
New School Models Embrace Smaller Size
It is tough to understate just how central a role scale has played in education reform.
Starting more than a century ago, reformers looked to scale up schools, inventing institutions like the comprehensive high school to centralize student populations and broaden the offerings available to them. In this century, movements towards statewide teacher evaluation systems or even nationwide educational standards were massive in scale.
Scale has been a part of the school choice movement as well. For a time, if a promising charter or private school model came onto the scene, the first question they were asked was 'can you scale up?' A school was not truly seen as successful unless it could open 5, 10, or 20 campuses.
The tide has turned.
Increasingly, parents, educators, philanthropists, and states themselves are looking to smaller learning environments. Organizations like the National Microschooling Center are tracking the growth in purposely small learning environments. The National Hybrid Schools Project is doing the same for hybrid homeschooling. According to a recent EdChoice/Morning Consult poll, 14% of parents state that they would like to have their child learn from home entirely, with either parents or a tutor working with them. Thirty-three percent of parents identified that they would like their child learning from home between one and four days per week. Thirty-five percent said that their child was either currently working with a tutor or that they were looking for a tutor for their child.
I contributed a chapter to the new book School Rethink 2.0 (edited by Rick Hess, Michael Horn, and Julie Squire) looking at small scale school environments. These include homeschools, homeschool co-ops, hybrid homeschools, microschools, and tutoring.
I identify four forces driving the creation of new, smaller school models.
The wider availability of educational resources and the ability of learning management software to organize those resources into coherent lessons and units makes it much easier for parents or single educators to teach students on their own. Whereas in the past educational resources were expensive to obtain and limited in their offerings, the world really is an educator's oyster today. And, while there is a lot of administrative work to be done managing even a small number of students, technology is getting better at handling that.
When talking to parents who enroll their children in hybrid homeschools (schools that offer formal classes part of the week and have students learn from home for the rest), it was interesting to see how many worked jobs with non-traditional hours. For nurses, doctors, realtors, car salespeople, and others, a non-traditional school schedule could actually work better than a traditional Monday to Friday, 8 to 3:30 schedule. As more and more professionals utilize flexible work schedules, more and more parents may look for flexible schooling schedules. It is much easier for a smaller school to be flexible than a larger one, a difference that can make smaller educational options more attractive.
Historically, funders in the education reform space were more likely to support scalable school models (or models that were in the process of scaling). That is changing. In 2019, the Walton Family Foundation and Charles Koch Institute launched the VELA Education Fund to seed small educational entrepreneurs to launch schools and create other solutions. Educators did not have to serve thousands of students to get funded. At the time the book was published, VELA had awarded more than 2,500 small grants, and the number is surely higher now. (Full disclosure: I received funding from VELA for my research on hybrid homeschooling and the various organizations that I have worked for have received funding from both the Walton Family Foundation and Koch-related entities.)
Perhaps the most transformative change in the past half-decade in favor of small school models has been the creation of Education Savings Account programs in states across the country. Extending public funding to parents in ways that is flexible allows them to find smaller environments and supplement any of their shortcomings with additional resources. Simply making tutoring providers, microschool operators, and hybrid schools eligible for support has been incredibly helpful for entrepreneurial educators looking to launch their schools or services.
This is not to say that there are not headwinds. Technology is not all it's cracked up to be. As more and more parents and educators become skeptical of technology and more forthright about its limitations, what was seen as a limitless horizon of opportunity is becoming much more drawn in. The same is true for work schedules. As businesses rein in flexible work schedules and bring people back into the office for a traditional schedule, schools with alternative schedules could take a hit. Philanthropy is fickle and could return to desiring larger models. Parents' preferences could change too, directing their new state support to larger school models.
All that said, it is clear that parents want learning environments where their children are known and understood. They don't want to see their children lost in the shuffle or slip through the cracks. Educators want the same. They don't want to be cogs in a big impersonal machine. These fundamental realities help explain the allure of smaller learning models.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
02-06-2025
- Forbes
Microschools Go Macro And Provide More Learning Choices For Families
Students at home-based microschool working on a school project. 'Microschools aren't so micro anymore,' writes Linda Jacobson in The 74. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the growth of these K-12 learning models. They became a refuge for families facing school closures and challenges with remote learning. Their expansion is another important development in America's K-12 education choice landscape. Microschools are often described as today's version of the one-room schoolhouse. They typically consist of small, mixed-age student groups. They operate in traditional school buildings, homes, churches, and commercial spaces. They emphasize customized curricula, experiential learning, and a focus on mastery of content over standardized testing. They take different organizational forms, including learning centers that follow a state's homeschooling rules, private schools that charge tuition, a single charter school or a member of a charter network, or a traditional public school. Their learning calendars vary from being open year-round to part-time to following a typical academic year. The National Microschooling Center's 2025 report, American Microschools: A Sector Analysis, surveyed 800 currently operating or soon-to-open microschools, representing all 50 states and the District of Columbia. They serve 2% of the U.S. student population, which equates to approximately 750,000 students nationwide (though some estimates calculate that as many as 2 million students are enrolled in these schools). They can be found in cities, suburbs, and rural areas. The median number of students per nonpublic microschool is 22, while the median number for traditional public or charter microschools is higher at 36 students, with some institutions accommodating up to 100 students. Most of these schools are led by current or former educators, as 86% of microschool founders have an educational background, up from 71% in 2024. More than half (53%) of microschools report serving as learning centers for homeschooling children, private schools (30%), and public charter schools (5%). The primary sources of funding for microschools are tuition (61%) and state-provided school choice funds (38%). Nearly half of them (46%) charge annual tuition between $5,000 and $10,000, while 26% charge less than $5,000. Over two-thirds (65%) offer discounts or a sliding scale based on family need. The median cost to educate one child is $6,500 in currently operating schools. When currently operating schools are asked to describe their educational approach by selecting all that apply, the top four choices are project-based learning (72%), self-directed learning (65%), social-emotional learning (58%), and faith-based instruction (29%). When asked to describe their curriculum and select all that apply, a majority reported one purchased from a company (60%), one created by a person at the school (52%), one from on line learning tools (51%), and one used by other teachers (50%). These schools typically serve younger children, with 84% serving children ages 5 to 11. More than four out of 10 (43%) report that their students have previously attended traditional district schools, followed by homeschooling (30%), private schools (9%), and charter schools (9%). One of the defining characteristics of microschools is their ability to serve a diverse student population. Survey respondents were asked to select all the categories that apply from eight different student populations. The four highest categories were serving children who are neurodiverse (74%), children performing below grade level (63%), children who experienced emotional trauma (50%), and children with other special needs (46%). Despite their growth and success, microschools face challenges related to accountability and accreditation. Many operate without formal accreditation, and oversight varies significantly across states. Nearly eight out of 10 (78%) are not accredited in their state, a decrease from 84% in 2024. Eight in 10 (80%) are interested in seeking accreditation. The microschool sector's diversity of educational programs produces different approaches to measuring the impact of their work on students. When asked to select all that apply from a list of 10 different approaches, the four most common ways of measuring effectiveness were observation-based reports (65%), portfolios (55%), track learning mastery (51%), and formal assessments (43%). When asked to identify the most essential desired student outcome, microschool founders named growth in nonacademic learning as the most important outcome. As microschools continue to evolve, they present both opportunities and challenges for the American K-12 education system. Their growth reflects a demand for personalized, flexible, and community-based learning environments. To sustain this momentum, there is a pressing need for frameworks and practical guidance on how to do this. One example of this is the Public Microschool Playbook, written by three former K-12 superintendents and advocates--Deborah Gist, Tom Vander Ark, and Devin Vedicka. It provides detailed information on how to start and operate public microschools that are funded with existing K-12 per-pupil dollars. These can include new stand-alone microschools or different learning options within existing K-12 public schools. 'Microschools are not just a trend, they're a turning point. This is not about boutique innovation,' write those three former school superintendents in an article appearing in The 74. While COVID-19 propelled the expansion of these K-12 learning models, they are now an essential part of America's K-12 education choice landscape.
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
Gov. McKee's job approval rating falls to 19% in latest UNH poll
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — A new poll suggests Gov. Dan McKee is in serious political peril as he prepares to seek reelection next year. The latest 'Ocean State Poll' by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center pegs McKee's job approval rating at just 19%, down from 29% a year ago in the same survey. His disapproval rating in the poll was 71%, while 9% expressed no opinion. The survey also finds strong opposition to McKee's plan to run for another term in 2026. Just 11% of those polled said the governor deserves to be reelected, while 74% said he does not, including 60% of Democrats. 'It puts him in the Lincoln Chafee range,' said 12 News political analyst Joe Fleming, recalling the independent-turned-Democratic governor's poor poll numbers from 2011 to 2015. 'It's a very dangerous range for a governor.' (Story continues below graphic.) UNH's finding on McKee is markedly worse than a poll last month by another firm, Morning Consult, which put his job approval rating at 43% and his disapproval at 41%. The governor's campaign team has cited Morning Consult's data as evidence he has a path to reelection. A YouGov survey in March put his job approval rating at 36%. Separately, the new UNH poll puts President Trump's job approval rating in Rhode Island at 37%, down slightly since March. It also finds 54% of voters think Democratic U.S. Sen. Jack Reed deserves another term when he seeks reelection next year. The survey of 653 Rhode Island residents was conducted by UNH online and by text message from May 22 to May 26 using a probability-based web panel. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.8 percentage points. Fleming said McKee's political team should be particularly concerned about his numbers among self-identified Democrats polled by UNH, 63% of whom disapprove of his job performance. Former CVS executive Helena Foulkes is planning to challenge McKee again in next year's Democratic primary, and others are also interested. 'The governor has some serious work to do over the next six months or so to show voters that he's doing a good job and deserves reelection,' Fleming said. 'If he can't do that, I think you'll see Democrats lining up to run for the office.' The poll shows 32% of voters definitely or probably want Foulkes to run next year, while 26% don't and 42% have no opinion. Among former candidates, 23% are open to former Republican candidate Ashley Klaus running again, and just 19% are open to former Democratic Gov. Gina Raimondo doing so. Across four New England states surveyed by UNH, McKee's job approval rating is far lower than his counterparts. Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont is at 52%, while Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey and New Hampshire Gov. Kelly Ayotte are both at 49%. Housing is cited most often as the top issue facing Rhode Island, named by 23% of voters in the UNH survey, followed by infrastructure (11%) and corrupt or incompetent government (10%). (Story continues below graphic.) As state lawmakers debate the proposed Rhode Island Assault Weapons Ban Act, the poll shows 55% of voters support 'banning the sale and manufacture of firearms with military-style features,' while 37% oppose the policy and 8% expressed no opinion. At the federal level, Trump's numbers have moved little in Rhode Island during the early months of his administration, according to UNH's polling. The only noteworthy change was on his handling of foreign policy, where approval of his actions has dropped from 39% to 34% and disapproval has risen from 60% to 66% since March. Across the states tested by UNH, Trump's job approval is highest in New Hampshire (45%) and lowest in Massachusetts (34%), with roughly similar numbers in Rhode Island and Connecticut. More than two-thirds of Rhode Island voters say it is inappropriate for the U.S. to accept a luxury jet from Qatar to serve as Air Force One and then be given to Trump's presidential library. However, 57% of Republicans say the move is appropriate. The poll shows 51% of Rhode Island voters think the U.S. is doing too little to help Ukraine, while 18% think it's doing about the right amount, 15% say it's doing too much and 16% aren't sure. Democrats are far more supportive of assisting Ukraine than independents or Republicans. Ted Nesi (tnesi@ is a Target 12 investigative reporter and 12 News politics/business editor. He co-hosts Newsmakers and writes Nesi's Notes on Saturdays. Connect with him on Twitter, Bluesky and Facebook. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Forbes
29-05-2025
- Forbes
Elon Musk Exits Trump Administration More Unpopular Than When He Started
Elon Musk has become significantly less popular since he joined President Donald Trump's administration, according to polls, as he exits his government role after a tenure marked by some fumbled attempts to gut government agencies. Elon Musk listens as reporters ask President Donald Trump and South Africa President Cyril Ramaphosa ... More questions in the Oval Office at the White House on May 21, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by) The amount of people who like Musk hasn't changed much since he endorsed Trump on July 13, the day he was shot in Pennsylvania, but the number of people who view him unfavorably has increased significantly, according to Nate Silver's Silver Bulletin. Musk's favorability rating has gone from 41% in mid-July to 39% as of Thursday, a day after he announced he was formally leaving his role leading the Department of Government Efficiency, according to the polling average. His unfavorability rating has increased 14 points, from 40% to 54%. One of the most recent reputable polls on Musk, conducted May 23-25 by Morning Consult, found 40% have a very or somewhat favorable opinion and 52% have a very or somewhat unfavorable opinion. A CNN poll conducted in March, at the height of Musk's work at DOGE, found the majority of respondents believed Musk has neither the experience nor judgement to carry out Trump's changes to the federal government and found they were worried the cuts would go too far, though results were largely split along party lines. Musk announced Wednesday in a post on X he was formally exiting his role at DOGE, predicting 'the DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.' Musk made the announcement less than a month after he said he would significantly scale back political spending and just days after he publicly criticized Trump's signature policy legislation for adding to the federal deficit. We estimate Musk is worth $430.9 billion. It's unclear who will lead the Department of Government Efficiency in Musk's absence. While Musk was the de facto head of department, the Trump administration said that former health care executive, Amy Gleason, was technically the acting administrator of DOGE. Gleason did not have a public-facing role and the extent of her involvement in DOGE's activities is unclear, however. Musk took a heavy-handed approach to cutting government spending during his time in the Trump administration, gutting some agencies, such as the U.S. Agency for International Development, entirely, and laying off tens of thousands of employees across the federal government. He admittedly fell far short of his goal to make $1 trillion in cuts, however, and many of the terminations were reversed by the courts or acknowledgements that they were made in error. Musk became a fixture at Trump's side after he endorsed him in July and subsequently donated $250 million to Trump's campaign, joining him on international trips and weekends at Mar-a-Lago and sometimes spending the night at the White House. Trump's affinity for Musk did not extend to the broader Republican party, however, as many GOP lawmakers publicly expressed doubts about the cuts Musk made. Elon Musk Exits Trump Administration—What To Know (Forbes) Elon Musk Says He'll Remain Tesla CEO For Next 5 Years And 'Do A Lot Less' Political Spending (Forbes) Musk 'Disappointed' With Trump's Spending Bill—Says It Undermines DOGE's Work (Forbes)