New Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia asks for 'a little grace period' as Parliament opens
Liberal MP Francis Scarpaleggia, who represents the Quebec riding of Lac-Saint-Louis, is the new Speaker of the House of Commons and will preside over what Prime Minister Mark Carney has told his caucus will be a "very, very" busy few weeks and months ahead.
The Speaker is an MP chosen in a secret ranked ballot by other MPs to preside over the business of the House of Commons, act as an impartial arbiter of House proceedings and maintain order during debates.
While the Speaker is elected to Parliament as a member of a party, they do not sit in any party caucus because the role is considered non-partisan.
"I will remind members that we are at the beginning of a mandate in the selfish hope that you will afford me a little grace period," he said after being ushered to the Speaker's chair by Carney and interim Opposition leader Andrew Scheer.
"Once again thank you for your confidence. I have few words, because well, we all have things we want to accomplish and we have been away. Thank you, colleagues."
WATCH | Carney thanks voters in his first House speech:
Carney stood in the House for the first time on Monday, thanking those who voted for him personally and all members of the House of Commons, before going on to congratulate Scarpaleggia.
"I have much to learn from the members of this great House," Carney said. "I will make mistakes. I have no doubt that you will call them out for good reason, because this House has rules, it has traditions and it's on those traditions that our Athenian democracy is founded," he said.
"Yes we are Athens, they are Rome," Carney said, referencing Scarpaleggia's campaign speech for the speakership earlier in the day. "We will prevail. We are in the golden age of Athens. Thank you Mr. Speaker, you have my support."
Scheer, who served as Speaker from 2011 to 2015, congratulated Scarpaleggia, telling the House that he has the support of the Conservative Party.
"You have taken charge of an office that's almost as old as Parliament itself," Scheer said Monday, noting seven previous speakers of the British House of Commons had been beheaded by the monarch."It might no longer be a requirement to stand up to kings and queens, but you may find yourself having to stand up to other offices of authority," Scheer said.
"If such an opportunity presents itself, we trust you will stand with those Speakers who came before you, who defended this institution on behalf of the people."
Scarpaleggia defeated Greg Fergus, the MP for the Quebec riding of Hull-Alymer who had served as Speaker since October 2023.
On Sunday evening, there were officially eight candidates for the post, but at the outset of Monday's proceedings in the House, Conservatives Chris d'Entremont, a Nova Scotia MP who served as deputy Speaker since 2021, and John Nater, who represents the Ontario riding of Perth-Wellington, pulled out of the race.
With both Conservative candidates withdrawing their names, that left five Liberals aside from Scarpaleggia: Sean Casey, (Charlottetown), Rob Oliphant (Don Valley West), Alexandra Mendès (Brossard-Saint-Lambert), Sherry Romanado (Longueuil-Charles-LeMoyne) and Fergus.
'Canada's greatest asset is its democracy'
Scarpaleggia was first elected to the House in the 2004 federal election and has been re-elected seven consecutive times since then.
From 2011 until 2021, he served as the Liberal caucus chair, and has chaired multiple Commons committees including environment and sustainable development, and electoral reform.
In his campaign speech in the House Monday morning, he said that it is possible to hold passionate, substantive, debates without engaging in personal insults or intimidation, and that if elected he would work to improve decorum in the Commons.
WATCH | Scarpaleggia elected Speaker:
"Canada's greatest asset is its democracy, and democracy lives and breathes here in this chamber," he said.
"It is rightly said that there can be no true freedom without order. Likewise, we can't have a truly meaningful exchange of ideas without an orderly, rules-based House of Commons."
Scarpaleggia said he was in favour of robust debate where "board-rattling" bodychecks take place in the corners, but that a problem begins to emerge "when sticks go high."
"Canadians want to see sticks on the ice and it's the responsibility of the Speaker to make this so," he said.
"Our neighbour to the south may be modern-day Rome in size and power; we are Athens in culture, values and democracy.… That is how we must see ourselves. That is who we must be."
A Speaker has the authority to demand that MPs apologize if they use unparliamentary language — and can even order a member removed from the chamber.
The Speaker also oversees the administration and finances of the House. They manage staff and communicate between the Senate and the Crown.
The Speaker earns a $99,900 top-up on their $209,800 MP salary, along with a car allowance. The job comes with a small apartment in West Block and an official estate in Gatineau Park known as The Farm.
There are some ceremonial duties that also come with the role, such as hosting dignitaries and diplomats and representing the Commons abroad, for which the Speaker has a large hospitality budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
39 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Why some Canadians are alarmed by Mark Carney's pledge to act with urgency
Canadians elected Prime Minister Mark Carney's Liberal government based on its pledge to act with urgency and fix things — the country's economy, its security and its standing on the world stage. But with the unveiling of a bill to supercharge the economy and early efforts to improve the country's adversarial relations with India and China, there's growing concern that Carney's plans to boost Canada could involve unsavoury trade offs. Ask Indigenous leaders who were left out of 'nation-building' meetings or were given just a week to comment on legislation that will fast track infrastructure projects reasonably expected to pass through their treaty-protected territories. Ask Sikh-Canadian leaders who have seen their members targeted for death or violence, allegedly on orders from Indian government agents. Last Friday, they listened as Carney defended his G7 invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as one that 'makes sense' based on India's economic power, population and key role in international 'supply chains.' Ask foreign aid organizations, perhaps, if Canada commits to radically increasing defence spending along with NATO allies at a leaders' summit planned for later this month. Carney is not alone in his apparent willingness to step on toes if it means he can move further and faster in responding to the sense of emergency at hand. It's part of a global movement with governments invoking looming threats and emerging risks to push through all sorts of questionable — and sometimes contestable — priorities. The most blatant example is the one that has sparked the economic emergency in Canada. U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on imports have been pushed through not with legislation that can be studied, debated and voted upon, but through presidential executive orders invoking real or imagined national emergencies at the Canada-U. S. border. They are premised upon risks from America-bound migrants, fentanyl, steel and cars and, despite initial court rulings that tranches of the tariffs are illegal under U.S. law, they remain in effect. Likewise, the generalized panic that Russia's three-years-and-counting war against Ukraine has instilled in Europe. There is legitimate reason to worry about the longer-term intentions of Russian President Vladimir Putin, a leader who has been unwilling to agree to a ceasefire despite sanctions, despite diplomatic isolation, despite the more recent appeals, threats and exhortations of the Trump administration. But preparations for a potentially wider conflict on the European continent now have German officials talking about rehabilitating long-abandoned bunkers, Poland vowing to build up 'the strongest army in the region,' and Swedish households receiving an alarming 32-page pamphlet from their government entitled: 'In case of crisis or war.' 'To all residents of Sweden: we live in uncertain times,' the booklet begins ominously. It goes on to cover everything from securing one's home to digital safety to instructions on how to stop bleeding to advice about handling pets and talking to children. This is the political and emotional backdrop against which Canada and other NATO member states later this month are expected to back an agreement to steeply increase in their national defence budgets, moving to five per cent of GDP from two per cent. If agreed to, it will result in many billions of dollars going to weapons, tanks, planes and soldiers' salaries. But before those purchases can go ahead, there will be many difficult choices made about how to come up with the funds. Governments always talk about finding budget efficiencies for unexpected priorities, though saving is not a specialty for which politicians are well suited. Even Donald Trump and Elon Musk came up spectacularly short of their savings pledges through the Department of Government Efficiency. More frequently, governments end up robbing Peter in order to pay Paul, as the saying goes — cutting spending in on domain to increase it in another. That is exactly what the United Kingdom did with blunt effect when it announced earlier this year that it would slash foreign aid spending drastically in order to increase the defence budget. 'Few countries have articulated such a direct, one-to-one trade off before between those two areas of public spending,' noted a report from ODI Global , a think tank, that criticized the British government for thinking of defence and foreign-aid spending as an either-or choice. Similar potential trade offs are cause for concern in Canada. Will the urgency to build oil pipelines and assert the country as an 'energy superpower' in new markets come at the cost of Canada's fight against global warming? Carney's reputation as a climate-change warrior is well-established, but his use of the oil-and-gas industry's ' marketing speak ' at a recent meeting first ministers' meeting with provincial premiers has some worried about the economy taking priority over the environment. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, the national association representing Canadian Inuit, wasn't even invited to the first ministers' meeting, which concluded with a statement about the need to 'unlock the North's economic potential.' 'It is troubling that in 2025, the Government of Canada is so comfortable with empty rhetoric in place of rightful participation,' the Inuit association said in a news release . The legislation to get Carney's economic fast-track transformation under way — one that the Liberal government wants to pass into law by Canada Day — was decried by the Assembly of First Nations, which had just seven days to provide any concerns about the bill, APTN News reported . There are those who will defend a go-fast approach to governing in extraordinary times. They will warn that there is a greater risk in being sunk by the status quo — the never-ending consultations, the delays, red-tape entanglements. 'The advantage of a wartime mentality lies in the sense of urgency it introduces, and the readiness it encourages to push aside unnecessary bureaucratic barriers,' wrote Lawrence Freedman, an emeritus professor of War Studies at King's College London, in a piece about Russia, Ukraine and Europe. It's a line that can be applied as equally to Ottawa as to Moscow, Kyiv, Paris, Brussels or London. But one person's bureaucratic barrier is the next person's guard rail — a measure ensuring confidence, protecting against damaging errors, saving lives. Moving at high speeds, it can be difficult to spot the difference.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Carney says Canada will meet NATO spending target this year
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney on Monday announced an ambitious defense spending target that would end Canada's status as a NATO laggard and mollify frustrated Americans. Carney committed to meeting the alliance's current spending target of 2 percent in 2025, half a decade ahead of Ottawa's previous commitment. Carney's announcement comes less than a week before he hosts President Donald Trump at the G7 summit in Alberta. The accelerated spending also follows amplified calls from the U.S. president and his Canadian ambassador, Pete Hoekstra, for Ottawa to honor its unfulfilled 11-year-old commitment to the target. Carney framed the new spending as a necessary response to a more dangerous world that has left Canada more vulnerable to threats in the Arctic — and less protected by Americans. 'A new imperialism threatens. Middle powers must compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they're not at the table, they're on the menu,' Carney said, repeating a go-to line from keynote speeches before he formally entered politics. 'Our fundamental goal in all of this is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants,' he added. 'But now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony, charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contribution to our collective security.' Canada faces spending decisions in the coming weeks and months. Carney's government isn't planning to unveil a budget until the fall, which has sparked widespread criticism from opposition parties. But his finance minister, François-Philippe Champagne, has told POLITICO that Ottawa must take into account whether NATO leaders adopt a plan to raise the spending benchmark to 5 percent at a June 24 summit in The Hague. Champagne said in a recent interview that with the NATO summit coming in June, and 'with the trade dispute we have with the United States, things could shift. Obviously, we have a big exercise around government efficiency.' NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte last week outlined a proposal that would see members spend 3.5 percent on core defense spending and a 1.5 percent component on defense tied to 'security-related investment, including in infrastructure and resilience.' Carney said Canada was already well positioned to make a contribution to that second component, as part of his government's plan to build up Canada's defense industrial base and make it less reliant on the U.S. 'With the fall of the Berlin Wall, the United States became the global hegemon, its gravitational pull on Canada, always strong, became virtually irresistible, and made the U.S. our closest ally and dominant trading partner,' Carney said. Carney reiterated Canada's intent to join the ReArm Europe initiative, which Defense Minister David McGuinty recently confirmed to CANSEC, Canada's largest military trade show. 'Canada is confident that our economic strategy and our many strategic resources, from critical minerals to cyber, will make major contributions to NATO security,' Carney said. 'We will ensure that Canadian workers and businesses benefit from the huge increase in defense procurement that will be required using Canadian steel, Canadian aluminum, Canadian critical minerals, Canadian cyber,' said Carney. Carney's announcement amounts to a sea change in Canadian defense and foreign policy. Former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau once once privately advised NATO officials that Canada would never meet the 2 percent target, according to documents leaked from the Pentagon two years ago. Some Canadians have been calling for increased spending more quickly, but until Monday, those calls were mostly ignored by political leaders from both the federal Liberal and Conservative parties. Those calls have come for decades. Less than one month after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the U.S., Canada's then Foreign Minister John Manley said it was incumbent on the country to spend more on its national security. Canada, he said, 'can't just sit at the G8 table and then, when the bill comes, go to the washroom."
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Carney says Canada will meet NATO target this year
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney on Monday announced an ambitious defense spending target that would end Canada's status as a NATO laggard and mollify frustrated Americans. Carney committed to meeting the alliance's current spending target of 2 percent in 2025, half a decade ahead of Ottawa's previous commitment. Carney's announcement comes less than a week before he hosts President Donald Trump at the G7 summit in Alberta. The accelerated spending also follows amplified calls from the U.S. president and his Canadian ambassador, Pete Hoekstra, for Ottawa to honor its unfulfilled 11-year-old commitment to the target. Carney framed the new spending as a necessary response to a more dangerous world that has left Canada more vulnerable to threats in the Arctic — and less protected by Americans. 'A new imperialism threatens. Middle powers must compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they're not at the table, they're on the menu,' Carney said, repeating a go-to line from keynote speeches before he formally entered politics. 'Our fundamental goal in all of this is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants,' he added. 'But now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony, charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contribution to our collective security.' Canada faces spending decisions in the coming weeks and months. Carney's government isn't planning to unveil a budget until the fall, which has sparked widespread criticism from opposition parties. But his finance minister, François-Philippe Champagne, has told POLITICO that Ottawa must take into account whether NATO leaders adopt a plan to raise the spending benchmark to 5 percent at a June 24 summit in The Hague. Champagne said in a recent interview that with the NATO summit coming in June, and 'with the trade dispute we have with the United States, things could shift. Obviously, we have a big exercise around government efficiency.' NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte last week outlined a proposal that would see members spend 3.5 percent on core defense spending and a 1.5 percent component on defense tied to 'security-related investment, including in infrastructure and resilience.' Carney said Canada was already well positioned to make a contribution to that second component, as part of his government's plan to build up Canada's defense industrial base and make it less reliant on the U.S. 'With the fall of the Berlin Wall, the United States became the global hegemon, its gravitational pull on Canada, always strong, became virtually irresistible, and made the U.S. our closest ally and dominant trading partner,' Carney said. Carney reiterated Canada's intent to join the ReArm Europe initiative, which Defense Minister David McGuinty recently confirmed to CANSEC, Canada's largest military trade show. 'Canada is confident that our economic strategy and our many strategic resources, from critical minerals to cyber, will make major contributions to NATO security,' Carney said. 'We will ensure that Canadian workers and businesses benefit from the huge increase in defense procurement that will be required using Canadian steel, Canadian aluminum, Canadian critical minerals, Canadian cyber,' said Carney. Carney's announcement amounts to a sea change in Canadian defense and foreign policy. Former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau once once privately advised NATO officials that Canada would never meet the 2 percent target, according to documents leaked from the Pentagon two years ago. Some Canadians have been calling for increased spending more quickly, but until Monday, those calls were mostly ignored by political leaders from both the federal Liberal and Conservative parties. Those calls have come for decades. Less than one month after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the U.S., Canada's then Foreign Minister John Manley said it was incumbent on the country to spend more on its national security. Canada, he said, 'can't just sit at the G8 table and then, when the bill comes, go to the washroom.'
