
Bay Area food banks warn Trump's "big, beautiful bill" would slash federal SNAP funding
With GOP lawmakers looking at a July Fourth deadline to pass President Trump's "big, beautiful bill," the leaders of five major food banks in the Bay Area are urging lawmakers to reconsider a provision of it that would impact the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.
"The cuts that are on the table in Congress are the greatest rollback in food assistance that we have seen in modern U.S. history," said Leslie Bacho, CEO of Second Harvest of Silicon Valley.
The proposed bill would slash billions of dollars of federal funding for SNAP and shift much of the financial responsibility to individual states. Congressional Republicans who support the cuts say this will help eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse within SNAP. But in a letter addressed to lawmakers, 23 governors warned this will result in states dramatically reducing access to critical food assistance for those who need it most.
"These cuts are being rushed through. They're being jammed through. This is not the usual order of business. This is happening swiftly, and it is cruel," said Tanis Crosby, Executive Director of the San Francisco-Marin Food Bank.
"Our federal government is creating a crisis," said Caitlin Sly, CEO of the Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano.
"It will mean that in our community, there is clear and present danger for 175,000 households in this Bay Area to lose SNAP benefits," Crosby said.
"One in four children in California rely on SNAP. SNAP is not just a safety net. It is a foundation for stability and most importantly, for dignity," Sly said.
Aside from children, the leaders of the food banks say SNAP helps feed seniors on fixed incomes, people with disabilities, and families struggling to get by.
"SNAP is the single-most effective anti-poverty tool that we have in this country, and it works," Crosby said.
People who lose access to SNAP benefits would likely turn to food banks, currently trying to do more with less as they cater to a historic need.
"All of our elected officials right now have the opportunity to speak out, raise awareness, and prevent these harmful cuts from impacting the most vulnerable in our community," Sly said.
The bill is not a done deal yet, but President Trump continues to push GOP lawmakers to have it on his desk by Independence Day.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
On GPS: Biden's NSA Jake Sullivan on Trump bombing Iran
From the Aspen Ideas Festival, Fareed asks Jake Sullivan what he makes of President Trump's decision to strike Iran's nuclear facilities, and whether the Biden administration overestimated Iran's strength as an adversary.


Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
Thom Tillis Won't Seek Reelection After Opposing Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
Sen. Thom Tillis, the North Carolina Republican who broke with his party to vote against advancing the spending bill promoted by President Donald Trump, announced he would not run for reelection in 2026. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he will not run for reelection in 2026. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Tillis opposed the bill for the extensive cuts to Medicaid, telling voters in a statement released Saturday 'we can and must accomplish this without hurting our rural communities and hospitals, and without jeopardizing access to care for hundreds of thousands of North Carolinians who need it the most.' Tillis was one of two Republicans to break with the party to vote against advancing the bill, alongside Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul. Trump lashed out at Tillis after his opposition, calling his vote against the bill a 'BIG MISTAKE' and announcing he would meet with candidates to oppose Tillis in a future election. In a statement released Sunday, Tillis said he wanted to spend more time with his family and was not looking forward to running for a third term. 'That is true since the choice is between spending another six years navigating the political theatre and partisan gridlock in Washington or spending that time with the love of my life Susan, our two children, three beautiful grandchildren, and the rest of our extended family back home. It's not a hard choice, and I will not be seeking re-election.'


Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
Mamdani doubles down on plan for 'richer and whiter' NYC neighborhoods, says billionaires shouldn't exist
Print Close By Ronn Blitzer, Bonny Chu Published June 29, 2025 New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani doubled down on his plan to tax "richer and whiter neighborhoods," while also adding that he believes billionaires should not exist. The democratic socialist claimed Sunday that his push to burden white taxpayers was not racist, despite his agenda explicitly targeting white-majority areas. "That is just a description of what we see right now," Mamdani told NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday. "It's not driven by race. It's more of an assessment of what neighborhoods are being under taxed and overtaxed." Mamdani's policy proposal, "Stop the Sqeeze on NYC Homeowners," outlines his plans to "shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods." NEW YORK MAYORAL HOPEFUL ZOHRAN MAMDANI SLAMS CAPITALISM ON CNN, CITES MLK TO DEFEND SOCIALISM The policy notes that homeowners in wealthy neighborhoods "pay less than their fair share," and proposes adjusting tax rates and assessment percentages to address the supposed imbalance. NEW YORK DEMOCRAT SAYS MAYORAL CANDIDATE ZOHRAN MAMDANI 'TOO EXTREME TO LEAD' When asked whether he would change the language of the proposal, Mamdani deflected, saying that the proposal is meant to ensure a fair property tax system and that the wording simply reflects an observation. "The use of that language is just an assessment of the neighborhood." Mamdani said. "I'm just naming things as they are," he added. "The thing that motivates me in this is to create a system of fairness. It is not to work backwards from a racial assessment of neighborhoods or our city." BERNIE SANDERS, AOC-BACKED MAYORAL CANDIDATE PLANNING MASSIVE SPENDING INCREASES IN NYC Mamdani also reiterated his belief that "we shouldn't have billionaires," despite campaigning in the city believed to have the most billionaires in the world at 123 people. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP "I don't think that we should have billionaires, frankly," he said. "It is so much money in a moment of such inequality. And ultimately, what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country." Print Close URL