3715 Submissions Received Ahead Of 22 May City Council Votes
Press Release – Wellington City Council
Along with the submissions, close to 175 people, groups and organisations spoke at an oral hearing. The Council also surveyed a representative sample of 500 residents reflecting the demographic characteristics of Wellington.
More than 3000 submissions regarding water, insurance, investment, project spending, rates, fees and other charges were received by Wellington City Council during consultations last month.
The Council consulted on an amendment to the 2024-34 Long-term Plan, the Annual Plan and necessary water reform under Local Water Done Well legislation between 20 March and 21 April.
In total, 3002 submissions were received on the amendment and the Annual Plan, while 713 came in about Local Water Done Well reform.
Along with the submissions, close to 175 people, groups and organisations spoke at an oral hearing. The Council also surveyed a representative sample of 500 residents reflecting the demographic characteristics of Wellington.
When it came to water reform, 72 percent of submissions and 82 percent of survey participants supported the Council's preferred options of a multi-council-owned water organisation. The most important factors cited for the delivery model were value for money and legal compliance.
Regarding the Long-term Plan amendment, over a third of respondents to both the consultation and the survey supported the preferred option of creating large debt headroom by making changes to capital spending valued at $385 million and establishing a small $68m investment fund using proceeds from the sale of nine ground leases.
Close to a quarter of respondents backed an alternative option of balancing borrowing and investing by reducing capital spending by $200 million and creating a medium-sized investment fund of up to $314 million. Most of these responses indicated their preference for establishing the fund was a partial sale of the Council's airports shares plus the sale of nine ground leases.
There was a high level of interest in the proposed changes to capital projects aimed at reducing spending.
Sixty one percent of consultation submissions supported the preferred Council option of increasing the Begonia House project budget by $2.9 million to do the minimum amount of work for it to continue operation. Half of the survey respondents indicated the same.
Nineteen percent of submissions supported the Council's preferred option of selling the Karori Events Centre in its current state, while 41 percent said repairs should be done to achieve compliance. Forty-six percent of survey respondents said the site should be sold as is, while 24 percent backed the option to do repairs for compliance, which would increase the related budget by $1.3 million.
A quarter of submissions supported the Council's preferred option to rephase the Paneke Pōneke bike network over 20 years rather than 10, while 34 percent said only projects that are approved or under construction should be finished. Thirty-six percent of survey respondents backed a rephasing of the network while 32 percent supported finishing what was started, approved or under construction.
For the Annual Plan, 60 percent of submissions supported the Council partnering with Taranaki Whānui to manage the Matai Moana reserve, with 27 opposing joint management. Sixty-four percent of survey respondents supported the partnership arrangement around Matai Moana while 22 percent did not. (Four to 5 percent in both platforms didn't like either option).
A large majority of submitters and respondents supported Council proposals to change the current policy around short-term accommodation providers. Sixty-six percent of submissions backed clearer guidelines around charging commercial rates to such providers with 20 percent against the move. Seventy-one percent of survey respondents also supported the move, with 13 percent against.
Support for the overall budget, which would result in an average rates increase of 12 percent in 2025/26 (including the 1.4 percent sludge levy), was mixed. Thirty-eight percent of submissions supported the budget, and the same percentage of people opposed it; while 40 percent of survey respondents supported the budget and 30 percent opposed it.
Deliberations on the Long-term Plan Amendment, Annual Plan and Local Water Done Well water reform will take place at the Long-term Plan, Finance and Performance Committee meeting on Thursday 22 May.
The final amendment and Annual Plan are scheduled to be adopted by Council on Thursday 26 June.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
36 minutes ago
- Scoop
Tasman Goes In-House For Local Water Done Well Implementation
Tasman's future management of drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater services has taken a step forward, with Tasman District Council unanimously opting for an in-house business unit structure to implement requirements of the Government's Local Water Done Well programme. This unit would be managed separately from other Council operations in a ringfenced capacity. While still part of the Council, it would be independently monitored to ensure high environmental and customer standards, as set by Taumata Arowai. The Council has also agreed in principle to establish an internal advisory committee with the option of external members to help provide operational oversight of three waters activities and provide advice to the Council. A report will be provided to the Council that includes options for membership, terms of reference and associated costs. Further to this, the Mayor and Councillors have expressed a desire for staff to continue discussions with other councils regarding options for greater alignment of services, information and procurement to increase efficiency savings across the Council's water, wastewater and stormwater functions. Local Water Done Well is intended to ensure people pay cost-reflective prices for water services, that those services are delivered to an acceptable quality, and that water services providers are investing sufficiently in infrastructure. The Council was obliged to consider and consult on new water service delivery options as part of the LWDW programme. On 27 March 2025, the Council confirmed public consultation on three options for future governance and management of Water, Wastewater and Stormwater. We received 16 submissions during the public consultation period between 22 April - 23 May 2025 Two options involving setting up a Water Council Controlled Organisation (CCO), each governed by an independent board, were also considered alongside the in-house proposal. Other governance options – such as trust models like those used in the electricity sector – have been considered by Council but are not being pursued. In the short to medium term, all options deliver similar financial outcomes. The structure and scope of the new business unit is yet to be finalized. However, it was acknowledged that an in-house unit operating within its agreed parameters allowed better opportunities for community involvement, as opposed to a CCO. The next steps in the process require a Water Service Delivery Plan to be completed and submitted to Department of Internal Affairs by 3 September, 2025. The WSDP will then be shared with the Commerce Commission, with a view towards the Water Service Delivery Plan being approved and ready for implementation by November 2025. It is intended that the internal business unit will formally function from 1 July 2027 to align with the next Long-Term Plan in 2027/2037.
Scoop
19 hours ago
- Scoop
Orbus On Demand: A New Electric Rideshare Service Debuting In Mosgiel
Otago Regional Council (ORC) is launching an innovative new public transport service operated by Go Bus (a subsidiary of Kinetic) for Mosgiel on Monday, 30 June. Orbus On Demand offers a different way for people to travel. It will operate within the Mosgiel, Wingatui, East Taieri and Kinmont areas using a wheelchair-accessible 22-seat electric bus. The service is replacing the Mosgiel loop service (Routes 80 and 81), which ends at 6pm on Friday, 27 June. The new on demand bus service will run weekdays from 8am to 6pm. People can book any time via the Orbus On Demand app or by phoning ORC Customer Services weekdays from 8am to 5pm. The app is free to download from the App Store or Google Play from 16 June. Orbus On Demand is not a door-to-door service; it is a rideshare service where passengers may be joined by others during their trip. There are nearly 100 pick-up/drop-off points available; some are marked bus stops, and some are not. The Orbus On Demand app or the Customer Services team will direct people to the closest pick-up location anywhere in the service zone. (see map below). Co-chair of Otago Regional Council's Public and Active Transport Committee Andrew Noone says Orbus On Demand aims to add convenience and provide wider coverage for bus users in the area, which is something residents asked ORC for during ORC's Long-Term Plan consultation. 'This represents a new era of public transport. It means no parking worries and hassle-free trips to essential services like medical and community centres or visiting friends and family across town.' A fleet of 13 new electric buses servicing the Mosgiel – Dunedin route, also operated by Go Bus, will also be launched on 30 June, although some buses started running on the route earlier this month. The fleet includes six large 75-passenger capacity buses, introduced to increase capacity during peak times and allow for further bus-use growth in Mosgiel. The launch of the electric Orbus On Demand service is the final step in moving all Mosgiel buses to zero emissions, enabling ORC to deliver cleaner more sustainable public transport for the region. Ben Barlow, Chief Operating Officer, Go Bus, says: 'We're proud to be working alongside Otago Regional Council to deliver this innovative new On Demand service. It represents a forward-thinking approach to public transport in the region. 'It's great to be part of a solution that's not only convenient but also aligned with ORC's wider goals around accessibility and sustainability.'
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Marlborough Residents Speak Against Council's Preferred Water Plan
Residents have spoken against the Marlborough District Council's preferred water services model at a Local Water Done Well hearing on Monday. The Government requires councils to choose from five water service delivery options a modified status quo (an in-house council department), a single council-controlled organisation, a multi-council-controlled organisation, and two types of trusts. The Marlborough District Council's preferred option is to create a standalone Water Services Organisation owned and controlled by the council. The council said it would find greater efficiencies to deliver better service at a lower cost, and have more borrowing capacity to maintain and improve the region's water infrastructure. But Marlborough residents aren't convinced. Of about 45 submissions made, 58 percent wanted to keep water services in-house, compared to 13 percent who preferred the standalone organisation. The remainder did not indicate a preference. Five people spoke on their submissions at a hearing in the council chamber on Monday, and they were all opposed to a standalone organisation. Brendan Kearney, who used to be chief financial officer of a council-controlled organisation in Canterbury, said there was no proof that a separate organisation would be more efficient, and setting up and funding a separate entity could cost ratepayers more. It would "inevitably duplicate some overhead costs", Kearney said. He said he saw no reason for water services to be removed from a council that had maintained its water systems relatively well. "[Water] assets are in good or very good condition. That's a credit to the current council and past councils as well. Council also has low debt relative to its peers. "This is compelling evidence, in my view, that the council has performed well and will continue to do so." To create a separate organisation, Kearney said the council would need to appoint directors, manage a new relationship with the organisation, and manage the organisation's own agenda. "A standalone company is no guarantee of good governance." Kearney said there also needed to be balance in who footed the water infrastructure bill between the ratepayers of today and of tomorrow. "It's unfair to gift hundreds of millions of dollars ... to the next generations completely debt free. That means the past generations paid too much. "On the other hand, it's unfair to get those assets, billions of dollars of assets, fully debt funded ... it's unfair on future generations. "Something in between those two extremes needs to happen." Submitter Lauchy Hynd said that creating a separate organisation to take on debt outside the council books was not sustainable. "What happens when we default?" Hynd said. "We're leveraging [water assets] by three to five times to borrow money against them. "This looks to me like Three Waters from the back door. "You can kick the can down the road and borrow recklessly, but I appeal to you to act boldly on behalf of the people." Submitters also voiced concerns about allowing an unelected and "unaccountable" organisation to take control of water services. "How do we maintain the ownership and the status of [water] assets in the hands of the people of Marlborough, when we're divesting them to an unelected group?" Hynd said. Submitter Bob Watson said he was worried about the potential to more easily privatise a separate organisation, pointing how the United Kingdom's water management became privatised. Ten regional water authorities were formed in 1974, which the UK government then sold to the private sector in 1989. "I think that the potential for private ownership ... basically our water utilities to be sold off to another entity, and for us to lose the democratic voice, would be terrible," Watson said. "I like the idea that [we're] here with people that have represented the community who can speak for us." The coalition Government had previously said that privatisation of water services was not on the table. The council would make its final decision on water services delivery on June 26, and submit its plan to the Government for approval by 3 September . LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
