logo
Why Rick Tocchet left the Canucks and what it means for their offseason

Why Rick Tocchet left the Canucks and what it means for their offseason

New York Times30-04-2025

Rick Tocchet and Vancouver Canucks hockey operations leadership spent last weekend in meetings, discussing the difficult year they'd just endured, the future of the organization and their plans for a high stakes, all-in summer.
Less than a week later, Tocchet and his agent informed Canucks president of hockey operations Jim Rutherford that he'd decided not to return to Vancouver as head coach.
As the Tocchet saga reached its conclusion this week, it really wasn't a back-and-forth negotiation. There was nothing adversarial or acrimonious about it.
The Canucks 'stepped up' financially, according to two league sources, and offered Tocchet a contract that would have made him one of the highest-paid coaches in the NHL. Keeping Tocchet was the club's first choice, a fact that Rutherford wasn't going to shy away from Tuesday simply because the outcome was a disappointing one from the team's perspective.
Advertisement
As Tocchet wrestled with his decision over the past week, which was an arduous process for him, it wasn't about money or term or a counteroffer being met (or not). It wasn't about the relationships with ownership or management. It wasn't about the city, or the Vancouver media, or the sometimes overwhelming attention about town.
No, for Tocchet, this seems to have been a highly personal decision. One that he didn't make lightly.
It's a decision made at a fork in the road of an NHL head coaching career during which Tocchet has had to contend with significant organizational dysfunction at every turn.
Tocchet's first shot at being an NHL head coach came with the pre-Jeff Vinik Tampa Bay Lightning, and he was tasked with picking up the pieces of the disastrous 16-game Barry Melrose era.
Then, after years as a successful assistant coach with the Pittsburgh Penguins, Tocchet resurfaced with the cap-laundromat version of the Arizona Coyotes.
Finally, with the Canucks, Tocchet had appeared to land somewhere relatively stable, working with people he trusted and for a franchise that — after he helped author the most incredible single-season defensive turnaround in recent NHL history — seemed on the verge of breaking through as a consistent playoff team and fringe contender.
That was before this season, though.
That was before Elias Pettersson's form dipped to an excruciatingly low level. Before Thatcher Demko missed extended stretches of games with three separate injuries, including an unprecedented knee tear. Before the rift between J.T. Miller and Pettersson tore the Canucks locker room apart and scuttled a season that opened with such incredible promise.
That was before Quinn Hughes' future, clouded by his status as an extension eligible player in the summer of 2026, became the lens through which every piece of Canucks news was filtered.
Advertisement
After a trying campaign for the Canucks, a season that was more difficult for the people involved to live through than anyone on the outside can gather, there are dark clouds gathering unmistakably on the horizon.
There are massive, difficult questions shrouding all of Vancouver's top players. There are real questions about the makeup and maturity level of this team, too, outside of Hughes and a handful of other reliable veterans.
The Canucks are the only team in the NHL without a practice facility, something that genuinely matters, especially for a coach like Tocchet who focuses a lot of his and his staff's time, effort and thought to hands-on on-ice teaching.
All of that factored into Tocchet's decision.
If it wasn't about the money and it wasn't about the relationships — and it wasn't — then it's fundamentally difficult to process Tocchet's departure as anything but a complicated personal decision that leaves us fairly questioning whether he believed that there was a path to winning in Vancouver. Or not.
The implications of that, of course, are heavy for Canucks fans to consider.
That sense of an organization that, after one magical season of apparent progress, appears to be headed swiftly in a concerning, confidence-sapping direction. The Hughes dynamic raises those stakes further, stoking fears of a club that never really emerged from the unintentional Jim Benning era rebuild and could already be headed inexorably back into the relative irrelevance that the Canucks have largely toiled under for the past decade and a half.
This is the environment, and the level of fan-driven anxiety, that Rutherford attempted to settle by explaining the situation on Tuesday. Over the course of a typically honest 30-minute media availability, Rutherford admitted that Hughes had yet to call him back when he tried to reach him to inform him of the news about Tocchet's departure.
Advertisement
The veteran executive was also asked about his Canucks future.
'I don't think about it a lot, so I'm not thinking about leaving town,' Rutherford said, after a pregnant pause. 'I'm still here for the same reasons, and I don't feel comfortable with the job that I've done. We were on the right track a year ago, we got off that track. I take a lot of responsibility for it. It's my job. I have the hockey department. We have a lot of work to do to get back on track and at this point in time that's my focus, to see if we can do it.'
If getting this all back on track seems like an impossible task at this point, especially in the absence of Tocchet, the Canucks' handpicked, culture-changing head coach, it's at least worth bearing in mind that this isn't the first time that this Rutherford-led management group has seemed to have its backs to the wall, tasked with microwaving a contender against all odds.
You'll recall that the sky was falling in Vancouver too after l'affaire Bruce Boudreau in 2023, with the club having made a series of widely panned trades, including dealing captain Bo Horvat, and having fired its head coach in absurd, unbecoming circumstances.
The next year, the Canucks made it work. There was some luck involved, absolutely, but there were also some sharp, disciplined bets placed on bargain-bin free agents. Some dexterous work on the trade market to reallocate money and talent from the wings into center and defense.
And, of course, in landing Tocchet as Boudreau's replacement, they indisputably nailed the head coaching hire.
Obviously, it's difficult to repeat an improbable trick shot, and this isn't where the Canucks would want to be positioned to begin this critical offseason. However, that seems to be where they've landed. It's on Rutherford and his management group to do it again, whether that's a fair ask or not.
Advertisement
This is really the thing to bear in mind here, more than anything. The crisis of confidence in the Vancouver market emanating from Tuesday's news of Tocchet's departure is, in some ways, indicative of a fan base that's beginning to see the bottom of a deep, dark well.
That deep, dark well, however, has been visible for the entirety of this decade to anyone paying attention. An organization that's been left behind in several crucial respects by its competitors, who have generally been far more willing to invest in facility upgrades, tanking seasons and the lost revenue and hope in stretch run games that are an inevitable byproduct of executing seller trades at the deadline than Vancouver has been.
There's a cost to that, one that informs the club's positioning, and indirectly, some of the factors that shaped Tocchet's departure.
There's a distinction between grappling with reality, however, and indulging unduly in cynicism. And underneath the churn of dysfunction and disappointment that has characterized the Canucks experience for the past 12 months, it's worth recalling, after all, that this is still a hockey club with a vibrant, locked-in fan base that only missed the Stanley Cup playoffs by seven points — despite its star center struggling, and a significant late-season injury to one of the league's most impactful superstar players.
This is a team that has quality goaltending and legitimate blue-line depth. There are emergency-level holes up front, without question, but the Canucks have both the assets and meaningful cap flexibility to take a credible shot at addressing it.
Vancouver has also still got a management team that's proven itself at being adept at acquiring players on the trade market, and has proven itself efficient at identifying undervalued contributors.
Ironically, too, for the first offseason in well over a decade, the organization's actual self-interest and penchant for reckless, all-in swings in pursuit of immediate gratification are actually aligned.
Advertisement
There's no sense, after all, in rebuilding or charting a new direction now.
If you believe the Canucks can convince Hughes to stay provided that they prove that there's a path to contention, then the club has to get back to the business of winning games in the playoffs. That necessitates major short-term improvement, a transformative, aggressive offseason in which future assets — like Vancouver's 2025 first-round pick — should absolutely be on the table in trade talks for win-now help.
If you're more dubious about their chances of getting Hughes' autograph on an extension next summer, then next season should be viewed as the organization's last kick at the can with the best defender in franchise history. Go all in, because there's no sense in ripping the band-aid off now. Hughes isn't extension eligible until next summer anyway, and his value will be maximized when you're able to trade him in a Mikko Rantanen-style deal where an eight-year mega extension is baked into the return.
Of course, in either scenario, you'd feel more comfortable with a coach of Tocchet's quality at the helm. The Canucks will miss the thoughtfulness and tactical ingenuity that Tocchet brought to the job. He established a holistic way to play and win. He unquestionably elevated this team during his two-and-a-half-year stint in Vancouver.
That Tocchet will immediately be considered among the top head coaching candidates on the market is a testament to the work he did in Vancouver, and the magnitude of the Canucks' loss.
For the Canucks, however, and for their fans, there's no time to be sullen about Tocchet's decision. No point in being fatalistic about what it means for the franchise. Or what it portends.
There's a new head coach to hire, a top-six center to land and a lot of scoring skill to graft onto this roster.
For the Canucks, this remains an all-in summer. Perhaps the most critical offseason in recent franchise history.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oilers' penalty woes and composure issues lead to blowout loss and put them in precarious spot
Oilers' penalty woes and composure issues lead to blowout loss and put them in precarious spot

Washington Post

time23 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Oilers' penalty woes and composure issues lead to blowout loss and put them in precarious spot

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — Falling behind early, parading to the penalty box and losing their composure, the Edmonton Oilers find themselves in an all-too-familiar position trailing the Florida Panthers in the Stanley Cup Final . Not much went right for them in Game 3 on Monday night, a 6-1 blowout loss that put them down 2-1 in the series after taking the opener at home. By Tuesday, they were back on the ice for practice, eager to put their worst performance since early in the playoffs behind them.

NHL's state income tax debate heats up with the Florida Panthers back in the Stanley Cup Final
NHL's state income tax debate heats up with the Florida Panthers back in the Stanley Cup Final

San Francisco Chronicle​

time24 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

NHL's state income tax debate heats up with the Florida Panthers back in the Stanley Cup Final

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) — The Florida Panthers are two wins away from becoming the fifth Stanley Cup champion in the past six years from a U.S. state with no income tax. The run has made taxes something of a hot topic around the league. Many contenders going deep in the playoffs come from Sun Belt locales, but the financial benefit is one advantage of many for them in attracting and retaining players. Or is it? "The tax thing is marginal at best, and I think the real reasons are that we're trying to do figure out a way to do our best to try to win," Florida general manager Bill Zito said, adding that team ownership and coach Paul Maurice are also key assets. 'The sun doesn't kill us. It's a nice environment to live in. It's a good place for families. It's a good place for singles. It's got a little something for everybody,' Commissioner Gary Bettman said before the final he 'hates the issue," and that was evident Monday night on TNT when retired player-turned-analyst Paul Bissonnette suggested tax problems should be addressed in the next collective bargaining agreement. Bettman called it ridiculous and rhetorically asked if the league should subsidize teams in places like New York and Los Angeles. The NHL tax landscape The Panthers, Tampa Bay Lightning, Vegas Golden Knights, Dallas Stars, Nashville Predators and Seattle Kraken are the six NHL teams out of 32 in a place with no state income tax. Deputy Commissioner Bill Daly said some other franchises have raised it as a concern but added the league does not share that thinking. 'These imbalances have existed forever,' Daly said. 'There are so many reasons why a player may choose to play in a particular location for a particular team for a particular coach that have nothing to do with the tax situation in that market.' The union seems to agreed that nothing needs to be negotiated in the next CBA to mitigate varying tax levels. NHLPA assistant executive director Ron Hainsey, who played for seven teams over 17 seasons from 2003-20, cited a run of Cup winners in places like Detroit, Chicago, Los Angeles and Pittsburgh over a decade-plus span as a hole in the argument. 'I'm kind of baffled at times that this is the topic it is,' Hainsey said. 'To react this way out there because Florida and Tampa are having their moment here where they have the players, good teams, took less to stay — it's the same thing that's happened the previous 12 years with all these other things. So, when we talk about, is it really an issue, I'm not certain that it is." Hainsey also pointed out that this is not a top issue in the NFL and NBA. Of course, hockey still has a ways to go to catch up with football and basketball player salaries, even with the NHL cap rising over the next few years because of revenues setting records. Alan Pogroszewski, who has studied and worked with players on tax matters for more than a decade, said a flexible salary cap would account for the range of tax situations. His AFP Consulting found that since 2016, teams in places with no state income tax qualified for the playoffs at a higher rate, providing what he called 'an innate-built-in tax advantage for several of these cities.' 'It's a combination of many things,' Pogroszewski said Tuesday. 'There's more factors than just the amount of money that's spent. It's how it's spent. But when you come into an equal playing field and your dollar's worth more, then that allows you some leeway.' What do players think? Brad Marchand, a Canadian who played in Boston for a decade and a half before getting traded to Florida in March, does not dismiss taxes as a factor in choosing where to play. "The Canadian teams, most of them have an extremely high tax rate, and then the California teams, same thing: Those teams are going to have to pay more money to get certain players than others,' Marchand said. "When you look at a team like Montreal, what are they 52, 54%? Versus a team like here or Dallas or whatever. That's a 15% difference. When you add that up, it's a tremendous amount of money.' Of course, money isn't the only motivating factor. Success for Florida, Tampa Bay, Vegas and Dallas directly coincides with Zito, Julien BriseBois, Kelly McCrimmon and Jim Nill being some of the best executives around and knowing how to evaluate talent and manage the cap. Being able to golf in the winter does not hurt either, and some players prefer smaller markets with less pressure. Others are drawn to hockey-crazy places where fans care deeply and hockey is either the top dog or the only game in town. The Edmonton Oilers, in the final for a second consecutive year, are the perfect example of that. 'The passion obviously that this fanbase has for their team is incredible,' said Oilers forward Evander Kane, who has also played in Atlanta, Winnipeg, Buffalo and San Jose. 'Once you actually get here and get to know your way around the city a little bit more, you realize there's actually quite a bit to do and it is a good spot for families and they have great summers.' NHL players get paid in U.S. dollars, even in Canada, taking some of the tax bite out of places like Montreal and Toronto with high tax rates because of the exchange rate. But that can also get cut into based on where guys choose to live. 'It helps while you're there, but also the living costs in Canada are extremely high, too, because you're taxed through the roof on everything: what you buy, what you sell, what you make,' Marchand said. 'So, yes, at the time, the costs are a little bit different but not much, and then when you move back, you have 20, 30% less money, so it absolutely plays a part.'

NHL's state income tax debate heats up with the Florida Panthers back in the Stanley Cup Final
NHL's state income tax debate heats up with the Florida Panthers back in the Stanley Cup Final

Fox Sports

time24 minutes ago

  • Fox Sports

NHL's state income tax debate heats up with the Florida Panthers back in the Stanley Cup Final

Associated Press FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) — The Florida Panthers are two wins away from becoming the fifth Stanley Cup champion in the past six years from a U.S. state with no income tax. The run has made taxes something of a hot topic around the league. Many contenders going deep in the playoffs come from Sun Belt locales, but the financial benefit is one advantage of many for them in attracting and retaining players. Or is it? "The tax thing is marginal at best, and I think the real reasons are that we're trying to do figure out a way to do our best to try to win," Florida general manager Bill Zito said, adding that team ownership and coach Paul Maurice are also key assets. 'The sun doesn't kill us. It's a nice environment to live in. It's a good place for families. It's a good place for singles. It's got a little something for everybody,' Commissioner Gary Bettman said before the final he 'hates the issue," and that was evident Monday night on TNT when retired player-turned-analyst Paul Bissonnette suggested tax problems should be addressed in the next collective bargaining agreement. Bettman called it ridiculous and rhetorically asked if the league should subsidize teams in places like New York and Los Angeles. The NHL tax landscape The Panthers, Tampa Bay Lightning, Vegas Golden Knights, Dallas Stars, Nashville Predators and Seattle Kraken are the six NHL teams out of 32 in a place with no state income tax. Deputy Commissioner Bill Daly said some other franchises have raised it as a concern but added the league does not share that thinking. 'These imbalances have existed forever,' Daly said. 'There are so many reasons why a player may choose to play in a particular location for a particular team for a particular coach that have nothing to do with the tax situation in that market.' The union seems to agreed that nothing needs to be negotiated in the next CBA to mitigate varying tax levels. NHLPA assistant executive director Ron Hainsey, who played for seven teams over 17 seasons from 2003-20, cited a run of Cup winners in places like Detroit, Chicago, Los Angeles and Pittsburgh over a decade-plus span as a hole in the argument. 'I'm kind of baffled at times that this is the topic it is,' Hainsey said. 'To react this way out there because Florida and Tampa are having their moment here where they have the players, good teams, took less to stay — it's the same thing that's happened the previous 12 years with all these other things. So, when we talk about, is it really an issue, I'm not certain that it is." Hainsey also pointed out that this is not a top issue in the NFL and NBA. Of course, hockey still has a ways to go to catch up with football and basketball player salaries, even with the NHL cap rising over the next few years because of revenues setting records. Alan Pogroszewski, who has studied and worked with players on tax matters for more than a decade, said a flexible salary cap would account for the range of tax situations. His AFP Consulting found that since 2016, teams in places with no state income tax qualified for the playoffs at a higher rate, providing what he called 'an innate-built-in tax advantage for several of these cities.' 'It's a combination of many things,' Pogroszewski said Tuesday. 'There's more factors than just the amount of money that's spent. It's how it's spent. But when you come into an equal playing field and your dollar's worth more, then that allows you some leeway.' What do players think? Brad Marchand, a Canadian who played in Boston for a decade and a half before getting traded to Florida in March, does not dismiss taxes as a factor in choosing where to play. "The Canadian teams, most of them have an extremely high tax rate, and then the California teams, same thing: Those teams are going to have to pay more money to get certain players than others,' Marchand said. "When you look at a team like Montreal, what are they 52, 54%? Versus a team like here or Dallas or whatever. That's a 15% difference. When you add that up, it's a tremendous amount of money.' Of course, money isn't the only motivating factor. Success for Florida, Tampa Bay, Vegas and Dallas directly coincides with Zito, Julien BriseBois, Kelly McCrimmon and Jim Nill being some of the best executives around and knowing how to evaluate talent and manage the cap. Being able to golf in the winter does not hurt either, and some players prefer smaller markets with less pressure. Others are drawn to hockey-crazy places where fans care deeply and hockey is either the top dog or the only game in town. The Edmonton Oilers, in the final for a second consecutive year, are the perfect example of that. 'The passion obviously that this fanbase has for their team is incredible,' said Oilers forward Evander Kane, who has also played in Atlanta, Winnipeg, Buffalo and San Jose. 'Once you actually get here and get to know your way around the city a little bit more, you realize there's actually quite a bit to do and it is a good spot for families and they have great summers.' NHL players get paid in U.S. dollars, even in Canada, taking some of the tax bite out of places like Montreal and Toronto with high tax rates because of the exchange rate. But that can also get cut into based on where guys choose to live. 'It helps while you're there, but also the living costs in Canada are extremely high, too, because you're taxed through the roof on everything: what you buy, what you sell, what you make,' Marchand said. 'So, yes, at the time, the costs are a little bit different but not much, and then when you move back, you have 20, 30% less money, so it absolutely plays a part.' ___ AP NHL playoffs: and recommended

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store