Pacers, back home in Indiana, have some things to figure out before Game 3 vs. Thunder in NBA Finals
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — The Indiana Pacers simply couldn't wait to get home early Monday.
There's a slew of possible reasons for that. Maybe they just wanted to get out of Oklahoma City with their split of the first two games in the NBA Finals. Maybe they couldn't wait to see what finals fever will look like in Indianapolis after a 25-year wait to get back to the title round. Or maybe they just wanted to get back to work.
It's probably a little of everything — especially the last part.
Yes, the Pacers are tied with the Thunder 1-1 after two games of the NBA Finals. For the lower-seeded team, that's huge; the Pacers took home-court advantage away by winning Game 1. But they know that if they don't take care of their own business at home, starting with Game 3 on Wednesday night, it'll be advantage Thunder again, just like that.
'We're going to have to be a lot better on Wednesday,' Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said.
That might sound like coaching hyperbole, but really, it isn't. The Pacers have yet to have anyone score 20 points in a game in these finals. They've led for a total — a total! — of 1 minute, 54 seconds in this series, or just under 2% of the time. (That's a major improvement over the 0.0001% that they led Game 1 for, in a winning effort, somehow.) And in Game 2, the Thunder held the Pacers without a point in the paint for the entirety of the first quarter.
Points in the paint isn't a stat that tends to jump off the page. It's possible that a lot of people didn't even notice. But consider this: Before Sunday night, more than nine years had passed since the Pacers didn't manage a single paint point in the first quarter of a game.
'We have to do a better job of getting to the paint,' Pacers guard Tyrese Haliburton said. 'It's a lot easier said than done. ... Our offense is built from the inside-out, and we have to do a better job getting downhill. They collapse and make plays from there. I thought we could improve a lot there. But yeah, man, they are flying around. They have got great point-of-attack defenders and great rim protectors.'
For a team that has now won 81 of its 100 games this season (not counting the NBA Cup final loss, since that doesn't figure into any records), the Thunder somehow tend to get overlooked on the defensive end. Oklahoma City handcuffed the Pacers in the first two games, daring Indiana to take 3-pointers and barely giving up anything easy around the rim.
It starts with bothering Haliburton, which the Thunder have managed to do for the majority of the first two games.
'Most of the guys I guard have the ball most of the time,' said Thunder forward Luguentz Dort, who has drawn the assignment on Haliburton for much of the first two games. 'My main thing is to stay in front of him and make everything tough. He's a great player. He is going to make some tough shots and great reads, so I just have to stay in front of him.'
No team gave up fewer paint points in the regular season than the Thunder. It truly is a clash of styles; the Pacers are averaging 46 paint points in their 13 wins in these playoffs as opposed to averaging 36 paint points in their five losses.
'I think we have been one of the better teams scoring in the paint all year and we have to establish that early,' Pacers forward Myles Turner said. 'I think we only had four or six points in the paint in the first half (of Game 2) and that's not Pacers basketball. When you live and die by that three or mid-range shots, it doesn't always fare well for you.'
Maybe at home, things will be easier. The Pacers got a split in Oklahoma City; things could be much worse. And now, the Pacers have two days to try to find a way to respond to what the Thunder defense is taking away.
'We'll watch the film, see where we can get better," Haliburton said. 'We know that the paint is our emphasis and the paint is our friend. The more that we're able to attack the paint, usually better things happen for us."
___
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NBA Finals 2025: Want to win a championship? Your team might need a Chet Holmgren
Over the final four minutes of the first quarter in Game 2 of the NBA Finals, as he does for stretches on most nights, Oklahoma City Thunder big man Chet Holmgren showed a little bit of everything he can do. Defensively, Holmgren slid from the corner, where he was hidden on Indiana Pacers center Thomas Bryant, to block one-time slam dunk champion Obi Toppin at the rim. A few possessions later, Holmgren switched onto T.J. McConnell, sticking with Indiana's pest and forcing him into a contested long 2-pointer. Advertisement Offensively, Holmgren spotted up from the left arc for an in-rhythm 3-pointer. That set up his next attack a few plays later, as he took another pass on the left arc, drawing Pacers big Myles Turner to the perimeter. Holmgren took him off the dribble, finger-rolling home a layup from his outstretched 7-foot-6 wingspan. Otherwise, Holmgren keeps the ball moving with his passing, even calmly registering an assist from his backside on a broken play early in the second quarter. As it turns out, everything he can do is quite a lot. In other words: Every NBA team could use a Chet Holmgren. Sure, it is easy to say: Get yourself a 7-foot-1 No. 2 overall pick who can shoot the 3, attack close-outs, pass with aplomb and hold his own defensively in space. But, as his Thunder remain betting favorites to win the championship, according to BetMGM, he begs the question: Does a team need some semblance of a Chet Holmgren — or, at the very least, a floor-spacing rim protector — to compete for a title? Advertisement Holmgren finished the Thunder's Game 2 victory against the Pacers with 15 points, 6 rebounds, 1 assist and 1 block, hardly the stuff of legend, but his contributions to Oklahoma City go well beyond stat lines. While 3-and-D wings were once the craze — and still are (they are extremely necessary, too) — the 3-and-D big is what unlocks every lineup combination for his team. Put him at center, and he can anchor smaller five-out units, which feature shooters everywhere and a more versatile defensive approach. Slide him to the power forward position, and he can help to physically punish opponents in double-big combinations. As Thunder head coach Mark Daigneault said after Game 2, "When we play small, we tend to be a little bit more of a turnover defense. When we play bigger, we have other strengths. It's a combination of things." Typically, teams will have to choose between sacrificing rim protection in small-ball lineups or versatility in double-big outfits, but with someone like Holmgren, that sacrifice is minimized, or eliminated entirely. Case in point: The Thunder outscored opponents by roughly 15 points per 100 meaningful possessions regardless of whether Holmgren manned the 4 or the 5 position during the regular season, per Cleaning the Glass. That dominance was nearly halved to a mortal figure whenever he was off the floor. Advertisement The Thunder inexplicably abandoned their double-big lineups in their Game 1 loss to Indiana, which was curious, because the Pacers have no counter for them. They have Myles Turner, a center whose ability to space the floor and protect the rim has unlocked a sensational small-ball outfit that has carried Indiana this far. What they lack is a second big who can play alongside him. What they lack is a Chet Holmgren. And maybe that is the final piece to a championship puzzle: Teams need a facsimile of Holmgren to unlock the double-big arrow in their quiver, and they need that second capable big to employ it. This is why the Thunder felt compelled to give Isaiah Hartenstein a three-year, $87 million contract last summer. Consider the Boston Celtics, who won last year's championship with a pair of big men, Al Horford and Kristaps Porziņģis, both of whom could shoot the 3 and anchor a defense. They could play separately or with each other, and the ability to do both is what unlocked their full potential. They survived without Porziņģis for much of last year's playoffs, but this year they ran into New York Knicks big Karl-Anthony Towns, whose ability to play as a 4 or a 5 allowed then-head coach Tom Thibodeau to toy with lineup combinations until he found one with Mitchell Robinson at center that punished the smaller Celtics. Look at the league's recent champions, and you will find someone who can flutter between the 4 and the 5 and be effective at both. As we saw again this season, Aaron Gordon could play alongside Nikola Jokić or spell him at the 5 for the Denver Nuggets. Draymond Green was the original "Every Team Needs A Version of This Guy" for the Golden State Warriors. He played with Kevon Looney or without. Advertisement Look at the standings, too. Every good team has someone like Holmgren (i.e., Evan Mobley of the 64-win Cleveland Cavaliers). Every bad team does not (the Washington Wizards, for example, hope Alex Sarr can become him). Every middling team wishes its version of Holmgren was as good as he is. (Imagine, for a moment, if you swapped Isaiah Stewart for Holmgren and what the Detroit Pistons might look like.) Think of the Houston Rockets. They boasted both Alperen Şengün and Steven Adams, either of whom could man the center position and neither of whom was best positioned to play power forward. While they enjoyed some success as a double-big combination, the Rockets rarely trusted them, because they lacked versatility on defense and shrunk the floor on offense. It made them susceptible to the first-round loss they suffered against the Warriors, who practically invented this concept of an ultra-versatile big. Think of the Chicago Bulls, who feature Nikola Vučević. He can shoot but cannot defend the rim. Think of the Atlanta Hawks, whose bigs can defend the rim but cannot shoot. You can get paid handsomely to do one or the other, but can you win on the highest level? Not if the most recent champions are indicators. It is not a novel concept to consider that every team needs a Chet Holmgren or someone who can do a bit of everything in the frontcourt. But it may be a necessary one if you hope to win the championship.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chet Holmgren Is On The Hot Seat After Game 1 Stinker Against Pacers
Chet Holmgren Is On The Hot Seat After Game 1 Stinker Against Pacers originally appeared on Fadeaway World. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and the Thunder got their hearts broken in the final seconds of Game 1 in the NBA Finals as Tyrese Haliburton nailed a mid-range game-winner to seal the Pacers' 111-110 win. The Thunder led the game from the tip-off until there were 0.4 seconds left on the clock, and were major favorites to win the game. Advertisement One of the reasons why they were considered favorites to win this series was not just because of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander but the Thunder's 'Big Three', i.e, Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, and Chet Holmgren. While Williams and Gilgeous-Alexander have had a consistent Playoff run this season, Holmgren's has been a bit of a roller coaster. He had two 20-point+ games in the Grizzlies series, none in the Nuggets series (mainly due to Jokic's matchup), three in the Timberwolves series, and has started with a 6-point game against the Pacers in Game 1. The former No. 2 pick in the NBA Draft has averaged 15.8 points, 8.4 rebounds, and 1.9 blocks in 17 games of the 2025 playoffs so far. Holmgren went two of nine from the floor and did not make a single three-point shot in the game. Several fans, along with troll account admins, went on social media to put Holmgren in a 'hot seat' and criticize his Game 1 performance. "Chet Holmgren, you are disappointing," wrote an NBA fan on X. Advertisement "Chet Holmgren should not be able to fly under the radar for being ASS on the big stage," wrote another unhappy fan on X. "Chet Holmgren if he wasn't 7'1" was the caption of a meme that showed Holmgren as a McDonald's worker. "Chet Holmgren is 8ft tall for nothing, WTF" wrote another surprised basketball fan on X. "Chet Holmgren pulled up like this just to go 2/9 and get benched in crunch time," wrote BricksCenter, a satirical rip-off of SportsCenter meant to be a troll account. Shaquille O'Neal: Not Impressed With Chet Holmgren Earlier this week, Shaquille O'Neal went on the Pivot Podcast and gave his honest opinion about the Thunder. He blamed the NBA media for hyping up Holmgren too fast before he reached star status and is currently a role player at best. Advertisement 'We're all responsible for this, we give away too many titles sometimes. They got a big two, that mo***rf***ker Jay Dub is serious, he can play. The other guy's just a role player, stop it… But he's a great role player. He's a Horace Grant or Tony Kukoc, not taking away, but he's not a big three, stop it, stop it'. O'Neal believes that Holmgren is yet to prove that he is a part of a 'Big Three' in Oklahoma. Meanwhile, Anthony Edwards, during their series with the Timberwolves, called Holmgren the game-changer for the Thunder. Therefore, a lot of expectations are riding on Holmgren's shoulders. Next summer, Holmgren will be up for an extension. His performance in this series and the next season could decide how big a contract he gets from the Thunder. Since he will be competing with Williams for contracts expected to be in the range of $240 million+ and more, depending on factors like All-NBA selections. Will Holmgren be able to turn things around after a rough start against the Pacers? Or will Myles Turner be too tough a match-up for him, like Jokic was? It will be interesting to see what lies ahead for Holmgren. Advertisement Related: "It's Not Rocket Science": Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Reacts After Tyrese Haliburton Steals Game 1 For Pacers This story was originally reported by Fadeaway World on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"You Can't Get Too Comfortable": Shai Gilgeous-Alexander On Thunder's Next Steps After Game 2 Win In NBA Finals
"You Can't Get Too Comfortable": Shai Gilgeous-Alexander On Thunder's Next Steps After Game 2 Win In NBA Finals originally appeared on Fadeaway World. After a convincing 123-107 win in Game 2, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and the Oklahoma City Thunder successfully bounced back and displayed the resilience of a championship team. While discussing the process of coming back from a loss in the first game of the NBA Finals, the Thunder star detailed the next steps forward with ESPN after the game. Advertisement "You can't get comfortable," he said. "You've got to focus on the little things, recovery, you've got to focus on the game plan. And ultimately, I'm going to sound like a broken record, but get better for the next game and the next opportunity." While speaking about the team's resilience after a chaotic finish to Game 1, which eventually resulted in a loss, Gilgeous-Alexander said: "We've just used this opportunity to get better. We've done a really good job of that all year, and the last game was no different. Tonight is the same thing. Did some things good tonight. Did some things bad. But we've got to get better and get ready for Game 3." Although the Thunder had done a solid job of establishing themselves in Game 1 as well, a fourth-quarter comeback mounted by the Pacers saw their 15-point lead evaporate into thin air. Advertisement More late-game heroics by Pacers guard Tyrese Haliburton sealed the win for his team. However, OKC appeared to be unfazed by this miraculous performance. A calm and methodical dissection of Indiana's defense on Sunday night was a clear depiction of this. Oklahoma showcased its ability as the best defensive team in the NBA. Every attempt Indiana made at cutting through the lead was met with tough covers, eventually leading to turnovers, as the Pacers stacked 15 for the night. The efforts of Alex Caruso, Lu Dort, and Aaron Wiggins were immense in ensuring this. The Thunder star himself played an active role in forcing turnovers, securing four steals on the night in the process. Caruso and Wiggins also contributed on the scoring front, with 20 and 18 points, respectively. Gilgeous-Alexander's effort on both ends of the floor was critical in dictating success. His contribution of 34 points, five rebounds, and eight assists also saw him break a record, surpassing Allen Iverson for the most points scored in the first two games of the NBA Finals. Advertisement OKC's star didn't carry his team alone. His co-star, Jalen Williams, put up a significant contribution of 19 points, five rebounds, and five assists. Meanwhile, Thunder big man Chet Holmgren bounced back from a poor performance in Game 1 with a solid 15 points and six rebounds on 5-11 shooting from the field. With the series tied at 1-1, there appears to be a stalemate at the moment. However, given how dominant OKC's performance was, it would be safe to say they have the upper hand. As the series heads to Indiana for the next set of games, the Thunder will look to capitalize on this. With each win taking them one step closer to the title, OKC will come out firing in Game 3 on Wednesday at 8:30 pm ET. Related: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Joins Michael Jordan, Shaquille O'Neal, Wilt Chamberlain, And Others On Top-Tier NBA List This story was originally reported by Fadeaway World on Jun 9, 2025, where it first appeared.
