logo
The Latest: Trump says all of Tehran should evacuate 'immediately'

The Latest: Trump says all of Tehran should evacuate 'immediately'

Independent9 hours ago

U.S. President Donald Trump posted an ominous message on his social media site Monday calling for the immediate evacuation of Tehran but later denied reports he had rushed back to Washington to work on a ceasefire.
Israel 's air campaign on the Iranian capital appeared to broaden an intensifying conflict after it issued warnings on Monday for about 300,000 people in Tehran to evacuate ahead of airstrikes.
People were seen leaving the city Tuesday morning as shops and the historic Grand Bazaar were closed. Iranian authorities insist everything is under control and no guidance has been issued.
Here's the latest:
___
US joining conflict would lead to 'broader conflict,' EU foreign policy chief
The European Union's top diplomat said on Tuesday that the United States joining the conflict between Israel and Iran would 'drag the region into a broader conflict.'
Kaja Kallas added that during a recent call with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, he had 'emphasized that it's also not in their interest to be drawn into this conflict.'
Kallas said the foreign ministers of the 27-nation bloc, in a video conference meeting, agreed on a peaceful political resolution of the conflict in Gaza and between Israel and Iran .
'Ministers called on all sides to abide by international law, exercise restraint and avoid actions that could spiral out of control.'
She said that 'all agreed the urgent need for de-escalation' and that 'Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb and diplomacy is the solution to prevent this.'
Russian drone production not affected by conflict
Russia makes the drones it uses in its war in Ukraine and is unlikely to be impacted immediately by the conflict in the Middle East, said David Albright, an expert on Russian and Iranian drones.
The drones are made predominantly in the Alabuga plant in Russia's Tatarstan region and while Moscow initially bought a limited number of drones from Tehran, it later opened its own production facilities.
Iran has 'decades of experience' building drones, Albright said, and Russia could suffer because it will not be able to get more 'advanced drone models' from Iran, which is likely to need them.
Trump rejects intelligence assessment on Iran nukes
The Republican president insisted that Tehran was 'very close' to building a nuclear weapon despite congressional testimony from his top intelligence adviser earlier this year.
Back in March, National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard told lawmakers that spy agencies have assessed that 'Iran is not building a nuclear weapon' and the country's supreme leader 'has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.'
Trump dismissed that when speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One during an overnight flight back to Washington after leaving the G7 summit early.
'I don't care what she said,' Trump said. 'I think they were very close to having it.'
Trump not 'in the mood to negotiate'
'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, it's very simple,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One during his overnight flight back to Washington.
He accused Iranian leaders of being unwilling to reach an agreement over their nuclear program, and suggested he was now less interested in talking with them.
'They should have done the deal. I told them, do the deal,' Trump said. 'So I don't know. I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate.'
The Republican president, who said he plans to meet with advisers in the Situation Room, appears to be gradually building the public case for a more direct American role in the conflict.
His shift in tone comes as the U.S. has repositioned warships and military aircraft in the region to respond if the conflict between Israel and Iran further escalates.
Iran cancels leave for medical personnel
In Tehran on Tuesday, placards and boards calling for a 'severe' response to Israel could be seen everywhere.
Authorities cancelled leave and vacations for doctors and nurses as the attacks continue.
Long lines could be seen at gas stations.
European leaders push for de-escalation
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot spoke with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Monday night and then in the ensuing hours with the Iranian, British and German foreign ministers about the situation in the Mideast.
The French, British and German ministers passed on joint messages to the Iranian foreign minister about the need for a de-escalation and a return to diplomacy, according to a French diplomatic official.
They urged Iran to return to negotiations as soon as possible, without conditions, the official said.
They urged Iran to avoid any threats to Western interests, any extension of hostilities elsewhere in the region and any nuclear escalation including leaving the Non-Proliferation Treaty, stopping cooperation with the IAEA or pursuing further enrichment, the official said.
The ministers also passed along messages to Israel on the need to not target Iranian authorities, infrastructure and the civilian population, the official said.
The official was not authorized to be publicly named in accordance with Foreign Ministry policy.
Italy's Meloni reiterates negotiations with Iran
Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni reaffirmed 'the opportunity to reopen the road of negotiations' with Iran during a bilateral meeting with President Trump on the sidelines of the G-7 meeting in Canada, her office said in a statement Tuesday.
She also underlined 'the necessity in this moment' of reaching a ceasefire in Gaza.
More than 40 Palestinians killed while waiting for aid in Gaza
At least 45 Palestinians were killed in the Gaza Strip while waiting for U.N. and commercial trucks to enter the territory with desperately needed food, according to Gaza's Health Ministry and a local hospital.
The circumstances of the killings were not immediately clear.
Palestinians say Israeli forces have repeatedly opened fire on crowds trying to reach food distribution points run by a separate U.S. and Israeli-backed aid group since the centers opened last month.
Local health officials say scores have been killed and hundreds wounded.
In those instances, the Israeli military has acknowledged firing warning shots at people it said had approached its forces in a suspicious manner.
Egypt, Jordan and others call for a halt to the conflict
Twenty countries denounced in a joint statement the escalating tensions in the Middle East caused by what they term Israel's aggression against Iran and called for diplomacy and dialogue to restore stability in the region.
'There's an imperative need to halt Israeli hostilities against Iran, which come during a time of increasing tension in the Middle East, and to work towards de-escalation, to achieve a comprehensive ceasefire and restoration of calm,' read the statement.
Foreign ministers of Algeria, Bahrain, Brunei, Chad, the Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, and Mauritania rejected finding resolution through military campaigns. Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Somalia, Sudan, Turkey, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates also condemned the escalation.
They also highlighted the importance of clearing the region of nuclear and mass destruction weapons and called for refraining from targeting nuclear facilities and protecting maritime navigation in international waters.
India evacuates its citizens
India has evacuated an unspecified number of students from Tehran amid rising tension in the region, the foreign ministry said in a statement on Tuesday.
Some Indian nationals have also received assistance to leave Iran through the borders with Armenia, it added.
Those who can afford transport on their own have been advised to evacuate as soon as possible.
Israel says it killed high-ranking Iranian general
Israel claimed Tuesday it killed another high-ranking Iranian general after decimating its military command.
The Israeli military said it killed Gen. Ali Shadmani, who had just been named as the head of the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters.
Iran did not immediately acknowledge Shadmani's death.
Shadmani was a general in Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard.
Trump says return to Washington not tied to ceasefire
President Trump denied reports that he had rushed back to Washington from the G7 summit to work on a ceasefire, saying on his social media platform that "it certainly has nothing to do with a Cease Fire. Much bigger than that.'
Trump earlier issued an ominous warning on Truth Social, saying 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,' and adding 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!'
People seen leaving Tehran
As the sun rose Tuesday on Iran, the downtown area of Tehran, the country's capital, appeared to be beginning to empty out.
Many shops in the capital stood closed. The city's ancient Grand Bazaar was closed, something that's rarely done, like during demonstrations or during the height of the coronavirus pandemic.
On the roads out of Tehran to the west, traffic stood bumper to bumper. Many appeared to be heading to the Caspian Sea area, with local reports suggesting there were some diversions.
Long lines also could be seen at gas stations operating in Tehran.
Iran's capital, Tehran, is home to some 10 million people. That's roughly the same population for the entirety of Israel.
It remained unclear how the city could be evacuated.
Authorities within Iran's government continued to insist everything was under control and did not offer any guidance for the public on what to do.
G7 leaders call for de-escalation but insist Iran must not get nukes
Leaders of the Group of Seven countries meeting in Canada signed a joint statement calling for de-escalation of fighting between Israel and Iran while reaffirming that Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear bomb.
The statement reads:
'We, the leaders of the G7, reiterate our commitment to peace and stability in the Middle East.
'In this context, we affirm that Israel has a right to defend itself. We reiterate our support for the security of Israel.
'We also affirm the importance of the protection of civilians.
'Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror.
'We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.
'We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza.
'We will remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump swats US intelligence reports on Iran's nuclear threat to align with Israel
Trump swats US intelligence reports on Iran's nuclear threat to align with Israel

The Guardian

time28 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump swats US intelligence reports on Iran's nuclear threat to align with Israel

Tulsi Gabbard, the US director of national intelligence, delivered a concise verdict during congressional testimony this March: the intelligence community 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003'. As he rushed back to Washington on Tuesday morning, Donald Trump swatted aside the assessment from the official that he handpicked to deliver him information from 18 US intelligence agencies. 'I don't care what she said,' said Trump. 'I think they were very close to having one.' Trump's assessment aligned him with Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, who has warned that Iran's 'imminent' plans to produce nuclear weapons required a pre-emptive strike from Israel – and, he hopes, from the United States – in order to shut down the Iranian uranium enrichment program for good. It also isolates Trump's spy chief, whom he nominated specifically because of her skepticism for past US interventions in the Middle East and of the broader intelligence community, which he has described as a 'deep state'. Gabbard sought to tamp down on a schism with Trump, telling CNN that Trump 'was saying the same thing that I said in my annual threat assessment back in March. Unfortunately too many people in the media don't care to actually read what I said.' But as the Trump administration now appears closer than ever before to a strike on Iran, Gabbard has been left out of key decision-making discussions and her assessments that Iran is not close to a nuclear breakout has become decidedly inconvenient for an administration now mulling a pre-emptive strike. 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' he wrote in a social media post on Tuesday. The US has dispatched an additional carrier group, KC-135 refueling tankers and additional fighter jets to the region. Those assets have been sent to give Trump 'more options' for a direct intervention in the conflict, US media have reported. Deliberations over the intelligence regarding Iran's breakout time to a nuclear weapon will be pored over if the US moves forward with a strike that initiates a new foreign conflict for the US that could potentially reshape the Middle East and redefine a Trump presidency that was supposed to end the US era of 'forever wars'. Israel launched airstrikes last week in the wake of an International Atomic Energy Agency report that formally declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years and said the country had enriched enough uranium to near weapons grade to potentially make nine nuclear bombs. Gen Michael Erik Kurilla, the head of US Central Command who has forcefully campaigned for a tougher stance on Iran, told members of the armed services committee in the House of Representatives last week that Iran could have enough weapons-grade uranium for 'up to 10 nuclear weapons in three weeks'. Yet a CNN report on Tuesday challenged that claim. Four sources familiar with a US intelligence assessment said that Iran was 'not actively pursuing a nuclear weapon' and that the country was 'up to three years away from being able to produce and deliver one to a target of its choosing'. The skepticism over Iran's potential for a nuclear breakout has also been reflected in Gabbard's distancing from Trump's inner circle. People often represent policy in the Trump administration and those with unpopular views find themselves on the outside looking in. Trump last Sunday held a policy discussion with all the top member of his cabinet on national security. But Gabbard was not there. Her absence was taken as a sign that US policy was shifting in a direction against Iran. 'Why was Gabbard not invited to the Camp David meeting all day?' asked Steve Bannon, a member of Trump's Maga isolationist wing that has pushed against the US launching a direct strike against Iran. 'You know why,' responded Tucker Carlson, an influential pundit in Trump's America First coalition who had slammed 'warmongers' in the administration including popular Fox News hosts like Mark Levin. Days after the Camp David meeting, Gabbard released a bizarre video in which she warned about the threat of nuclear war, saying that this is the 'reality of what's at stake, what we are facing now'. 'Because as we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers,' she said. The remarks could have referred to US involvement in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. But it is with Iran that US policy appears to be changing rapidly and avowed opponents of foreign interventions appear to be falling in line in order to avoid losing clout in the Trump administration. Trump 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment', said vice-president JD Vance, who has publicly called on the US to avoid costly overseas interventions but has remained muted over Iran. 'That decision ultimately belongs to the president. 'But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue,' he continued. 'And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's goals. Whatever he does, that is his focus.'

Elon Musk posts 'negative drug test results'
Elon Musk posts 'negative drug test results'

Sky News

time33 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Elon Musk posts 'negative drug test results'

Elon Musk appears to have shared the results of a recent drug test following claims he abused illegal substances while campaigning for Donald Trump last year. The Tesla chief executive posted an image of the document on X, his social media platform, which suggested he had tested negative for more than a dozen drugs including ecstasy, ketamine and cocaine. The test was purportedly carried out by Fastest Labs of South Austin after it collected a urine sample from a donor called " Elon Musk" on 11 June. The billionaire wrote "lol" alongside the image, which was posted in the early hours of Tuesday morning US time. It comes after The New York Times reported in May that the SpaceX founder had taken drugs while supporting Mr Trump's presidential campaign last year. But the newspaper said it was "unclear" if he had continued to do so while working for the White House. In January 2024, The Wall Street Journal also claimed that senior figures at SpaceX and Tesla had expressed concern about his alleged drug use. Mr Musk has consistently denied the claims. When asked about The New York Times report at his last press conference in the White House, he attacked the outlet for publishing what he called "fake news". Following his post on Tuesday, Mr Musk hit out at the newspapers which reported the allegations. He wrote: "The sheer audacity of the WSJ/NYT lies is astonishing!" The tech tycoon also challenged the journalists responsible for the articles to "take drug tests and publish the results!" "They won't, because those hypocrites are guilty as sin," he added. Meanwhile, on Tuesday, Mr Musk's X announced it was suing the state of New York over a new law forcing companies to share their content moderation practices. The complaint, filed in Manhattan federal court, argued the legislation was unconstitutional.

Instead of ending wars, ‘America First' is being dragged into more of them
Instead of ending wars, ‘America First' is being dragged into more of them

The Independent

time33 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Instead of ending wars, ‘America First' is being dragged into more of them

It is difficult to discern exactly what the 'big stuff' is that prompted President Trump to leave the G7 summit and return to Washington a day early. Mr Trump wouldn't say what, precisely, but he did advise the 9 million residents of Tehran to 'immediately evacuate' their homes, causing mass panic. Any lingering hopes that the president was going back to the White House to work full time on a ceasefire were extinguished when Mr Trump declared that suggestions to that effect made by the president of France were mistaken: 'I'm not looking for a ceasefire, we're looking at better than a ceasefire.' What the president does want, in his words, is 'an end, a real end, not a ceasefire,' and a 'complete give-up' by Iran. At the same time, though, the president told the world that he had not contacted the Iranians to engage in peace talks in any 'way, shape, or form' because they 'should have taken the deal that was on the table'. Given that many American diplomats have left the region – and the USS Nimitz and its carrier strike group are transferring from the Pacific – it seems plain that the US government is at least contemplating how force (or the threat of it) might have to become necessary to pursue American strategic objectives. President Trump has long been perfectly clear about what one of those prime objectives is: Iran 'just can't have a nuclear weapon'. On that point, at least, he has the backing of his allies, endorsed in the G7 communique, which added that Iran is a 'source of terror'. As is his style, weeks ago he tried a bold – if unlikely – diplomatic initiative to strike a deal, with direct talks in Rome between American and Iranian officials. These were stalling even before Israel started its bombardment of Iran's labs, uranium enrichment facilities and other targets – and the US-Iran talks have since broken down. Yet even now, there is speculation that – pressured by Israel's actions and backed with a major US naval taskforce heading towards the Persian Gulf – Mr Trump may try to use this opportunity to achieve a breakthrough deal. Asked by reporters if he might dispatch his vice-president, JD Vance, and roaming negotiator Steve Witkoff to Iran for this purpose, Mr Trump did not rule it out. 'Peace through strength' is a slogan that the president frequently uses, but thus far in his presidency, it has seldom worked out in practice. This time, the world must hope, will be different. If diplomacy fails? Mr Trump could simply allow Israel to continue its efforts to eliminate Iran's nuclear capabilities, such as they are, and to so destabilise the theocratic regime that it is overthrown by the Iranian people. Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, has made no secret of his wish for 'regime change', addressing the 'Persian' people directly and having his photograph taken with the exiled son of the last shah of Iran, who was toppled by the ayatollahs in the revolution of 1979. Subcontracting the task of disarming Iran and persuading the people of Iran to replace their government with a more palatable, peace-loving alternative, all without any direct US involvement, must have some attractions for American foreign policy (though Mr Trump reportedly vetoed an assassination attempt on the supreme leader of Iran). That carries significant risks, however, which will be apparent to the defence, security and state department officials briefing Mr Trump. For some weeks, Israel has used the George W Bush playbook as applied in the last Gulf war to justify its attacks in Iran – a pre-emptive military strike to remove the threat of weapons of mass destruction, and, as the Americans did with Saddam Hussein, offering regime change as an alternative to destruction and defeat. A similar ultimatum is now being issued by Mr Trump, with Israeli backing – give up your nukes and you can stay in power. If not... But the world knows how that Iraqi story ended – a fractured country that fell into civil war and the rule of Isis, an even more murderous and dangerous entity than the Baathists. The collapse of Iran into chaos and civil war would be a far greater disaster for the world than anything that has happened in Iraq, Libya, Syria or Afghanistan in terms of the consequences for turning a stable (if malign) state into a failed one. Iran is in another league of military and political importance. If there was fighting for control of Iran – and the ayatollahs cannot be expected to meekly slink away to their holy places – then that would soon spread to Yemen, and restart the horrific proxy war there with Saudi Arabia. Russia remains Iran's friend and ally, and relies on its Shahed drones that proved so effective in Ukraine. What would Vladimir Putin do to protect his interests? If America intervenes, or acquiesces in Israel's escalating campaign, the regional conflagration so long feared between Israel and Iran would not remain a private dispute between the two regional superpowers of Israel and Iran, not least because Tehran's client terrorists in Hezbollah, the Houthi rebels and, above all, Hamas will continue to be involved. The more nations and groups become involved, the more unpredictable events will become, and the harder it will be for America to control them. Instead of ending far-away wars, this 'America First' is being dragged into more of them. That's very much 'big stuff' – and big risks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store