As MS execution closes in, Richard Jordan trying new ways to fight death
In the remaining weeks before his scheduled execution, Richard Jordan, Mississippi's oldest and longest serving death row inmate, is looking for ways to fight his death sentence.
Jordan was sentenced to death for the kidnap and murder of Gulfport resident Edwina Marter in January 1976. Marter's sons, who were 3 and 9 at the time of her death, and her husband are still alive, according to public records. About a decade ago, her family told The Advocate they were hoping to receive closure from the execution after years of its delay.
The decision to let the execution proceed rests in the hands of the Mississippi Supreme Court, the U.S. Supreme Court and a federal district court judge – two courts that have rejected his previous requests and a judge who has allowed another execution to be carried out while a challenge to the state's execution protocol continues.
Attorneys filed two motions asking the Mississippi Supreme Court to rehear its denial of the 78-year-old's petition for post conviction relief and to rehear its order setting his execution.
They wrote that when the court denied his post-conviction relief petition, it 'misapprehended the facts and the law.' To fix it, Jordan asked the court to vacate his death sentence or at a minimum return it to the trial court for another look.
His attorneys argue Jordan's death sentence is not valid because in 1976, when the murder was committed and Jordan was sentenced, Mississippi and all other states had ceased executions based on a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Furman v. Georgia that capital punishment was unconstitutional.
On July 2, 1976, four months after Jordan was sentenced, the Supreme Court overturned this ruling in Gregg v. Georgia. Mississippi passed a statute allowing discretionary death penalty sentences in 1977.
'Here, because there was no constitutional provision for the death penalty at the time of Jordan's offense, his death sentence is unconstitutional,' the May 15 filing states.
Jordan went to trial multiple times and his sentences were overturned. His death sentence did not stick until decades later in 1998. Since his first trial, Jordan has been incarcerated for nearly 50 years.
In another recent court filing, Jordan's attorneys argue the state's motion to set Jordan's execution didn't follow state law because he has not exhausted all state and federal remedies.
Jordan asked the U.S. Supreme Court in March to hear his case. As of May, that petition for writ of certiorari is awaiting a decision. The state opposes and has asked the high court not to take up Jordan's petition, saying the Mississippi Supreme Court was correct in its ruling.
That petition centers around his access to a mental health expert separate from the prosecution to develop and present sentencing mitigation as an indigent defendant, which was established as a constitutional right through the U.S. Supreme Court's Ake v. Oklahoma decision. The other issue is how the Mississippi Supreme Court handled Jordan's Ake claims in his appeal and post-conviction.
At trial, Jordan was evaluated by a state psychiatrist whose report was also given to the prosecution, which his attorneys argue undermined his mitigation case since the Ake decision specified the evaluation was to be used on the indigent defendant's behalf.
The petition states he was not diagnosed as suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from his combat service in Vietnam, but instead incorrectly as having antisocial personality disorder.
'Review of that decision is manifestly warranted to ensure appropriate respect for this Court's decisions, vindicate the supremacy of federal law, and ensure that those defendants in Mississippi whose mental health will be an issue at trial receive the right to the expert assistance to which the Due Process Clause entitles them,' the March court filing states.
Additionally, Jordan and fellow death row inmate Ricky Chase are lead plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the drugs used for lethal injection.
Since 2022, the state has since added alternative execution methods if lethal injection drugs aren't available: execution by gas chamber, electrocution or firing squad. To date, a handful of states have used these other methods, including the use of nitrogen gas in Alabama and firing squad in South Carolina.
The Mississippi lawsuit did not stop the December 2022 execution of Thomas Loden, another inmate who was part of the legal challenge.
The same day Jordan's attorneys filed motions with the Mississippi Supreme Court, Jordan and Chase filed a motion with U.S. District Judge Henry Wingate, asking for him to order the state to provide essential documents to the plaintiffs about the state's possession and planned use of execution drugs as well as documents related to the most recent executions of David Cox in 2021 and Loden.
Plaintiffs wrote that access to this information would help them seek an injunction to stay Jordan's execution and help with discovery, which is the process of obtaining evidence from other parties before trial. Trial for the lawsuit has been scheduled for Dec. 1, 2025.
'It is unconscionable for Defendants to seek the execution of Richard Jordan while continuing to stonewall Plaintiffs' repeated demands for supplementation of discovery in this case,' a May 14 court filing states.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
19 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Proud Boys Leaders Sue U.S. Over Jan. 6 Prosecutions
Five members of the Proud Boys, once convicted of masterminding the Jan. 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol, are accusing the federal government and FBI employees of violating their rights in connection with their prosecutions in a new lawsuit. Top leaders of the far-right group were either pardoned or had their sentences commuted by President Trump earlier this year. On Friday, they filed a lawsuit in a Florida federal court claiming that the FBI agents and prosecutors were motivated by personal animus against them and their beliefs. The suit seeks $100 million in punitive damages.


Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
Meet Joshua Smith, New Deputy Director Of Bureau Of Prisons
The Department of Justice announced a new Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The ... More announcement of Josh Smith to head the agency will be first as he is the only director to also have a felony record. There have been many 'Firsts' in the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The first director of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) was Sanford Bates who got the job in 1930. Charles Samuels was the first African American director and Kathleen Hawk Sawyer was the first woman director. Now, a Deputy Director has been named to the BOP and that too will be a first. According to an internal memo from the BOP, Joshua Smith was named Deputy Director at the BOP. Smith's first experience with federal prison was not running one but being incarcerated in one. Far from letting his prison experience define his life, Smith's path since prison is nothing short of astonishing. The Knoxville-based entrepreneur and prison reform advocate, is a prominent figure in criminal justice reform, especially following his presidential pardon by Donald Trump in January 2021. His journey from incarceration to successful entrepreneur and advocate offers a compelling narrative of personal transformation and dedication to societal change. However, will his experience as a prisoner, his success as an entrepreneur and his leadership ability be enough to help lead the BOP to better days? It will be one of the most trying experiences of his life but one he is certainly equipped to handle. In his youth, Smith became entangled in criminal activities, leading to his conviction on federal drug charges. He was removed from his home at age 11 due to abuse and was convicted of 10 felonies by the time he was 16 years old. He entered prison at age 21 as an 11th-grade dropout with no plans to exit it any differently than how he entered. He served a five-year sentence in a Kentucky federal prison camp, an experience that profoundly impacted his perspective on life. During his incarceration, Smith recognized the systemic challenges within the prison system and the pressing need for reform. He also knew he could do better. Smith said in a video on his website, Fourth Purpose, 'Prison time for me shifted into an educational time rather than just doing time.' He credited his success with interacting with other inmates, many of whom were there for white collar offenses who encouraged him to learn more about business. Smith is a deeply religious person who found comfort in faith to turn his life around. Upon his release from prison, Smith was determined to rebuild his life. He ventured into the business world, founding several companies in Knoxville. His entrepreneurial endeavors not only provided employment opportunities within the community but also demonstrated the potential for individuals with criminal records to contribute positively to society when given a second chance. Smith started a residential service company known as Master Service Companies that would become a $30 million enterprise. Some of the company's more than 180 employees were ex-offenders. 'My focus has always been on the people who worked for me,' Smith said, 'and I intend to focus on the BOP staff that do such an important job in keeping our country safe.' Smith's personal experiences fueled his passion for prison reform. He became an outspoken advocate, emphasizing the importance of rehabilitation and reintegration programs for incarcerated individuals. His efforts aimed to reduce recidivism rates and promote policies that support the successful reentry of former inmates into society. According to his non-profit, The Fourth Purpose, Smith used his prison experience to make a better life for himself and others. Smith has spent the past 15 years actively involved in criminal justice reform in Kentucky, Tennessee and countries in Central America. Among those who have helped him along the way have been those who run prisons. In January 2021, in the final hours of his presidency, Donald Trump granted a full pardon to Josh Smith. Smith's pardon was notable, given his active role in criminal justice reform and his contributions to the Knoxville community. In June of 2019 he was named to Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee's Criminal Justice Reinvestment Task Force, a role he embraced. His success in that role and his story of overcoming such adversity led Gov. Lee to support Smith's pardon request. Smith's pardon brought national attention to his work and the broader issues within the criminal justice system. His story underscores the potential for personal transformation and the importance of providing opportunities for rehabilitation. Through his advocacy, Smith continued to influence discussions on prison reform, emphasizing that individuals are capable of change and can positively impact their communities when supported in their reintegration efforts. Smith's journey from incarceration to entrepreneurship and advocacy serves as a testament to the power of redemption and the impact one individual can have on systemic change. His ongoing work in prison reform highlights the need for policies that focus on rehabilitation, support reentry, and recognize the inherent potential within every individual to contribute meaningfully to society. Working with stakeholders and advocates is going to be an important part of Smith's work. Having been in prison, he supported initiatives for those who work in prisons and establishing a non-profit to help those emerge from prison provides him with an extensive background on working with a diverse group of people. An important part of Smith's commitment to criminal justice reform focuses on those leaders running the prisons. His film projects are focused on leaders in prison who he calls 'disrupters' based on their different approach to making prisoners better people than the ones who came into prison. Smith said that his basis for filming both staff and inmates in prison was to give the public an understanding of prison. Smith said the purpose of the films he is making is to 'make prisons a place of transformation.' He knows that to transform prisoners, he must have the committed staff that is engaged to make better people. Attracting those people to work in federal prisons will certainly be a task in an agency that has been a challenged in filling any role. Smith and Director Marshall both have past experience in private-public partnerships as well as working with advocacy groups. Rabbi Moshe Margaretten, President, Tzedek Association provided a quote about Smith's appoint saying, "Director Marshall couldn't have made a better choice. Josh Smith brings a deep moral clarity and transformative vision to the Bureau — grounded in lived experience and a passion for redemption and human dignity. His leadership on reentry is exactly what this moment demands.' Smith realizes that real change is only going to occur if he has buy-in from the staff and that may be a challenge. Former Director Colette Peters, also an outsider to the BOP, found change difficult though she did manage to improve hiring and made a number of strides in implementing the First Step Act. The Trump administration's aggressive pace of change has left little room for patience. With hiring freezes, firings, and funding cuts in place, Smith will work alongside newly appointed Director William Marshall III, facing significant changes from day one. Both Marshall and Smith will step into the BOP's Central Office with fresh leadership, following the termination of Director Peters on January 20, 2025, and the retirement announcement of acting Director William Lathrop, along with several regional directors. In 2024, morale at the BOP hit an all-time low, and it's expected to remain poor through much of 2025 as the agency faces the reality of a downsized operation that will have to adapt to new ways of functioning. With over 150,000 prisoners—more than half in minimum and low-security facilities spread across 120 complexes nationwide—the BOP is already under strain. The Trump administration's tough stance on the budget and waste reduction will place Smith in a challenging position, leading an organization that acknowledges the need for reform but lacks the drive to implement it. Past Directors have fallen short or just did not get the momentum they needed to make change. Congress has had a contentious relationship with the BOP as it was highly critical of the shortcomings with the sexual assaults of women at FCI Dublin and the lack of security due to missing cameras at the facility. Office of Inspector General Reports have often been critical of the agency and its leadership is a challenge listed by the Government Accountability Office who put the BOP on its high-risk list. The BOP needs change and they need reform. Nothing says reform louder than bringing in someone like Josh Smith who has seen life on both sides of the fence.


Washington Post
30 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Five Proud Boys leaders sue Justice Department over Jan. 6 prosecutions
Five leaders of the Proud Boys, four of whom were found guilty of engaging in a seditious conspiracy to keep President Donald Trump in power on Jan. 6, 2021, want the government to pay them $100 million in restitution over claims their constitutional rights were violated, according to a federal lawsuit filed Friday in Florida.