logo
10 Underrated Bourbon Brands You Should Be Drinking

10 Underrated Bourbon Brands You Should Be Drinking

Forbes08-05-2025

Scotch whiskey glass and old wooden barrel. With copy space
Bourbon has never been more popular, and with that popularity comes a lot of hype. Bottles sell out in minutes, secondary market prices skyrocket, and suddenly, it feels like you need a treasure map (or a really good liquor store connection) just to get your hands on the so-called 'best' bourbons. But here's the thing—some of the best bottles aren't the ones people are camping out for. They're the ones quietly waiting on the shelf, overlooked by the masses but beloved by those in the know.
While brands like Pappy Van Winkle, Weller, and Blanton's get all the attention, there's a whole world of underrated bourbons that offer incredible flavor without the impossible hunt or inflated price tag. These are the bottles you can actually find, actually afford, and—most importantly—actually enjoy without feeling guilty for opening them.
From high-proof powerhouses to smooth, easy sippers, this list highlights ten bourbons that deserve more love. Some are longtime staples that have been overshadowed by new trends, while others are up-and-coming distilleries proving they can compete with the big names. But they all have one thing in common: they're absolutely worth drinking.
So, if you're looking to expand your bourbon horizons and add a few new favorites to your rotation, here are ten underrated bourbons that should be on your radar.
Old Grand Dad 114
If you think Old Grand-Dad is just a bottom-shelf relic, think again. The 114-proof version is a hidden gem that delivers serious flavor at a wallet-friendly price. Don't let the old-school name fool you—this bourbon punches well above its weight class.
Why It's Underrated: The name might not scream sophistication, but this high-proof bourbon is a fantastic bang for your buck. It's got history, character, and enough kick to make you double-check the label.
Tasting Notes: Rich caramel and vanilla up front, followed by baking spices, toasted oak, and a warming cinnamon finish. Strong but surprisingly smooth.
Henry McKenna 10-Year Bottled-in-Bond
Despite winning top whiskey honors, Henry McKenna 10-Year still manages to fly under the radar. Aged for a full decade and bottled-in-bond, this bourbon is rich, complex, and proof that sometimes, the best things come to those who wait.
Why It's Underrated: It won Best in Show at the San Francisco World Spirits Competition, but it still flies under the radar compared to other premium-aged bourbons.
Tasting Notes: Deep vanilla, toasted oak, and honey, with a touch of black pepper and dried fruit on the finish. A solid balance of sweet and spice.
Old Forester 1920 Prohibition Style
Old Forester might not always get the same fanfare as some of its Brown-Forman siblings, but the 1920 Prohibition Style expression is an absolute powerhouse. If you like high-proof, full-bodied bourbons with a bit of history, this one's for you.
Why It's Underrated: Old Forester is often overshadowed by its fancier cousins in the Brown-Forman family (hello, Woodford Reserve), but this Prohibition-era tribute is a powerhouse.
Tasting Notes: Dark cherry, caramelized sugar, cocoa, and a hint of leather. A warm, long finish with plenty of oak and spice.
Wilderness Trail Bottled-in-Bond
Wilderness Trail is a small but mighty Kentucky distillery that's making waves with its commitment to traditional bourbon-making. This bottled-in-bond expression showcases their dedication to quality, with rich flavors and a perfectly balanced profile.
Why It's Underrated: A small Kentucky distillery making a name for itself with traditional methods and a focus on grain-to-glass transparency.
Tasting Notes: Butterscotch, honey, and citrus zest up front, balanced with rich oak and nutmeg. Creamy mouthfeel with a long, dry finish.
New Riff Bottled-in-Bond
New Riff may be a newcomer in the bourbon world, but they're already proving they can hang with the best. Their bottled-in-bond release is a fantastic example of what careful craftsmanship and patience can produce.
Why It's Underrated: New Riff is one of the newer kids on the block, but they're doing things the right way—100% Kentucky-made with no shortcuts.
Tasting Notes: Toasted marshmallow, vanilla bean, and a little herbal spice. The rye in the mash bill gives it a peppery kick on the finish.
1792 Full Proof
If you're after a high-proof bourbon that delivers bold flavors without the insane secondary market prices, 1792 Full Proof is a winner. It's a well-balanced, rich, and deeply satisfying pour that deserves more attention.
Why It's Underrated: This high-proof bourbon delivers a big, bold flavor without the collector's price tag. It's not as flashy as some barrel-proof offerings, but it holds its own.
Tasting Notes: Dark chocolate, caramelized banana, cinnamon, and oak. The heat is there, but it mellows out nicely.
Elijah Craig Small Batch
Elijah Craig Barrel Proof gets all the glory, but don't sleep on the Small Batch. It's an excellent everyday bourbon with a depth of flavor that makes it a go-to for both sipping and cocktails.
Why It's Underrated: It's often overlooked in favor of its barrel-proof sibling, but this is a solid everyday bourbon with plenty of depth.
Tasting Notes: Brown sugar, vanilla, and toasted oak, with a hint of orange peel. Classic bourbon flavors, well-balanced and easy to sip.
Four Roses Single Barrel
Four Roses is well-known, but its Single Barrel offering is often overshadowed by more hyped bourbons. With a unique high-rye mash bill and hand-selected barrels, this is a beautifully balanced and flavorful bourbon.
Why It's Underrated: Four Roses gets respect, but it's still not as widely adored as some other Kentucky classics. The Single Barrel expression is one of the best values in bourbon.
Tasting Notes: Ripe red fruit, caramel, spice, and a floral undertone. The finish is long with just enough heat to keep things interesting.
Barrel Craft Spirits Bourbon
Barrell Craft Spirits is known for sourcing and blending exceptional whiskeys, but they don't always get the love they deserve. Their bourbon releases are bold, complex, and a fantastic option for those who love cask-strength pours.
Why It's Underrated: It's a non-distilling producer (NDP), which means they source their whiskey—but they do it exceptionally well, blending barrels from multiple states for unique flavor profiles.
Tasting Notes: Maple syrup, dark chocolate, dried cherries, and a touch of espresso. Bold, complex, and worth every penny.
Chattanooga Whiskey 111
Tennessee bourbon often gets overlooked, but Chattanooga Whiskey is changing the game. Their 111-proof expression is a bold, flavorful sip that proves great whiskey exists outside of Kentucky.
Why It's Underrated: Tennessee bourbon gets overshadowed by Kentucky, but Chattanooga Whiskey is proof that great whiskey doesn't stop at the state line.
Tasting Notes: Molasses, toasted coconut, dark fruit, and warm baking spices. A rich, full-bodied pour with a long, satisfying finish.
Bourbon lovers tend to chase the bottles that everyone's talking about, but there's plenty of great whiskey outside the spotlight. Next time you're looking to try something new, skip the long lines and secondary market prices—one of these bourbons might just become your new favorite.
Have your own favorite underrated bourbon? Tell us why you like it in the comments!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scottie Scheffler joins Tiger Woods as only repeat winners at Memorial
Scottie Scheffler joins Tiger Woods as only repeat winners at Memorial

Washington Post

time21 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Scottie Scheffler joins Tiger Woods as only repeat winners at Memorial

DUBLIN, Ohio — Scottie Scheffler is winning with such alarming regularity that describing his dominance is not a comfortable topic. So when he won the Memorial on Sunday for the second straight year, he at least had tournament host Jack Nicklaus at his side. Nicklaus is a great authority when it comes to Scheffler because the Golden Bear sees so much of himself in the world's No. 1 player.

BarEhud Barak: Israel Must Back Trump's Gaza Deal
BarEhud Barak: Israel Must Back Trump's Gaza Deal

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

BarEhud Barak: Israel Must Back Trump's Gaza Deal

U.S. President Donald Trump greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he arrives at the White House on April 7, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Credit - Alex Wong—Getty Images In the coming few days, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will face a defining choice between a politically motivated "war of deception" in Gaza and a deal to release all hostages while ending the war. He must choose between his extreme-right ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—or aligning with Donald Trump. There is no symmetry here. Accepting a hostage deal, ending the war, and working with Trump and free world leaders, won't be effortless. Any choice requires detailed negotiations and compromises. But this path is far superior to any realistic alternative. Based on the achievements of the Israel Defense Forces—including damage to Hamas, weakening Hezbollah, destroying Syria's military arsenal during Assad's collapse, and demonstrating Israel's capability to strike deep into Iran—Israeli leadership could, from a position of strength, pursue releasing all hostages simultaneously, halt this senseless war, end the humanitarian crisis, and uproot Hamas from power. This would enable Israel, though belatedly, to join Trump's vision of a New Middle East, including normalization with Saudi Arabia, regional deployment to tackle the Iranian challenge, and participation in the trade corridor project from India through the Gulf to Europe. Choosing a "war of deception" instead—where misleading propaganda presents political warfare as serving Israel's security—would be a grave mistake. It's highly doubtful that continuing the war could produce results different from previous Gaza rounds over the past 20 months. But it would certainly constitute a death sentence for some or most living hostages and deepen the diplomatic tsunami and International Criminal Court claims Israel already faces. This approach might make sense if it could achieve "total victory" over Hamas, but that won't happen. When this new war inevitably halts—under diplomatic pressure, humanitarian crisis, battlefield events, or domestic political developments—we would find ourselves in precisely the same situation as today. To understand, examine recent history. The October 7th barbaric attack created a compelling imperative for Israel to ensure Hamas could never again reign over Gaza or threaten Israel from there. The question was how to achieve this goal. Since Ben-Gurion, Israel has followed four strategic maxims: wars should be aggressive, fought on enemy territory, ended quickly to translate battlefield results into diplomatic and political realities while maintaining international legitimacy, and—extremely important—never lose the moral high ground. That's how we won in 1967 in six days and 1973 in three weeks. Netanyahu has betrayed almost all these principles. Read More: The Israel-Hamas Ceasefire Was Never Going to Last Another strategic maxim, from Clausewitz to Kissinger, holds that war must have a clearly defined, operationally feasible political purpose. As the Roman saying goes: "If you don't know which port you want to reach, no wind will take you there." This maxim was deliberately ignored. Netanyahu has blocked any discussion of this issue since October 7th, 2023. It was clear to any serious observer that Hamas suffered major military blows daily, losing most weapons systems and leadership figures since October 7th. However, since any Hamas group or individual can easily "disappear" within minutes, hiding among the Strip's 2 million civilians and emerging from tunnels or building windows to attack Israelis, their absolute elimination remains a Sisyphean task. Even after 58 years in the West Bank, we never fully eliminated Hamas' presence in Jenin or Tulkarm. The only way to ensure Hamas cannot reign over Gaza and threaten Israel is by replacing it with another governing entity legitimate to the international community, Arab neighbors like Egypt, UAE, and Saudi Arabia, and Palestinians themselves. Practically, this means a temporary inter-Arab force backed by the Arab League, potentially supported by UN Security Council resolution, funded by Saudi Arabia and UAE, with a technocratic government overseeing Palestinian bureaucracy and a new, non-Hamas security body trained by the inter-Arab force under U.S. supervision. Israel would present only two conditions: no Hamas military branch member could participate in the new entity's organs, and the IDF, initially deployed to the Strip's perimeter, would withdraw to the border only after all pre-agreed security benchmarks are met. This plan, easily implementable a year ago, and appearing to save Gaza and Gazans from further destruction, is harder now, because it could be interpreted as saving Israel from sinking into Gazan mud. But the plan remains viable despite the Israeli government's refusal to consider it. Since this is the only practical "day after" plan, there's no sense sacrificing hostages' lives or endangering Israeli troops in pointless warfare. Who can look into the eyes of future bereaved parents, newly widowed spouses, new orphans, disabled and traumatized soldiers, and claim with clear conscience that everything was done to prevent loss, or that it had justification? As long as Israel rejects hostage release and war's end, the risk increases of international initiatives, including Arab neighbors calling for Israel boycotts and steps toward recognition of a Palestinian state by European countries—many of them stable friends of Israel. Read More: I Am a Former Hamas Hostage. Here's My Message to Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu Permanent occupation of the Gaza Strip, population transfer of 2 million Palestinians, and Israeli resettlement on the that land are base and delusional visions that would backfire and accelerate confrontation with the world. Why is Netanyahu, an intelligent, experienced, savvy politician, failing? The answer isn't simple. Netanyahu has ruled since 2015 through an alliance with ultra-Orthodox parties who don't serve in the army and care only about sectoral needs, and since January 2023 added ultra-right zealots believing Gaza resettlement and Palestinian transfer are heavenly orders. He's caught in a dilemma: 80% of the public sees him as primarily responsible for the country's worst day, 60% believe he should resign. A heavy majority perceives his judicial reform, initiated immediately after January 2023 elections, as a "judicial coup d'état"—an attempt to castrate the legislative branch and demolish Supreme Court independence. Many believe the aim of his blatant attack on democracy is to escape his bribery, fraud, and breach of trust court case. For him, any pause in the war—even 60 days, certainly longer—would immediately bring reckoning and accountability: accelerated court proceedings; demands for national inquiry committee investigating October 7th, and events before, during and after; coalition meltdown; and probable disgraced ejection from public life. I believe Netanyahu genuinely wants all hostages home. But when this clashes with immediate threats to his political survival, he prefers leaving them in Gaza. He has already torpedoed several hostage deal opportunities, and seems to be doing it once again over the weekend, by resisting U.S. guarantee to Hamas for an end to the war in exchange for release of all hostages and entering, together with the Trump Administration, into Trump's New Middle East Order (to include the replacement of Hamas, described above). Netanyahu sticks to his eternal war in order to avoid a pause in fighting, which might lead to the end of his political career. This behavior is unacceptable to Israel and Israelis. We are, as former Supreme Court President Aharon Barak wrote years ago, 'defending democracy' that "should be capable of defending itself against those who try to use the very freedoms and tools it provides to destroy it from within." We're led by someone who lost his strategic and moral compass, dragging the nation into war motivated by personal political interests against our security and common future. Israel urgently needs new, sober leadership with clear realistic vision and self-confidence—leadership capable of reading our people's soul, understanding partners' and rivals' minds, and above all, having courage to make decisions and power to implement them. The world will pass judgment. But the burden of bringing Israel back on track is ours—Israeli citizens. I believe we will overcome. This war will end soon, and Israel's worst ever government will be replaced by a responsible, effective one. A long path of repair must follow. Contact us at letters@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store