logo
'Right To Be Left Alone': Delhi Court Upholds Wife's Privacy After Major's Plea For Hotel CCTV

'Right To Be Left Alone': Delhi Court Upholds Wife's Privacy After Major's Plea For Hotel CCTV

News1824-05-2025

Last Updated:
A Delhi court rejected an Army Major's plea for hotel CCTV footage to prove his wife's alleged affair, citing the right to privacy.
A Delhi court on Friday rejected a plea by a man and upheld the right to privacy of his wife, whom he alleged was having an affair with a man.
The man identified himself as Major in the Indian Army and sought the CCTV footage of a hotel, where he alleged his wife was with another man, also a Major.
'The right to privacy and to be left alone in a hotel would extend to the common areas as against a third party who was not present there and has no other legally justifiable entitlement to seek the data of the guest. The same would hold good for the booking details," civil judge Vaibhav Pratap Singh of Patiala House Court observed, as he upheld the right to privacy of the wife and her alleged lover.
He added that the concept of 'stealing' the affection of a wife by another man, as if a woman is not in control of whom she loves, is 'dated" and has been rightly rejected by the Supreme Court Joseph Shine v. Union of India.
'The dated idea of a man stealing away the wife of another man, without ascribing any role or responsibility to the woman, is to be rejected. It takes agency away from women and dehumanises them," the judge said.
The court also cited the novel 'The End of the Affair' by Graham Greene, and said that even the Indian Parliament has given its imprimatur to the said jurisprudence when, while doing away with the colonial penal law, it enacted the The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and did not retain therein the offence of adultery, showing that the 'modern day Bharat has no place for gender- condescension and patriarchal notions."
As the major alleged his wife, with whom he was involved in a marital dispute and divorce, visited the hotel with her alleged paramour, the judge observed that hotels generally owe a duty of confidentiality to their guests and are required to protect the privacy of their records, including booking details and CCTV footage.
The court also said that the wife and her alleged paramour were central to the husband's claims, but they were not impleaded in the suit, which raised significant questions about their right to be heard before any disclosure was made.
Further, the judge said that courts are not meant to serve as investigative bodies for private disputes or as instruments for the collection of evidence in internal proceedings, especially when no clear legal entitlement to that evidence exists.
First Published:
May 24, 2025, 11:12 IST

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Forced narco tests illegal, results not admissible: Supreme Court
Forced narco tests illegal, results not admissible: Supreme Court

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Forced narco tests illegal, results not admissible: Supreme Court

Setting aside a high court order allowing narco-analysis tests on accused persons without consent, the Supreme Court on Wednesday asserted that involuntary or forced tests are not permissible under the law. The Supreme Court held that compelling an accused to undergo narco-analysis, without free and informed consent, violates the constitutional protection against self-incrimination under Article 20(3) and the right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the report of such an involuntary test or any information discovered as a result is not admissible as evidence in criminal or other proceedings," the bench clarified. The order came days after a Patna High Court order accepting a police officer's submission to subject all accused persons and witnesses in a criminal case to narco-analysis testing. The submission of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer was accepted during the hearing of a bail plea filed by the its ruling, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its landmark 2010 judgment in Selvi and Others v State of Karnataka, which held that forcibly subjecting individuals to narco-analysis, polygraph, or brain mapping tests was unconstitutional. The court reiterated that these techniques, if not voluntarily undertaken, breach personal liberty and the right against safeguards laid down in the Selvi case judgement:No lie detector or narco-analysis test shall be conducted without the accused's voluntary accused must be informed of the legal, emotional, and physical implications of the to legal counsel must be provided before deciding on consentConsent must be recorded before a Judicial guidelines for polygraph tests should be followed, and similar protocols adopted for narco-analysis and brain mapping top court further clarified that an accused may voluntarily choose to do so at an appropriate stage, such as during the presentation of defence evidence in a even in such cases, the court emphasised that there is no indefeasible right to undergo narco-analysis. It also said that judicial authorisation must account for the totality of circumstances, including safeguards and genuine InMust Watch

Calling a rapist 'family' is not just
Calling a rapist 'family' is not just

New Indian Express

time3 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Calling a rapist 'family' is not just

The Supreme Court recently used its special powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to uphold the conviction of a 25-year-old man for raping a 14-year-old girl without imposing a sentence. Some hailed the decision as a 'landmark', but it has raised serious concerns about the message it sends on child protection and justice. In 2018, a child was kidnapped in West Bengal. Later, she was found married to the man who had raped her and gave birth to his child. The court acknowledged that a crime had taken place and upheld his conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, but reasoned that sending him to jail would make the victim the 'worst sufferer' because she had now built a life with the accused. The bench of Justices A S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan made the decision based on the report of a committee consisting of a clinical psychologist, a social scientist and a child welfare officer, which found that the woman, now 21, is emotionally attached to the accused and protective of her 'small family'. Has the court interpreted her trauma-based dependence as 'consent' and survival as 'choice'? In another recent case, the Orissa High Court adopted a similar approach. Justice S K Panigrahi granted bail to a 26-year-old man accused of raping a girl he had allegedly been in a relationship with since 2019, when she was 16. The complainant said the accused had physical relations with her on the false promise of marriage and that she became pregnant twice, in 2020 and 2022, but was forced to terminate both pregnancies. A case under the POCSO Act was filed in 2023. In 2024, the accused sought bail, claiming both families had agreed he should marry the complainant. The judge, while granting bail, remarked that the allegations, though serious in statutory terms, arose out of a 'consensual relationship' between two individuals who were close in age and shared a personal bond before the case was filed and did not prima facie exhibit characteristics of force, coercion or exploitation.

Soldier beaten to death in Jhunjhunu, kin refuse body
Soldier beaten to death in Jhunjhunu, kin refuse body

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Soldier beaten to death in Jhunjhunu, kin refuse body

Jhunjhunu: A soldier on leave at his native village of Palota Ka Bas in Surajgarh area of Jhunjhunu district was brutally beaten to death Tuesday night, leading his family to file a murder case. The deceased, Vikram Singh, was a havildar in the Indian Army's 18 Raj Rifles and was posted in Abohar, Punjab. He had come to his village on June 7. On Tuesday night, Singh was leaving home to return to duty when two young men in a black Scorpio car forcibly bundled him into their vehicle and brought him to their house, where they brutally assaulted him. Upon receiving information, family members and Surajgarh police reached the scene, and Singh was first taken to Surajgarh CHC and later referred to BDK Hospital in Jhunjhunu. He succumbed to his injuries during treatment there. SHO Hemraj Meena stated that the police team found Singh severely injured. Following an initial investigation, police have detained two suspects and are interrogating them. On Wednesday morning, police conducted a detailed inspection of the crime scene and collected evidence. Meanwhile, the agitated family members and villagers refused to take the body after a postmortem was conducted. They submitted a memorandum to the collector and SP, demanding the immediate arrest of the culprits.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store