M&S boss criticises post-Brexit food labelling as ‘bureaucratic madness'
These labels have been phased in since 2023 when the post-Brexit trading deal was agreed.
The Windsor Framework was negotiated by the UK and EU to address issues which had arisen in the operation of the Northern Ireland Protocol which effectively keeps Northern Ireland within the EU for trade.
Next week sees the final phase of the Windsor Framework come into effect, adding yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for food retailers like M&S.
– 1000+ M&S products destined for Northern Ireland will need to have a 'Not For EU' label stuck on them.
– Another… pic.twitter.com/XDCLwPjX00
— Stuart Machin (@MachinStuart1) June 27, 2025
However, rules were needed to ensure goods for the UK did not enter the EU single market in the Republic of Ireland.
Earlier this month the UK Government indicated it would hope for a smoother flow of trade when its new sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) deal with the EU is finalised.
Mr Machin indicated he was hopeful that the stickers may become unnecessary following the new deal.
He took to social media on Friday to express his frustration.
'Next week sees the final phase of the Windsor Framework come into effect, adding yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for food retailers like M&S. – 1000+ M&S products destined for Northern Ireland will need to have a 'Not For EU' label stuck on them,' he posted on the social media platform X.
'Another 400 will need to go through additional checks in the 'Red Lane'.
'Quite frankly it's bureaucratic madness, confusing for customers, and completely unnecessary given the UK has some of the highest food standards in the world.
'The Government's SPS deal with the EU will be game-changing, and it can't come soon enough!'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
17 minutes ago
- Leader Live
M&S boss criticises post-Brexit food labelling as ‘bureaucratic madness'
Stuart Machin described 'yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for retailers', as he revealed that more than 1,000 M&S products destined for Northern Ireland will need to have a 'Not for EU' sticker affixed from next week. These labels have been phased in since 2023 when the post-Brexit trading deal was agreed. The Windsor Framework was negotiated by the UK and EU to address issues which had arisen in the operation of the Northern Ireland Protocol which effectively keeps Northern Ireland within the EU for trade. Next week sees the final phase of the Windsor Framework come into effect, adding yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for food retailers like M&S. – 1000+ M&S products destined for Northern Ireland will need to have a 'Not For EU' label stuck on them. – Another… — Stuart Machin (@MachinStuart1) June 27, 2025 However, rules were needed to ensure goods for the UK did not enter the EU single market in the Republic of Ireland. Earlier this month the UK Government indicated it would hope for a smoother flow of trade when its new sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) deal with the EU is finalised. Mr Machin indicated he was hopeful that the stickers may become unnecessary following the new deal. He took to social media on Friday to express his frustration. 'Next week sees the final phase of the Windsor Framework come into effect, adding yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for food retailers like M&S. – 1000+ M&S products destined for Northern Ireland will need to have a 'Not For EU' label stuck on them,' he posted on the social media platform X. 'Another 400 will need to go through additional checks in the 'Red Lane'. 'Quite frankly it's bureaucratic madness, confusing for customers, and completely unnecessary given the UK has some of the highest food standards in the world. 'The Government's SPS deal with the EU will be game-changing, and it can't come soon enough!'
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
NHS drug charges row hits deadlock
Ministers have failed to agree a crucial deal on NHS drug charges that was meant to be at the centre of a plan to boost growth. Talks on Friday between the Government and pharmaceutical industry bosses ended without an agreement on how much the NHS is able to claw back in rebates on drugs. Ministers had been hoping to be able to address industry complaints of unfairness prior to the publication a strategy for the sector, expected next week. One senior pharmaceutical executive said: 'If a [NHS clawback] deal is not secured, it's a missed opportunity for the life sciences sector plan and one which blocks the UK's ambition to be a life sciences superpower.' Another said that the UK needed to show it wanted to make the scheme competitive again, adding: 'Without that, all the high statements of ambition or new strategies in the world are not going to make the UK a leading life sciences centre.' The Department of Health launched a review of NHS rebates earlier this year under pressure from Donald Trump and the pharmaceutical industry. Ministers said they would take into account the 'concerns of the US president' that countries are unfairly keeping prices low relative to the high drug costs in the American health system. Under the trade agreement signed between the two nations earlier this year, the Government agreed to 'endeavour to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies operating in the UK'. The failure to secure a deal ahead of the publication of the sector strategy follows months of wrangling. Under the current rebate scheme, known as VPAG, pharmaceutical companies have to hand at least 23pc of their revenue from sales of branded medicines back to the NHS. The scheme cut the drug bill by £3bn last year. However, pharmaceutical bosses have warned the scheme is preventing the launch of cutting-edge medicines in the UK. They have pressed for the UK to cut the rate of rebates into single digits, a level seen elsewhere in Europe. The life sciences strategy is one of several sector plans announced as part of Labour's industrial strategy. Others were published this week. A spokesman for the Government said: 'Economic growth is our number one priority and we're taking decisive action to unlock innovation and drive investment in the UK's world-class pharmaceutical sector. As part of this, we continue to work closely with industry on a rapid review of our voluntary scheme for medicines pricing. 'With our work and investment, we will make sure the next game changers in medicine are developed here in Britain, for the benefit of our health at home and abroad.'
BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
The big change affecting European travel
The days of being charged additional fees for your hand luggage on flights could soon be a thing of the past – at least in the European Union. On 24 June, lawmakers voted in favour of a proposal allowing passengers to bring a small carry-on bag weighing up to 7kg (15.4lbs) on board their flight free of charge, even on budget airlines. Under the new rule, which could take effect as early as July 2025, travellers would be allowed to bring one cabin bag measuring up to 100cm on board their flight, as well as an under-the-seat personal item with a maximum size of 40x30x15cm at no additional cost. The proposed law still requires approval from 55% of EU member states, but if adopted, the new rules would extend to all flights within the EU, as well as routes to and from the EU. "Today's vote marks an important step toward fairer and more transparent travel," vice-chair of the EU Committee on Transport and Tourism (TRAN) Matteo Ricci said in a press statement. "[It introduces] concrete measures such as the clear definition of free hand luggage … a fundamental right to avoid unjustified extra costs." Previously, EU-based budget airlines like EasyJet, RyanAir, Wizz and others often charged substantial fees for hand luggage, depending on its size and weight. As a result, Spain's Consumer Rights Ministry fined five budget airlines €179m (£149m) for what it deemed "abusive practices" in November 2024. The Spanish ruling, along with pressure from consumer rights associations and passengers, has paved the way for the EU to push for what it considers fairer and more consistent hand luggage rules. The carry-on proposal is part of a larger effort by the European Parliament to increase protections and rights for travellers. To ensure that families can sit together without incurring additional costs, lawmakers also voted to prohibit airlines from imposing seat selection charges for children aged 12 and under. Lawmakers also want to change the way companies handle compensation and reimbursement requests by requiring ticket vendors or third-party retailers to inform passengers of the full cost of their flight at the time of booking – including intermediation or service fees – as well as the reimbursement process. Officials also want to ensure that travellers in the EU aren't just entitled to compensation when airline delays cause them to miss their connecting flights, but also when a delay causes them to miss their connection on another mode of transport (an airport bus, for instance) when the ticket is purchased through one operator. While the new proposals may seem like a victory for passengers, not everyone is in favour of enacting them into law. Airline industry representatives are strongly opposed to waiving hand luggage fees, saying that the cost of the bag will be folded into overall prices, making them higher for everyone in the long run. Critics suggest that the new rules essentially force travellers to bring along hand luggage, since the cost will be baked into their ticket with no opportunity to opt out. "Europe's airline market is built on choice. Forcing a mandatory trolley bag strips passengers of that choice and obliges passengers to pay for services they may not want or need," said Ourania Georgoutsakou, Managing Director of Airlines For Europe, Europe's largest airline association, in a statement. "What's next? Mandatory popcorn and drinks as part of your cinema ticket? The European Parliament should let travellers decide what services they want, what services they pay for and, importantly, what services they don't." -- For more Travel stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram.
