Alabama lawmakers plan to prioritize crime and immigration in 2025 legislative session
Senate President Pro Tem Garlan Gudger, R-Cullman, is sworn in by Alabama Chief Justice Sarah Stewart on Feb. 4, 2025 in the Alabama Senate chamber in the Alabama Statehouse in Montgomery, Alabama. Gudger won the majority Republicans' nomination for the position late last year. Gudger's wife Heather stands between them. (Brian Lyman/Alabama Reflector
Alabama's legislative leaders said Tuesday they would prioritize crime prevention and immigration bills as the 2025 regular session of the state Legislature began.
Newly-elected Senate President Pro Tempore Garlan Gudger, R-Cullman, said the Senate's to-do list 'is long, and our time to accomplish it is short' in the chamber shortly after being sworn in as the chamber's leader.
He added after the chamber recessed that 'protecting Alabama values and protecting families' and 'government efficiency and transparency' are two 'overwhelming themes' lawmakers are considering but did not mention specific legislation or policy.
'I think that we need more of that in government, and I believe that everybody right now would like to see that,' Gudger said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Alabama House Speaker Nathaniel Ledbetter, R-Rainsville, said after the House gaveled out Tuesday that the chamber would prioritize a crime bill package early in the session. He said his staff and Gov. Kay Ivey's staff worked closely to develop the package.
'We'll probably hear the governor say something about those tonight at the State the State,' Ledbetter said. 'So we're excited to see that, and I think it's going to make a difference.'
Gudger said that 'key bills' will be introduced soon addressing immigration, such as targeting migrants who are felons and those lacking permanent legal status from using fraudulent documents to buy firearms, though it is already illegal for them to own firearms, while Ledbetter said a priority of the Legislature will be a package of about 10 immigration bills. The speaker said he expects the bills to move through quickly.
'I think most of the ones are just to make sure that the people here are legal, and if they're not, they're not criminals,' Ledbetter said.
Another priority for the Legislature will be to change the funding model for the Education Trust Fund to be a weighted model. Money is currently delivered to schools under a formula that relies on average daily attendance. Legislators have been speaking for months about changes that would provide extra money for schools with special needs populations, such as students in poverty; English language learners and rural schools.
'I think it's just the thing about it: You change something that has been changed in 30 years, you need to try to go through the process and make sure we don't hurt people,' Ledbetter said. Ledbetter said the new model will benefit poverty stricken school systems and be an overall benefit to the state.
'And that's what they're doing. They've done a great job of being cautious,' he said of House ETF Committee Chair Rep. Danny Garrett, R-Trussville, and Senate Finance and Taxation Education Chair Sen. Arthur Orr, R-Decatur. 'But I do think once we get it changed, it'd be better for the state, better for the students in the state.'
Gudger said the chamber aimed to provide quality education from K-12 to higher education and retaining graduates in the state, though he did not mention specific legislation.
'We want to be able to retain that knowledge and that sophistication when they get their graduate degrees into Alabama, to stay in Alabama, and we're able to retain that knowledge here, instead of it going out of state.
He also pointed to potential gambling legislation but said he has not seen any bills and is not part of the discussion.
'Right now, people are talking about it, but I haven't seen anything,' he said.
House members have been more reluctant to discuss gambling after a bitter fight between the House and Senate over a comprehensive proposal last year. Ledbetter said 'we're not going to do anything on this side' related to gambling.
'That's something they'll have to handle,' he said. 'But we won't see anything from the House.'
Senators also honored former Senate Pro Tempore Greg Reed, R-Jasper, who left the Senate last year after Gov. Kay Ivey to become Senior Advisor to Workforce Transformation as the Department of Labor is rebranded as the Department of Workforce. Reed, speaking to the chamber, thanked Senators for their work while he served as leader of the Senate.
'What a group of enormously capable, wildly intelligent, continuously dedicated men and women that are about the business of doing all the things important to people of the state of Alabama,' he said to the body.
Gudger also said to the Senate body that he'll focus on teamwork 'to ensure that every member feels included, valued, respected, and heard,' a theme he promoted in his bid to become the Senate's leader.
'Let's all of us embrace the spirit of Alabama and resolve as one man and woman, Democrat, Republican, black and white, liberal and conservative, to work together for the betterment of the citizens that all of us took an oath to serve,' he said.
Ivey was scheduled to deliver the State of the State address, outlining her priorities for the session, Tuesday evening.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
39 minutes ago
- Newsweek
2024 Election Results Under Scrutiny as Lawsuit Advances
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A legal case questioning the accuracy of the 2024 election is moving forward. The lawsuit, brought by SMART Legislation, the action arm of SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog group, filed the lawsuit over voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York. Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruled in open court in May that the allegations were serious enough for discovery to proceed. Newsweek has contacted SMART Elections for comment via email. People cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the general election in Michigan at the Livingston Educational Service Agency in Howell on November 3, 2024. People cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the general election in Michigan at the Livingston Educational Service Agency in Howell on November 3, 2024. Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images Why It Matters The lawsuit could renew debate about the 2024 election, though it won't change the outcome since Congress has certified the results declaring President Donald Trump the winner. It comes amid unconfirmed reports that voting machines were secretly altered before ballots were cast in November's election. The federally accredited testing lab, Pro V&V, that signed off on "significant" changes to ES&S voting machines—which are used in over 40 percent of U.S. counties—"vanished from public view" after the election, according to the Dissent in Bloom Substack. What To Know According to the complaint, more voters have sworn in legal affidavits that they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare than the Rockland County Board of Elections counted and certified, contradicting those results. The complaint also cited numerous statistical anomalies in the presidential election results. They include multiple districts where hundreds of voters chose the Democratic candidate Kirsten Gillibrand for Senate, but none voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate for president. Max Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the author of the Statistics and Analysis of Scientific Data, said in a paper that the 2024 presidential election results were statistically highly unlikely in four of the five towns in Rockland County when compared with 2020 results. What People Are Saying Lulu Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement: "There is clear evidence that the Senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely. "If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount of all presidential and Senate ballots in Rockland County. We believe it's vitally important, especially in the current environment, to be absolutely confident about the results of the election." Max Bonamente said in a paper on the voting data from Rockland County: "These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity." Costas Panagopoulos, a professor of political science at Northeastern University, told Newsweek: "Statistical irregularities in elections should always be investigated, but the sources of such inconsistencies, which can include error or miscalculation, are not always nefarious. Still, scrutinizing election results can strengthen confidence in elections. Mistakes can happen. "In this case, the drop-off inconsistencies could reflect the idiosyncratic nature of the 2024 presidential election cycle. Alone, statistical comparisons to previous cycles cannot provide definitive proof of wrongdoing. "In any case, it does not appear that any of these inconsistencies would be sufficient to change the outcomes of any of the elections in question in New York state. That does not mean they should not be scrutinized, and any errors, if verified, should be corrected for the historical record. But there is not necessarily any need to invalidate any of these elections in these jurisdictions." What's Next The lawsuit is seeking a full, hand recount of ballots cast in the presidential and U.S. Senate races in Rockland County. A hearing has been scheduled for September 22.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Trump's 'big beautiful' spending bill could make it harder to claim this low-income tax credit
As Senate Republicans debate President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill", a lesser-known provision from the House-approved package could make it harder to claim a low-income tax credit. If enacted as written, the House measure in the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" would require precertification of each qualifying child for filers claiming the so-called earned income tax credit, or EITC, starting in 2028. Under current law, taxpayers claim the EITC on their tax return — including Schedule EIC for qualifying children. The provision aims to "avoid duplicative and other erroneous claims," according to the bill's text. But policy experts say the new rules would burden eligible filers, who may forgo the EITC as a result. The measure could also delay tax refunds for those filers, particularly amid IRS cutbacks, experts say. More from Personal Finance:Job market is 'trash' right now, career coach says — here's whyWhat a 'revenge tax' in Trump's spending bill could mean for investorsWhat Trump's plan to slash Pell Grant to lowest level in a decade means for you "You're going to flood the IRS with all these [EITC] documents," said Janet Holtzblatt, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. "It's just not clear how they're going to process all this information." Holtzblatt, who has pushed to simplify the EITC for decades, wrote a critique of the proposed precertification last week. "This is not a new idea, but was previously considered, studied and rejected for very good reasons," Greg Leiserson, a senior fellow at the Tax Law Center at New York University Law, wrote about the proposal in late May. Studies during the George W. Bush administration found an EITC precertification process reduced EITC claims for eligible filers, Leiserson wrote. During the study, precertification also yielded a lower return on investment compared to existing EITC enforcement, such as audits, he wrote. One of the key benefits of the EITC is the tax break is "refundable," meaning you can still claim the credit and get a refund with zero taxes owed. That's valuable for lower earners who don't have a tax bill, experts say. To qualify, you need "earned income," or wages from work. The income phase-outs depend on your "qualifying children," based on four IRS tests. "Eligibility is complicated," and residency requirements for qualifying children often cause errors, said Holtzblatt with the Tax Policy Center. For 2025, the tax break is worth up to $8,046 for eligible families. You can claim the maximum EITC with adjusted gross income up to $61,555 for single filers and $68,675 for married couples filing jointly. These phase-outs apply to families with three or more children. As of December 2024, about 23 million workers received the EITC for tax year 2022, according to the IRS. But 1 in 5 eligible taxpayers don't claim the tax break, the agency estimates. Nine Democratic Senators last week voiced concerns about the House-approved EITC changes in a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. If enacted, the updates would "further complicate the EITC's existing challenges and make it more difficult to claim," the lawmakers wrote. Higher earners are more likely to face an audit, but EITC claimants have a 5.5 times higher audit rate than the rest of U.S. filers, partly due to improper payments, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center. The proposed EITC change, among other House provisions, still need Senate approval, and it's unclear how the measure could change. However, under the reconciliation process, Senate Republicans only need a simple majority to advance the bill.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Elon Musk hints at détente with Trump after prez wishes him well
Tech mogul Elon Musk signaled Monday that his white-hot public feud with President Trump may be starting to cool off. 'We had a great relationship and I wish him well — very well, actually,' Trump told reporters at the White House Monday in a clip reposted by X influencer ALX. Musk responded by posting a heart emoji, signaling that the former 'First Buddy' may no longer have hard feelings after his explosive falling out with the president last week. 3 Elon Musk has indicated that he's softening on President Trump after his public falling out with him last week. AP Tensions between the two men had slowly started to seep into the public eye before exploding last week. In late May, Musk taped an interview with 'CBS Sunday Morning' in which he could barely mask his disdain for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which is projected to increase the federal deficit by around $3 trillion. 3 The tech baron had fumed at President Trump after his time as a special government employee came to an end. AP Beginning on Tuesday of last week, Musk took it a step further, chastising the bill as an 'outrageous, pork-filled' measure and a 'disgusting abomination,' urging Republicans to 'kill the bill.' Then, on June 5, Musk went nuclear, taking credit for the president's electoral victory last year and even accusing the White House of concealing the Jeffrey Epstein files to protect Trump — X posts he later deleted. During the course of his outbursts, Musk also railed against Trump's decision to yank the nomination of Jared Isaacman, a close ally of the Tesla and SpaceX CEO, to become the head of NASA. Trump, 78, blasted Musk in response, saying that he went 'crazy,' 'lost his mind' and mused about cutting off government contracts to the tech mogul's companies. This led to Musk threatening to decommission the Dragon spacecraft, the government's primary means of sending humans into orbit. Musk, 53, later backpedaled on that threat. While Trump has indicated he won't rush to mend fences with Musk, the mogul has expressed admiration for the commander-in-chef. At one point, Musk posted a screengrab of a Truth Social post in which Trump lashed out at California Democrats over the riots in Los Angeles. 'Governor Gavin Newscum and 'Mayor' Bass should apologize to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job that they've done, and this now includes the ongoing L.A. riots,' Trump wrote in the post that Musk shared. 3 The explosive feud between the world's richest man and the most powerful man in the world erupted last week. In another re-post, Musk amplified a message from Vice President JD Vance vowing a crackdown by DC. 'This moment calls for decisive leadership,' Vance declared. 'The president will not tolerate rioting and violence.'
