logo
US Could Reduce Troop Presence Near North Korea: WSJ

US Could Reduce Troop Presence Near North Korea: WSJ

Miami Herald23-05-2025

The U.S. is mulling withdrawing thousands of troops from South Korea, according to a Wall Street Journal report.
Newsweek reached out to the Pentagon and South Korean embassy in the U.S. with emailed requests for comment.
It would mark the first such drawdown since 2008, when Washington redeployed 12,500 troops from what was then a 40,000-strong U.S. Forces Korea.
South Korea hosts the third-largest number of American troops outside the U.S.—after Japan and Germany—stationed there to help defend Seoul against threats from nuclear-armed North Korea and support regional efforts to counter an increasingly assertive China.
With North-South relations at their most fraught in decades, military officials have warned a reduction could impact U.S. and allied capabilities in a conflict with Kim Jong Un's regime.
Members of the Trump administration have proposed redeploying some 4,500 troops from South Korea to U.S. bases in the Indo-Pacific region, such as in Guam, the WSJ reported, citing two Pentagon officials familiar with the discussions.
The officials said the proposal had not yet been brought before President Donald Trump and was still being prepared as part of an informal review of North Korea policy.
There were 26,556 U.S. military personnel and Department of Defense civilians stationed in South Korea as of December 2024, according to the Pentagon's Defense Manpower Data Center.
A Department of Defense spokesperson told the newspaper there were no policy announcements to be made on the matter. National Security Council spokesperson Pete Nguyen declined to comment on the potential withdrawal but said the president remains committed to North Korea's "complete denuclearization."
Trump has reportedly floated the idea of reducing the U.S. military footprint in South Korea since his first term. In the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, he complained that South Korea was not paying enough for the deployment of American troops.
South Korea's defense ministry told Reuters there have been no discussions with the U.S. regarding a troop withdrawal.
The WSJ report comes amid flaring tensions on the Korean Peninsula.
The North continues to press forward with its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs, and last year formally abandoned its longstanding policy of eventual reunification with the South. Kim Jong Un's deployment of thousands of troops to support Russia's war in Ukraine has further stoked tensions.
Sean King, Asia scholar and senior vice president of New York-based consultancy Park Strategies, told Newsweek: "I'm all for the U.S. defending Guam as best we can and for holding the line on the Second Island Chain, but let's hope that doesn't come at the expense of South Korea's defense."
It remains to be seen whether Trump will order a significant redeployment of troops.
At an April 10 Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Indo-Pacific Command chief Admiral Samuel Paparo said that reducing the U.S. troop presence in South Korea would "inherently…reduce our ability to prevail in conflict."
Army Gen. Xavier Brunson, commander of U.S. Forces Korea, said such a move would be "problematic."
Related Articles
DOD Responds to South Korea Troops Report: 'Not True'US Reveals Movements of Navy's Nuclear-Armed SubmarinesVideos Show US Destroyers Training To Intercept Ballistic MissilesMinuteman III vs Yars: US ICBM Passes Test Days After Russian Launch Flops
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.
The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.

Los Angeles Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.

The Trump administration announced Saturday that National Guard troops were being sent to Los Angeles — an action Gov. Gavin Newsom said he opposed. President Trump is activating the Guard by using powers that have been invoked only rarely. Trump said in a memo to the Defense and Homeland Security departments that he was calling the National Guard into federal service under a provision called Title 10 to 'temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions.' Title 10 provides for activating National Guard troops for federal service. Such Title 10 orders can be used for deploying National Guard members in the United States or abroad. Erwin Chemerinsky, one of the nation's leading constitutional law scholars, said 'for the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling.' 'It is using the military domestically to stop dissent,' said Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. 'It certainly sends a message as to how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very frightening to see this done.' Tom Homan, the Trump administration's 'border czar,' announced the plan to send the National Guard in an interview on Fox News on Saturday as protesters continued confronting immigration agents during raids. 'This is about enforcing the law,' Homan said. 'We're not going to apologize for doing it. We're stepping up.' 'We're already ahead of the game. We were already mobilizing,' he added. 'We're gonna bring the National Guard in tonight. We're gonna continue doing our job. We're gonna push back on these people.' Newsom criticized the federal action, saying that local law enforcement was already mobilized and that sending in troops was a move that was 'purposefully inflammatory' and would 'only escalate tensions.' The governor called the president and they spoke for about 40 minutes, according to the governor's office. Critics have raised concerns that Trump also might try to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 to activate troops as part of his campaign to deport large numbers of undocumented immigrants. The president has the authority under the Insurrection Act to federalize the National Guard units of states to suppress 'any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy' that 'so hinders the execution of the laws' that any portion of the state's inhabitants are deprived of a constitutional right and state authorities are unable or unwilling to protect that right. The American Civil Liberties Union has warned that Trump's use of the military domestically would be misguided and dangerous. According to the ACLU, Title 10 activation of National Guard troops has historically been rare and Congress has prohibited troops deployed under the law from providing 'direct assistance' to civilian law enforcement — under both a separate provision of Title 10 as well as the Posse Comitatus Act. The Insurrection Act, however, is viewed as an exception to the prohibitions under the Posse Comitatus Act. In 1958, President Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court's decision ending racial segregation in schools, and to defend Black students against a violent mob. Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, wrote in a recent article that if Trump were to invoke the Insurrection Act 'to activate federalized troops for mass deportation — whether at the border or somewhere else in the country — it would be unprecedented, unnecessary, and wrong.' Chemerinsky said invoking the Insurrection Act and nationalizing a state's National Guard has been reserved for extreme circumstances where there are no other alternatives to maintain the peace. Chemerinsky said he feared that in this case the Trump administration was seeking 'to send a message to protesters of the willingness of the federal government to use federal troops to quell protests.' In 1992, California Gov. Pete Wilson requested that President George H.W. Bush use the National Guard to quell the unrest in Los Angeles after police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. That was under a different provision of federal law that allows the president to use military force in the United States. That provision applies if a state governor or legislature requests it. California politics editor Phil Willon contributed to this report.

Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud

time21 minutes ago

Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud

NEWARK, N.J. -- President Donald Trump walked out to a thunderous standing ovation just ahead of the start of the UFC pay-per-view card at the Prudential Center on Saturday night, putting his public feud with tech billionaire Elon Musk on hold to instead watch the fierce battles inside the cage. Trump was accompanied by UFC President Dana White and the pair headed to their cageside seats to Kid Rock's 'American Bad Ass.' Trump and White did the same for UFC's card last November at Madison Square Garden, only then they were joined by Musk. Trump shook hands with fans and supporters — a heavyweight lineup that included retired boxing champion Mike Tyson — on his way to the cage. Trump was joined by his daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, along with son Eric Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Trump shook hands with the UFC broadcast team that included Joe Rogan. Rogan hosted Trump on his podcast for hours in the final stages of the campaign last year. UFC fans went wild for Trump and held mobile devices in their outstretched arms to snap pictures of him. Trump arrived in time for the start of a card set to include two championship fights. Julianna Peña and Merab Dvalishvili were scheduled to each defend their 135-pound championships. UFC fighter Kevin Holland won the first fight with Trump in the building, scaled the cage and briefly chatted with the President before his post-fight interview.

LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members

time26 minutes ago

LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members

California Gov. Gavin Newsom called the move "purposefully inflammatory." 1:20 The Trump administration is deploying the California National Guard in response to protests in Los Angeles that begin Friday evening over immigration enforcement operations that have resulted in some clashes between demonstrators and authorities, the White House said in a statement. President Donald Trump signed a memorandum "deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness" in California as demonstrations opposing Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations continue in the state, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement Saturday evening. Earlier Saturday, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the federal government was moving to "take over the California National Guard," calling the move "purposefully inflammatory" and saying it will "only escalate tensions." 6 minutes ago Hegseth says National Guard being mobilized immediately, active-duty Marines on 'high alert' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the Defense Department is "mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles." Hegseth said if violence continues, "active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." The memo that President Donald Trump signed Saturday night directing the National Guard to California said that the current protests "constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." Trump utilized his authority under "10 U.S.C. 12406 to temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel," according to the memo. The presidential memorandum also said that the 2,000 service members could be deployed for 60 days or "at the discretion" of the defense secretary. The memo adds that the secretary of defense "may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store