Trump defends US strikes on Iran as intelligence assessment stirs debate
'This was a devastating attack, and it knocked them for a loop,' Mr Trump said as his administration deployed a phalanx of top officials to defend his claims that Iran's nuclear programme was 'completely and fully obliterated'.
US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said the leaked intelligence assessment, which said Iran suffered a delay of only a few months, was 'preliminary' and 'low confidence'.
President Donald Trump speaks during a media conference at the end of the Nato summit as secretary of state Marco Rubio, right, and defence secretary Pete Hegseth listen, in The Hague, Netherlands (Alex Brandon/AP)
US secretary of state Marco Rubio said the officials who disclosed the findings are 'professional stabbers'.
The White House pointed to a statement from the Israel Atomic Energy Commission that said Iran faced a setback of 'many years'.
Drawing reliable conclusions about the impact of the US strikes is difficult, making the issue a breeding ground for competing claims that could determine how American voters view Mr Trump's risky decision to join Israel's attacks on Iran.
Also at stake are Mr Trump's next steps in the Middle East, where diplomatic efforts could be required to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear program.
Iran maintains that its atomic ambitions are for peaceful purposes, while US and Israeli leaders have described the country's nuclear programme as the precursor to obtaining a nuclear weapon.
One of the targets of the US attack was Fordo, where nuclear infrastructure is buried deep underground.
Damage at Fordo enrichment facility after strikes in Iran (Maxar Technologies via AP)
The Israeli commission said in a statement that the bombing 'rendered the enrichment facility inoperable'.
The statement was distributed by the White House and the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other parts of Iran's military nuclear programme, have 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years', the statement said.
In addition, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei told Al Jazeera that there was significant damage from US bombers.
'Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure,' he said.
The episode has triggered some of Mr Trump's longstanding vendettas against leaks and intelligence officials, who he has often viewed as a part of a 'deep state' dedicated to undermining his agenda.
He also lashed out at media outlets that reported on the classified assessment, describing them as 'scum' and 'disgusting'.
President Donald Trump dismissed media reports (Piroschka Van De Wouw, Pool Photo via AP)
Mr Trump said questioning the effectiveness of the strikes was disrespectful to the military, which flew stealth bombers halfway around the world to attack the nuclear facilities with weapons designed to penetrate deep underground.
The reports, he said, were 'very unfair to the pilots, who risked their lives for our country'.
He described the American attack as a definitive conclusion to what he has dubbed 'the 12-day war,' much like the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki heralded the end of the Second World War.
'That ended that war,' he said. 'This ended the war.'
One critical question is whether enriched uranium, which could be developed into fuel for a nuclear bomb, was moved out of facilities before the US strikes.
'I believe they didn't have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast,' Mr Trump said.
He added that 'it's very hard to move that kind of material, and very dangerous'.
Classified briefings for legislators, originally scheduled for Tuesday, are now expected to take place on Thursday and Friday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
EU warns Europe must start building 'millions of drones' to defend itself against possible Russian attacks
Why you can trust Sky News The EU's defence commissioner has warned Europe must be capable of building a drone army in case Russia attacks. Military intelligence has suggested Russian forces could be ready to strike a NATO country within the next five years. In order to defend themselves, Andrius Kubilius says Europeans will require millions of drones and need to start preparing now. "Russia can have around five million drones, so we need to have capacities bigger than those in order to prevail," he told Sky News, warning that if President Putin ordered an attack, the target would face a "battle-tested" Russian army with the ability to use millions of drones". The 2022 invasion of Ukraine sparked a revolution in drone warfare. Facing one of the world's strongest militaries, the Ukrainians used the cheap, adaptable technology to their advantage. It estimates its drone units are now responsible for 80% of Russian frontline losses. Mr Kubilius has visited Ukraine to learn the lessons from the battlefield. Along the 1200km (745 miles) front line is an area nicknamed "Death Valley". "Nothing can move. Everything is controlled by drones. A traditional tank in that zone survives six minutes," he explained. This year, Ukraine's expected to produce more than four million drones. Contemplating how many units other countries would need, the commissioner used the example of his home country of Lithuania. The former Soviet republic shares a border of around 900km (559 miles) with Russia and Belarus. "If Ukrainians need four million for 1200km, we need something like three million drones for one year if the war is starting, if 'Day X' is coming," he said. To try to stay ahead in the fight, both Russia and Ukraine are constantly updating their drone technology. For this reason, the commissioner believes that rather than stockpiling drones now, which will go out of date, Europe should instead build up teams of pilots, engineers, and producers ready to scale up production should the time come. "On the European continent, at the moment, there are only two armies battle-tested with the ability to use millions of drones: one is Russian, which is planning new aggressions; another one is Ukrainian," said Mr Kubilius. "We need to learn a lot from Ukraine... how to organise defences against millions of drones, and also how to make your defence industry innovative," he added. It's a point many in the business agree with. German start-up STARK has been testing loitering munitions or "attack drones" ready to supply to Kyiv. "It's all made for easy handling for soldiers, so you don't have to use any tools on the front line, and you just plug in the rudders," said STARK's senior vice president, Josef Kranawetvogl, as he quickly clicked the unit's tail together. He spent 18 years in the German military before making the jump to weapons production. He says staying ahead of the enemy requires tactics and technology to be frequently updated. "Every day you have to adapt. You have such fast development cycles in Ukraine - two or three weeks, then there's something new upcoming and you have to be prepared for this." Since the start of June, Russia has repeatedly used drone swarms to attack Ukraine. It involves hundreds of drones hammering cities in one night. I asked Josef whether he believes NATO's European members are ready to defend against such an attack. "I see quite a lot of European armies starting right now to develop or to purchase unmanned systems, and it's a good development, but it's all about time. How can we speed up?" he replied. Close to the border with France, another German start-up, Alpine Eagle, is testing defence drone units for Ukraine. "This is our interceptor drone," explained the company's CEO, Jan-Hendrik Boelens, holding up a prototype which looks a bit like a small black plane. The interceptor is carried underneath a large grey drone. On-board radar means it can be fired at enemy drones up to 5km (3 miles) away. Jan thinks that could be a game changer in an aerial battle as it means hostile units could be picked off before they get close. And he believes NATO is unprepared if one of its countries was to be hit by a wave of drones like those in Ukraine. "We are absolutely not ready in my view," he said. He explained that Ukraine produced around 1.3 million drones a year last year. "I would be surprised if NATO even bought a thousand drones last year. I think Germany procured, I don't know, 100, maybe 200. So now you do the math on what that means and how quickly you run out of drones. "If Ukraine consumed 1.3 million drones per year, that's 3,000 a day. So, if you have 100 in your inventory, that would not last an hour." A spokesperson from the German Defence Ministry said the numbers stated "do not closely reflect reality". "Drones are now part of everyday life for soldiers, they are omnipresent and are used extensively in service operations and training," they added. Drones are a key part of NATO's defence plan. The alliance's leadership has repeatedly said producing, procuring, and protecting against drones is a priority. At the NATO summit, members agreed to boost defence spending to 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2035. In addition to increasing training and development, NATO Chief Mark Rutte has said he wants more investment in drone technology as well as boosting air defences fivefold. "We see Russia's deadly terror from the skies over Ukraine every day, and we must be able to defend ourselves from such attacks," he told an audience at the summit. Lessons from Ukraine have prompted members to embrace unmanned technology in various ways. Britain is one of the countries pledging to put drones front and centre of its new defence plan. Earlier this month, the government's Strategic Defence Review outlined a new way forward for British Army warfighting based around a drone-centric 20-40-40 strategy where uncrewed systems are deployed for first wave attacks, before tanks, attack helicopters and other manned platforms arrive on the battlefield. In essence, the new weapons mix would be 20% traditional heavy platforms (like tanks), 40% single-use expendable drones and munitions, and the remaining 40% reusable, high-end drones. It's been confirmed that an extra £2bn will be spent on army drones this parliament. Defence Secretary John Healey said Britain's adversaries were working more in alliance and technology was changing how war was fought. "Drones now kill more people than traditional artillery in the war in Ukraine and whoever gets new technology into the hands of their armed forces the quickest will win," he said. This week, the prime minister announced a deal with Ukraine to co-produce drones. Germany and Denmark have made similar agreements with the German Ministry of Defence, telling Sky News that drones are a top priority. In a drone showroom in central Berlin, we meet Sven Weizenegger, head of the German military's cyber innovation hub. He said they have noticed a boom in pitches from potential suppliers. Every day, his department receives up to 20 enquiries from companies asking how their products could be used by the military. He believes things need to move more quickly so soldiers get weapons faster. "We are very advanced in the innovation process. That means we have a lot of ideas and many companies that are ready to deliver," he explained. "Unfortunately, what we are not good at right now, due to our current processes, is getting these things into real operations, into frontline use. We need to fix that." Germany has promised to turbo-charge defence spending, with the Chancellor pledging to create the "strongest conventional army in Europe". Plans announced this week include boosting unmanned systems and air defences. The German Ministry of Defence said it couldn't reveal stock levels due to security, but a spokesperson confirmed the country is investing in a range of different units, including signing two contracts for attack drones. "We are procuring not just a few but quite large quantities and testing them directly with the troops," the spokesperson added. However, they agreed with the EU defence commissioner that rather than stockpiling tech which would go out of date, it was better to have a system in place to allow for large quantities to be made quickly in the event of war. In May, the EU approved a €150bn (£125bn) loan scheme to boost defence production across the bloc.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Reform capital markets to boost British AI
T he UK's ambition to become a global leader in artificial intelligence is clear — £1 billion in public funding isn't small change. But ambition without infrastructure is just rhetoric — and currently the country's capital markets are not fit for purpose. Outdated listing rules, heavy regulatory burdens, and a lack of access to retail and pension capital are steadily pushing Britain's brightest technology businesses into the arms of foreign private capital or overseas exchanges. This is not just about AI. The UK is the world's third-largest technology ecosystem after the US and China. We lead in life sciences, advanced materials, and, increasingly, defence and security technologies — all areas that are buoyed by renewed EU and Nato spending. Britain is increasingly becoming a leader in defence and security technologies OLI SCARFF/AFP These fields require scale, patience and flexibility; precisely what public markets should offer. Instead, AIM and the main market at the London Stock Exchange are shedding listings at an alarming rate. Rather than building global champions in London, top-tier companies are taking Silicon Valley capital or floating on the Nasdaq to gain access to deeper liquidity and higher valuations. This matters because public markets offer scale, credibility and access to patient capital — and something private capital often does not offer: independence. Companies can raise substantial funds without ceding board control or investor consent rights, loading up on debt, or being pressured into an early exit. This is especially vital in biotech and defence, where long-term research and development needs room to breathe. Public equity enables bold innovation, not just the path to acquisition. Yet our system is holding businesses back. Advisory fees remain high, disclosures are excessive, and digital tools are underused. Prospectus production, investor roadshows and compliance remain stubbornly analogue, adding needless cost and delay. At the same time, domestic capital is missing in action. UK pension funds and retail investors are sitting on deep pools of money, but they are largely absent from growth-stage equity. Allocations to UK equities have fallen below 5 per cent, down from more than 50 per cent in the 1990s. This is not just an investment gap, it's a strategic failure. We're training technology experts here, only to fund their growth and success abroad. Reform is urgent. First, digitise the listing process: templated prospectuses, AI-enabled drafting, online roadshows. Second, strip out non-material disclosures and cap advisory fees. Third, unlock domestic capital: require small pension fund allocations to UK growth, expand Isa incentives, and scrap stamp duty to boost liquidity. And crucially, make public markets central to our national technology strategy, not a nostalgic footnote. If we want to build and keep the next wave of innovators, we need markets that work for them. David Ramm is a partner at the London office of the US law firm Crowell & Moring
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
There were toe-curling displays of affection towards 'Daddy' Trump at the NATO summit - but like it or not, it worked
Donald Trump the "daddy" and a NATO summit marked by simpering gratitude. That was the overriding theme of a day-and-a-half of defence and diplomacy at The Hague. Like it or not, the fawning praise by Mark Rutte, the head of NATO, and many other European allies appears to have paid off, with the US president heading home seemingly back on board with the notion of collective defence - for now. The most toe-curling display of affection towards Mr Trump came when he, along with Mr Rutte, were speaking to reporters about how the US commander-in-chief brokered a ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran. "They've had a big fight, like two kids in a schoolyard," Mr Trump said. "You know, they fight like hell. You can't stop it. Let them fight for about two, three minutes, then it's easy to stop them." Mr Rutte added: "And then Daddy has to sometimes use strong language to get it stopped." I later asked Mr Trump at a news conference at the end of the summit about being called "Daddy" and whether he regards his NATO allies as children. The president said: "He likes me. I think he likes me. If he doesn't, I'll let you know. I'll come back and I'll hit him hard. Okay? He did it. Very affectionate. Daddy. You're my daddy." 1:14 I continued the question, though, to ask again whether he views fellow NATO member states as children and once they bolster their defences, might they be able to defend themselves without needing to rely on the US. The president said he thought they would still need help from the start. As for whether they could go it alone without the United States in the future, he said: "Ask Mark [Rutte]." For now, the feeling at the summit was more harmonious than hostile. 4:06 Whether that sentiment endures will depend on everyone being true to their word and increasing defence spending to a new target of 3.5% of GDP - up from 2% - with an additional 1.5% of GDP to be invested in national resilience. It adds up to 5% in total - a figure first touted by Mr Trump when he returned to the White House for his second term and resumed an attack on NATO, accusing too many of its members of freeloading off American security instead of paying to defend themselves. The US president, though, seemed to think the boost to budgets would be happening quickly, whereas the shortest timeline all 32 allies could agree to is 10 years. Spain has been even more flaky, agreeing to the new target but making clear it won't be met. As well as disappointing Mr Trump, such a slow pace of change is also woefully inadequate to rearm member states in time to confront what the Baltic states and Poland believe to be a very real risk of Vladimir Putin testing the alliance's defences within the next five years.
