logo
Ekurhuleni encourages public to use suggestion boxes at health facilities

Ekurhuleni encourages public to use suggestion boxes at health facilities

The Citizen01-05-2025

Residents are encouraged to use suggestion boxes to voice any frustrations experienced at any of the city's health facilities.
This reminder follows a brief disruption by a few members of the community at Geluksdal Clinic on April 14.
Speaking about this matter, the city's spokesperson Zweli Dlamini said: 'The right to access healthcare services is a fundamental human right enshrined in the Constitution, and residents are urged to raise concerns, through proper channels, should they feel this right is being compromised.
'To uphold this right, residents visiting any of the city's health facilities are advised not to leave without having their needs addressed.
'Suggestion boxes are available at all health facilities, along with information on how to file complaints.'
Although the provincial government has resolved to take over the running and control of clinics in the region, Executive Mayor Nkosindiphile Xhakaza stated during the recent State of the City Address that the city remains resolute in its commitment to ensuring that clinics continue to operate optimally and provide the necessary primary healthcare to residents.
The community is encouraged to utilise these channels so that issues can be addressed promptly by the clinic head. This initiative is part of the city's ongoing efforts to improve customer experiences.
This was also addressed at the recent Ekurhuleni health district (EHD) media engagement.
During the session, it was highlighted that the EHD plays a crucial role in the administration and delivery of public primary health care (PHC) services within the City of Ekurhuleni.
Leading the EHD is acting chief director Simon Choma, who highlighted that there are 93 primary healthcare facilities within the CoE, with 77 clinics managed by the CoE, 16 managed by the EHD and there are eight community health centres that provide 24-hours services.
EHD also oversees six hospitals, compromising one district hospital (namely Bertha Gxowa Hospital), four regional hospitals and one tertiary hospital.
East Sub District Hlengiwe Makhanye later explained the process to lodge a complaint or record a compliment or suggestion.
'One can approach the official responsible for managing complaints, compliments and suggestions,' said Makhanye.
'In writing, one needs to fill in the prescribed form that is available next to the designated box or from the responsible official. The form will guide you on the information needed.
Hand over the form to the official or place it in the box provided to post complaints, compliments, or suggestions.
ALSO CHECK: SASSA enhances security with mandatory biometric verification
'If the complaint is urgent, give it directly to the responsible official as the boxes will only be opened at scheduled times as indicated on the box.
The complaint on the box will be acknowledged within five working days. The complaint will be investigated. The complaint will be resolved and redress conducted within 25 working days.
'Should the case require more time for investigation, updates will be provided. Should you be dissatisfied with the outcome, lodge the complaint at the district /provincial office or call centre,' said Makhanye.
For complaints, compliments and suggestions, patients and stakeholders can reach the Bertha Gxowa quality assurance manager Siyanda Mashatolo at Siyanda.Mashatolo@gauteng.gov.za or contact the Ekurhuleni Health District official Beatrice Peloagae at 0835512644 or email at Beatrice.Peloagae@gauteng.gov.za.
ALSO CHECK: Urgent steps needed to address low uptake of vaccinations amid rising hesitancy
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Children's rights and how to spot abuse
Children's rights and how to spot abuse

The Citizen

timea day ago

  • The Citizen

Children's rights and how to spot abuse

Children's rights and how to spot abuse As National Child Protection Week drew to a close on June 5, parents are urged to educate their children about their rights. National Child Protection Week is commemorated from May 29 to June 5. This year's theme was 'Working together in ending violence against children'. The week serves to raise awareness of the rights of children as articulated in the Constitution and the Children's Act (Act No. 38 of 2005). Under the act, each South African child is entitled to: – A name and nationality. – Family care or appropriate alternative care. – Basic nutrition, shelter, healthcare and social services. – Protection from neglect, maltreatment and abuse. – Protection from exploitative labour services, including work or services that are inappropriate. – Protection from being used in armed conflict and protection during times of armed conflict. Tshwane District Health Social Worker Agnes Mathebula says there are various signs of physical and emotional abuse that parents can look out for should they occur. 'We identify signs of abuse either physically or through looking at the behaviour of the child. Physically, you'll see things like bruises, fractures, cigarette burns and things like that, those aren't too difficult to identify. But the emotional abuse can be difficult to spot,' Mathebula says. Behavioural indicators may include fear of parents, alterations in behaviour, withdrawn or aggressive tendencies or academic difficulties. The Department of Social Development has a pilot 24-hour call centre dedicated to providing support and counselling to victims of gender-based violence: The toll-free number to call is 0800 428 428 (0800 GBV GBV) to speak to a social worker for assistance and counselling. Callers can also request a social worker from the Command Centre to contact them by dialling *120*7867# (free) from any cellphone. You can also get help at: Childline South Africa: 116 Child Welfare South Africa: 0861 4 CHILD (24453), 011 452-4110 or e-mail: info@ ALSO READ: Your ultimate weekend plans in Pretoria Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to bennittb@ or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading! Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App here

Health Funders Association launches latest legal challenge to NHI Act, calling legislation ‘unworkable'
Health Funders Association launches latest legal challenge to NHI Act, calling legislation ‘unworkable'

Daily Maverick

time2 days ago

  • Daily Maverick

Health Funders Association launches latest legal challenge to NHI Act, calling legislation ‘unworkable'

The Health Funders Association is the sixth organisation to launch a legal challenge to the NHI Act, describing it as 'unaffordable, unworkable and unconstitutional'. The Health Funders Association (HFA), a nonprofit representing 20 medical schemes and three administrators in South Africa's private healthcare funding sector, has become the latest organisation to launch a legal challenge to the National Health Insurance Act. On Thursday, 5 June the HFA announced the challenge, which has been lodged in the Gauteng Division of the High Court in Pretoria. The organisation has said that while it supports the 'goal of universal health coverage', it considers the NHI Act to be 'unaffordable, unworkable and unconstitutional'. 'Litigation is not our preferred route but it is, under these circumstances, the responsible one to protect our economy and the future of healthcare in our country,' said NFA chief executive Thoneshan Naidoo. Unconstitutional and invalid In its legal challenge, the HFA argues that the NHI Act is procedurally and substantively flawed and will cause irreparable harm to the health system economy. It also seeks to show that: Section 33 of the NHI Act, which limits the role of medical schemes to providing complementary cover, infringes on section 27 of the Constitution regarding the right to access healthcare; The Act is not a 'reasonable measure' under section 27(2) of the Constitution, which stipulates that the government must take progressive, reasonable steps to realise access to care; and The Act unconstitutionally delegates legislative authority to the minister of health. Naidoo said that the relief sought by the HFA in the high court was for 'certain sections of the NHI Act be declared unconstitutional and invalid. Alternatively, the Act, in its entirety, to be declared unconstitutional and invalid.' There are already five legal challenges to the Act playing out in South Africa's courts, led by the South African Medical Association, the Board of Healthcare Funders, the Hospital Association of South Africa, the South African Private Practitioners Forum and the trade union Solidarity. 'With our knowledge, skills and experience of the funding industry… we bring an understanding of what the flaws are [in the NHI Act], what path we're on and alternative solutions. We don't view ourselves in opposition, but as part of completing the solution,' Naidoo told Daily Maverick. He noted that the HFA had engaged with the NHI through public participation processes before it was signed into law, in an attempt to work collaboratively with stakeholders. 'We are a part of Busa [Business Unity South Africa]… and while we go ahead with this legal challenge, we are hoping that through Busa… and that ongoing engagement with the president, it can lead to some amicable solution,' Naidoo said. Health Department spokesperson Foster Mohale said the department would study the HFA's application once it had received it and 'respond accordingly through the legal channels'. Independent study Part of the reason the HFA's legal challenge was launched more than a year after the NHI Act was signed into law was to allow time to research the potential impact of the legislation, said Naidoo. The organisation commissioned an independent economic analysis by consultancy firm Genesis Analytics. 'The Genesis analysis assesses various potential efficiency savings under NHI compared to the current system. For modelling purposes, savings are assumed to be as high as 45% of private sector cost levels. The report demonstrates that even under the most optimistic assumptions, it is not possible to raise the funds required for NHI,' the HFA said. 'For NHI to fund a level of care equivalent to what medical scheme members currently receive, as government has indicated is the intention, the Genesis model shows that personal income tax would need to increase by 2.2 times (a 115% increase in tax) from the current average rate of 21% to an average of 46% of income.' The Genensis model considered a scenario of pooling existing healthcare expenditure in the private and public sectors to support NHI. Its finding was that to enable this, personal income tax would need to increase by 1.5 times its current rate (a 47% increase in tax), from its average of 21% to 31%, according to the HFA. The report stated that medical scheme members would face a 43% reduction in the level of healthcare services relative to what they currently receive. When breaking down who would be affected by the potential decline in services under the NHI, Naidoo said the Genesis analysis showed that more than 68% of medical scheme members were black, Indian or coloured, with up to 83% earning less than R37,500 per month. 'There's often a misconception that medical schemes are for the wealthy and the elite. But if 83% are earning less than R40,000, it means this is actually your economic engine of South Africa. This is your workforce,' Naidoo said. Another finding of the study was that an additional 282,000 healthcare professionals would be needed to achieve the same level of care and access under the NHI than is currently experienced through medical schemes. 'Every year, we only get about 3,600 new medical graduates. Qualifications take between nine to 13 years… so the targets are decades away,' Naidoo said. Pursuing meaningful reform Naidoo said the HFA was not seeking to preserve the status quo, since it believed meaningful reform was essential to improve affordability, quality and access in healthcare. 'We remain committed to working with government and stakeholders to design a more inclusive, financially viable and constitutionally sound [system],' he said. 'Almost all successful [universal healthcare coverage] models, whether it's in high-income, middle-income or even low-income countries, involve strong public-private sector collaboration… Rather than sidelining the private sector, these systems leverage its capacity, innovation and infrastructure to expand access, improve efficiency and enhance quality of care.' The HFA has proposed a 'hybrid funding model' that involves the NHI fund and medical schemes operating 'in tandem'. It argues that this system would preserve individuals' 'freedom to choose supplementary private cover'. 'Public resources are focused on those most in need, while regulated competition supports innovation, efficiency and cost control,' it said. 'The proposed model offers a common benefit package with built-in cross-subsidisation to ensure equitable access for vulnerable populations. Grounded in a strong primary healthcare foundation, the model reflects international best practice and is especially relevant for middle-income countries like South Africa.' Other organisations have proposed alternative models to the NHI fund, including the Universal Healthcare Access Coalition, made up of the South African Medical Association, the Progressive Health Forum and the South African Private Practitioners Forum. Naidoo noted that a 'common thread' in many of these healthcare reform proposals was the emphasis placed on 'multifund, multipayer systems' rather than a single-fund monopoly. DM

Pride Month in South Africa: the gap between legal rights and lived realities
Pride Month in South Africa: the gap between legal rights and lived realities

IOL News

time3 days ago

  • IOL News

Pride Month in South Africa: the gap between legal rights and lived realities

June is Pride Month Image: Unsplash As June dawns and South Africa steps into Pride Month, the contradiction between what is promised and what is lived becomes impossible to ignore. On paper, South Africa boasts one of the most progressive constitutions in the world — a beacon of equality, dignity, and protection for all, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. But for many in the LGBTQIA+ community, especially those living on the margins, that promise remains unfulfilled. Legal protections offer hope, but discrimination persists, violence goes unchecked, and many queer South Africans still live in fear, forced to justify their existence in a society that too often refuse to see them. For organisations like Ilitha Labantu, Pride Month is not just about rainbow flags and celebration — it is a solemn call to affirm the rights, dignity, and safety of LGBTQIA+ persons. Siya Monakali of Ilitha Labantu said: 'The LGBTQIA+ community is not a homogenous group. Our experiences are shaped by race, class, gender, and geography — and too often, those at the intersection of these identities bear the brunt of exclusion and violence.' Monakali explained that while the Constitution offers strong protections, systemic discrimination persists — particularly against Black lesbian women, transgender individuals, and those living in poverty. This is a reality Taswald Ruiters, a transgender woman based in Cape Town, has experienced first hand. 'There is no question that the Constitution is set to protect the transgender community,' Ruiters said. 'It makes us feel seen and heard. However, there is still work that needs to be done.'Despite legal protections, economic exclusion remains widespread. 'Our brothers and sisters are jobless. The Constitution says no person should be discriminated against based on sexual orientation or gender identity — but that's just not enough. The public sees you as different, and that is not what the workforce wants.' She recalled an incident in which she was discriminated against for using a female restroom in a government building. 'The facility had no specific protections in place for transgender persons. When I reported it, the response I received from authorities was that they would look into it and update the regulations in due time. These are not future issues — they are happening now. My question is: is this missed communication, or just disregard?' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Taswald Ruiters Image: Supplied Ruiters began her transition at the age of 30. 'It felt impossible at first, like it was too late in my life — but I regret nothing,' she said. After five years on hormone replacement therapy, she saw improvements — but recent funding cuts have limited access. 'The medications we need to aid in our transition are no longer being provided. The influence of other countries has unfortunately diminished the efforts we've made towards inclusivity.' She reflected on how the gap between law and lived experience affects dignity. 'This country has come far. It sometimes feels like a privilege just to be able to practice your basic human rights. But why should we be made to feel privileged when, for the rest of society, it's just life as normal? 'I cannot blame anyone for their ignorance if they've never been educated about what a transgender person is, or how the Constitution protects us. But people must know — every action gets a reaction. Treat others the way you want to be treated.' She called for inclusive LGBTQIA+ education in high schools. 'We have progressive young people. Education would help promote inclusivity and allow them to make positive changes in their homes and communities,' she said. As a parent to a five-year-old, she said that primary school learners may not yet be ready for conversations about gender identity — but respect can and should be taught early. Globally, increasing anti-trans rhetoric — especially in the United States — casts a shadow. Former President Donald Trump has pledged to ban gender-affirming healthcare and restrict transgender participation in sport if re-elected, a stance that emboldened right-wing movements worldwide. South African advocates warn these ideas, spread online and through media, risk reversing hard-won progress. Luiz De Barros, founder and editor of — South Africa's largest LGBTQIA+ news platform noted even the most advanced legal systems can fall short. 'Although South Africa's Constitution and legal framework offer strong protections for LGBTQ+ people, these rights often do not translate into lived realities. Discrimination, stigma, and violence remain persistent challenges in our communities,' said De Barros. 'Although the Hate Crimes Act was passed in 2023, it has yet to be fully implemented. SAPS continues to struggle with providing appropriate and sensitive services to LGBTQ+ survivors.'On transgender exclusion in sports, De Barros challenged the idea of unfair advantage. 'The notion of an 'unfair physical advantage' as grounds to exclude transgender athletes is often based on misinformation, sensationalism, and a lack of scientific understanding… If trans women had a consistent competitive advantage, we would expect to see them dominating podiums and breaking records regularly but this is not the case.' 'All individuals, including transgender and intersex athletes, deserve the right to participate in sports,' he added. 'We must work together across sectors — sports, science, and civil society — to develop equitable, inclusive, and evidence-based policies that uphold the dignity and rights of all athletes.' Weekend Argus

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store