How did the US get involved in the Israel-Iran war? USA TODAY answers your FAQs
After President Donald Trump authorized a military strike at three of Iran's nuclear sites, USA TODAY is answering your questions about the conflict.
The U.S. bombed three nuclear facilities in Iran on June 21 after negotiations failed to reach a deal for Tehran to end its nuclear program.
USA TODAY readers have lots of questions about the attacks and what comes next.
Here are some of the answers and please check back for updates as we take on more of your questions.
Why is the U.S. getting involved?
President Donald Trump has warned repeatedly that Iran must never be allowed to build a nuclear weapon. But the White House said recently that Iran was 'close' to developing a nuclear weapon and could do so within weeks.
The U.S. struck three Iranian nuclear facilities on June 21, using the military's most powerful conventional weapon, the GBU-57 bunker buster, a 30,000-pound bomb that burrows deep into the earth before exploding.
The attacks came after Israel began bombing Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure on June 13. A preliminary Pentagon intelligence assessment concluded the air strikes set back Iran's nuclear program by a few months, according to a U.S. government source familiar with the intelligence findings. The White House has pushed back on the assessment.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt called the assessment "flat-out wrong" in a statement posted to X.
–Michael Collins, Cybele Mayes-Osterman and Tom Vanden Brook
Why won't Congress hold the Executive Branch responsible for its actions?
Trump argues as commander in chief of the armed forces he had the discretion to bomb Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons. But lawmakers note the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war.
At least three resolutions are pending in Congress to curb Trump's use of the military in Iran amid a dispute between the legislative and executive branches about who holds the keys to a U.S. attack on another country.
But Republicans are nearly unanimous in their support of Trump, so none of the measures is likely to pass since the GOP holds a majority in both chambers.
–Bart Jansen
Related: Dems aim to curb Trump's use of military in Iran but GOP expects to kill bills
What other countries support Iran?
Russia, China and North Korea are Iran's biggest allies.
Russia has warned that any direct U.S. action on Iranian soil would amount to "a dangerous escalation." Russian President Vladimir Putin met with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi in Moscow on June 23 and said there was no justification for the U.S. attack and called aggression against Iran groundless. China and North Korea strongly condemned the U.S. attack on Iran.
–Michael Collins and Natalie Neysa Alund
Will Iran close the Strait of Hormuz?
The Strait of Hormuz is a major oil transportation route, ferrying around 20% of the world's oil and gas flow.
The narrow channel, whittling down to just 21 miles across at one point, connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the wider Arabian Sea. The waterway's choke point is sandwiched by the Iranian coastline to one side and a small Omani peninsula on the other.
Iran has threatened to mine the strait in recent days to effectively block the transportation of oil. Iran's parliament approved a measure the day after U.S. airstrikes hit three of its nuclear facilities, endorsing the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, making it a possible option for retaliation, though the decision to close the channel ultimately belongs to Iran's Supreme National Security Council.
−Kathryn Palmer and Janet Loehrke
How will war impact U.S. economy and oil prices?
After Israel attacked Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities and the U.S. followed with a more damaging strike on its nuclear program, economists worried that Iran could close the Strait of Hormuz, which handles about a quarter of global oil shipped by sea.
ING Chief International Economist James Knightly worried such a scenario could push oil prices as high as $120 barrel, drive gasoline to $5 a gallon and add 1.5 percentage points to inflation. But after Iran launched a limited retaliatory strike on a U.S. military base in Qatar this week, U.S. oil prices that had shot up tumbled 7%, then fell further after President Trump announced an Israel-Iran ceasefire.
Israel has accused Iran of violating the truce but Trump says it remains in effect. Capital Economics said the ceasefire is likely to prove fragile but added it seems all sides have incentives to spare key energy infrastructure. In that case, oil prices should continue to drift lower, the research firm said.
–Paul Davidson
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Sees Limited Damage to Iran Atomic Sites as UN Watchdog Urges Inspections
(Bloomberg) -- US President Donald Trump disputed an intelligence report that found the airstrikes he ordered on Iran had only a limited impact on its nuclear program, even though the assessment came from the Pentagon. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags 'The nuclear sites in Iran are completely destroyed,' Trump said on Truth Social. He said CNN and the New York Times, which first reported the intelligence findings on Tuesday, 'have teamed up in an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history.' The assessment from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency said the bombing on June 22 likely didn't cripple the core components of Iran's program below ground, including its centrifuges, according to people familiar with its contents. The findings are in line with open-source satellite imagery that shows new craters, possible collapsed tunnel entrances and holes on top of a mountain ridge but no conclusive evidence the attack breached the most heavily protected underground facilities. Trump had said the strikes — on atomic sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan — 'totally obliterated' their targets, and dismissed reports casting doubt on the claim. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on X Tuesday that the intelligence finding of limited impact was 'flat-out wrong.' Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy for the Middle East, appeared on Fox News Tuesday night and described the reports as 'completely preposterous.' The head of Israel's military, Eyal Zamir, late on Tuesday said the assaults on Iran had set back its nuclear and missile projects by years. Still, the Pentagon assessment was backed up to some extent by the International Atomic Energy Agency. It's chief, Rafael Grossi, told Fox News that while Iran's atomic program 'has been set back significantly,' it's hard to specify whether that means months or years. Trump brokered a ceasefire to end the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran that appeared to be holding early Wednesday. The president had lashed out at both countries Tuesday, and particularly Israel, over what he said were early violations of the truce. Both nations have said they'll honor the ceasefire provided their enemy does the same. The de-escalation triggered a slump in oil prices — erasing almost all of its increase since the conflict broke out. Still, the ceasefire remains fragile as the focus shifts back to nuclear diplomacy. A stated goal of the American and Israeli strikes was to destroy Iran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon, adding urgency to assessments of how much damage was done. Witkoff, who told Fox would be almost impossible for Iran to resurrect its nuclear program, said he was already speaking with the country's officials about restarting formal negotiations. The talks so far have been promising, he said. The IAEA's Grossi said inspections by the United Nations atomic watchdog should resume 'as soon as possible' to determine what's happened to Iran's stocks of uranium enriched to 60% levels, not far short of the 90% required to build a bomb. The IAEA says it last verified those inventories a few days before Israel's attacks on Iran started on June 13, and their whereabouts is now unknown. The DIA's report found considerable damage on the surface at the nuclear sites, with the US strikes likely to have set Iran's program back by several months to as much as a year, according to a person briefed on the report's contents. The assessment has been shared with House and Senate leadership. Before the strikes, Trump had said Iran was 'weeks away' from having a nuclear bomb, though some experts and US intelligence estimates said it could take months or years for the nation to develop a weapon. The US strikes involved dropping more than a dozen 30,000-pound so-called bunker-buster bombs on Iranian nuclear sites, their first use in combat, according to the Pentagon. Tomahawk missiles were also fired from a US Ohio-class submarine in the Arabian Sea. Before Israel's attack on Iran, the US had held five rounds of negotiations with the Islamic Republic, seeking a diplomatic solution to concerns over its nuclear program — effectively a replacement for the 2015 nuclear deal that Trump abandoned during his first term. An agreement hadn't been reached, though a sixth round was scheduled before the Israeli missiles led to Iran canceling it. Tehran has insisted on its rights under international law to enrich uranium for civilian purposes such as fueling nuclear power plants. In calls with regional counterparts reported by state media on Tuesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian appeared to reiterate that stance. 'The Islamic Republic of Iran is solely pursuing its legitimate rights and has no ambitions beyond that,' he told UAE officials. In Iran, 606 people were killed by Israeli strikes, according to the government. Israeli emergency services said 28 people were killed by Iranian missiles, including four on Tuesday morning just as the truce was about to start. Israeli authorities said Tuesday that wartime safety directives had been lifted. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the nation that immediate threats from Iran's nuclear program and ballistic missiles had been eliminated — though his military chief, Zamir, cautioned that 'the campaign against Iran is not over.' --With assistance from Akayla Gardner, Maeve Sheehey, Erik Wasson, Courtney McBride and Rosalind Mathieson. Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Makes ‘Super' Awkward Gaffe While Ranting About Iran
President Donald Trump was ridiculed online for a stormy slip-up during an exchange with a reporter aboard Air Force One on Tuesday. Asked about concerns over possible Iranian sleeper cell attacks in the United States following his decision to bomb the country, Trump pivoted to slamming his predecessor, former President Joe Biden ― but referred to 'supercells' thunderstorms instead. 'Biden let a lot of supercells into the United States,' Trump fumed. 'He was an incompetent president. He had no idea what he was doing. It was gross incompetence. Among everything else, he let a lot of supercells in, many from Iran. But hopefully we'll take care of them. What Biden did to this country should never be forgotten.' Trump: "Biden let a lot of super cells in, many from Iran. But hopefully we'll take care of them." (The term he was looking for is "sleeper cells") — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 24, 2025 The gaffe predictably went viral: Trump called sleeper cells, super cellsHe thinks he invented the words 'groceries' and 'equalize.'He called for world peace then posted a video to the tune of bomb IranBut he identified the elephant on a dementia test so I guess he's a god damn genius — Kelly D 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇨🇦🇬🇱 (@KellDA) June 25, 2025 He can fix Super Cells with his Sharpie. — wjmalik@ (@wjmalik) June 24, 2025 Trump's brain is just wind, noise, and rotating nonsense.A super cell of disinformation. — Nikos Unity (@nikosunity) June 24, 2025 Trump: "Biden let a lot of super cells in, many from Iran. But hopefully we'll take care of them." He's just so pathetic. — Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) June 24, 2025 Super cells? Like thunderstorms? Do I have to been on the lookout for twisters walking down the street now? — Juice (@TheJuiceBoxGuy) June 24, 2025 A confused Trump refers to "super" cells instead of "sleeper" cells — FactPost (@factpostnews) June 24, 2025 Trump Admin Slammed For Backing 'Downright Sadistic And Inhumane' Plan Marjorie Taylor Greene Flips Out Over 'Dirty Rumors' About Her And Trump Kayleigh McEnany's 'Go Viral' Dare Boosting Trump Ends In Mockery From 'Real Fear' To Heartbreak: GOP-Led Campaign Spotlights How Trump Is Wrecking Lives


The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
NATO chief sees as ‘transformational' summit ahead despite stark differences over defense spending
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte was upbeat that the military organization will agree on massive spending hikes at a 'transformational summit' on Wednesday, as member state leaders including U.S. President Donald Trump assembled in The Netherlands. Leaders of the 32-nation alliance are expected to agree a new defense spending target of 5% of gross domestic product, as the United States — NATO's biggest-spending member — shifts its attention away from Europe to focus on security priorities elsewhere. 'So a transformational summit. Looking forward to it,' Rutte told reporters in The Hague, before chairing the meeting's only working session, which was expected to last less than three hours. But ahead of the meeting, Spain announced that it would not be able to reach the target by the new 2035 deadline, calling it 'unreasonable.' Belgium signaled that it would not get there either, and Slovakia said it reserves the right to decide its own defense spending. Rutte conceded that 'these are difficult decisions. Let's be honest. I mean, politicians have to make choices in scarcity. And this is not easy.' But he said: 'given the threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative.' Other countries closer to the borders of Russia and Ukraine — Poland and the three Baltic countries — have committed to the goal, as have NATO's European heavyweights Britain, France, Germany and the Netherlands. On Tuesday, Trump complained that 'there's a problem with Spain. Spain is not agreeing, which is very unfair to the rest of them, frankly.' He has also criticized Canada 'a low payer.' In 2018, a NATO summit during Trump's first term unraveled due to a dispute over defense spending. After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the NATO allies agreed to make 2% of GDP the minimum spending level. Last year, 22 countries were expected to hit that target, up from just three a decade ago.