France's Macron praises Palestinian president's ‘genuine willingness' for peace
LONDON: France's President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday praised Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' 'concrete and unprecedented commitments' after receiving a letter from the latter ahead of the UN-backed Saudi-French conference on a two-state solution in Palestine.
In his letter on Monday, which was addressed to Macron and Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Abbas outlined the main steps to be taken to end the war on Gaza.
He called for the demilitarization of Hamas, the release of hostages, a ceasefire in Gaza and deployment of international forces to protect 'the Palestinian people,' while reaffirming his commitment to reforms and elections.
Abbas also demanded an end to 'the occupation and conflict once and for all' and halting settler activities.
In a post on X, Macron described the letter as 'a decisive moment, praising the Palestinian leader for charting 'a course toward a horizon of peace.'
I received a letter of hope, courage, and clarity.
The President of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, charts a course toward a horizon of peace.
A condemnation of terrorism, the release of hostages, the demilitarization of Hamas, an end to the war in Gaza,… pic.twitter.com/zQ2ZgEOQ5k
— Emmanuel Macron (@EmmanuelMacron) June 12, 2025
'Concrete and unprecedented commitments that demonstrate a genuine willingness to move forward,' said Macron.
France and Saudi Arabia will co-chair the International Conference for the Peaceful Settlement of the Palestinian Question and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution in New York next week.
The conference at the UN's headquarters aims to achieve concrete steps toward the two-state solution.
In his letter, Abbas stressed the Palestinian Authority's commitment to presidential and general elections within a year across the Occupied Territories — including East Jerusalem — under international supervision.
'The Palestinian people are entitled to live in freedom and dignity in their homeland. Palestine and Israel are entitled to exist as states, in peace and security, in conformity with international law,' Abbas wrote in his letter.
Reaffirming his commitment to the two-state solution, he said: 'We are ready to conclude within a clear and binding timeline, and with international support, supervision and guarantees, a peace agreement that ends the Israeli occupation and resolves all outstanding and final status issues.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
19 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Israel to shut missions around world, says embassy in Sweden
Israel's embassy to Sweden said on Friday that Israel would close its diplomatic missions around the world in light of recent developments, and that consular services would not be provided. It did not say how long the missions would be closed.
Asharq Al-Awsat
19 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
US Sanctions on Syria: From Hafez al-Assad to al-Sharaa
Syrians have lived under the shadow of US sanctions for 46 years, spanning generations who know no other reality. These sanctions have become woven into every aspect of daily life, from banking and international aviation to construction and food supplies. Their burden has fallen hardest on ordinary people, rather than on the symbols of the ousted Assad regime. While lifting sanctions now would undoubtedly unlock planning and reconstruction efforts, political and security concerns persist, and Syria's dilapidated infrastructure may impede private-sector investment. Most importantly, we must ask whether US President Donald Trump's move to begin lifting sanctions was as improvised as his 2018 announcement to withdraw militarily from Syria, or whether it marks a pivotal shift in US foreign policy toward Syria. On May 13, during his visit to Saudi Arabia, Trump announced the lifting of US sanctions on Syria. This triggered a period of confusion and internal reviews before his administration outlined an initial mechanism that balanced implementing his announcement with addressing his advisors' worries over unfettered engagement with the new Syrian leadership. Before assessing this current phase of easing sanctions, we need a historical overview of them, their context, underlying rationale, implementation methods, and what their potential impact might be for Syria and its people. Sanctions on Syria can be divided into three eras: under Hafez al-Assad, under his son Bashar, and now under interim President Ahmed al‑Sharaa. Shift toward Iran (1979–2000) US sanctions on Syria began in 1979, following the Camp David Accords between Egypt and Israel and the rise of Iran's revolution. With the end of the strategic alliance between Cairo and Damascus, Hafez al-Assad viewed Iran's emerging regime as a counterweight to Iraq and Israel. Washington designated Syria a state sponsor of terrorism in 1979 due to its role in Lebanon and its support for fighters opposed to Israel. Consequently, the US imposed restrictions on foreign aid, defense exports, and the transfer of dual‑use goods. In November 1986, President Ronald Reagan barred Syrian planes from landing in the US. The Iraq War (2001–2010) Sanctions entered a new phase as US policy shifted after the September 11, 2001 attacks and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, coinciding with Bashar al‑Assad's arrival to power in July 2000. In his 2002 State of the Union, President George W. Bush labeled Iran, Iraq under Saddam Hussein, and North Korea the 'Axis of Evil', prompting Iran to form a 'Resistance Axis' that included Syria and Hezbollah. With these strains came stricter measures: the Syria Accountability and Lebanon Sovereignty Act of 2003, enforced by OFAC at the US Treasury in 2004 under Executive Order 13338, targeted Syria's role in Lebanon and its pursuit of weapons of mass destruction, as well as its opposition to the US-led occupation of Iraq. On May 7, 2025, the Trump administration signed a notice extending the national emergency concerning Syria until May 7, 2026, encompassing executive orders from 2003 to 2012. The Syrian uprising and Caesar Act Following Syria's uprising in March 2011, the US imposed a wave of sanctions targeting violence and human rights abuses. President Barack Obama's April 29, 2011 executive order froze Assad regime assets, followed by an August 2011 ban on oil, asset freezes, and broad trade prohibitions, excluding food and medicine. However, the defining moment came with the Caesar Civilian Protection Act of 2019, signed by Trump in December 2019 and implemented in June 2020. Targeting infrastructure, military maintenance, energy, and those funding the Assad regime, it also banned foreign investment in Syria's reconstruction. This legislation aimed to check both Russian and Iranian influence and serve as leverage for negotiations with Moscow, permitting temporary waivers if productive talks occurred. Though enacted long after the internal conflict began, the Act functioned less as a response to internal dynamics and more as an economic restraint on reconstruction efforts. Al‑Sharaa after Assad By late 2024, with Bashar al-Assad's regime fallen and Trump back in power, Syria had not been a US priority, with internal debate over how to engage the new al‑Sharaa administration. That shifted after Trump spoke with Türkiye's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on March 16, signaling alignment with Turkish‑Saudi policy against the hardline Israeli stance. In Saudi Arabia, Trump began rolling back sanctions on Syria, but the fate of the Caesar Act remains uncertain, currently suspended in 180‑day increments, extendable. Although it was briefly lifted for humanitarian relief during the Feb 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquakes and in areas controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), its full repeal remains on hold. Mechanisms and challenges Trump's administration has implemented three key executive measures: Treasury's 'GL‑25' on May 23, enabling sweeping economic coverage; a 180‑day suspension of Caesar sanctions; and a specific waiver for the Commercial Bank of Syria via the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, allowing re‑establishment of correspondent banking relationships. GL‑25 has no set expiry and can be revoked anytime, while Caesar waivers renew every six months. An earlier GL‑24 waiver, issued in January, allowed limited official and energy sector transactions and personal transfers, but US banks have remained cautious. The permit covers four sectors: finance, oil‑gas, maritime shipping, and aviation. US persons remain barred from transactions that may benefit Russia, Iran, or North Korea, meaning rigorous due diligence is necessary. The original executive orders remain in force, although press reports suggest possible cancellations. Procedurally, Syria remains on the State Sponsors of Terrorism list, as removal would require Congress to be notified by the US State Department. The Department of Commerce and State's defense trade regulators have yet to remove export controls, which means that Syria still falls under International Traffic in Arms Regulations, necessitating export licenses for most goods, excluding basic food and medicine. Furthermore, Hayat Tahrir al‑Sham is still designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization. Even after al‑Sharaa met Trump, the Treasury's waiver excludes HTS leader Abu Mohammed al‑Golani, al-Sharaa's former nom de guerre, who remains sanctioned under UN Security Council Resolution 1267, supported by a likely Russian veto of any attempt to remove HTS from global blacklists. Arms embargoes and surveillance‑tech restrictions will also persist. The Caesar Act itself was renewed by Congress in January 2025 for five years, lasting until January 2030 unless overturned legislatively and its suspension may be extended in November 2025. But these continue as temporary waivers, not full repeals. US politics and Congressional dynamics Legislative repeal would require Act passage in Congress. Ironically, Trump's allies in this are Democrats, as many Republicans, especially senators, remain wary. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair Jim Risch remarked that Trump lifted sanctions a bit more than what was expected, but cautioned that the sanctions could come back. US energy firms, together with Syrian‑American groups, have lobbied Trump to ease sanctions, while pro‑Israel lobby AIPAC insists any relief must hinge on demonstrable positive behavior from the new Syrian government. Impact on economy and society In 2018, the UN estimated at least $250 billion would be required to rebuild Syria fully, far beyond what domestic resources can furnish. Serious barriers remain: destroyed roads, hospitals, and power networks hinder basic services. Reviving industry needs massive investment; millions displaced internally or abroad need rehousing; food, fuel, medical gear, and decent jobs are in short supply. Even a partial lifting marks a seismic shift: essential imports like food, medicine, and technology could flow more freely; reconstruction of schools, hospitals, and roads becomes feasible; frozen international assets might be unfrozen, inviting foreign companies back to construction, energy, and trade. The most immediate relief will come from reconnecting Syrian banks to global payment systems, especially SWIFT, dismantling the economic collapse born of widespread distrust. Yet Syria remains on the FATF grey list, deterring banks and obstructing liquidity, so regulatory frameworks must be built. Future prospects Ambitious domestic and regional projects have surfaced under al‑Sharaa, with some contracts bypassing competitive bids. The UAE has been granted an $800 million concession at the Port of Tartus, via a Dubai Ports World MoU, to develop multi-purpose terminals, industrial zones, dry ports, and logistics hubs. Meanwhile, a 30‑year deal with French CMA CGM was signed to develop Latakia Port. China's VDL company secured rights to 300,000 m² in the Adra Free Zone outside Damascus for 20 years to build industrial and commercial facilities with tax breaks, labor flexibility, and repatriable profits. A Qatari-US-Turkish energy consortium plans a $7 billion, 5,000 MW power project. All are seen as steps to lure foreign capital and reshape Syria's foreign policy by leveraging international corporate interests. Uncertain transition The sanctions regime hinges on three pillars: Syria's State Sponsor designation (since 1979), the Syria Accountability Act (2003), and the Caesar Act (2019). Only the first may soon shift, pending a State Department and Congressional review; the others remain entrenched. While Syria will not likely see a flood of US investment tomorrow, the first visible presence would probably involve Turkish and Gulf investors, as the US must first verify the stability and reliability of the new Syrian leadership before enabling wider investors to return. Damascus does not fully control its territory or armed factions, and fresh sanctions may target entities linked to coastal violence in recent months. Thus, Caesar's intent has transitioned from coercing the Assad regime to ensuring al‑Sharaa's good behavior. But its six‑month renewals offer limited investor certainty, making regional neighbors the marginal beneficiaries. Al‑Sharaa's teams may aim to woo Trump with bold reconstruction plans akin to a Marshall Plan. But Trump isn't easily swayed. He has yet to appoint an ambassador to Damascus; instead, US Ambassador to Türkiye Tom Barrack was named envoy to Syria, indicating Syria remains an extension of Turkish policy. Trump is unpredictable and could reverse course swiftly, but current signs still point to provisional waivers rather than a full repeal of sanctions.
Asharq Al-Awsat
24 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Gulf Countries Condemn Israel's Attack on Iran
The United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Oman strongly condemned on Friday Israel's strikes against Iran. The UAE's Ministry of Foreign Affairs 'stressed the importance of exercising the utmost self-restraint and judgment' and urged against the conflict's expansion, warning of its repercussions on regional security and stability. It reiterated the UAE's position that boosting dialogue, adhering to international law, and respecting the sovereignty of states are 'essential principles for resolving the current crises.' It stressed the need to 'resolve disputes through diplomatic means rather than confrontation and escalation,' calling on the United Nations Security Council to take 'urgent and necessary measures to achieve a ceasefire, and to reinforce international peace and security.' Qatar, which has served as a key mediator in the Israel-Hamas war, said the attack was 'a blatant violation of Iran's sovereignty and security, as well as a clear breach of international law and its established principles.' A Foreign Ministry statement expressed Qatar's 'grave concern over this dangerous escalation, which forms part of a recurring pattern of aggressive policies that threaten regional peace and stability, and hinder efforts aimed at de-escalation and diplomatic resolution.' It underscored the urgent need 'for the international community to assume its legal and moral responsibilities and to act swiftly to halt these Israeli violations.' It reiterated its firm position in rejecting all forms of violence, renewing its call for restraint and the avoidance of escalation that could widen the scope of conflict and undermine regional security and stability. Oman, which is mediating nuclear talks between the US and Iran, said it considers the attack 'a dangerous, reckless escalation, representing a flagrant violation of the UN Charter and the principles of international law. Such aggressive, persistent behavior is unacceptable and further destabilizes the regional peace and security.' 'The Sultanate of Oman holds Israel responsible for this escalation and its consequences, and calls upon the international community to adopt a firm and unequivocal stance to halt this dangerous course of action,' it added. Israel launched a wave of strikes across Iran on Friday that targeted its nuclear program and military sites, killing top military officers and raising the prospect of an all-out war between the two bitter adversaries. Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said Friday Israel will face 'severe punishment,' as state-run IRNA news agency confirmed top military officials and scientists had been killed in the attack. An Israeli military official said that the Israeli Air Force targeted Iranian nuclear and military sites, without identifying them. The attack comes as tensions have reached new heights over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. The Board of Governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency for the first time in 20 years on Thursday censured Iran over it not working with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site in the country and swap out some centrifuges for more advanced ones. Israel for years has warned it will not allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon, something Tehran insists it doesn't want though officials there have repeatedly warned it could.
