Who is General Michael Guetlein? US Space Force leader appointed by Donald Trump to head the ‘Golden Dome' space missile defense system
Source: New York Post
President
Donald Trump
released new information on Tuesday regarding the United States' ambitious
missile defense program
called the Golden Dome. At an estimated price of $175 billion, this advanced system of defense has the potential to transform the national security of the US through the combination of ground-based and space-based technologies. The project will be the first of its type, with America planning to put a defensive weapon in space to counter attacks by the air that would endanger the security of the nation.
Although in its initial stages of creation, the Golden Dome project is a huge step ahead in defense capabilities in the US. Under the leadership of
General Michael Guetlein
, the project seeks to develop an unbeatable defense system that combines space and missile defense technologies to protect the homeland. As the project advances, the Golden Dome will be a symbol of strength for the country's military strategy, positioning America to confront the needs of an evolving world.
General Michael Guetlein selected to lead the Golden Dome System
General Michael Anthony Guetlein is a military veteran of over two decades of space operations and missile defense experience. As the current vice chief of space operations for the
US Space Force
, General Guetlein is no stranger to leadership roles. His past assignments have seen him command Space Systems Command from 2021 to 2024 and serve as deputy director of the National Reconnaissance Office from 2019 to 2021.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Cost Of Amusement Park Equipment From Mexico Might Surprise You - See Tips
Amusement Park Equipment | search ads
Click Here
Undo
Born on the 22nd of November, 1967, in Oklahoma, General Guetlein has had an illustrious US military career. In 1991, after graduating from Oklahoma State University, General Guetlein joined the United States Air Force. Throughout his service, General Guetlein has received many awards of distinction, including the Defense Distinguished Service Medal, the Air Force Distinguished Service Medal, the Defense Superior Service Medal, and two Legion of Merit awards. These awards speak to his outstanding leadership and his significant contributions to the development of US space and military operations.
spca
What is Golden Dome missile defence system
The
Golden Dome system
will feature both ground- and space-based components. These include satellite sensors and interceptors, which will work in tandem with existing terrestrial missile defense systems. This combination allows the system to detect and neutralise threats at multiple stages of flight, from pre-launch to mid-air interception. The system's ability to target missiles before they take off or intercept them mid-flight offers an unprecedented layer of security.
President Trump:
"This is not only a defense shield, but a deterrent to any aggressor contemplating attacking the United States with missile strikes, including from outer space."
During his speech, General Guetlein showed firm backing for the Golden Dome project, referring to it as a "bold and aggressive approach" that is meant to quickly improve the defense of the homeland. He referred to the urgency of the project as, "The 'Golden Dome' is a bold and aggressive strategy to quickly defend the homeland against our enemies." His statement captures the strategic significance of the project aimed at keeping the US ahead of fast-evolving missile and space technologies.
Golden Dome System: Estimated costs
Early research and development on the Golden Dome will cost between $25 billion and $35 billion. Yet long-term costs may amount to as much as $831 billion, with the overall cost of the project possibly nearing $1 trillion within two decades. Though expensive, the Golden Dome is regarded as an indispensable investment in the future of US defense, keeping the nation adequately safeguarded against upcoming threats from both state and non-state actors.
US President Donald Trump vision behind the 'Golden Dome'
President Trump highlighted the Golden Dome's strategic value to national defense in his announcement. The system is intended to safeguard the United States from maturing and more sophisticated missile threats. Differing from conventional ground systems, the Golden Dome combines space-based interceptors and sensors in offering a complete, multi-layered defense against a range of airborne attacks.
Also Read |
NASA alert! A massive asteroid racing towards Earth at 14 kilometres per second on May 24; should we be concerned
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 hours ago
- Business Standard
How a Trump staffer's quiet revenge may have triggered the Musk fallout
A senior White House official has found himself at the heart of the public fallout between US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk. According to a report by the New York Post, simmering tensions, personal vendettas, and behind-the-scenes maneuvering triggered the dramatic rift between the two influential figures. Sergio Gor, director of Presidential Personnel in the Trump administration, has been identified as the key figure behind Trump's abrupt move to withdraw the nomination of Jared Isaacman—Musk's close friend—for the post of Nasa administrator. The decision reportedly came just hours after Musk exited the Oval Office, and according to sources cited by New York Post, it was no coincidence. The March 6 flashpoint Tensions between Gor and Musk had reportedly been brewing since before Trump officially resumed office in January. But it was the March 6 Cabinet meeting that proved to be the tipping point. 'Elon was always telling the president 'Sergio's not moving fast enough to hire people. He's not the right guy for the job.' In front of the entire Cabinet, he said that,' one source told the New York Post. Following the incident, sources say Trump began showing clear signs of displeasure toward Gor. 'It wasn't just about humiliation,' the source said. 'It was the way the president began giving him the 'Why aren't you doing your f***ing job?' look.' 'Elon was his obsession' What followed, according to sources, was a quiet campaign of retribution. Gor allegedly told colleagues that he was going to take 'one last shot' at Musk before his own White House exit. 'He was bragging to other people that he was going to get one last shot at Elon out the door,' said a source. 'He was going to get Elon back for making him look bad.' Sources also claimed that Gor would monitor Tesla's stock performance obsessively, taking delight in any decline. 'He would pull up the Stocks app on his phone, show the dip in Tesla shares, and send screenshots with laughing emojis,' a source said. 'Elon was, like, his obsession," the source added. Gor is even said to have mocked a moment when Trump publicly bought a Tesla from Musk outside the White House—implying that the Tesla CEO was seeking presidential support to stabilise his company's dipping stock. Sergio Gor denies allegations Gor, however, has categorically denied that his actions were driven by personal animosity. Bannon dismisses Gor's role Trump ally Steve Bannon also pushed back against claims that Gor instigated the Trump-Musk clash. According to Bannon, the tensions had been building over deeper issues, including disagreements on tariffs and security protocols. 'This is between the president and Elon,' Bannon told the New York Post. 'This has nothing to do with Sergio Gor. Sergio Gor is a staffer that the president has to do things.'
Hindustan Times
11 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
A White House staffer may have triggered the Trump-Musk feud. Here's how
A senior White House official is being blamed for setting off the explosive public spat between US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk. A report in the New York Post suggests that months of behind-the-scenes tensions and personal vendettas may have played a key role in the high-profile fallout. Sergio Gor, the director of presidential personnel in the Trump administration, is reportedly the force behind President Trump's abrupt decision to withdraw Musk's close friend, Jared Isaacman, from nomination as NASA administrator right after Tesla CEO Elon Musk's Oval Office exit. According to multiple sources with direct knowledge of White House cited in the New York Post report, Gor helped push Trump to revoke Isaacman's nomination, which later escalated an internal dispute into a full-blown Trump-Musk feud. Gor had long harboured personal animosity toward Musk, dating back to the transition period before Trump's return to office in January, but tensions escalated further after the March 6 Cabinet meeting, reported the Post. The source said, 'Elon was always telling the president 'Sergio's not moving fast enough to hire people. He's not the right guy for the job.' In front of the entire Cabinet, he said that.' The source added that it wasn't just about humiliation, but the way President began giving him the 'Why aren't you doing your f***ing job?' look. Earlier, Musk had dismissed Gor as 'sleazy.' 'Sergio was upset about Elon dressing him down at the meeting and said he was going to 'get him'', another source familiar with the matter told the New York Post. The meeting incident appears to have set off a campaign of quiet retribution by Gor, who allegedly told colleagues he would get 'one last shot' at Musk before leaving. 'He was bragging to other people that he was going to get one last shot at Elon out the door. He was going to get Elon back for making him look bad,' said a source with close knowledge of the events. Several sources describe Gor gloating when Tesla's stock price dropped, frequently pulling up the 'Stocks' app on his phone to show Musk's financial losses and even sharing screenshots with laughing emojis. 'Elon was, like, his obsession,' one source said. 'He would plant a story on Elon and he would send me the link and then send me a screenshot of Tesla's stock price with a laughing face.' The White House official is also said to have mocked the moment when Trump publicly purchased a Tesla from Musk outside the White House, hinting that Musk asked for Trump's help to bring up the dipping Tesla share prices. Gor has denied that his actions were motivated by revenge and personal vendetta. In a statement cited by the New York Post, he said, 'I fully support President Donald Trump's decision to remove this nominee (Jared Isaacman)…This was never about Elon, it's about someone who doesn't agree with America First Principles.' Meanwhile, Trump ally Steve Bannon dismissed the idea that Gor was the instigator behind the breakdown, attributing the rift to long-standing differences between the former president and Musk, including disputes over tariffs and security briefings. 'It's the president and Elon. This has nothing to do with Sergio Gor. Sergio Gor is a staffer that the president has to do things,' Bannon said. Bannon, who has previously advocated for Musk's deportation despite his US citizenship since 2002, called suggestions of Gor being the root cause 'absolutely ludicrous.'
Hindustan Times
12 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Haryana human rights panel seeks report on polluting factory
Haryana Human Rights commission(HHRC) has sought report from Rewari deputy commissioner, municipal commissioner, municipal council and regional officer of the Haryana state pollution board, Rewari, on a complaint filed by residents of Bheem Basti seeking intervention against the continued operation of a private industrial unit, which is functioning illegally within a densely populated residential area. The right panel has sought a report before August 19. The complainants alleged that the factory named Sai Ram pipe Udyog, is operating in violation of environmental laws, emitting hazardous noise and air pollution, causing severe vibrations from heavy machinery and operating during night hours, thereby endangering the health and safety of residents and violating their fundamental and human rights. Right panel chairperson Lalit Batra observed that the conduct of the factory and the inaction of statutory bodies such as the Haryana State Pollution Control Board amount to a blatant violation of multiple provisions of environmental and municipal laws, including but not limited to Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Factories Act, 1948, and Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000. 'These Noise Rules set maximum noise limits of 55 dB during the day and 45 dB at night for residential zones. The district authorities displayed apathy towards the residents' repeated pleas,' Batra said in the order.
