process was tested last year when the Victorian Liquor Commission backed Hepburn Shire Council's decision to deny an application by Endeavour Group to place a Dan Murphy's bottle shop near a school. Endeavour Group is contesting the decision at the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Swan Hill independent bottle shop owner John Charleson said the assessment criteria did not work if a town comprises one main street because a 500-metre radius was applied. "So, the square metreage of a circle basically, a 500-metre radius in our town, really should be put into context and be taken in a long rectangular view."