Liberal mayor Dan beats nationalist in tense race for Romanian presidency
The liberal, pro-EU mayor of Bucharest, Nicusor Dan, has fought off a strong challenge from a Romanian right-wing nationalist to win the presidency after months of political turbulence.
George Simion, the leader of the far-right AUR party, won a dramatic first-round victory earlier this month, riding a wave of anger from Romanians who had seen the presidential race annulled late last year because of claims of Russian interference.
But it was the softly spoken Nicusor Dan who swept to victory, winning 55% of the vote in Romania, even though Simion was well ahead in the diaspora.
"We need to build Romania together irrespective of who you voted for," said Dan, once his victory was secure.
More than 11.6 million Romanians voted in Sunday's run-off, and Dan won the support of more than six million of them.
The mathematician waited until after midnight on Sunday before he could be absolutely sure that the numbers were on his side and he could join his supporters in a park opposite City Hall in Bucharest.
They went wild, chanting his name and cheering. At one point he was almost mobbed but this was a huge moment for the president-elect and for his supporters after months of political tension.
"A community of Romanians who want a profound change in Romania won," he said.
Romanians are broadly unhappy with the dominance of mainstream parties and the turbulence in this European Union and Nato member state intensified earlier this month when the government collapsed because its candidate had failed to make the second round.
While Nicusor Dan campaigned on fighting corruption and maintaining support for northern neighbour Ukraine, Simion attacked the EU and called for cutting aid to Kyiv.
"Russia, don't forget, Romania isn't yours," Dan's supporters chanted.
Even though exit polls had given him victory, they did not include the all-important diaspora vote and Simion clung to the belief that he could still win.
"I won, I am the new president of Romania and I am giving back power to the Romanians," he insisted initially.
It was not until the early hours of Monday that he conceded victory on Facebook. A protest planned by his supporters was then apparently called off.
During the election campaign Simion had stood side by side with Calin Georgescu, the far-right fringe figure who had stunned Romania with a first-round presidential victory at the end of last year, buoyed by an enormous TikTok campaign.
The vote was annulled over allegations of campaign fraud and Russian interference and Georgescu was barred from running again. Russia denied any involvement.
Asked by the BBC on Sunday whether he was acting as Georgescu's puppet, George Simion said: "The puppets are those who annulled the elections... I am a man of my people and my people voted for Calin Georgescu.
"Do we like democracy only when the good guy has won? I don't think this is an option."
He said he was a patriot and accused what he called the mainstream media of smearing him as a pro-Russian or fascist.
The key to Simion's success in the first round was his extraordinary win among diaspora voters in Western Europe, including in the UK.
His supporters turned out in force again on Sunday, with partial results giving him 68.5% support in Spain, 66.8% in Italy and 67% in Germany. He also had the edge in the UK, where voters said they would have picked Calin Georgescu if authorities had not barred him from running.
"We didn't know anything about [Georgescu] but then I listened to what he was saying, and you can tell he's a good Christian," said 37-year-old Catalina Grancea.
She had vowed to go back to Romania if Simion had won and her mother Maria said she too had voted for change: "Our children were forced to leave Romania because they couldn't find any jobs there."
However, Nicusor Dan's voters came out in even bigger numbers both in Romania and abroad. In neighbouring Moldova 87% of Romanians backed the mayor of Bucharest.
The presidents of both Moldova and Ukraine congratulated him on his victory.
"Moldova and Romania stand together, supporting one another and working side by side for a peaceful, democratic, and European future for all our citizens," said Maia Sandu.
"For Ukraine, as a neighbour and friend, it is important to have Romania as a reliable partner," said Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on social media that Romanians had turned out in massive numbers and had "chosen the promise of an open, prosperous Romania in a strong Europe".
Will Romania vote take country away from European mainstream?
The TikTokers accused of triggering an election scandal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canada to join major European rearmament deal as early as June 23: sources
Prime Minister Mark Carney plans on joining a sweeping European plan in Belgium this month to rearm the continent and provide more military aid to Ukraine, CBC News has learned. Last month, Carney signalled to CBC's Power & Politics that he hopes to sign on to the new defence initiative by Canada Day as he tries to move away from relying on the United States for weapons and munitions. Now sources with knowledge of the matter say Carney is expected to join the rearmament deal as early as June 23, when he meets with European leaders in Brussels at the EU-Canada summit. Carney hinted on Monday this summit will "be more important than ever." "Canada will arrive at this summit with a plan to lead, with new investments to build our strength in service of our values," Carney said. WATCH | Why ReArm Europe would want Canada: The prime minister has said he's been in talks with European countries for months about closer defence co-operation. Carney wants to build up Canada's defence capabilities and expand its military suppliers beyond the U.S. as President Donald Trump wages a trade war on Canada and most of the world. "Over 75 cents on every dollar of capital spending for defence goes to the United States. That's not smart," Carney told Power & Politics host David Cochrane on May 27. Carney said it would be better to "spend more at home" with "diversified partnerships." CBC News is not naming the sources because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the deal. European Union President Ursula von der Leyen first proposed the plan called ReArm Europe in March to bolster the continent's military capabilities during global threats, Russia's ongoing invasion in Ukraine and uncertainty with the United States. The plan, renamed Readiness 2030, includes boosting European defence spending by up to 800 billion euros, including a 150-billion euro loan program to pay for more military technology and weapons. It's unclear how much money Canada would contribute. CBC News asked the Prime Minister's Office for details about the spending commitment and has yet to receive a response. Carney announced more than $9 billion in new military spending this fiscal year on Monday — and said Canada must further increase defence spending in the years to come. Once Canada joins the European deal, the government will have to decide what initiative it wants to launch and which countries it will partner with. The list of potential projects includes air and missile defence, drones and anti-drone systems, artificial intelligence and electronic warfare. "The first step is joining the club. The next step is deciding what projects you want to work on with other club members," said Dave Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute. Ahead of the EU-Canada summit, Carney is also expected to announce more support for Ukraine. As part of Carney's promise to increase defence spending this year, supplementary estimates this week show the government has earmarked $2 billion for military aid to Ukraine and to expand defence partnerships. A source told CBC News the government is expected to reveal how much of that money will go toward Ukraine at the G7 meeting in in Kananaskis, Alta., next week. Carney is hosting this year's summit and invited Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who hopes to urge Trump to move forward with a stronger sanctions package on Russia. WATCH | Carney says Three years into Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, it continues to push forward in the Donbas region where Ukrainians are progressively losing "more and more" territory, Perry said. Ukraine needs armoured vehicles, artillery systems, ground-based air defence systems and munitions, he said. "They need help repairing all of the critical infrastructure the Russians are going after," he said. "They need the funding to basically keep the government of Ukraine solvent … they need a whole range of things."
Politico
7 hours ago
- Politico
Kids off social media, Macron says
TECH MAZE French President Emmanuel Macron is gearing up to ban kids from social media, but that may not be so easy, our colleagues in Paris report. Why it matters: The proposed ban, which would impact children under 15, comes amid high-profile youth violence cases, including the fatal stabbing of a high school teaching assistant this week that prompted Macron to call for a hastened social media ban across France and the European Union. Macron has argued that age checks — particularly for websites that sell knives and show explicit material — could help mitigate the problem. The obstacles: The EU doesn't want a social media ban 'because this is the prerogative of our member states,' European Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier told reporters this week. Macron said that he will adopt a ban in France if the EU doesn't. That could prompt legal wrangling. Macron's proposed age checks could breach privacy and free expression liberties because they could lead to people 'constantly prov[ing] their age, or even their identity,' warned the French Data Protection Authority, the country's independent data protection regulator. The tech industry is also squabbling over whether operating systems or social media apps and websites should be responsible for enforcing the social media ban. Almost half of children under 10 have social media accounts in Denmark even though laws prohibit this, the country's digital minister, Caroline Stage Olsen, said last week. They can also use virtual private networks, which allow internet users to spoof locations, to bypass geographic restrictions on certain websites. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. A federal judge in Massachusetts will hear a challenge to the Trump administration's directive to slash research grants for projects about health equity, transgender health and vaccine skepticism on Monday. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Danny Nguyen at dnguyen@ Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: Dannyn516.70, CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. FOLLOW THE MONEY Scientists at California's public universities are worried about how declining state and federal funding will impact the state's tobacco researchers. Tobacco researchers in California, whose studies are largely funded by state tobacco tax revenue and National Institutes of Health dollars, are being pinched from both sides: California's smoking rates are dwindling, which means less tax revenue for researchers, and NIH money long-regarded as steady is now precarious due to President Donald Trump's belt-tightening. Researchers say diminished funding could seriously impair their hiring capabilities and infrastructure maintenance, and ultimately stymie critical public health research. Key context: In the first months of the Trump administration, NIH has clawed back funds for scientific research and upkeep of the buildings, staff and tools that support the work. It's targeted research that doesn't square with Trump's agenda, such as projects advancing diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as specific universities the administration accuses of antisemitism. NIH has also promised to cut funding for universities' indirect costs, which finance infrastructure and logistics at research institutes, but court orders have put that directive on pause. What's next: Scientists across California public universities are anticipating increased competition for a shrinking pool of state funds for their labs. California has pledged to cushion the loss of NIH funding by creating a state-level replica of the federal agency. But it's unclear whether the state can mimic the funding scale of the federal government. 'We can all see this coming, and we're scared shitless,' said a tobacco researcher at a California state university who was granted anonymity to avoid retribution. The federal government's cuts — particularly the cuts to indirect costs — would leave a large hole for California to fill. The state's largest public university system, the California State University, faces a budget deficit amid declining enrollment and increased costs that prompted the state to propose cuts of over $100 million earlier this year. The University of California, the state's other public college system, is facing similar financial constraints. 'There's just no room in the budget,' said Georg Matt, a tobacco researcher at San Diego State University, which is part of the CSU consortium. 'So for the CSU to do research, this research has to come from extramural support.' Scientists tasked with submitting yearly progress reports for secured NIH funding are omitting 'red flag words' like 'structural racism' that could be construed as contributing to DEI research — which the Trump administration has pledged to eliminate — said Pam Ling, the director of UC San Francisco's Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. 'Without knowing whether or not that report is going to be accepted and whether the next year's funding is coming in, your work grinds to a halt because you're waiting for the assurance that you're going to be able to pay your people or conduct your experiments,' Ling said.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive: Trump's tariff deal ‘quietly' added 10% raise which nobody is complaining about anymore, says his former commerce secretary
Wilbur Ross, former Commerce Secretary and a key architect of Trump's first-term trade policy, describes Trump's current tariff strategy as a deliberate evolution: moving faster, hitting harder, and using broader executive powers to impose tariffs for both economic and diplomatic leverage. The Trump administration's use of tariffs has sparked debate over the ultimate goals of its economic strategy. However, a former Cabinet member and key trade advisor to the President has suggested there is an underlying logic to the approach. Since winning the Oval Office, President Trump has announced an evolving range of policies. with economic sanctions spinning higher on some trade partners while others have been granted pauses. Many of the announcements have not come through official White House channels; for example, Trump threatened a 50% tariff on the EU in April in a bid to get European negotiators to the table—by posting on his social media site, Truth Social. Indeed, Trump has come under scrutiny from Beijing, arguably the most critical region for the U.S. to make a deal, who claim America's tariff tactics have been 'coercion and blackmail' when instead it should 'convey information to the Chinese side…through relevant parties.' But Wilbur Ross, Trump's Commerce Secretary in his first administration, says there's a clear tactic at play beneath Trump's bluster. The 87-year-old banker turned D.C. power player said there is an 'art' to Trump's dealmaking, as White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has suggested; Ross told Fortune in an exclusive interview: 'Well, everybody's reaction to [tariffs] was first shock and amazement, but the actual retaliatory measures that they put in were fairly modest—even China didn't match in dollar for dollar. 'There's a real reason for that, I think the other countries, as they've thought about it, have recognized that while they have to talk very bravely for their domestic political constituencies… They also recognize that at the end of the day, they can't afford a tit-for-tat escalating trade war with us.' And this was a fact Trump was relying on, continued Ross: 'One of the earliest things he put in was that 10% tariff on everything from everywhere. 'Nobody is even complaining about that anymore. When you think about it, in the normal course, getting quietly to do a 10% tariff on everything from everywhere was a huge achievement, even if he didn't get anything else. But because he followed it with these much more extreme things, it makes the 10% look like it's not such a big bother. 'But it's a huge number, and he's been collecting it every day.' Indeed, imported goods alone into the U.S. in 2024 stood at $3.36 trillion—even before tax, duties, and levies were collected (worth $82 billion) and before imported services are added to those figures. Even 10% of near-$3.4 trillion is an eye-watering sum to add to federal budgets, though some items like autos and steel are even higher. Indeed nations like China, Canada, and Mexico are all already subject to more than the baseline 10% universal tariff. When Ross spoke to Fortune in a previous exclusive interview earlier this year, he said President Trump would be all the more confident in his second term because he now better understands the inner workings of Washington, D.C., and has a stronger mandate courtesy of a solid election sweep. And President Trump's tactics, which have included everything from threatening a 25% hike on Apple's iPhones specifically to raising sanctions to more than 150% on China at some points, reflect the path Ross expected. After all, as Secretary, Ross was one of the key allies in Trump's team when renegotiating America's position on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). At the time, Trump was a fierce critic of the deal with Mexico and Canada and wanted to withdraw from the agreement and begin negotiating from there. Ross felt the better tactic was to threaten such action and keep an exit as a last resort, an opinion that Trump eventually came around to agreeing with. Likewise, having been appointed in 2017 Ross oversaw the tariff action in the first Trump administration which included sanctions on Chinese goods as well as aluminum and steel more widely. 'He has started out on a much more adventurous path than last time,' Ross told Fortune this week. 'Broader in scope and more extreme in terms of the numbers themselves.' Trump has three objectives, he adds: shrinking trade deficits, producing revenue to offset his 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' and achieving other diplomatic purposes such as the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. and global defense spending. 'He has a much more fulsome, much more complicated agenda than before,' Ross explains. 'It's also different in…that last time I was very careful to set the groundwork to do public hearings, stakeholder meetings, to do written reports, to set a whole record so that under the Administrative Procedures Act we would be relatively safe from people trying to knock it out in court. 'This time, they did a very different thing. They went in mostly just by his say so using the IFA, the Emergency Powers Act, and they ran into a snag at the Court for International Trade.' This snag may alter the course of tariff reaction on the account of businesses, he added, because their investment timelines may shift based on when the tariffs are legally approved. But Ross added: 'Most people are operating under the assumption that sooner or later, he'll get something like what he was looking for…and therefore, while it's slowed down a bit, [I] don't think it will derail [trade talks] because [foreign governments] also know there are other ways he could punish them rather than just the tariffs. 'So it's a bump in the road, but I don't think it's a huge pothole that would wreck the car.' This story was originally featured on
