House votes not to keep University of Wyoming Lab School open
CHEYENNE — Wyoming's House of Representatives has opted against passing legislation to keep the University of Wyoming Lab School open, killing a bill that has sparked hours of debate in the Capitol.
With 41 pieces of legislation scheduled for debate before a Friday night deadline, acting chairman Rep. Landon Brown, R-Cheyenne, noted that representatives spent an hour and 18 minutes debating Senate File 126, 'Establishment of a K-8 public lab school.' Ultimately, the measure failed in a 32-24 vote.
Some lawmakers gave impassioned pleas to keep the school, which has been a part of Wyoming's history for more than 125 years, open. Others argued that passing SF 126 would be overstepping the bounds of state government, wading into a local issue that Albany County School District 1 Board of Trustees and University of Wyoming Board of Trustees have already decided.
Rep. Tom Kelly, R-Sheridan (2025)
Rep. Tom Kelly, R-Sheridan
'When this came into the (House Education) Committee, I was somebody who was on the fence about it,' Rep. Tom Kelly, R-Sheridan, said. 'When I voted yes on it, it was because this is exactly the type of discussion this issue deserved.'
Kelly ended up casting another vote in favor of SF 126 Friday, but it was not enough.
'We are having trouble categorizing this, because the school is unique,' Kelly said. 'But we are seeking to restore that historical and cultural gem to Wyoming. Is it the right thing to do? Absolutely.'
The Legislature was the last stop in a long effort to reestablish the UW Lab School as it once was, after an announcement last year from both managing educational institutions that this academic year would be the last for the lab school. For over 130 years, the lab school operated as a K-8 public school, many of those offering practicum and observational experiences for pre-service teachers and other UW students on campus.
For around a decade, the school has been guided by a memorandum of understanding between the ACSD1 and the university, but the two educational bodies could not agree on a process to move forward while also meeting objectives both said they had for the school.
Argument in favor: 'Decision makers have failed'
House Education Committee Chairman Rep. Ocean Andrew, R-Laramie, said the bill was not about saving a school, but promoting a Wyoming legacy.
Rep. Ocean Andrew, R-Laramie (2025)
Rep. Ocean Andrew, R-Laramie
'In recent years, decision makers have failed the very people they were entrusted to serve. Many feel the decision to unilaterally close the Lab School was made behind closed doors, without transparency and without input from parents, students and the Wyoming public,' Andrew said.
Rep. Tomi Strock, R-Douglas, urged her fellow lawmakers not to look at the decision as if it were about a 'normal school in a school district,' because, in fact, the issue is one of school choice.
Rep. Tomi Strock, R-Douglas (2025)
Rep. Tomi Strock, R-Douglas
'I want to remind everyone that this is not the same kind of setup … as in the school district,' Strock said. 'Please quit looking at it as the same as all the other school districts, and as if we are taking over some local control.'
Rep. Ken Chestek, D-Laramie, said he believes there were 'no bad actors' that led the Lab School to where it is today. However, the issue has been 'divisive, and it has been tearing apart the community,' Chestek said. He respects both the ACSD1 and UW trustees, but said he had to support keeping the school open.
Rep. Ken Chestek, D-Laramie (2025)
Rep. Ken Chestek, D-Laramie
'It breaks my heart to see these two entities, good institutions, at loggerheads, not agreeing on something that I think the community loves,' Chestek said. 'This is tearing us up.'
Argument against: 'Not the role of the state Legislature'
Rep. Martha Lawley, R-Worland, said she could not support the Lab School bill, although she empathized with parents, teachers and students who desperately wanted to save the school.
'It is simply not the role of the state Legislature to come into a situation like this and make themselves, sort of, a court of last resort,' Lawley said. 'A place for people to come when they are unhappy or dissatisfied with what has happened at the local level, and want us to enter into a space that includes a school district, our university and somehow be the arbiter of that.'
Rep. Martha Lawley, R-Worland (2025)
Rep. Martha Lawley, R-Worland
Rep. Art Washut, R-Casper, said he felt the bill was asking lawmakers to 'micromanage a local school,' and that he could not support SF 126. Rep. McKay Erickson, R-Afton, said he had not found a person at the university or on the school board who wanted to continue the Lab School.
'It is, folks, tough to close schools for any district,' Erickson said. 'But this would be getting into the weeds big time, if we go above their decision to close the school. … That seems to just be clouded, extremely.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
Why the U.S. tax bill's Section 899 could push European firms to list in the U.S.
The decision by U.K. fintech firm Wise to move its primary stock listing to the U.S. is the latest in a series of blows to the London market — and a new provision tucked inside a U.S. tax bill could make things even worse. Section 899 of President Donald Trump's spending bill, which passed the House of Representatives in May, threatens to penalize foreign-owned firms domiciled in countries with "unfair foreign taxes," and experts say it could accelerate the trend for European companies to hop the pond. The provision introduces retaliatory tax measures against corporations and other entities from countries that have levies such as the Digital Services Taxes and the OECD's global minimum tax rules. The list of affected nations would include most European Union members, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Switzerland, among others. For publicly traded companies, Section 899 imposes a new withholding tax on U.S.-sourced income for any foreign corporation that is more than 50% owned by non-U.S. entities. The tax would start at 5% and escalate by five percentage points annually to a maximum of 20%, on top of existing taxes, which vary by country and tax treaties. That could dent earnings for companies in the Stoxx Europe 600 index, for instance, by up to 2% in the first year, and as much as 5% over four years, according to Goldman Sachs analysts. How can European firms avoid Section 899? The Wall Street bank has identified a U.S. re-listing as one of many measures that companies could take if the bill becomes law. A listing in the U.S. would provide a direct path to increasing a company's base of American investors, according to Goldman. This would help companies push their non-U.S. ownership below the critical 50% threshold, taking them out of Section 899's scope. While there are many U.K. companies with high exposure to the U.S. with a majority-U.S. shareholder base, Goldman Sachs identified consumer credit rating firm Experian and Hikma Pharmaceuticals , among others, as two FTSE 100 companies with more than half their group revenues in the U.S. but falling below the 50% threshold for U.S. ownership. The Wall Street bank suggested that such companies could use a U.S. listing as one avenue to avoid taxes imposed by Section 899. Tax experts cautioned that to avoid the impact of Section 899, it would require significantly more work than simply relisting in the U.S. with an attempt to gain U.S. shareholders. "I'm not sure that listing alone would be sufficient," said a senior executive at a large European firm with extensive operations in the U.S., who asked not to be named as they were not authorized to comment on the issue. "The proposed language [in the bill] includes a vote or value test for U.S. ownership, including publicly traded companies, and seems to say that if a company [falls under Section 899 tax] for even one day then it is for the year." The executive also questioned whether companies will be able to identify beneficial owners — or the actual owners that control a business — "with any degree of confidence." That's because the tax bill includes "a look-through concept" — which means U.S. fund managers investing on behalf of foreign clients would not count toward the exemption requirements. "The monitoring [of the shareholder register] alone would be resource intensive," the executive added. Others point out that if European governments dropped what Trump calls their "unfair foreign tax" policies, their companies would automatically be exempted from 899. "Hill Republicans see section 899 not as a revenue-generating measure, but as a tool that gives the Treasury Department additional leverage in negotiations with other countries to encourage changes in behavior," Pat Brown, a tax expert at the consultancy PwC U.S., told CNBC. "Foreign-headquartered companies considering changes in their capital structure to reduce the impact of section 899 would need to consider that the government of their home country could, with the stroke of a pen, eliminate the need to consider section 899 as an issue," Brown added. Exacerbating a corporate-migration trend Goldman Sachs also highlighted that Section 899 could also act as a powerful incentive to a corporate migration trend that is already underway. For years, European and U.K. companies have felt disadvantaged by their home markets, a sentiment that has led to a steady flow of buyouts and re-listings elsewhere. Companies have repeatedly pointed to the valuation discount that European equities suffer compared to their U.S. peers to justify their decisions to move their listing to the U.S. Wise debuted on London's stock market in 2021 in a direct listing that valued the company at £8 billion ($10.84 billion) at the time. It is now valued at £11.07 billion, according to LSEG data. Since then, London has been mired in doubts over whether it can play host to major tech listings. The market is often criticized for lacking the depth of liquidity and industry expertise from investment analysts to accommodate such transactions. Doubts over London's stock market haven't been limited to tech, though. Last week, Glencore -backed metals investor Cobalt Holdings announced it was scrapping plans to go public in London. The IPO was expected to be the largest listing in the U.K. capital since early 2024. A spokesperson for London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) told CNBC last week that London remains the top European exchange in terms of capital raised and the total market cap of the companies listed. They added that they had seen a "noticeable increase in interest from international companies in coming to London with many starting to prepare." — CNBC's Ryan Browne contributed reporting.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Horse trading session has arrived at N.H. State House
Both the New Hampshire House of Representatives and Senate worked late into the night Thursday as they tried desperately to revive bills that the other branch didn't want. The political game of chicken is expected to continue this week when the two bodies return to session to create committees of conference that will be charged with trying to work out differences between competing versions of a bill. This stage in the budget process signals that the 2025 session, barring a negotiating meltdown, will conclude in the coming weeks. Once named, the conference committees will have until June 19 to come up with an agreement that the Legislature must act upon by June 26. Both bodies must vote to create these panels with three state senators and four House members. Any agreement requires all conferees to sign onto the proposal; it then returns to the House and Senate for an up-or-down vote, meaning lawmakers at that final meeting are unable to amend it in any fashion. The two-year state budget is the biggest and most consequential of the disputes, with the Senate last week approving its measure that spent nearly $250 million more than the House-approved version. All of this one-upmanship resulted in some strange bedfellows, like when the Senate voted to add to a bill increasing the penalty for wrong-way driving (HB 776) and a Senate-passed bill to declare the Virginia opossum the state marsupial (SB 30). Sen. Donovan Fenton, D-Keene, thanked his colleagues for this act taken because the House put his own bill at risk when, earlier this month, it had tacked onto it new penalties for improper application of fertilizer. Senate Democratic Leader Rebecca Perkins Kwoka of Portsmouth couldn't resist a punning quip. 'I'm glad the senator from Dist. 10 (Fenton) has not played dead on his bill,' she joked. The House responded last week, adding to a bill raising the personal allowance that residents of nursing homes are allowed to keep (SB 118) the House-passed bill that would allow medically eligible patients to grow their own marijuana rather than have to buy it at alternative treatment centers at market costs. House keeps pushing cannabis agenda Rep. Gary Daniels, R-Milford, tried to convince his colleagues to drop this last-ditch effort. 'The Senate has rejected every single cannabis bill the House has sent it. Do we really want to put a good bill at risk by insisting this be included?' Daniels asked rhetorically. Rep. Wendy Thomas, D-Merrimack, a cancer survivor, said as an eligible patient she takes marijuana every day and that the underlying personal allowance issue is already contained in versions of the state budget. The House voted 215-103 to keep the marijuana bill as part of the House position. Not all of these gambits succeeded. Rep. Judy Aron, R-Acworth and chairman of the House Environment and Agriculture Committee, had wanted to add to legislation that designated Coos County as an economically distressed area to (SB 180), an unrelated bill from her committee to enhance state rules regarding the approval of future landfills that the Senate had rejected (HB 707). The House voted 166-163 against that idea, choosing to keep the Coos County economic bill clean. In one of its last moves, the Senate voted to add onto a temporary youth operator driver's license bill (HB 612) its legislation to declare the third week in September each year "New Hampshire Service Dog Week." Moments earlier, the House had voted, 179-144, to kill that service dog bill (SB 198). "We don't need a special holiday in order to say, 'Good dog,'" said Rep. Erica Layon, R-Derry. Here are some other issues that are likely to need more negotiation before they are settled: • Mandatory Minimums (SB 14): This Gov. Kelly Ayotte-priority bill that cleared the Senate set stiff mandatory prison terms for offenders selling large amounts of fentanyl and for anyone convicted of selling drugs that causes someone else's death. The House changed it to give a judge broad latitude to approve a lesser punishment if the offender meets certain criteria. The House also added to this bill a measure the Senate rejected to decriminalize possession of up to three-quarters of an ounce of psilocybin, otherwise known as magic mushrooms. This change would bring the mushrooms in line with how state law decriminalizes marijuana possession. • Risk Pools (SB 297): Secretary of State David Scanlan convinced the Senate to adopt a bill that gave his office greater power over groups that manage insurance coverage for units of government. The House instead rejected Scanlan's approach in favor of letting these risk pools decide if they would rather come under the regulation of the Insurance Department. • Tenancy Law Changes (HB 60): The House approved this bill that would permit landlords to give notice to any tenant 60 days notice that they would not be extending their lease and require tenants be evicted if they resisted this move. The Senate adopted this proposal but it would only kick in once the state had a 4% vacancy rate; currently this tight housing market has less than one-half of 1% vacancy in it. klandrigan@
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
World Pride Attendance Plummets As Trump's Shadow Looms Over D.C.
The glitter-caked gatherings at World Pride have taken a more somber tone amid the Trump administration's crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights. World Pride comes to a close this weekend in Washington, D.C., after a month-long celebration. D.C. had anticipated some 3 million people to mark the 50th anniversary of Pride celebrations in the Capitol. But attendance has plummeted, hotel bookings were down, and the estimated $800 million expected to be generated in the local economy failed to materialize. The BBC reports that a massive two-thirds of expected attendees stayed away. 'It is a risk to now come over [the border] and especially as a trans woman,' one Canadian who decided not to attend told the BBC. The drop is sharp, though not unexpected. Nations around the world have issued travel warnings to their non-binary, trans, and LGBTQ+ citizens, cautioning them that America under Trump is not a safe place. World Pride organizers themselves even considered advising trans attendees not to come. The African Human Rights Coalition explicitly called out the event, warning 'LGBTQI+ people worldwide to refrain from attending' because 'the event is being held in a venue ... governed now by an antagonistic fascist regime which presents distinct dangers to foreign LGBTQI+ attendees.' The last World Pride, held in Sydney in 2023, served as a touchpoint for the Australian government to announce record funding for LGBTQ+ organizations. 'It couldn't be a starker contrast,' an Australian human rights law professor who attended both events told ABC. 'Sydney was a celebration ... This is a call to action. This is a realization of how quickly our rights can be wound back.' Government policy has been notably hostile since the new administration took office. On his very first day, President Donald Trump directed government agencies to recognize only two sexes on official documents. Bans on diversity, equity, and inclusion policies; curtailing anti-discrimination efforts; and suspending trans people from military service quickly followed. The Trump administration has refused to recognize World Pride, in contrast to the administration of former President Joe Biden. The crackdown has spread to corporate America, previously a stalwart supporter of LGBTQ+ rights. A recent survey found that more than a third of Fortune 1000 companies surveyed planned to decrease their support for Pride events in 2025. Booz Allen Hamilton, a leading federal contractor, pulled its support for World Pride this year, while others did not renew previous funding commitments. Ryan Bos, executive director of the group that organizes D.C. Pride events, told The New York Times that corporate fundraising reached about half its target. Some companies sponsoring the event asked for their logos not to be displayed, he said. Still, some attendees saw their attendance as a necessary act of defiance—a return to Pride's more traditional protest, rather than celebratory, history. 'For the first time in many, many years, I'm not parading; I'm marching,' one attendee told NPR. 'It's a very different approach for the first time in a long time. Everything's under threat right now.'
