
Meet the Real Zombies That Exist Everywhere Around Us
Zombies are real and everywhere we look. Not human zombies, of course, but animal ones: insects, arachnids, and countless other species.
In her new book, Rise of the Zombie Bugs: The Surprising Science of Parasitic Mind-Control, author and science writer Mindy Weisberger delves into the world of zombifying parasites, aka the various lifeforms that have evolved to nudge or outright force their hosts into doing their bidding.
The average person probably knows about a few of these parasites, such as the fungi that take over an ant's body so it can climb up blades of grass and release a new generation of infectious spores—an act so horrifically spell-binding that a fictional version of it sparked the human apocalypse seen in the popular game and HBO TV show The Last of Us. But Weisberger details a whole litany of zombie-making bugs (microscopic germs, insects, and other creepy crawlies) for readers to be grossed out by, including a few that might even be able to influence human behavior.
'Parasitism has been around for about as long as there has been life on earth.'
Gizmodo spoke to Weisberger about her fascination with these bugs, the evolution of parasitism in general, and disco-lighted snails.
Ed Cara, Gizmodo: We here at Gizmodo are no strangers to covering all sorts of zombie bugs. But what drew you specifically to spend so much time digging into these parasites and their gruesome way of life?
Mindy Weisberger: For starters, they're inherently fascinating.
And like a lot of people, my first introduction to these zombifying agents was the cordyceps fungus in The Last of Us, which of course is inspired by an actual zombie ant fungus in the genus Ophiocordyceps. So this is something that people maybe are a little more aware of now.
But over time, as a science reporter, I came across more examples of different types of zombifying organisms, and I just started to get a sense of the scope of how many different kinds there were and all of these different mechanisms they had for zombification. So, of course, there are zombifying fungi, but there are also zombifying viruses. There are zombifying insects. There are many, many species of wasps that have evolved to manipulate their hosts. There are zombifying worms. So, it seemed like the deeper I went, the more that I uncovered and the more I just wanted to learn about all of these different types of zombifiers. And that just led me down the rabbit hole.
And, of course, I wrote a whole book about them, but there are still so many examples that just didn't even make it into the book. So, these parasites are a very, very rich source of study, and they tell us a lot about the natural world and how different relationships work and the different kinds of strategies that have evolved for different forms of life to survive.
Gizmodo: Throughout the book, you talk about how abundant and ancient these parasites really are. That raises the question of why. Why have so many organisms evolved to have this sort of freeloading lifestyle, despite the very real risks of being wholly dependent on another living thing?
Weisberger: So, just the fact that you use freeloading is very telling. People in general have a negative view towards parasites because many parasites cause disease. And I also think, from a capitalistic perspective, the idea of being a freeloader is like, 'Oh my God, there's nothing worse than that.' But in fact, this is obviously a very successful strategy, and parasitism has been around for about as long as there has been life on Earth.
One of the researchers that I spoke to for the book was Kelly Weinersmith, who studies parasitic wasps. And she said that parasitologists like to joke amongst themselves that the first form of life that emerged on earth was free-living, and the second was parasitic. Because it is actually a very attractive strategy. I mean, if you had to worry about going out and looking for food, finding a safe place for you to reproduce and raise your young, and potentially exposing yourself to all different kinds of threats and predators, would it not be profitable to find yourself a place where everything you need is there, all the nutrients are there, the place where you can reproduce is there? Once you've established yourself in a way that you can evade the host's immune system and just do your thing, that is actually a safer, better option for you. And this is why parasitism has evolved so many times across not just the animal kingdom, but plants and fungi as well.
By some estimates, there are roughly about 8 million known animal species, and at least 40% of those are estimated to be parasitic. And this is something that goes back hundreds of millions of years. The earliest direct fossil evidence of parasitism is found in the shells of marine organisms called brachiopods, from a site in China dating to about 512 million years ago. These parasites were probably worms that built these little mineralized cylinders for themselves on the shells of these brachiopods. And they were thought to be kleptoparasites, which means that they stole their host's food. And the way that scientists figured that out was when they looked at the brachiopod fossils, the ones that were carrying a greater load of these parasites were smaller, which seemed to suggest that they were not getting enough to eat.
So parasitism goes back a very long time. But of all the known parasite-host associations on the planet, only a tiny fraction to date are known to involve behavioral manipulation.
Gizmodo: You detail so many different examples of zombie parasitism that the average person might wonder; is this something I should ever be worried about? Are there any bugs out there that can or possibly could zombify people someday?
Weisberger: Well, it's natural to be concerned about how this might affect you personally. And the fact is that there are some pathogens that are known to affect mammal behavior, and you probably know them already.
Rabies, of course, is a very common one. Cases of rabies are recorded in texts that go back thousands of years, and it's known to affect its host's behavior very dramatically. This usually involves behavioral changes that make them more aggressive, and there's also excessive salivation involved. The thinking is that this benefits the parasite, because aggressive animals are more likely to fight. And the virus particles are shed in their saliva. So the combination of changing aggressive behavior and a lot of drool means that the rabies virus is able to increase its chances of successful reproduction.
Another example you might know about is Toxoplasma gondii, which causes the disease toxoplasmosis.
T. gondii's definitive hosts are cats, which means that it only can reproduce in cats. But it can live in lots of different species of birds and mammals, and that includes people. And so there's robust evidence that T. gondii changes the behavior in infected rodents. What it does in rats and mice is it reduces their fear of cats. It makes them attracted to cat urine, which is something that's normally, for good reason, a deterrent for them. It makes them bolder around cats, which means they're more likely to be eaten by cats, which means the T. gondii they are carrying will then get inside a cat where it needs to be to reproduce. But there's also evidence starting to come out in papers within the last decade or so showing that there seem to be similar types of behavioral changes in animals that are not rodents. In hyena cubs, for example, that are infected with T. gondii, they seem to be bolder around lions. And there are studies of captive chimps infected with T. gondii that seem to lose their fear of leopards, which are a natural prey of theirs.
Now with humans, they're dead-end hosts. More than 2 billion people worldwide are thought to carry this pathogen, even if they don't show any symptoms or have any signs of toxoplasmosis. And there's also a growing body of evidence hinting that T. gondii can change human behavior, even if the person doesn't show any other symptoms, and in similar kinds of ways where the person with T. gondii will be bolder or more aggressive. But figuring out what actually makes a specific behavioral change is very complicated. And it's even more complicated in people compared to figuring out what changes behavior in an ant, for example. So there is still, at this point, a lot of work to be done to be certain that you can separate out these specific changes and link them to T. gondii, rather than there being other factors involved. But it's definitely an interesting area of study.
Gizmodo: Speaking of unresolved questions, what are some of the biggest mysteries left to be solved about these zombifying parasites?
Weisberger: Well, if you look at the history of how scientists have studied behavior manipulation and zombification, some of the first records of these are centuries old. And usually it just starts out with the scientist observing that an insect is either behaving in an unexpected way or that it seems to be sprouting things that are not normal. But it's only really been in the last 20 years or so that scientists have been able to drill down and look at the neurochemistry of what's going on.
We're finally at that point we can start to figure out questions like: What are the proteins that are being changed? What are the genes that are being expressed? What is the parasite actually doing to its host? And one of the big questions is; is the parasite itself producing the compounds that are causing the change, or is it producing compounds that then get the insect to produce chemicals that affect its behavior?
For example, there is a type of wasp that zombifies spiders. And what it does is it lays an egg on the spider, the egg hatches, and the wasp larvae essentially just piggybacks on the spider. It just sits there discretely sipping the spider's hemolymph [the invertebrate version of blood], almost like a juice box, until it's ready to pupate. And when that happens, there is a very dramatic behavioral change in the spider. The spider starts to build a web that is completely different from the normal web it makes. You can probably picture the Charlotte's web type of web, which is a series of concentric circles with spokes. And that's a typical prey catching web. But the zombified spider builds a web that's usually used to keep it safe and secure as it molts. Once the spider is done with this web, its job is done. The wasp larvae drains it dry, the spider corpse drops to the ground, the wasp builds itself a little cocoon and then it hangs out in the wasp web—the last web that the spider ever built.
So what the wasp is doing is it's stimulating in the spiders a massive amount of hormones called ecdysteroids. And the big unanswered question right now is, is the wasp producing this itself or is it stimulating it in the spider? Because spiders naturally produce these hormones just before they molt; it's actually the trigger that starts the whole process of them building this web in preparation for them having this big physical change.
So in this and in many, many other examples of zombification, there is still so much to be unpacked about what the specific pathways are between the parasite and its host, about the small nudges that it's doing to cause these dramatic changes in behavior.
Gizmodo: So to close things out, what's your favorite zombie bug that you learned about in writing this book?
Weisberger: I was originally a filmmaker before I was a science journalist, so I'm naturally attracted to things that are very visual. And one of the most dramatic examples that caught my attention are the discofied zombie snails.
So these are land snails that are infected by worms in the genus Leucochloridium. What these worms do is they infect the snails using these broodsacs, which is like these little sausages full of worm larvae. And these broodsacs are very colorful, they're usually striped, patterned in shades of brown and green depending on the species. The sacs migrate into the snails' eye stalks, and once there, they pulse, making the stalks look very much like the undulation of a crawling caterpillar. Now, the definitive hosts of these worms are birds; they have to be in a bird to reproduce. So this display, which looks like a caterpillar, is something that is uniquely attractive to hungry birds. The worm also manipulates the snail's behavior so that it will wander out into exposed spaces, rather than hunkering down in the undergrowth where it normally stays. So they're now out in the open and they have these caterpillar-looking eye stalks, making the broodsacs an enticing meal. But the eyestalks split very easily, so the broodsacs will often just pop right out, and the snail will often heal its eyestalks and be fine afterward.
That's my favorite species example, but I also have a favorite specific individual zombie bug.
There was a zombie ladybug that became TikTok famous in 2021, which became known as Lady Berry. There's this content creator named Tiana Gayton, who's very enamored of insects and spiders. And one day, she was in a grocery store when she looked at a head of lettuce and saw a ladybug that looked like it was hugging something. It looked like it was hugging a small cocoon. And she was like, 'Oh, this is weird. I'm going to take this ladybug home with me and see what's happening.' She took it home and she tried to pry the ladybug's legs away from the silk around the cocoon, but the ladybug refused to let go.
It turned out that the ladybug was parasitized by a species of wasp that manipulates its behavior. It will lay an egg inside the host's abdomen, the egg hatches out of the ladybug and forms into a pupa, and the host then becomes the pupa's bodyguard. So the ladybug was guarding the cocoon. But Tiana Gayton was determined to save it. She pried it off the cocoon, separated it from the cocoon, and put the ladybug in a little jar. She gave it water, gave it food, and nursed it back to health. And eventually she took Lady Berry to the park and returned it to the wild.
And so there's an example of a zombie that got something most zombies don't: a second chance.
Rise of the Zombie Bugs: The Surprising Science of Parasitic Mind-Control, published by Johns Hopkins University Press, is now available in hardcover and as a e-book.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Olivia Munn was left feeling like an ‘expectant dad' while waiting for her daughter to arrive via surrogacy
Olivia Munn was left feeling like an 'expectant dad' while waiting for her daughter to arrive via surrogacy. The 44-year-old actress has son Malcolm, three, with her comedian husband John Mulaney, 42, andhe couple expanded their family through surrogacy following Olivia's breast cancer diagnosis in April 2023. Reflecting on the emotional journey of welcoming her now eight-month-old daughter Méi via surrogate, Olivia told People: 'It was the first time I was like, 'Oh wait, is this what it's like to be an expectant dad?'' After undergoing extensive treatment — including a lymph node dissection, nipple delay procedure, and double mastectomy — Olivia faced surgical menopause following the removal of her uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries during her cancer battle. 'It was important to do it at that moment, but it was also scary because my type of cancer feeds on hormones, and there are a lot of hormone injections with IVF,' she said, referring to the fertility preservation process she underwent before her hysterectomy. Her doctor devised a special IVF protocol tailored for cancer patients, enabling Olivia to retrieve seven eggs. 'At my age, about one in 10 eggs is healthy,' she explained. After fertilisation, two embryos were 'strong enough to be tested for abnormalities and the gender'. She and John hoped for a girl, with Olivia saying: 'I remember I was on a walk with John, and I said, 'I really don't think that I'll be okay unless we get two girl embryos. I know this puts me at risk, but I just need you to support me,'' she recalled. Mulaney responded: ''Whatever you need.'' That same day, Olivia received a call confirming both embryos were female. 'That was a sign for me everything was going to be okay,' she said. The couple then embarked on the 'emotional process' of finding a surrogate. 'The number one thing that I wanted in a surrogate was someone who was kind,' Olivia said. A friend's recommendation led them to an agency, which presented two potential surrogates. One candidate expressed a desire to help someone who had survived cancer. 'After meeting with her, I knew she was the right person to carry our daughter,' Olivia said. She added: 'The first thing I worried about was if I would be able to find somebody who would love and take care of my daughter as much as I would. 'We were so lucky to find someone so kind who we bonded with so much.'


Forbes
22 minutes ago
- Forbes
2025 Tony Awards: How To Watch, Start Time, Presenters And Performers
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - JUNE 16: Cynthia Erivo poses during The 77th Annual Tony Awards at David H. ... More Koch Theater at Lincoln Center on June 16, 2024 in New York City. (Photo byfor Tony Awards Productions) The 2025 Tony Awards are set to take place at Radio City Music Hall in New York City this weekend. The musicals Buena Vista Social Club, Death Becomes Her and Maybe Happy Ending are nomination leaders going into the 2025 Tony Awards ceremony with 10 nods each. The nominees include Audra McDonald, who scored her record 11th Tony nomination in May for Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role in a Musical for Gypsy. Wicked Oscar nominee and The Color Purple Tony Winner Cynthia Erivo is hosting the 78th annual event. The ceremony is Sunday from 8 to 11 p.m. ET/5 to 8 p.m. PT and will air live on CBS-TV and be streaming live on Paramount+. According to the American Theatre Wing, the presenters for the 78th Annual Tony Awards include Aaron Tveit, Adam Lambert, Alex Winter, Allison Janney, Ariana DeBose, Auli'i Cravalho, Ben Stiller, Bryan Cranston, Carrie Preston, Charli D'Amelio, Danielle Brooks, Jean Smart, Jesse Eisenberg, Julianne Hough, Katie Holmes and Keanu Reeves. Also presenting are Kelli O'Hara, Kristin Chenoweth, LaTanya Richardson Jackson, Lea Michele, Lea Salonga, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Michelle Williams, Oprah, Rachel Bay Jones, Renée Elise Goldsberry, Samuel L. Jackson, Sara Bareilles, Sarah Paulson and Tom Felton. The show's announcer is Tony Award-winning actor Brian Stokes Mitchell. The 2025 Tony Awards will include performances by cast members from nominated musicals and revivals including Buena Vista Social Club, Dead Outlaw, Death Becomes Her, Floyd Collins, Gypsy, Maybe Happy Ending, Operation Mincemeat: A New Musical, Pirates! The Penzance Musical, Sunset Blvd., Just In Time. and Real Women Have Curves. NEW YORK, NY - AUGUST 06: (L-R) Leslie Odom; Jr., Phillipa Soo, Lin-Manuel Miranda and Christopher ... More Jackson attend "Hamilton" Broadway Opening Night at Richard Rodgers Theatre on August 6, 2015 in New York City. (Photo by) In additon, the original Broadway cast of the multiple Tony Award-winning musical Hamilton is reuniting for show's 10th anniversary for a special performance. Per the American Theatre Wing, artists participating in the performance include Carleigh Bettiol, Andrew Chappelle, Ariana DeBose, Alysha Deslorieux, Daveed Diggs, Renée Elise Goldsberry, Jonathan Groff, Sydney James Harcourt, Neil Haskell, Sasha Hutchings, Christopher Jackson, Thayne Jasperson, Jasmine Cephas Jones, Stephanie Klemons, Morgan Marcell, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Javier Muñoz, Leslie Odom, Jr., Okieriete Onaodowan, Emmy Raver-Lampman, Jon Rua, Austin Smith, Phillipa Soo, Seth Stewart, Betsy Struxness, Ephraim Sykes and Voltaire Wade-Greene. See the complete list of nominations for the 2025 Tony Awards below. Best Musical Buena Vista Social Club Dead Outlaw Death Becomes Her Maybe Happy Ending Operation Mincemeat: A New Musical Best Play English by Sanaz Toossi The Hills of California by Jez Butterworth John Proctor is the Villain by Kimberly Belflower Oh, Mary! by Cole Escola Purpose by Branden Jacobs-Jenkins Best Revival of a Musical Floyd Collins Gypsy Pirates! The Penzance Musical Sunset Boulevard Best Revival of a Play Eureka Day by Jonathan Spector Romeo + Juliet Thornton Wilder's Our Town Yellow Face Best Book of a Musical Buena Vista Social Club, Marco Ramirez Dead Outlaw, Itamar Moses Death Becomes Her, Marco Pennette Maybe Happy Ending, Will Aronson and Hue Park Operation Mincemeat: A New Musical, David Cumming, Felix Hagan, Natasha Hodgson and Zoë Roberts Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role in a Play Laura Donnelly, The Hills of California Mia Farrow, The Roommate LaTanya Richardson Jackson, Purpose Sadie Sink, John Proctor is the Villain Sarah Snook, The Picture of Dorian Gray Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in a Play George Clooney, Good Night, and Good Luck Cole Escola, Oh, Mary! Jon Michael Hill, Purpose Daniel Dae Kim, Yellow Face Harry Lennix, Purpose Louis McCartney, Stranger Things: The First Shadow Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role in a Musical Megan Hilty, Death Becomes Her Audra McDonald, Gypsy Jasmine Amy Rogers, BOOP! The Musical Nicole Scherzinger, Sunset Boulevard Jennifer Simard, Death Becomes Her Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in a Musical Darren Criss, Maybe Happy Ending Andrew Durand, Dead Outlaw Tom Francis, Sunset Boulevard Jonathan Groff, Just in Time James Monroe Iglehart, A Wonderful World: The Louis Armstrong Musical Jeremy Jordan, Floyd Collins Best Performance by an Actress in a Featured Role in a Play Tala Ashe, English Jessica Hecht, Eureka Day Marjan Neshat, English Fina Strazza, John Proctor is the Villain Kara Young, Purpose Best Performance by an Actor in a Featured Role in a Play Glenn Davis, Purpose Gabriel Ebert, John Proctor is the Villain Francis Jue, Yellow Face Bob Odenkirk, Glengarry Glen Ross Conrad Ricamora, Oh, Mary! Best Performance by an Actress in a Featured Role in a Musical Natalie Venetia Belcon, Buena Vista Social Club Julia Knitel, Dead Outlaw Gracie Lawrence, Just in Time Justina Machado, Real Women Have Curves: The Musical Joy Woods, Gypsy Best Performance by an Actor in a Featured Role in a Musical Brooks Ashmanskas, Smash Jeb Brown, Dead Outlaw Danny Burstein, Gypsy Jak Malone, Operation Mincemeat: A New Musical Taylor Trensch, Floyd Collins Best Original Score (Music and/or Lyrics) Written for the Theatre Dead Outlaw, Music & Lyrics: David Yazbek and Erik Della Penna Death Becomes Her, Music & Lyrics: Julia Mattison and Noel Carey Maybe Happy Ending, Music: Will Aronson; Lyrics: Will Aronson and Hue Park Operation Mincemeat: A New Musical, Music & Lyrics: David Cumming, Felix Hagan, Natasha Hodgson and Zoë Roberts Real Women Have Curves: The Musical, Music & Lyrics: Joy Huerta and Benjamin Velez Best Scenic Design of a Play Marsha Ginsberg, English Rob Howell, The Hills of California Marg Horwell and David Bergman, The Picture of Dorian Gray Miriam Buether and 59, Stranger Things: The First Shadow Scott Pask, Good Night, and Good Luck Best Scenic Design of a Musical Rachel Hauck, Swept Away Dane Laffrey and George Reeve, Maybe Happy Ending Arnulfo Maldonado, Buena Vista Social Club Derek McLane, Death Becomes Her Derek McLane, Just in Time Best Costume Design of a Play Brenda Abbandandolo, Good Night, and Good Luck Marg Horwell, The Picture of Dorian Gray Rob Howell, The Hills of California Holly Pierson, Oh, Mary! Brigitte Reiffenstuel, Stranger Things: The First Shadow Best Costume Design of a Musical Dede Ayite, Buena Vista Social Club Gregg Barnes, BOOP! The Musical Clint Ramos, Maybe Happy Ending Paul Tazewell, Death Becomes Her Catherine Zuber, Just in Time Best Lighting Design of a Play Natasha Chivers, The Hills of California Jon Clark, Stranger Things: The First Shadow Heather Gilbert and David Bengali, Good Night, and Good Luck Natasha Katz and Hannah Wasileski, John Proctor is the Villain Nick Schlieper, The Picture of Dorian Gray Best Lighting Design of a Musical Jack Knowles, Sunset Boulevard Tyler Micoleau, Buena Vista Social Club Scott Zielinski and Ruey Horng Sun, Floyd Collins Ben Stanton, Maybe Happy Ending Justin Townsend, Death Becomes Her Best Sound Design of a Play Paul Arditti, Stranger Things: The First Shadow Palmer Hefferan, John Proctor is the Villain Daniel Kluger, Good Night, and Good Luck Nick Powell, The Hills of California Clemence Williams, The Picture of Dorian Gray Best Sound Design of a Musical Jonathan Deans, Buena Vista Social Club Adam Fisher, Sunset Boulevard Peter Hylenski, Just in Time Peter Hylenski, Maybe Happy Ending Dan Moses Schreier, Floyd Collins Best Direction of a Play Knud Adams, English Sam Mendes, The Hills of California Sam Pinkleton, Oh, Mary! Danya Taymor, John Proctor is the Villain Kip Williams, The Picture of Dorian Gray Best Direction of a Musical Saheem Ali, Buena Vista Social Club Michael Arden, Maybe Happy Ending David Cromer, Dead Outlaw Christopher Gattelli, Death Becomes Her Jamie Lloyd, Sunset Boulevard Best Choreography Joshua Bergasse, Smash Camille A. Brown, Gypsy Christopher Gattelli, Death Becomes Her Jerry Mitchell, BOOP! The Musical Patricia Delgado and Justin Peck, Buena Vista Social Club Best Orchestrations Andrew Resnick and Michael Thurber, Just in Time Will Aronson, Maybe Happy Ending Bruce Coughlin, Floyd Collins Marco Paguia, Buena Vista Social Club David Cullen and Andrew Lloyd Webber, Sunset Boulevard The 2025 Tony Awards ceremony is Sunday from 8 to 11 p.m. ET/5 to 8 p.m. PT and will air live on TV on CBS and stream on Paramount+.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick
The White House has withdrawn as its nominee for Nasa administrator, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head Nasa,' the US president posted online. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America first in space.' Related: Drugs, marital advice and that black eye: key takeaways from Trump's Oval Office send-off for Elon Musk Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead Nasa, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. Isaacman, whose removal was earlier reported by Semafor, said he was 'incredibly grateful' to Trump 'and all those who supported me throughout this journey'. 'I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry,' he posted. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission.' Isaacman's removal comes just days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the so-called department of government efficiency (Doge) created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Musk, according to a person familiar with his reaction, was disappointed by Isaacman's removal. 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk wrote of Isaacman on X, responding to the news of the White House's decision. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was unclear whom the administration might tap to replace Isaacman. One name being floated is the retired US air force Lt Gen Steven Kwast, an early advocate for the creation of the US space force and a Trump supporter, according to three people familiar with the discussions. Isaacman, the former CEO of the payment processor company Shift4, had broad space industry support but drew concerns from lawmakers over his ties to Musk and SpaceX, where he spent hundreds of millions of dollars as an early private spaceflight customer. The former nominee had donated to Democrats in prior elections. In his confirmation hearing in April, he sought to balance Nasa's existing moon-aligned space exploration strategy with pressure to shift the agency's focus on Mars, saying the US can plan for travel to both destinations. As a potential leader of Nasa's 18,000 employees, Isaacman faced a daunting task of implementing that decision to prioritize Mars, given that Nasa has spent years and billions of dollars trying to return its astronauts to the moon. On Friday, the space agency released new details of the Trump administration's 2026 budget plan that proposed killing dozens of space science programs and laying off thousands of employees, a controversial overhaul that space advocates and lawmakers described as devastating for the agency. The Montana Republican Tim Sheehy, a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee, posted that Isaacman had been 'a strong choice by President Trump to lead Nasa'. Related: Universe's mysteries may never be solved because of Trump's Nasa cuts, experts say 'I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' Sheehy said. Some scientists saw the nominee change as further destabilizing to Nasa as it faces dramatic budget cuts without a confirmed leader in place to navigate political turbulence between Congress, the White House and the space agency's workforce. 'So not having [Isaacman] as boss of Nasa is bad news for the agency,' Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer Jonathan McDowell posted. 'Maybe a good thing for Jared himself though, since being Nasa head right now is a bit of a Kobayashi Maru scenario,' McDowell added, referring to an exercise in the science fiction franchise Star Trek where cadets are placed in a no-win scenario. With Reuters