logo
NM governor wants $50 million for tribal education

NM governor wants $50 million for tribal education

Yahoo28-01-2025

Rep. Derrick Lente, D-Sandia Pueblo, sits in his office in the Roundhouse on Jan. 22, 2025. Credit: Bella Davis/New Mexico In Depth
Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham is seeking $50 million for educational programs for Indigenous children in the next fiscal year, and she wants most of it to go directly to tribes, getting rid of a grant process that's prevented tribal officials from making full use of state funding.
The move comes after years of advocacy at the Roundhouse for the Tribal Remedy Framework, a plan for giving Indigenous children an education that incorporates their cultural experiences and knowledge and results in better academic outcomes.
This story was originally published by New Mexico In Depth
Indigenous education experts and tribal communities created the framework in the wake of the 2018 Yazzie-Martinez court ruling, in which a state judge found New Mexico had failed to provide a sufficient education to a majority of students, including Indigenous children. (In September, the plaintiffs filed a motion arguing the state hasn't complied with the ruling.)
'To push back on decades worth of bad federal policy and state paternalism that sought to assimilate our people and take away our languages and take away how we learn, it's been a fight,' said Derrick Lente, a Democrat from Sandia Pueblo who's run a number of tribal education bills over the past eight years. 'But now there seems to be an appreciation about, yes, in fact, tribes do know what's best for their children.'
The governor's $10.9 billion budget recommendation includes, like last year, $20 million in recurring funding to the Indian Education Fund, set up by the 2003 New Mexico Indian Education Act. But she's also proposing an additional, nonrecurring $30 million per year to the fund over the next three years, according to spokesperson Michael Coleman.
The Public Education Department (PED) is working to change the way that funding would make its way to tribes and how much they'd get.
Under a proposed rule change, 70% of the fund would be allocated to tribes automatically, said KatieAnn Juanico (Acoma Pueblo), the assistant secretary of PED's Indian Education Division. The rest would go to local education agencies and Bureau of Indian Education tribally-controlled schools, which, unlike tribes, would still need to apply for grants from the fund.
A distribution formula for tribes, Juanico said, factors in student counts and students with an individualized education plan.
The department is accepting feedback from tribal leaders, she said.
The proposal, if approved, would alter the existing system in which tribes can apply for one or two-year grants and, if approved, must first spend the money from their own coffers before applying for reimbursement from the state. Challenges including slow processing by PED and understaffing in tribal departments have made it difficult for tribes to spend the total amounts and develop long-term projects.
Last year, Lente co-sponsored a bill that sought to change that, sending funds out to tribes automatically and allowing them to carry over any unspent dollars. The House Education Committee passed the bill but it didn't get another hearing.
And during the two previous legislative sessions, Lente, along with four other Indigenous lawmakers, sponsored a bill to create a trust fund that would've earned interest for tribes to spend on language revitalization, career readiness, and other education initiatives.
Lujan Grisham said last year she supported the idea, and the state budget lawmakers sent to her desk included $50 million for the trust fund, conditional on the bill being enacted. The House passed the bill unanimously, but Lente pulled it after learning several amendments were going to be introduced on the Senate floor.
Before this year's session, Lente said, he sat down with Native advocates and education experts who make up a coalition called the Tribal Education Alliance to talk about potential legislation.
'I had to take a step back and really just have a heart-to-heart with all of them and say, 'It seems like now [PED] is speaking our language. They're saying the things that we used to have to argue with them about, and the Legislature understands it much better than ever before.' We still have to advocate, don't get me wrong, but in terms of the heavy lifting, we weren't doing much of that heavy lifting,' Lente said.
He's supporting the governor's budget request and the rule change, rather than pushing his own bill through the Legislature.
During her address last week, Lujan Grisham thanked 'the leaders of our sovereign nations and many legislators who have been working all year long to figure out that vehicle and provide a proposal to the Legislature that we believe will have enormous, bipartisan support.'
Lujan Grisham credited Lente by name.
'While I've been the talking piece legislatively, I know that I've always simply been a part of the larger team,' Lente told New Mexico In Depth. 'That includes the tribal nations, all of those tribal education advocates, the students, the parents, the administrators, the list can go on and on, but in terms of where we were and where we're at today, it's truly been one of the honors of my political career to be a part of this.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Major projects will be slowed by court challenges if rights are violated: B.C. chief
Major projects will be slowed by court challenges if rights are violated: B.C. chief

Hamilton Spectator

time39 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Major projects will be slowed by court challenges if rights are violated: B.C. chief

OTTAWA - The regional chief for British Columbia said Wednesday that governments should not speed up major projects at the expense of First Nations rights — and warned that projects will be slowed down by court challenges if First Nations are not consulted from the start. 'We're asking the government to follow your own laws,' Terry Teegee said, citing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples that the federal government adopted. The government of Prime Minister Mark Carney introduced major economic legislation last week. The bill has two parts — one to break down federal barriers to internal trade and the other to fast-track major projects. It sets out five criteria to determine whether a project is in the 'national interest.' Those criteria include the project's likelihood of success, whether it would strengthen the country's resiliency and advance the interests of Indigenous Peoples, and whether it would contribute to economic growth in an environmentally responsible way. But First Nations leaders say their interests weren't considered when the legislation was being drafted and they were given just one week to review and bring comments forward on a briefing document on the bill. 'It's probably going to take a lot longer to get approval for some of these projects because we're going to end up in court,' Teegee said. 'This is where we end up.' The national chief of the Assembly of First Nations agreed. 'It's not about the bill itself. It's about the process. And I think that ramming something through when you should be hearing from Canadians, from industry, from First Nations … is the wrong way to go,' Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said. 'You don't want to end back up in court. You don't want to have civil unrest. Why not just invite us to the table?' First Nations leaders have warned that widespread protests and blockades are possible if governments don't obtain affected Indigenous communities' free, prior and informed consent, as required by the UN declaration. The federal government has said that declaration doesn't amount to a veto — a statement Justice Minister Sean Fraser walked back last week following criticism from Woodhouse Nepinak. Teegee said 'no government has a veto, meaning that when we come to a decision, all governments come into the room to make a decision together.' 'First Nations, certainly as a part of this, need to be part of the decision-making process,' he added. Even groups that generally support development are raising concerns about the federal government's plan. Mark Podlasly, CEO of the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, said he was 'surprised' First Nations were only given seven days to review parts of the legislation before it was introduced. 'The answer will not automatically be 'no' from First Nations when a project comes along. It's just that Indigenous rights and involvement has to not only be included, but respected. That hasn't happened a lot in the Canadian past,' he said. 'There's also a question on the environment, and there's a question about who bears the impact of these projects if they're rushed through. It's going to be Indigenous Peoples, especially in parts of the country where there's mining or energy sources (on lands) that are integral to our lifestyle, our cultural practices.' Podlasly said that while the federal legislation 'seems to have Indigenous participation at its core,' it's not clear what that participation will look like, especially under the tight two-year approval timeline the government seeks. He said First Nations can support projects and many do — but they don't want to be 'caught at the back end' of decisions made without their knowledge or consent. 'We're all operating with seven days' notice. That's what we're operating with. And time will tell,' he said. The Assembly of First Nations is holding an emergency chiefs meeting on Monday to discuss what to do next. Woodhouse Nepinak vowed to follow their direction and said a legal review of the legislation is ongoing. 'We need time,' Woodhouse Nepinak said. 'And we're not being given that time.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Bill allowing anyone 18 or older to conceal carry passes NC House, headed to governor
Bill allowing anyone 18 or older to conceal carry passes NC House, headed to governor

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Bill allowing anyone 18 or older to conceal carry passes NC House, headed to governor

RALEIGH, N.C. (WNCN) — Despite two Republican lawmakers siding with Democrats in opposition, a bill allowing people as young as 18 to carry a gun without a permit in the state, is headed to the Governor's office. Republican sponsors of the bill say it only enshrines the right to carry a weapon to law-abiding citizens. Rep. Jay Adams (R-Catawba) said in defense of the bill, ' States have done this…we're close to 50% of the country…this is really not going to affect criminal behavior…this is going to benefit law abiding citizens.' Democrats opposed the bill, saying it'll only lead to more gun violence and put guns into the hands of teenagers who aren't old enough to understand the true dangers of guns. 'Studies have shown that permit-less concealed carry increases violence and death,' Rep. Phil Rubin (D-Wake) said. The final vote came after a second reading in which 54 voted in favor and 48 voted against. The bill now heads to Gov. Josh Stein's desk, where he can sign it into law or veto the bill. If Stein vetoes SB50, House Republicans would need every single Republican and one Democrat to vote to override that veto. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

A bid for bail by former New Jersey US Sen. Menendez is rejected by appeals court as prison looms
A bid for bail by former New Jersey US Sen. Menendez is rejected by appeals court as prison looms

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

A bid for bail by former New Jersey US Sen. Menendez is rejected by appeals court as prison looms

NEW YORK (AP) — A bid for bail by former U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez while he appeals his bribery conviction was rejected Wednesday by a federal appeals court, a week before the veteran New Jersey politician is scheduled to report to prison. Menendez, 71, was convicted last July of selling his clout for bribes. FBI agents who searched his home three years ago found $480,000, some of it stuffed inside boots and jacket pockets, gold bars worth an estimated $150,000 and a luxury convertible in the garage. Prosecutors said that in exchange, Menendez performed corrupt favors for the New Jersey business owners. They said he tried to protect the men and associates from criminal investigations, helped two in business deals with foreign powers and met with Egyptian intelligence officials before helping that country access $300 million in U.S. military aid. Menendez, a Democrat, has insisted that he is innocent and is seeking to overturn his conviction. He is scheduled to surrender to federal prison authorities on Tuesday. A three-judge panel on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied his bail motion in a brief order issued Wednesday. The decision did not include a rationale, but it said one of the three judges would have granted the motion. An email seeking comment was sent to his attorneys. Menendez, who once served as chair of the influential Senate Foreign Relations Committee, resigned his seat a month after his conviction. He had been in the Senate since 2006. Two business owners also were convicted last year along with Menendez. His wife, Nadine Menendez, was convicted in April of teaming up with her husband to accept bribes from the business owners. Her trial was delayed after she was diagnosed with breast cancer and required surgery. Her sentencing has been set for Sept. 11.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store