logo
Millions of Brits risk ‘gradually wrecking' their motor with poor washing routine – three issues could cost £1,000s

Millions of Brits risk ‘gradually wrecking' their motor with poor washing routine – three issues could cost £1,000s

The Sun17-05-2025

OVER 11 million motorists are damaging their cars by washing them incorrectly – a costly mistake that could leave you £1,000s out of pocket.
Recent statistics highlight Britain's car washing habits, with a significant number of drivers unknowingly risking serious harm to their vehicle's paintwork.
4
4
4
4
After surveying more than 1,000 car owners about their washing routines, Auto Express found that a large portion of Brits are relying solely on automatic car washes, while nearly one in 10 (9%) don't clean their cars at all.
What's more, while most drivers – 61%, according to the findings – wash their cars themselves, 15% only ever use an automatic car wash, while a further 16% use one sometimes.
But while the estimated 11.2 million drivers who put their cars through an automatic wash may think they are doing better than the 2 million that admit they don't wash their cars at all, the wrong method can do far more harm than good.
Speaking exclusively to Sun Motors, Tom Jervis, Consumer Editor at Auto Express, said: 'Most drivers think a quick run through an automatic car wash is doing their car a favour, but in reality, this is gradually wrecking the paintwork.
'The worst offenders are drive-through washes with old-style hard nylon brushes.
'They are not great because they pick up all the dirt and grit from all the previous cars, and it then gets rotated repeatedly over the paint.
'They can also rip off trim or a wiper and then drag it along the car.
'They don't do a great job either, as they miss bits like the inside of wheels or the corners by the number plate.
'And it is not just the automatic washes that are causing problems – poor car washing practices which use acidic chemicals, rough cloths, dirt-laden brushes – are leaving behind thousands of pounds' worth of damage in the form of micro-scratches, dulled paint, and damaged alloys.'
CLEAN SWEEP
Thankfully, washing your car carefully and efficiently doesn't have to be hard work – or even costly.
I drove the Aston Martin Vantage Roadster -it's a car which cries out to be driven hard & will get you a nod of appreciation wherever you go
Firstly, and unsurprisingly, Tom urges drivers to avoid automatic car washes.
He said: 'Though newer automatic washes use softer microfibre brushes, they still often recycle dirt from previous cars.
'They also miss the details – like wheel arches and number plate corners – and can trigger boot sensors mid-wash, causing a real mess.
'If you must use one, pick a service that includes a human pre-wash and uses non-contact methods where possible.'
Furthermore, he also advises car owners to steer clear of roadside hand car washes.
'Always check online reviews and get there early in the day when the cloths, mitts, and water are clean,' Tom said.
'Look out for a proper pre-wash using snow foam – not acidic traffic film removers, which some car washers mix up to be far too strong thinking it will work better.
'But it doesn't and can end up marking alloy trims and stripping the lustre off window rubbers.
'They also tend to slop on painted tyre shine, which may look good while the car is stationary, but as soon as you drive off, it gets flung onto the side of your car.'
Tom even suggests being careful with jet washes, like the ones you find at a petrol station.
'I can see the attraction of these if you can't access a hose at home; using a communal jet wash at a petrol station gives you more control,' Tom said.
'But don't trust the communal brush – they are usually caked in grit from the last user. You're better off bringing your own bucket, washing mitt, and just using the lance.'
DOS AND DON'TS
When hand-washing your car - which Tom suggests is the 'safest and most effective method' - pre-washing to remove loose dirt before touching the paint is essential, and using snow foam or a pre-cleaner and rinsing thoroughly can help prevent scratches.
Auto Express' 2025 Product of the Year winner, the Hydro V2, priced at £24.99, makes dispensing spray foams and coatings simple while ensuring precise ratios.
A straightforward yet effective technique is the dual-bucket method, which consists of one bucket for clean water and another for rinsing, both equipped with grit guards to keep dirt from contaminating your mitt.
For those without access to water, a waterless wash offers an excellent alternative – such as the CarPro ECH20, priced at £9.95 for 500ml, which earned Auto Express' 2025 Waterless Wash Product of the Year.
When paired with microfibre cloths, it cuts through dirt effortlessly and leaves a brilliant shine.
When washing, fine swirls and cobweb-like marks can dull your car's finish over time.
These can be avoided by using proper washing techniques and protecting the paintwork with car wax, sealant, or ceramic coating to guard against future damage.
Bilt-Hamber's Double Speed-Wax, priced at £16.95 for 250ml, and Shelby Ceramic Coating, £34.99 for 50ml, are Auto Express' top recommendations.
For cars already showing fine scratches or swirl marks, a mild abrasive polish – also known as a colour restorer or T-cut – can be used to gently level the clear coat, either by hand or with a dual-action machine polisher.
The Diamondbrite Diamond Cut, priced at £9.99 for 500ml, was recently named Auto Express' Colour Restorer of the Year.
Deeper imperfections can be addressed with a paint depth gauge to ensure repairs stay within safe limits and avoid permanent damage.
Even after washing, bonded contaminants may remain on the surface. Using a clay bar, such as Autoglym Ceramic Wash & Protect (£25 for 1000ml), can remove these residues and leave the paintwork ultra-smooth.
TIME TO WASH
While car washing in the summer can be a tad more pleasant than the same process in the chilly winter, doing it in strong sun can cause water and products to dry too fast – reducing effectiveness and even risking chemical staining or streaks.
What's more, driving to dry your car can also leave streaks – which is why experts recommend a blow dryer or folded microfibre cloths to soak up water efficiently.
And this begs the question, how often should you wash your car?
According to Auto Express' survey, while nearly one in five car owners clean their motor every week or every month, some clean theirs every two weeks.
But 18% admit they wash their car less than monthly, while nearly one in three said the rising cost of living meant they are more likely to wash their cars themselves instead of paying for a car wash service.
He said: 'As a rule of thumb, washing your car every couple of weeks is usually enough to keep it in good condition.
'If your car is garaged or well protected with a ceramic coating, you can probably stretch it to once a month without doing any harm, but if you live near the coast, drive on muddy country roads or park under trees, you might need to clean it weekly to prevent damage from salt, grit, bird droppings or sap.
'What's really important is that if your car gets particularly dirty – even just in one spot – you clean it off as soon as possible.
'Things like bird mess and road salt can quickly cause permanent damage to your paintwork if they're left.'
But can you wash your car too often?
'You can only wash your car too often if you're doing it wrong,' said Tom.
'The act of washing won't harm your car, but bad technique – using dirty cloths, old sponges, or harsh chemicals – will.
'Just keep to our Dos and Don'ts from above and you can wash your car as often as you like without doing any damage.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla's Optimus humanoid robot program head exiting firm, Bloomberg News reports
Tesla's Optimus humanoid robot program head exiting firm, Bloomberg News reports

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Tesla's Optimus humanoid robot program head exiting firm, Bloomberg News reports

June 6 (Reuters) - The head of Tesla's (TSLA.O), opens new tab Optimus program, Milan Kovac, is leaving the company, casting uncertainty over chief executive Elon Musk's humanoid robot project, Bloomberg News reported on Friday, citing a person familiar with the matter. Kovac, vice president and head of engineering for Optimus, told colleagues on Friday that he was departing, effective immediately. Ashok Elluswamy, who leads Tesla's autopilot teams, will take on Kovac's role, the report said. Tesla, Kovac and Elluswamy did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. Musk has earlier said he expected Tesla to make thousands of Optimus robots this year. He said in April that China's export restrictions on rare-earth magnets had affected production of the humanoid robots. Tesla has shifted focus to launching the robots and its robotaxi service, with much of the company's valuation hanging on that bet. "The only things that matter in the long term are autonomy and Optimus," Musk told CNBC in an interview in May.

RAY MASSEY: New electric Mini Aceman packs a bit of poke
RAY MASSEY: New electric Mini Aceman packs a bit of poke

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

RAY MASSEY: New electric Mini Aceman packs a bit of poke

Back in the days when Britain really could do 'stuff', we invented the Mini. And not just A Mini. The Mini. Launched in 1959 by design genius Sir Alec Issigonis, this slight but powerful car became an icon of the Swinging Sixties. Measuring 10ft long (just over 3m) it really was small – a point worth reinforcing for those more used to its 21st century incarnations. It passed into the hands of Germany's BMW in 1994, who helmed the next four generations, the latest of which – the all-electric five-door Mini John Cooper Works (JCW) Aceman – I've just been driving. Measuring more than 4m and weighing 1,820kg, it is significantly heavier than the original's 590kg. Progress! Yet it too is a Mini. It also has a very sporty 'John Cooper' twist, made visible by specific exterior JCW bodywork tweaks, interior trim, and the red, black and white JCW logo. The new range-topping JCW Aceman compact SUV, like all in the Mini Aceman range, is available only as an electric. Powered by a 54.2kWh battery, it develops a maximum 255hp which propels it from rest to 62mph in a sprightly 6.4 seconds and up to 124mph. The front-wheel drive JCW is agile and grippy, giving a good lick on the straight and offering a blast around the Cotswold country lanes where I drove it. But you do need to keep a firm grip on the steering wheel to keep the power under control. The racing-inspired interior with high-sitting seats are great, but the rear is a bit of a squeeze even for four, never mind the claimed five, with a compact 300-litre boot. A 24cm, circular digital screen dominates the central dashboard and holds all the information the driver needs. It has seven driving modes, including 'go-kart' option. Claimed range is 243 miles, though real-world range is likely closer to 200. This Aceman doesn't come cheap: prices start from £40,920, putting it into the higher 'Tesla Tax' bracket for EV Vehicle Excise Duty. My car cost £44,570, thanks to extras including £550 for the British Racing Green paint and £3,800 for a 'Level 3' pack, which included a panoramic glass sunroof, front heated and electric memory seats and adaptive LED headlights. The sibling two-door JCW Electric hatchback starts from £39,120. It may be a compact SUV but the JCW Aceman still a far cry in size from the original 10ft long Mini – being more than a meter longer (4.08m compared to 3.05m). At nearly 2m wide it's also much broader (1.99m compared to 1.41m) and also taller (1.51m against 1.35m). At 1.820kg it's also around three times the unladen weight of the original Mini at 590kg. Roof rails are standard as are the larger 19-inch wheels and sports tyres on which it runs (the hatchback version has 18 inch wheels) with red painted brake callipers. Range finder The JCW Aceman has a claimed range of 243 miles, though real-world range is likely closer to 200 miles. An 80 per cent charge at a fast-charging station takes under 30 minutes, says Mini. Rivals It may be premium and a tad niche, but the JCW Aceman is in a competitive market for feisty compact SUVs at a time when prices generally are dropping because of sluggish sales, the influx of cheaper Chinese rivals, and discounts from car-makers desperate to avoid controversial ZEV mandate fines for selling too few electric cars to meet imposed government targets. Rivals include the Volvo EX30, Abarth 600e, Alfa Romeo Junior Veloce, and the Smart #1. Summing up its latest model, Mini notes: 'Over six decades ago designer John Cooper developed a sportier version of the classic Mini, becoming an instant success on racetracks and rally courses globally before the name was cemented in history with three victories at the Monte Carlo Rally across the 1960s. 'John Cooper Works has been transferring this success from the racetrack onto traditional MINI models ever since.' VERDICT The new range-topping JCW Aceman is a fun, fast and agile compact SUV that's marginally more practical - if slightly slower – than its hatchback sibling. But while extremely sprightly, it's go-kart handling does need to be controlled as raw power seems to have been promoted at the expense of performance finesse. And it's not cheap. And while German-owned MINI may still class it as a British 'brand', the new Aceman is currently built 5,000 miles from Oxford in Zhangjiagang, China. There were plans to build it in the UK, along with a reintroduced electric Mini hatchback. But in February BMW paused a planned £600m investment (announced in September 2023) to electrify its Oxford factory, citing 'multiple uncertainties facing the automotive industry' including a slower than expected take-up of EVs. Legend has it the original Mini of the Swinging Sixties never made a profit. That's not a mistake current owners BMW are ever likely to make. Kia unveils new generation Sportage SUV Kia has unveiled the sleek new generation version of its popular Sportage SUV. With mild styling tweaks, the new Sportage has an upgraded interior and offers a choice of petrol, hybrid and plug-in hybrid powertrains. Despite a slightly shortened wheelbase, it still offers more than one metre of rear legroom, and up to 1,776 litres boot capacity with second-row seats folded. As a rival to Skoda's Karoq and the Nissan Qashqai, expect prices from around £33,000 with first UK deliveries from this autumn. The five-seater SUV comes in three trim levels and with a choice of 17, 18, and 19in wheels, including exclusive designs for the higher spec versions. The Kia Sportage was the UK's second best-selling car last year (after the Ford Puma) and more than 124,000 of the current model have been sold since 2022, with more than 7 million Sportages sold globally.

Angela Rayner blocks plans for huge film studio in countryside village
Angela Rayner blocks plans for huge film studio in countryside village

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Angela Rayner blocks plans for huge film studio in countryside village

Angela Rayner has blocked plans for a new film studio the size of 66 football pitches in a Berkshire village. The Housing Secretary said plans for the studios, which would have been the third-largest in the UK, would have been harmful to the green belt and backed claims they were 'simply not needed'. Greystoke Land, an investment company, applied for planning permission to build the complex next to the village of Holyport, near Maidenhead, in 2022. The £260 million plans included sound stages, workshops, offices, a multi-storey car park and a roundabout. It would also have included a 'media village' with a virtual reality studio and an area for open-air filming. Studios 'simply not needed' Councillors at the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead rejected the application in March 2024, as they agreed with a planning report that said green belt development should only be allowed in 'very special circumstances' and that the studios were 'simply not needed'. The council said the case for the studio was 'overstated' because several others had already been built nearby. It also made the case that less TV and film are being made in the UK, citing statistics from the British Film Institute that the production volume fell by a quarter between 2022 and 2024. The company argued that the studios would provide economic benefits to the local area, and that the threat to green belt land had been 'exaggerated' by the council. The site, which spans more than 100 acres, is currently made up of fields on either side of a narrow lane near the village of Holyport, which dates back to the 13th century and was once home to the British racing driver Stirling Moss. The studio developers said the project offered 'the opportunity to create an entirely new film studio complex directing hundreds of millions of pounds of new investment into the local economy, and creating hundreds of new jobs'. Not considered 'alternative sites' The company's appeal was heard in November, then 'called in' by Ms Rayner's department for a final decision to be taken by ministers. She agreed with planning inspectors that 'there is likely to be sufficient capacity within existing studio space' for the industry in Berkshire and the rest of the South East 'for the immediate future'. She also argued that Greystoke had not searched enough for 'reasonably alternative sites' that would not have such a significant impact on the green belt. Responding to the appeal, the junior minister Matthew Pennycook said Ms Rayner was 'not persuaded that a clear and convincing need case has been demonstrated'. In a letter published on Friday, he insisted that the Government supports 'the growth of the creative industries in the UK'. But he said that the harm to green belt land 'is not clearly outweighed by other considerations and therefore there are no very special circumstances which would justify this development'. Labour to reduce green belt protections It comes despite Labour plans to relax protections for the green belt, which the Government said would help drive economic growth and the housing supply. Countryside campaigners have opposed the reforms, which made it easier to receive planning permission for green belt projects, especially on sites that have already been developed, now known as the 'grey belt'. Sir Keir Starmer said in December that he wanted to 'get the balance right with nature and the environment'. But he said that 'a human being wanting to have a house' would be the Government's priority, rather than protecting unspoiled land or commercial developments. The new grey belt is defined as green belt land that 'does not strongly contribute to green belt purposes,' which include limiting urban sprawl, stopping towns merging into one another and preserving historical character.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store