
Why Rick Tocchet left the Canucks and what it means for their offseason
Rick Tocchet and Vancouver Canucks hockey operations leadership spent last weekend in meetings, discussing the difficult year they'd just endured, the future of the organization and their plans for a high stakes, all-in summer.
Less than a week later, Tocchet and his agent informed Canucks president of hockey operations Jim Rutherford that he'd decided not to return to Vancouver as head coach.
As the Tocchet saga reached its conclusion this week, it really wasn't a back-and-forth negotiation. There was nothing adversarial or acrimonious about it.
The Canucks 'stepped up' financially, according to two league sources, and offered Tocchet a contract that would have made him one of the highest-paid coaches in the NHL. Keeping Tocchet was the club's first choice, a fact that Rutherford wasn't going to shy away from Tuesday simply because the outcome was a disappointing one from the team's perspective.
Advertisement
As Tocchet wrestled with his decision over the past week, which was an arduous process for him, it wasn't about money or term or a counteroffer being met (or not). It wasn't about the relationships with ownership or management. It wasn't about the city, or the Vancouver media, or the sometimes overwhelming attention about town.
No, for Tocchet, this seems to have been a highly personal decision. One that he didn't make lightly.
It's a decision made at a fork in the road of an NHL head coaching career during which Tocchet has had to contend with significant organizational dysfunction at every turn.
Tocchet's first shot at being an NHL head coach came with the pre-Jeff Vinik Tampa Bay Lightning, and he was tasked with picking up the pieces of the disastrous 16-game Barry Melrose era.
Then, after years as a successful assistant coach with the Pittsburgh Penguins, Tocchet resurfaced with the cap-laundromat version of the Arizona Coyotes.
Finally, with the Canucks, Tocchet had appeared to land somewhere relatively stable, working with people he trusted and for a franchise that — after he helped author the most incredible single-season defensive turnaround in recent NHL history — seemed on the verge of breaking through as a consistent playoff team and fringe contender.
That was before this season, though.
That was before Elias Pettersson's form dipped to an excruciatingly low level. Before Thatcher Demko missed extended stretches of games with three separate injuries, including an unprecedented knee tear. Before the rift between J.T. Miller and Pettersson tore the Canucks locker room apart and scuttled a season that opened with such incredible promise.
That was before Quinn Hughes' future, clouded by his status as an extension eligible player in the summer of 2026, became the lens through which every piece of Canucks news was filtered.
Advertisement
After a trying campaign for the Canucks, a season that was more difficult for the people involved to live through than anyone on the outside can gather, there are dark clouds gathering unmistakably on the horizon.
There are massive, difficult questions shrouding all of Vancouver's top players. There are real questions about the makeup and maturity level of this team, too, outside of Hughes and a handful of other reliable veterans.
The Canucks are the only team in the NHL without a practice facility, something that genuinely matters, especially for a coach like Tocchet who focuses a lot of his and his staff's time, effort and thought to hands-on on-ice teaching.
All of that factored into Tocchet's decision.
If it wasn't about the money and it wasn't about the relationships — and it wasn't — then it's fundamentally difficult to process Tocchet's departure as anything but a complicated personal decision that leaves us fairly questioning whether he believed that there was a path to winning in Vancouver. Or not.
The implications of that, of course, are heavy for Canucks fans to consider.
That sense of an organization that, after one magical season of apparent progress, appears to be headed swiftly in a concerning, confidence-sapping direction. The Hughes dynamic raises those stakes further, stoking fears of a club that never really emerged from the unintentional Jim Benning era rebuild and could already be headed inexorably back into the relative irrelevance that the Canucks have largely toiled under for the past decade and a half.
This is the environment, and the level of fan-driven anxiety, that Rutherford attempted to settle by explaining the situation on Tuesday. Over the course of a typically honest 30-minute media availability, Rutherford admitted that Hughes had yet to call him back when he tried to reach him to inform him of the news about Tocchet's departure.
Advertisement
The veteran executive was also asked about his Canucks future.
'I don't think about it a lot, so I'm not thinking about leaving town,' Rutherford said, after a pregnant pause. 'I'm still here for the same reasons, and I don't feel comfortable with the job that I've done. We were on the right track a year ago, we got off that track. I take a lot of responsibility for it. It's my job. I have the hockey department. We have a lot of work to do to get back on track and at this point in time that's my focus, to see if we can do it.'
If getting this all back on track seems like an impossible task at this point, especially in the absence of Tocchet, the Canucks' handpicked, culture-changing head coach, it's at least worth bearing in mind that this isn't the first time that this Rutherford-led management group has seemed to have its backs to the wall, tasked with microwaving a contender against all odds.
You'll recall that the sky was falling in Vancouver too after l'affaire Bruce Boudreau in 2023, with the club having made a series of widely panned trades, including dealing captain Bo Horvat, and having fired its head coach in absurd, unbecoming circumstances.
The next year, the Canucks made it work. There was some luck involved, absolutely, but there were also some sharp, disciplined bets placed on bargain-bin free agents. Some dexterous work on the trade market to reallocate money and talent from the wings into center and defense.
And, of course, in landing Tocchet as Boudreau's replacement, they indisputably nailed the head coaching hire.
Obviously, it's difficult to repeat an improbable trick shot, and this isn't where the Canucks would want to be positioned to begin this critical offseason. However, that seems to be where they've landed. It's on Rutherford and his management group to do it again, whether that's a fair ask or not.
Advertisement
This is really the thing to bear in mind here, more than anything. The crisis of confidence in the Vancouver market emanating from Tuesday's news of Tocchet's departure is, in some ways, indicative of a fan base that's beginning to see the bottom of a deep, dark well.
That deep, dark well, however, has been visible for the entirety of this decade to anyone paying attention. An organization that's been left behind in several crucial respects by its competitors, who have generally been far more willing to invest in facility upgrades, tanking seasons and the lost revenue and hope in stretch run games that are an inevitable byproduct of executing seller trades at the deadline than Vancouver has been.
There's a cost to that, one that informs the club's positioning, and indirectly, some of the factors that shaped Tocchet's departure.
There's a distinction between grappling with reality, however, and indulging unduly in cynicism. And underneath the churn of dysfunction and disappointment that has characterized the Canucks experience for the past 12 months, it's worth recalling, after all, that this is still a hockey club with a vibrant, locked-in fan base that only missed the Stanley Cup playoffs by seven points — despite its star center struggling, and a significant late-season injury to one of the league's most impactful superstar players.
This is a team that has quality goaltending and legitimate blue-line depth. There are emergency-level holes up front, without question, but the Canucks have both the assets and meaningful cap flexibility to take a credible shot at addressing it.
Vancouver has also still got a management team that's proven itself at being adept at acquiring players on the trade market, and has proven itself efficient at identifying undervalued contributors.
Ironically, too, for the first offseason in well over a decade, the organization's actual self-interest and penchant for reckless, all-in swings in pursuit of immediate gratification are actually aligned.
Advertisement
There's no sense, after all, in rebuilding or charting a new direction now.
If you believe the Canucks can convince Hughes to stay provided that they prove that there's a path to contention, then the club has to get back to the business of winning games in the playoffs. That necessitates major short-term improvement, a transformative, aggressive offseason in which future assets — like Vancouver's 2025 first-round pick — should absolutely be on the table in trade talks for win-now help.
If you're more dubious about their chances of getting Hughes' autograph on an extension next summer, then next season should be viewed as the organization's last kick at the can with the best defender in franchise history. Go all in, because there's no sense in ripping the band-aid off now. Hughes isn't extension eligible until next summer anyway, and his value will be maximized when you're able to trade him in a Mikko Rantanen-style deal where an eight-year mega extension is baked into the return.
Of course, in either scenario, you'd feel more comfortable with a coach of Tocchet's quality at the helm. The Canucks will miss the thoughtfulness and tactical ingenuity that Tocchet brought to the job. He established a holistic way to play and win. He unquestionably elevated this team during his two-and-a-half-year stint in Vancouver.
That Tocchet will immediately be considered among the top head coaching candidates on the market is a testament to the work he did in Vancouver, and the magnitude of the Canucks' loss.
For the Canucks, however, and for their fans, there's no time to be sullen about Tocchet's decision. No point in being fatalistic about what it means for the franchise. Or what it portends.
There's a new head coach to hire, a top-six center to land and a lot of scoring skill to graft onto this roster.
For the Canucks, this remains an all-in summer. Perhaps the most critical offseason in recent franchise history.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
2025 Stanley Cup Final schedule: Panthers vs. Oilers Game 4 time, TV info
2025 Stanley Cup Final schedule: Panthers vs. Oilers Game 4 time, TV info Show Caption Hide Caption NHL rescue dogs, all available for adoption, compete in the 2025 Stanley Pup 32 adorable rescue puppies representing each NHL team will compete in the 2025 Stanley Pup, airing June 6 on TruTV and Sportsnet! The 2025 Stanley Cup Final is a rematch of the 2024 Stanley Cup Final, but the early results are different. The defending champion Florida Panthers lost the opener but now lead the Edmonton Oilers 2-1 after a Game 3 rout. The Panthers will try to take a commanding 3-1 lead in Game 4 while the Oilers will try to tie the series 2-2. Last season, the Panthers won the first three games and the Oilers won the next three. Florida captured Game 7 on home ice for its first NHL championship. This year, the Oilers had home-ice advantage but lost it after a Game 2 loss, They have won five Stanley Cup titles, last in 1990. They are trying to become the first Canadian team since 1993 to win the championship. Here is the schedule, television and streaming information for the best-of-seven Stanley Cup Final: Stanley Cup Final schedule Panthers lead series 2-1 All times Eastern; (x-if necessary) Watch the Stanley Cup Final on Sling How to stream Stanley Cup Final Stanley Cup Final games can be streamed on Sling TV and Max.


Miami Herald
37 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Why are the Panthers-Oilers Stanley Cup Final and the NBA Finals being dragged out? An explanation
If the Stanley Cup Final between the Panthers and the Edmonton Oilers goes the maximum seven games, the series will end up taking more than twice as many days as it took for humans to travel from the Earth to the moon and four times as long as it took the United States to negotiate the Louisiana Purchase, in which France gave the U.S. parts of 15 states. So why exactly does the NHL need 17 days to play as many as seven games? And why have there been two nights in the past week without a Stanley Cup or NBA Finals game? Several factors have contributed, starting with these two: 1). The NBA and NHL and their television networks are sensible enough to know that competing against each other on the same nights isn't good for anyone. So nights the NBA Finals are played have become essentially, and voluntarily, off limits for the Stanley Cup Final. And vice versa. ABC has the NBA Finals every year, while TNT and ABC alternate Stanley Cup Final coverage, with TNT airing this month's Panthers-Oilers matchup. 2). Both leagues, ideally, also would prefer two nights between Finals games whenever possible, so that players can be rested and, at least in the NBA's case, so they can own a larger chunk of the June calendar. The NBA is adamant about having two days off in between Finals games played in different cities; the NHL prefers to have two days off between Final games in different cities because of the cross-country travel involved for players, coaches, NHL staff and media. But the NHL isn't insistent on having two days off between games in different cities, which is why the Panthers and Oilers will play Game 4 in Sunrise on Thursday and then Game 5 on Saturday in Edmonton. The NHL could have played Game 5 on Sunday (when the NBA is dark) instead of Saturday, but that would have meant having only one travel day between Games 5 and 6 or Games 6 and 7, and the NHL preferred to have the one-day break, on a travel day, earlier in the series, while also making sure that it would not compete with any NBA Finals game. For the Panthers and Oilers, there will be two days off between Game 5 in Edmonton and a potential Game 6 in Sunrise as well as two days off between Game 6 and a potential Game 7 in Edmonton. Television also plays a role in scheduling. TV's influence was felt last Saturday, when both the NBA Finals and Stanley Cup Final were dark. The Panthers and Oilers played Game 2 on Friday, so a Saturday game wasn't an option for the NHL. The NBA and NHL never play consecutive nights during their championship rounds. Game 2 was an option last Saturday for the NBA, because the Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers played Game 1 on Thursday. But the NBA and ABC opted to play Game 2 on Sunday night instead of Saturday night because television audiences are traditionally bigger on Sunday than Saturday, which is considered the least-watched night of viewing. And why was there no NBA or NHL game on Tuesday? The Panthers and Oilers played Game 3 on Monday, so Tuesday wasn't an option for the NHL. And the NBA wanted two days off between Game 2 in Oklahoma City on Sunday and Game 3 in Indiana on Wednesday. So Tuesday wasn't an option for an NBA game, either. So NBA and NHL fans must wait patiently as both series play out over as much as 2 ½ weeks. There's no shortcut to winning a championship, or apparently, to getting to the end of a championship series. Remaining games of each series Panthers-Oilers (Panthers lead 2-1): Game 4: Oilers at Panthers, Thursday, June 12, 8 p.m. ET; TNT, truTV, Max Game 5: Panthers at Oilers, Saturday, June 14, 8 p.m. ET; TNT, truTV, Max * Game 6: Oilers at Panthers, Tuesday, June 17, 8 p.m. ET; TNT, truTV, Max * Game 7: Panthers at Oilers, Friday, June 20, 8 p.m. ET; TNT, truTV, Max Thunder-Pacers (Series tied at 1-1): Game 3: Wednesday, June 11 | Thunder vs. Pacers | 8:30 p.m. ET, ABC/fubo Game 4: Friday, June 13 | Thunder vs. Pacers | 8:30 p.m. ET, ABC/fubo Game 5: Monday, June 16 | Pacers vs. Thunder | 8:30 p.m. ET, ABC/fubo *Game 6: Thursday, June 19 | Thunder vs. Pacers | 8:30 p.m. ET, ABC/fubo *Game 7: Sunday, June 22 | Pacers vs. Thunder | 8 p.m. ET, ABC/fubo * - if needed


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Fueled by a desire to teach, new Penguins coach Dan Muse is embracing the challenge that awaits
PITTSBURGH (AP) — Dan Muse knows his resume, at least the part that includes his playing career, doesn't exactly fit the profile of the typical NHL coach. And yet in some ways, the years spent as a self-described 'bad' forward at Division III Stonehill College, where Muse scored all of five goals in 61 games, played a vital role in creating a path that eventually led Muse to the Pittsburgh Penguins. 'That taught me about work ethic,' Muse said on Wednesday, a week after the Penguins hired him to replace two-time Stanley Cup winner Mike Sullivan. "That taught me about 'Never quit. Don't stop. Never listen to the outside noise and keep finding a way.'' Something Muse has done everywhere he's been over the past two decades, whether it's on the ice, in a high school history classroom or on the lacrosse field. Beyond hockey, teaching might be Muse's true calling. There's something about the challenge of trying to tap into someone's potential — whether it's a perennial NHL All-Star, a 20-year-old prospect, or a student struggling in the classroom — that has always called to him. The fact that calling pushed the 42-year-old to the highest reaches of the sport that's been a lifelong passion is mostly a happy accident. 'I haven't felt like I've worked a day in my life,' he said. An extraordinary impact Maybe, but there is plenty of work to be done in Pittsburgh, which finds itself trying to navigate the twilight of the Sidney Crosby Era to the beginning of whatever might come next. Those plans are still largely in the gestational phase. General manager Kyle Dubas has spent the past 15 months leaning into accumulating as many draft picks and young prospects as possible. The Penguins have 30 selections over the next three years, including 18 in the first three rounds. Muse's burgeoning reputation as a coach with the knack for getting the best out of players makes him seemingly a solid fit for where the Penguins might be going, though Dubas stressed Muse's talents lie beyond merely turning young, talented prospects into young, talented pros. 'Whether it's a young player coming into the league, or a veteran player trying to stay in the league, Dan has an extraordinary impact on all of them,' Dubas said. He'll have to if he wants to have a lengthy run in Pittsburgh, which has missed the playoffs each of the past three seasons and hasn't made it beyond the first round of the postseason since 2018. While longtime captain Crosby, who turns 38 this summer, remains one of the most productive and dependable players in the league, the Penguins have struggled defensively and in goal. Dubas is not interested in a quick fix and instead is searching for a solution that will have staying power. Muse seems to be on board, declining to put any sort of timeline on when Pittsburgh might return to legitimate Stanley Cup contention, saying only that the process will start when the club reports to training camp in September. Muse said he's spoken or at least reached out to '95%' of the players under contract for next season, though he's focused on simply getting to know them at this point rather than do a deep dive into specific philosophies. That will come later. Not intimidated There was a time earlier in his coaching journey — particularly when he was hired as an assistant at Yale in 2009 — when he feared his modest playing career would be a hindrance. Now, the idea of creating a plan and asking future Hall of Famers Crosby and Evgeni Malkin to execute it isn't a problem. 'I've worked in almost every role you can imagine,' said Muse, who spent the past two years on Peter Laviolette's staff with the New York Rangers. 'Second assistant. First assistant. Video coach. Head coach (at the junior level). Especially having the opportunity to work in two different NHL organizations, as well as with all those different players, led me to feel extremely confident about my abilities to come into this opportunity.' Heady territory for someone who grew up in a hockey family but didn't pick up the game seriously until he was 11 and living in Alabama, not exactly a hockey hotbed. Muse can't explain what exactly drew him to the game. He just always sort of loved it. His parents helped stoke that passion, and his work ethic did the rest. Muse's background is one of the reasons why Dubas was intent on opening the job up to candidates of all stripes, not just the people he'd gotten to know during his decade-plus in the NHL. 'If we hadn't gone through that whole process and turned to someone I knew in the past or worked with, we wouldn't have found the best coach for the Penguins,' Dubas said. 'And that's Dan.' In a league that recycles coaches with regularity, the bespectacled Muse and his almost gravely New England accent offer a blank canvas. The Penguins are, in a way, starting over. Muse, who has won championships at every level he's coached outside of the NHL, is just starting up. 'A year from now, I believe I'll be a better coach and hope to be a better person than the one I am sitting here today,' he said. 'That's how it should be.' ___