Gov. Cox signs bill expanding Utah's school lunch program for struggling families
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox remembers visiting a public school in Layton a couple of years ago where many of the students and their families were facing rough economic times.
The principal showed the governor a pantry inside the school stocked with food for the kids to take home.
The extra food, the principal explained, was helping the children satisfy an essential education resource: Basic nutrition and sustenance.
The principal then added something Cox has not forgotten: 'Kids can't learn when they're hungry. … Kids can't learn when their thoughts are elsewhere.'
That compassionate impulse to feed and educate Utah's kids is at the heart of House Bill 100, said the governor.
Cox, lawmakers and community advocates for fight against hunger gathered Tuesday at the Utah State Capitol to sign, ceremoniously, the bill passed during the recent Legislative session to provide school lunch at no cost to eligible students.
HB100, said Cox, 'Isn't just about providing school lunch — it's about helping kids learn, and kids can't learn when they're hungry.'
HB100 expands the number of Utah's K-12 students eligible to receive free school lunch — while shielding participating kids from embarrassment and also aiming to reduce food waste.
A trio of provisions highlight HB100:
First, all K-12 students currently eligible for 'reduced price' meals will be moved to the 'no cost' classification for the lunchtime meal. School breakfast is not included in the bill.
Second, protecting kids receiving free school lunch from embarrassment.
And third, limiting food waste by encouraging schools to expand lunch period times while implementing 'shared tables' where students can return, say, sealed or unopened food items to be consumed by others.
Eliminating the 'reduced price threshold' is a defining element of HB100, which was co-sponsored by Rep. Tyler Clancy, R-Provo, and Sen. Kirk Cullimore, R-Sandy.
The new legislation will reportedly provide no-cost meals for approximately 40,000 currently classified as 'reduced price' children whose families are perhaps waging daily battles to stay in the middle class.
'These are families that a couple years ago probably would be considered middle class — but due to inflation and a number of other concerns, the price of food in particular has hit these families hard,' said Clancy during a bill presentation last month to lawmakers.
The price of a healthy meal in Utah's San Juan County, he noted, 'has gone up 77% since 2020.'
Allowing 'reduced price school lunch' students to receive 'no-cost' school lunch, Clancy added, would signal 'a small adjustment to our social safety net' that can keep many Utah families on the path to self-sufficiency — and well-fed students succeeding in the classroom.
HB100 also requires schools to protect students who are receiving 'no-cost' school lunch from being stigmatized or embarrassed. Special buttons, different-colored lunch trays or other things that might identify free-meal recipients to their classmates are prohibited.
'The shame and the stigma associated with participation in social safety net programs can sometimes actually be an inhibitor to participation in those programs,' Clancy told the Deseret News.
Utah schools would also be encouraged to implement 'share tables' where unopened or sealed foods can be shared, instead of simply tossing it in the trash.
During Tuesday's event, Clancy said collaboration between lawmakers and community organizations such as the Policy Project and Utahns Against Hunger 'found a common sense solution that doesn't just address hunger — but also food insecurity, shame, stigma and many other things.'
As a police officer, Clancy has witnessed the heavy toll food insecurity can exact on Utahns — including many children.
'What HB100 represents is a system that's coming together … for all those children who are in need.'
Cullimore saluted Clancy's tenaciousness in pursuing the bill and the benefits it provides many of Utah children. 'Thank you to everyone who participated and got it across the finish line.'
Emily Bell McCormick, the founder and president of The Policy Project, said Tuesday that she fights back emotion thinking about the Utah children who will benefit from HB100.
'Our legislators did the right thing and got this passed for the kids,' she said.
Even for working families, rising housing costs and other expenses are burdening many, added Bell McCormick. The new school meal program will help lighten some of those burdens — while demonstrating the state's investment in its youth.
Neil Rickard, a child nutrition advocate with Utahns Against Hunger added that HB100 helps benefit youth by improving upon existing school meal programs for students facing economic hardships during volatile periods.
'By eliminating the reduced price category, it's just getting to that chunk of students who are in- between the reduced and free categories,' he said.
Contributing: Brigham Tomco
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Lawsuit filed over Arkansas Ten Commandments in classrooms law
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Families of students at some school districts in northwest Arkansas are suing over Act 573 of 2025, a law mandating the Ten Commandments be displayed in public school classrooms. The plaintiffs come from diverse backgrounds, some of which are very religious, while others are not, but all argue that the law is unconstitutional. Ten Commandments, 'In God We Trust' in classrooms is now Arkansas law When school starts, the Ten Commandments are to be displayed in classrooms across the state. However, the lawsuit seeks to stop the law from taking effect. John Williams, legal director for the ACLU of Arkansas, said the plaintiffs believe the law violates the U.S. Constitution. 'We think that by posting a religious document for students to view every day when they're in school, that that is an establishment of a preferred religion, and that's against the Establishment Clause,' Williams said. Williams also said the law violates the free exercise of religion. USDA approves Arkansas Gov. Sanders' waiver to ban soda, candy from SNAP Jerry Cox, executive director of the conservative Family Council, supports the law. 'We think that this is a very good law; the purpose of school is to teach young people good values and to teach them about our history,' Cox said. Cox says that the Ten Commandments are also historical and foundational to Western civilization. 'I think it's undeniable that the Ten Commandments formed the basis for all Western civilization, our laws, our morals, our society,' Cox said. Williams disagreed, emphasizing the religious nature of the commandments. 'Ten Commandments are not really a basis for law in the United States,' he said. Cox noted that the commandments are already displayed in various public places. 'We display the Ten Commandments in a lot of public places. They're over there on the grounds of the Capitol, you can find them at the U.S. Supreme Court,' he said. Lawsuit filed to halt Arkansas law putting 10 Commandments in classrooms The law is scheduled to take effect Aug. 5, before the new school year begins. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Advocates call on Sens. Lee, Curtis, to revive payments to downwinders in ‘big, beautiful' bill
Steve Erickson, an advocate for downwinders, speaks to reporters about a possible RECA expansion in Salt Lake City on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (Kyle Dunphey/Utah News Dispatch) It's been one year since Congress allowed the program offering payments to downwinders to expire. Now, advocates are hoping the Senate will revive the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, or RECA, as part of the 'big, beautiful' bill. That includes Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, who told reporters on Tuesday he's 'hoping something can get done.' RECA had been in place since 1990, offering payments to uranium workers and downwinders, people who contracted cancer from above-ground nuclear tests. For years it was criticized for being too narrow — despite studies suggesting the entire West was blanketed by dangerous levels of radiation during nuclear tests, downwinders in just 10 counties in Utah, as well as a handful of counties in Nevada and Arizona, were covered. And since the program expired last June, Congress has been unable to bring RECA back, stymied by spending concerns. Although the Senate passed a bill sponsored by Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley that would greatly expand the program, it hasn't been considered in the House. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX During a press conference in Salt Lake City on Tuesday, advocates called on Utah Republican Sens. John Curtis and Mike Lee to get behind an amendment to Congress' budget bill similar to what Hawley has proposed. 'There's a real possibility that a RECA reauthorization and expansion could be included in H.R.1,' said Steve Erickson, a longtime advocate for downwinders. 'But this will need the support of Utah's congressional delegation, especially the full-throated support from Senator Lee and Senator Curtis. Without their support, the prospects for RECA are much diminished.' Neither Curtis or Lee's offices responded to a request for comment. Dozens of Utah lawmakers call on Congress to resume payments to downwinders When asked about RECA during his monthly PBS news conference on Tuesday, Cox said he's hopeful Congress will find a way to bring the program back during budget reconciliation. Cox, along with a coalition of 41 Utah lawmakers, have previously supported efforts to expand the program, specifically Hawley's bill. Hawley's bill would expand the program to cover all of Utah and a handful of other Western states that weren't previously included in RECA, while extending coverage to communities around St. Louis and territories in the Pacific that were impacted by nuclear weapons testing development. 'We'll continue to express support for that,' Cox said on Tuesday. 'The repercussions of that above-ground nuclear testing in Utah are very long lasting and many of us had family members that have been impacted. So I think it's still important. Utah is not alone but Utah was significantly impacted.' However, the governor noted there haven't been any new developments in his talks with the congressional delegation. People who submitted their claims before the deadline last summer can still receive payments — but there's no option for downwinders who were just recently diagnosed with cancer, or didn't know about the program. '(We) continue to receive emails and phone calls from affected community members here in Utah who have received cancer diagnosis, asking where to apply and what to do,' said Carmen Valdez, a senior policy associate for the Health Environment Alliance of Utah. 'It's really discouraging to say that the program is expired and they can no longer apply, but they can contact their delegation about it.' RECA has always had bipartisan support. Originally sponsored by late Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch, both Democrats and Republicans have since advocated for its expansion. That includes Sens. Ben Ray Lujan, D-N.M. and Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, who have lobbied with Hawley to expand the program. 'This is not a partisan play by any means,' said Erickson. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' could wreck Utah's groundbreaking AI laws
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget package could derail the state's groundbreaking artificial intelligence laws unless it is changed. The 1,000-page bill that passed the House last month includes a 10-year prohibition on AI regulations. An updated Senate version removed the all-out ban but conditioned $500 million in AI infrastructure grants on states pausing enforcement of AI laws. Behind these provisions is a desire by some lawmakers to prevent a nationwide patchwork of AI regulations that hampers innovation amid competition with China. But Cox, and Utah's top tech policymakers, said the approach taken by Trump's bill interferes with the state's right to react to rapidly evolving technologies. 'Our hope is that the last version of this bill that passes, whatever that looks like, will allow for the smart type of regulation that we're doing in Utah, and prevent the bad kind of regulation that would stop AI from reaching its fullest potential,' Cox said Tuesday during a monthly PBS broadcast. Utah has been recognized around the world for having the 'first and smartest of the AI regulations that have been proposed,' according to Cox. These policies include bills that create a state-run AI policy lab, clarify consumer protection liability for AI and require AI disclosures in industries like finance and mental health. The governor said that multiple members of the U.S. House have told his team that they were not aware of the AI moratorium when they voted on the bill. Members of the White House and Senate have also said that they don't want the 'BBB bill' to eliminate Utah's law, Cox said. 'AI companies actually support what we're doing because they recognize that this is the right way to do AI regulation as opposed to just piecemeal,' Cox said. Cox agreed that 'a hodgepodge' of AI laws around the country would cause the U.S. to 'fall behind and we would lose this global race that is happening right now.' But he said a moratorium on AI policy shouldn't come at the expense of Utah's novel approach which doesn't actually tell AI companies how they can develop their models. Utah Rep. Doug Fiefia, R-Herriman, said the problem goes beyond counterproductive policy. It targets the foundation of states rights that has allowed Utah to lead out on so many issues, according to Fiefia, a freshman lawmaker who previously worked at Google. 'States are laboratories for innovation when it comes to policy, and I believe that the federal government should not overreach on this process and allow it to work,' Fiefia said. 'We will not give over our control because the federal government believes that it's the right thing to do to win this race.' On Tuesday, Utah House legislative leadership, and 62 state senators and representatives, sent a letter authored by Fiefia to Utah's congressional delegation arguing that the moratorium hindered 'Utah's nationally recognized efforts to strike the right balance between innovation and consumer protection.' Not only would the moratorium harm state efforts to legislate guardrails, it would also hurt businesses that are using AI responsibly by allowing their competitors to engage in unethical behavior, according to Fiefia. States have shown they are more nimble than the federal government when they need to adapt to change, Fiefia said. And this is the approach Fiefia believes Utah has demonstrated in opening up legal pathways for innovation while updating the law for the threats posed by AI. 'Just because we want to move fast in this global arms race of AI doesn't mean we can't do so with a seat belt,' Fiefia said. 'I believe that we can both win this AI race, but also doing it in a thoughtful and meaningful way.' The AI moratorium faces procedural hurdles in addition to ideological pushback. Utah Sen. Kirk Cullimore, R-Sandy, pointed out that reconciliation bills are meant only to amend the annual budget and not make substantive policy shifts. Some senators have alleged that the AI moratorium does not comply with the 'Byrd Rule,' a procedural requirement that prohibits 'nonbudgetary' additions during the budget 'reconciliation' process. Cullimore, who was the sponsor behind most of Utah's AI legislation, was in Washington, D.C., last week, speaking with members of the House Commerce Committee, which oversaw the inclusion of the AI moratorium provisions. The intentions behind the moratorium, Cullimore said, were to prevent states from implementing what are called 'foundational regulations' that restrict the kind of technology AI companies can develop. Utah's laws do not do this, according to Cullimore, who also signed Fiefia's letter, but they would still be sidelined by the 'big beautiful bill' even if the moratorium is replaced by the conditioned federal funding. 'I think the drafting of the moratorium was so broad that it potentially encompassed all of that stuff,' he said. 'So I hope that that we can refine the text a little bit, and then if they want to put those conditions in on foundational regulation, I think that'd be appropriate.'
