'No war on Iran': New Yorkers rally against US and Israeli regime change plans
On a sweltering summer evening in New York City on Wednesday, hundreds of protesters assembled on the steps of the New York Public Library in Manhattan to convey what they said was a clear message to the city and country's elected officials: 'No War on Iran'.
The emergency protest, organised by a coalition of advocacy groups in New York and in several cities across the country, came as rumours swirled of a possible announcement of direct US military intervention in Israel's attacks on Iran.
More than 585 Iranians have been killed since Israel launched its aerial strikes on 13 June over claims Iran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons.
Though Israel said it would exclusively targeting Iran's nuclear programme and military sites, Israel has struck residential buildings, hospitals, civilian infrastructure and the Iranian state television headquarters, killing hundreds of civilians in what is largely being seen as a operation geared towards regime change in Iran.
Hospitals in Iran are reportedly overwhelmed with the injured and thousands have been searching for ways to evacuate the capital city, Tehran.
Protesters held up Palestinian flags, as well as signs urging for the bombardment to end. Several people waved placards that read: 'Money for people's needs. Not War with Iran'.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Ahmad Shirazi, an Iranian-American film-maker based in New York City, told Middle East Eye that it would be a major catastrophe for the U.S and its allies if it attacked Iran.
"They tried in 1980. They were not successful. They cannot, and will not be able to get rid of one of the oldest countries in the world, like Iran," Shirazi said.
He said that both Israel and the U.S have been peddling lies for as long as he could remember.
Another protester, Philip, said that he had family currently in Iran and he was terrified for their safety.
"They are targetting civilians, water infrastructure. These are not precision [strikes]. I have family in Iran. They are afraid every night, he said.
Protesters carried placards calling for the U.S to deescalate tensions in the region (Azad Essa/MEE)
Spectre of US involvement
Though the US has denied direct involvement in Israel's strikes on Gaza, several reports indicated that not only has the US assisted Israel, it has also encouraged Israel to continue bombarding Tehran.
On Wednesday, three officials at the Arms Control Association, said American involvement in Israel's "illegal attacks" on Iran would "set back efforts to reach an effective nuclear agreement to block Iran's pathways to the Bomb".
The statement, released on Wednesday, said that a "consensus view among US intelligence agencies before Israel's bombing campaign was that Iran had not made a decision to move forward on building a bomb, and was several months away, if not longer, from being able to assemble a crude device.
"There was no imminent threat that Iran was weaponising its nuclear program before Israel's attack began."
For more than 20 months, hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers have taken to the streets to protest the ongoing war in Gaza.
Many at the protest on Tuesday said the impunity had allowed Israel to expand the war to Iran.
More than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israel's war on Gaza;, which both human rights groups and genocide scholars have labelled a genocide.
On Friday, the UN Security Council will convene for a meeting to discuss the hostilities between Israel and Iran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
21 minutes ago
- The National
'Iran can defend itself': Tehran's proxies left on the substitute bench
As the conflict between Israel and Iran dramatically escalates, with the US considering whether to intervene to back its long-time ally, a pressing question has emerged: will Tehran's proxies rush to the rescue of their patron? Hostilities between Iran and Israel have reached unprecedented levels, entering a seventh day of confrontation, after Israel launched attacks last Friday on Iran claiming to prevent the country from acquiring a nuclear weapon. The strikes prompted a series of retaliatory missile barrages from Iran. Sources in Iran's proxy groups have shared differing views on whether they will join the fight with Iran. A Hezbollah source says it will remain on the sidelines, regardless of whether the US intervenes, while Yemen's Houthi rebels are the only proxy to have announced attacks against Israel in support of Iran. The proxy groups, however, have stressed their autonomy from Tehran. The so-called Axis of Resistance is an Iran-led network that includes Hamas in Palestine, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen and armed groups in Iraq, whose aim is to deter Israel from conducting military action and countering its influence in the region. Many of these groups have fought against Iran's enemies in their respective countries. The groups launched attacks against Israel as part of a support campaign for Hamas and the Palestinian people after the Gaza war broke out on October 7, 2023. But months of fighting with Israel, which holds clear military dominance, has considerably eroded the operational capacity of the axis. Hezbollah, once a formidable militia and Iran's most powerful proxy, was battered by nearly 14 months of conflict with Israel that ended in November, leaving much of its chain of command dismantled and its arsenal decimated. The group has made it clear that it does not intend to take part in any retaliatory action to support Iran. Lebanese MP Hassan Fadlallah described Iran as a 'key regional power' that is capable of defending itself, in an interview with pro-Hezbollah outlet Al Mayadeen. 'It does not ask others to fight on its behalf,' he said. The group is under pressure to disarm and faces growing discontent from those in Lebanon who accuse it of dragging the cash-strapped country into a war it could not afford, and causing damage worth several billion dollars. Once a kingmaker, Hezbollah is now grappling with a loss of influence within the Lebanese political scene. A Lebanese official told The National that the army sent a message to Hezbollah, urging it not to intervene in the Iran-Israel conflict and warning against dragging the country into yet another devastating war. 'They said they wouldn't,' the official said. 'We're doing everything we can, calls, meetings, to prevent any escalation,' the official added. 'This is not our war." Some fear a potential US intervention against Iran might compel Hezbollah to join the fight. Statements attributed to an Iranian official suggested that, if the US became directly involved – an idea President Donald Trump has been publicly floating for days – Hezbollah would join forces with Tehran. A Hezbollah source firmly denied the claim. 'I don't think the statement is true … who is this source? Iran can defend itself,' the source told The National. The sources confirmed that it was a Hezbollah decision, not an Iranian decision. 'Unfortunately the media fabricates fake news." Cautious but ready In Iraq, which is home to several Tehran-backed militias that, unlike Hezbollah, remain largely intact, a senior militant leader told The National that the decision to open a front would depend 'on developments". 'The current situation calls for caution and wisdom, but also readiness to respond if Iran comes under full-scale attack,' he said. The militant said US intervention could be a game-changer in how the groups perceive their role in the conflict. 'We advise the United States not to get involved in the war – it has tried before and ended in failure," he said. "Any American aggression against Iran will directly affect Iraq, and Iraqis have the right to defend their sovereignty, religious beliefs and dignity." He warned that any attempt at regime change in Iran – which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has shown increasing interest in, beyond merely destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities – would lead to regional chaos. 'Iraq lies between two blazing arenas, and the resistance factions will not stand idly by," he added. Yemen's Houthis are the only proxy group to have announced joint military co-operation with Tehran since the recent escalation. The Houthis have launched attacks against Israel and ships in the Red Sea in support of Palestinians in Gaza since October 2023. On Sunday, the group said it fired ballistic missiles at Israel in support of 'the oppressed Palestinian and Iranian peoples". A Yemeni source in the capital Sanaa said there was 'no joint operations room between the Iranians and the Houthis", but rather continued co-ordination. 'When Houthis are required to strike, they carry out the strike independently," the source added. "This is what we've observed in the nature of their operations. This is also what Sanaa and Iranian officials have affirmed since the beginning of the operations, that Yemen acts on its own, deciding when it is in its interest to escalate, de-escalate, or strike a particular area."
Khaleej Times
22 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Israel-Iran conflict: Khamenei can no longer be allowed to exist, says minister Katz
Israel's defence minister said on Thursday that Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei "can no longer be allowed to exist", just days after reports that Washington vetoed Israeli plans to assassinate him. The comments from Defence Minister Israel Katz came after the Soroka Hospital in the southern city of Beersheba reported 40 people injured after an Iran missile strike. "Khamenei openly declares that he wants Israel destroyed — he personally gives the order to fire on hospitals," Katz told journalists in Holon near Tel Aviv. "Such a man can no longer be allowed to exist." A senior US official told AFP on Sunday that President Donald Trump had "found out that the Israelis had plans to hit Iran's supreme leader". "President Trump was against it and we told the Israelis not to," said the US official, speaking on condition of anonymity. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has neither confirmed nor denied the claim. In a television interview on Monday, he did not rule it out, saying that killing the 86-year-old cleric who has ruled Iran since 1989 would "end the conflict" between the two countries. Trump wrote on Tuesday that the United States knew Khamenei's location but would not kill him "for now". Israel launched strikes on Iran last Friday in what it said was an 11th-hour move to prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons. It has since hit hundreds of targets, including military commanders, top nuclear scientists and military and nuclear facilities. 'Regime change' The movements of the supreme leader, who has not left the Iran since he took over in 1989, are subject to the tightest security and secrecy. Netanyahu has not said publicly that Israel is trying to topple him, only that regime change could be a result of its military action. Iranians "understand that the regime is much weaker than they thought — they realise it, and that could lead to results," he told a press conference on Monday. French President Emmanuel Macron has said that any attempt at forcing change through military action would result in "chaos", while both China and Russia demanded that Israel cease fire. Iran denies seeking to develop a nuclear weapon and reports citing US intelligence officials this week have cast doubt on Israeli claims that it has accelerated efforts to produce one. Iran has been enriching uranium to 60 per cent — far above the 3.67 per cent limit set in a 2015 nuclear deal, which Trump abandoned, but still short of the 90 per cent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead. Israel has maintained ambiguity on its own nuclear arsenal, but the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute says it has 90 nuclear warheads.
Zawya
28 minutes ago
- Zawya
Oil prices jump as Israel-Iran conflict enters seventh day
Oil prices rose on Thursday after Israel and Iran continued to exchange missile attacks overnight and U.S. President Donald Trump's stance on the conflict kept investors on edge. Brent crude futures rose $1.06, or 1.4%, to $77.76 a barrel by 1151 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude for July was up $1.26, or 1.7%, at $76.40. Brent had surged to its highest in nearly five months at $78.50 on June 13, when Israel began its attacks. The conflict entered its seventh day on Thursday after Israel struck Iranian nuclear sites and Iranian missiles hit an Israeli hospital. There is still a "healthy risk premium baked into the price as traders wait to see whether the next stage of the Israel-Iran conflict is a U.S. strike or peace talks", said Tony Sycamore, analyst at trading platform IG. Goldman Sachs said on Wednesday that a geopolitical risk premium of about $10 a barrel is justified, given lower Iranian supply and risk of wider disruption that could push Brent crude above $90. President Trump told reporters on Wednesday that he had yet to decide whether the U.S. will join Israel in its attacks on Iran. As a result of the unpredictability that has long characterised Trump's foreign policy, "markets remain jittery, awaiting firmer signals that could influence global oil supply and regional stability" said Priyanka Sachdeva, analyst at Phillip Nova. The risk of major energy disruption will rise if Iran feels existentially threatened, and U.S. entry into the conflict could trigger direct attacks on tankers and energy infrastructure, said RBC Capital analyst Helima Croft. Iran is the third-largest producer among members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, extracting about 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil. About 18 million to 21 million bpd of oil and oil products move through the Strait of Hormuz along Iran's southern coast and there is widespread concern the fighting could disrupt trade flows. Separately, the U.S. Federal Reserve kept interest rates steady on Wednesday but pencilled in two cuts by the end of the year. Lower interest rates could stimulate the economy, helping to support demand for oil. On the supply side, U.S. crude stockpiles fell sharply last week, registering the largest decline in a year, the Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday. Russia, the U.S. and Saudi Arabia could act jointly to stabilise oil markets if needed, Russia's investment envoy Kirill Dmitriev told Reuters.
