logo
Why Rick Tocchet left the Canucks and what it means for their offseason

Why Rick Tocchet left the Canucks and what it means for their offseason

New York Times30-04-2025

Rick Tocchet and Vancouver Canucks hockey operations leadership spent last weekend in meetings, discussing the difficult year they'd just endured, the future of the organization and their plans for a high stakes, all-in summer.
Less than a week later, Tocchet and his agent informed Canucks president of hockey operations Jim Rutherford that he'd decided not to return to Vancouver as head coach.
As the Tocchet saga reached its conclusion this week, it really wasn't a back-and-forth negotiation. There was nothing adversarial or acrimonious about it.
The Canucks 'stepped up' financially, according to two league sources, and offered Tocchet a contract that would have made him one of the highest-paid coaches in the NHL. Keeping Tocchet was the club's first choice, a fact that Rutherford wasn't going to shy away from Tuesday simply because the outcome was a disappointing one from the team's perspective.
Advertisement
As Tocchet wrestled with his decision over the past week, which was an arduous process for him, it wasn't about money or term or a counteroffer being met (or not). It wasn't about the relationships with ownership or management. It wasn't about the city, or the Vancouver media, or the sometimes overwhelming attention about town.
No, for Tocchet, this seems to have been a highly personal decision. One that he didn't make lightly.
It's a decision made at a fork in the road of an NHL head coaching career during which Tocchet has had to contend with significant organizational dysfunction at every turn.
Tocchet's first shot at being an NHL head coach came with the pre-Jeff Vinik Tampa Bay Lightning, and he was tasked with picking up the pieces of the disastrous 16-game Barry Melrose era.
Then, after years as a successful assistant coach with the Pittsburgh Penguins, Tocchet resurfaced with the cap-laundromat version of the Arizona Coyotes.
Finally, with the Canucks, Tocchet had appeared to land somewhere relatively stable, working with people he trusted and for a franchise that — after he helped author the most incredible single-season defensive turnaround in recent NHL history — seemed on the verge of breaking through as a consistent playoff team and fringe contender.
That was before this season, though.
That was before Elias Pettersson's form dipped to an excruciatingly low level. Before Thatcher Demko missed extended stretches of games with three separate injuries, including an unprecedented knee tear. Before the rift between J.T. Miller and Pettersson tore the Canucks locker room apart and scuttled a season that opened with such incredible promise.
That was before Quinn Hughes' future, clouded by his status as an extension eligible player in the summer of 2026, became the lens through which every piece of Canucks news was filtered.
Advertisement
After a trying campaign for the Canucks, a season that was more difficult for the people involved to live through than anyone on the outside can gather, there are dark clouds gathering unmistakably on the horizon.
There are massive, difficult questions shrouding all of Vancouver's top players. There are real questions about the makeup and maturity level of this team, too, outside of Hughes and a handful of other reliable veterans.
The Canucks are the only team in the NHL without a practice facility, something that genuinely matters, especially for a coach like Tocchet who focuses a lot of his and his staff's time, effort and thought to hands-on on-ice teaching.
All of that factored into Tocchet's decision.
If it wasn't about the money and it wasn't about the relationships — and it wasn't — then it's fundamentally difficult to process Tocchet's departure as anything but a complicated personal decision that leaves us fairly questioning whether he believed that there was a path to winning in Vancouver. Or not.
The implications of that, of course, are heavy for Canucks fans to consider.
That sense of an organization that, after one magical season of apparent progress, appears to be headed swiftly in a concerning, confidence-sapping direction. The Hughes dynamic raises those stakes further, stoking fears of a club that never really emerged from the unintentional Jim Benning era rebuild and could already be headed inexorably back into the relative irrelevance that the Canucks have largely toiled under for the past decade and a half.
This is the environment, and the level of fan-driven anxiety, that Rutherford attempted to settle by explaining the situation on Tuesday. Over the course of a typically honest 30-minute media availability, Rutherford admitted that Hughes had yet to call him back when he tried to reach him to inform him of the news about Tocchet's departure.
Advertisement
The veteran executive was also asked about his Canucks future.
'I don't think about it a lot, so I'm not thinking about leaving town,' Rutherford said, after a pregnant pause. 'I'm still here for the same reasons, and I don't feel comfortable with the job that I've done. We were on the right track a year ago, we got off that track. I take a lot of responsibility for it. It's my job. I have the hockey department. We have a lot of work to do to get back on track and at this point in time that's my focus, to see if we can do it.'
If getting this all back on track seems like an impossible task at this point, especially in the absence of Tocchet, the Canucks' handpicked, culture-changing head coach, it's at least worth bearing in mind that this isn't the first time that this Rutherford-led management group has seemed to have its backs to the wall, tasked with microwaving a contender against all odds.
You'll recall that the sky was falling in Vancouver too after l'affaire Bruce Boudreau in 2023, with the club having made a series of widely panned trades, including dealing captain Bo Horvat, and having fired its head coach in absurd, unbecoming circumstances.
The next year, the Canucks made it work. There was some luck involved, absolutely, but there were also some sharp, disciplined bets placed on bargain-bin free agents. Some dexterous work on the trade market to reallocate money and talent from the wings into center and defense.
And, of course, in landing Tocchet as Boudreau's replacement, they indisputably nailed the head coaching hire.
Obviously, it's difficult to repeat an improbable trick shot, and this isn't where the Canucks would want to be positioned to begin this critical offseason. However, that seems to be where they've landed. It's on Rutherford and his management group to do it again, whether that's a fair ask or not.
Advertisement
This is really the thing to bear in mind here, more than anything. The crisis of confidence in the Vancouver market emanating from Tuesday's news of Tocchet's departure is, in some ways, indicative of a fan base that's beginning to see the bottom of a deep, dark well.
That deep, dark well, however, has been visible for the entirety of this decade to anyone paying attention. An organization that's been left behind in several crucial respects by its competitors, who have generally been far more willing to invest in facility upgrades, tanking seasons and the lost revenue and hope in stretch run games that are an inevitable byproduct of executing seller trades at the deadline than Vancouver has been.
There's a cost to that, one that informs the club's positioning, and indirectly, some of the factors that shaped Tocchet's departure.
There's a distinction between grappling with reality, however, and indulging unduly in cynicism. And underneath the churn of dysfunction and disappointment that has characterized the Canucks experience for the past 12 months, it's worth recalling, after all, that this is still a hockey club with a vibrant, locked-in fan base that only missed the Stanley Cup playoffs by seven points — despite its star center struggling, and a significant late-season injury to one of the league's most impactful superstar players.
This is a team that has quality goaltending and legitimate blue-line depth. There are emergency-level holes up front, without question, but the Canucks have both the assets and meaningful cap flexibility to take a credible shot at addressing it.
Vancouver has also still got a management team that's proven itself at being adept at acquiring players on the trade market, and has proven itself efficient at identifying undervalued contributors.
Ironically, too, for the first offseason in well over a decade, the organization's actual self-interest and penchant for reckless, all-in swings in pursuit of immediate gratification are actually aligned.
Advertisement
There's no sense, after all, in rebuilding or charting a new direction now.
If you believe the Canucks can convince Hughes to stay provided that they prove that there's a path to contention, then the club has to get back to the business of winning games in the playoffs. That necessitates major short-term improvement, a transformative, aggressive offseason in which future assets — like Vancouver's 2025 first-round pick — should absolutely be on the table in trade talks for win-now help.
If you're more dubious about their chances of getting Hughes' autograph on an extension next summer, then next season should be viewed as the organization's last kick at the can with the best defender in franchise history. Go all in, because there's no sense in ripping the band-aid off now. Hughes isn't extension eligible until next summer anyway, and his value will be maximized when you're able to trade him in a Mikko Rantanen-style deal where an eight-year mega extension is baked into the return.
Of course, in either scenario, you'd feel more comfortable with a coach of Tocchet's quality at the helm. The Canucks will miss the thoughtfulness and tactical ingenuity that Tocchet brought to the job. He established a holistic way to play and win. He unquestionably elevated this team during his two-and-a-half-year stint in Vancouver.
That Tocchet will immediately be considered among the top head coaching candidates on the market is a testament to the work he did in Vancouver, and the magnitude of the Canucks' loss.
For the Canucks, however, and for their fans, there's no time to be sullen about Tocchet's decision. No point in being fatalistic about what it means for the franchise. Or what it portends.
There's a new head coach to hire, a top-six center to land and a lot of scoring skill to graft onto this roster.
For the Canucks, this remains an all-in summer. Perhaps the most critical offseason in recent franchise history.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'A UFC fight': Tensions rise in Stanley Cup Final as the Panthers get the upper hand on the Oilers
'A UFC fight': Tensions rise in Stanley Cup Final as the Panthers get the upper hand on the Oilers

Associated Press

timean hour ago

  • Associated Press

'A UFC fight': Tensions rise in Stanley Cup Final as the Panthers get the upper hand on the Oilers

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) — Things got chippy in the Stanley Cup Final late in Game 3 when the Florida Panthers were well on their way to blowing out the Edmonton Oilers. Brawls ensued, Darnell Nurse and Jonah Gadjovich dropped the gloves, and eight guys got sent to the showers early with misconduct penalties. 'When we get into garbage time, those things happen, and I don't mind when those things happen,' Oilers captain Connor McDavid said. 'It's what good teams do: fight your way out of the rink. I don't mind that in garbage time.' Long before garbage time, Florida took it to Edmonton, with the defending champions dictating their style of play and knocking their opponents off kilter to take a 2-1 series lead with a 6-1 laugher. If more of that continues in Game 4 on Thursday night, it's advantage Panthers because they thrive on making other teams feel uncomfortable. 'We played our game, our style, stuck up for each other when we needed to,' Panthers winger Matthew Tkachuk said. 'If you have to take a punch, take a punch. If you have to take a cross-check, take a cross-check — a spear, a slash, whatever the case is, you've got to take it.' It should not be surprising that tensions boiled over given the lopsided score in the 10th game in the Cup final between these two teams over the past year. The Oilers and Panthers have grown a healthy distaste for each other with all that familiarity. With that comes plenty of hits, shoves and jabs that lead to slashes, punches and gear strewn all over the ice. The 140 combined penalty minutes in Game 3 were the most in a final since Game 4 between Montreal and Calgary in 1986. 'The game's over with 11 minutes left,' Oilers star Leon Draisaitl said Tuesday after practice. 'Then all hell breaks loose. It's a UFC fight.' The penalties that mattered to the result came early. The Oilers were not shy about criticizing the officiating and the Panthers for allegedly influencing it. Goaltender Stuart Skinner said, 'Some guys are flaking and going down trying to cause penalties,' and Evander Kane questioned some of the calls. 'There seems to be a little bit more attention on our group,' said Kane, who took two minor penalties in the first period alone. 'They seem to get away with it more than we do. It's tough to find the line.' Toeing that line is what the Panthers do best, and it is a recipe that has them in the final for a third consecutive year under coach Paul Maurice, who credited Tkachuk for having 'a little bit more impact on the tenacity of the team than the guy who wears a suit behind the bench and never takes a shift.' Florida's roster is full of truculence with talent to match. Sam Bennett delivered a big, open-ice hit that led to his breakaway and playoff-leading 14th goal, and finishing checks on John Klingberg has hampered the veteran defenseman's play in the series compared to the first three rounds. 'That's part of their DNA, that's what they do,' Draisaitl said. 'It's an emotional time. It's two teams that want to win, two teams of doing it their own way, but I don't think anybody is going crazy here. They're good at what they do.' Maurice did not buy into the idea that Game 3 was the Panthers showing what they can do at their best. The opener went to overtime and Florida needed double OT to win Game 2. 'I think the first two games are indicative of what Game 4 is going to look like,' Maurice said. 'We're not going to look at (Game 3) and say, 'That's the way it should look if we play our game.'' The Oilers certainly look at it as the opposite, discombobulated and nothing resembling the group that had gone 12-2 since a couple of losses to open the first round. They've dropped two in a row for the first time since. 'We just got to play our game,' Nurse said. 'We got guys that can do all that kind of stuff. But is that our game? So I think we just got to stick to play the way that we play. We're such a good hockey team when we just play hockey, and we just got to do that.' ___ AP NHL playoffs: and

Oilers' dream scenario in 2025 NHL Free Agency
Oilers' dream scenario in 2025 NHL Free Agency

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Oilers' dream scenario in 2025 NHL Free Agency

The post Oilers' dream scenario in 2025 NHL Free Agency appeared first on ClutchPoints. The Edmonton Oilers are in the Stanley Cup Final once again and facing the Florida Panthers. While everyone in Alberta focuses on bringing the title back, it's never too early to peek ahead to the summer. The Oilers should supplement their core in NHL free agency, but only after signing Connor McDavid to a long-term contract extension. Failing to lock in McDavid now would cause the entire summer to be a failure, regardless of their other pickups. The dream is signing McDavid and adding around him to create a sustainable champion. The Oilers have already locked in Leon Draisaitl for eight years at $14 million annually starting on July 1. Before any extensions or free-agency deals are signed, Draisaitl is set to be the highest-paid player in the league. McDavid should smash his teammate's record, which will make it hard for Edmonton to have elite depth under the salary cap. But three regular-season MVPs and a Conn Smythe Trophy before turning 29 warrant the big pay day. There is no drama around McDavid and the Oilers right now. He is the captain of the team, his friend has already been taken care of, his junior coach is the head coach, and his former agent is the president. McDavid leaving would be nothing short of stunning, as there have been no rumors about his unhappiness yet. But there is no reason to leave it up to chance. Stan Bowman should make McDavid the highest-paid player in the league on July 1, when he is eligible for an extension. The Oilers will still want to improve this summer, even if they win the Stanley Cup. How can they do that with Draisaitl and McDavid taking up so much of the cap? Finding the right bargain moves in free agency will be key this summer. The biggest free agent on the Oilers' books this offseason is defenseman Evan Bouchard. He is a restricted free agent, which means Edmonton will have time to negotiate with him, and they can match any contract he signs. Last year, the Blues snagged RFAs Philip Broberg and Dylan Holloway away from the Oilers, so they likely won't let that happen again. Bouchard was third on the Oilers in points this season, behind only McDavid and Draisaitl, with 67. He's been an elite offensive defenseman, helped by playing on the power play with those two forwards. If they want to sign him for eight years, it would be very expensive, but they could give him a bridge deal to buy out his RFA years. AFP Analytics projects Bouchard's contract at eight years and nearly $11 million annually. That puts him in the class with Rasmus Dahlin, Erik Karlsson, and Drew Doughty. If they could get McDavid in at any price and Bouchard in at a little bit below that, they could sign that depth. The Oilers have Corey Perry, Kasperi Kapanen, Trent Frederic, Connor Brown, and Jeff Skinner all hitting free agency this summer. Only some of those players can come back, and Elliotte Friedman recently reported that there is mutual interest between the team and Frederic. That could lead to the end of Kapanen's time in Edmonton if he can get a significant raise. The playoff experience could lead to a new deal for Skinner as well. Anthony Beauvillier would be a strong depth addition to bring in some scoring. If they wanted to go more of a physical route, they may just keep Brown and Perry, as they are the best bottom-six options focused on the hitting side. This offseason should be about locking in two of their strongest players and adding around the edges with the hopes of winning the West again. Related: Oilers coach undecided on goalie for Game 4 after Stuart Skinner benching Related: Oilers' Jake Walman fined $10,000 after scuffle with Matthew Tkachuk, Panthers bench

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store