
Pune digital arrest case: Pimpri Chinchwad police arrest two with ‘mule' accounts
Pune: Pimpri Chinchwad police's cyber wing arrested two men from Ahilyanagar district on Monday, in connection with the alleged "digital arrest" of a 47-year-old Pune man who lost Rs 53 lakh to fraudsters.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Police claimed the arrested duo from Bolhegaon in Ahilyanagar district — one's a farmer while the other works at a finance company — allowed their bank accounts to be used as "mule accounts". Stolen money would be wired to their accounts and the duo would then withdraw the cash to hand it over to their handlers, the authorities alleged.
"Their handler is also from the same village, but is currently based in Pune. Our investigations show the handler had created at least 20 mule accounts in this village.
The details of these accounts were handed over to fraudsters based out of Maharashtra," said assistant inspector Pravin Swami, of Pimpri Chinchwad cyber police.
The two men arrested on Monday were identified as Akash Pathare (28) and Avinash Tungar (27). They were held as the police investigate the complaint by a Moshi resident who said that on April 2 he received a "letter" via a messaging app that claimed his bank account was being used to launder money and that he faced arrest.
One police official said: "The person at the other end told the Moshi resident he was an 'officer' with the Mumbai crime branch. He told the victim the cops and the bank needed to verify his bank account through a money transfer. The victim was even told the bank would return the money to him immediately after verification. Believing all this, the Moshi man transferred Rs 53 lakh to the three bank account numbers given to him.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
He never got the money back."
Senior inspector Ravikiran Nale of Pimpri Chinchwad cyber police told TOI that during their investigation, they found Rs 5.4 lakh of the money was transferred to a private bank's account. "So we took the details of this account holder from the bank and found that it was in Ahilyanagar district. We arrested Pathare who revealed three more names. We then arrested Tungar. A search is on for the two others," Nale said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
33 minutes ago
- News18
Director Kawal Sharma, Absconding Since 2022, Nabbed by Uttarakhand Police
Last Updated: Kawal Sharma cheque bounce case: Bollywood filmmaker known for directing films with Sanjay Dutt and Govinda, was arrested in Mumbai after evading a court sentence since 2022. Kawal Sharma Cheque Bounce Case: Filmmaker Kawal Sharma, known for directing popular Hindi films with actors like Sanjay Dutt, Mithun Chakraborty, Govinda, and Jeetendra, has been arrested in Mumbai after evading a court sentence for nearly two years. Sharma, who has helmed films like Jeete Hain Shaan Se (1987), Maalamaal (1988), Mar Mitenge (1988), Namak (1996), and Heeralal Pannalal (1999), was taken into custody by the Haldwani Police from City Mall in Andheri on June 7, 2025. According to Samachar Shagun, the arrest was carried out by a team led by Haldwani police officer Rajesh Yadav. The case against Sharma dates back to 2013, during the time of his film Delhi Eye. He had reportedly borrowed Rs 25 lakh from a businessman and supermodel, with the promise to return Rs 50 lakh within 30 days of the film's release. Sharma issued a cheque for the promised amount, but it bounced — leading to legal action under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The businessman lodged a formal complaint in 2015, and on January 17, 2019, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Haldwani sentenced Sharma to one year in jail and imposed a fine of Rs 51.10 lakh. Though Sharma secured bail from the District and Sessions Judge in Nainital a month later, his appeal was dismissed in 2022. Following the rejection of his appeal, Sharma failed to comply with court orders and disappeared. He ignored multiple summons, warrants, and even public notices issued in Mumbai newspapers. He claimed he was unable to appear due to financial troubles and fear of imprisonment. Eventually, a non-bailable warrant was issued after an FIR (No. 0-37/2024) was filed at Kotwali Haldwani under IPC Sections 229K and 174K for his continued absence and failure to cooperate with the legal process. Reports state that Kawal Sharma will now be taken to Uttarakhand for the next phase of legal proceedings. First Published:


India.com
34 minutes ago
- India.com
Meghalaya Honeymoon Murder: Viral Wedding Video Of Unhappy Sonam Raghuvanshi Sparks Outrage After Her Arrest
A viral wedding video showing Sonam Raghuvanshi appearing "unhappy" as her husband, Raja Raghuvanshi, applied sindoor to her forehead has ignited social media debates following her arrest in the chilling Meghalaya honeymoon murder case. Sonam, accused of orchestrating her husband's murder, surrendered in Uttar Pradesh on Monday, June 9, after a two-week manhunt. Wedding Video Fuels Speculation The brief video, which has gone viral on sites such as X, showed Raja, 29, putting vermilion on Sonam's forehead at their May 11 wedding in Indore. Netizens have flagged Sonam's face, calling her "clearly not happy," and generating gossip about what may have motivated her. The clip emerged just hours after Sonam, 24, was arrested at a dhaba in Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, on June 9, when the body of Raja was found dumped in a Meghalaya gorge on June 2. Just take a look at this wedding video of Sonam and Raja Raghuvanshi and you will agree that Sonam was clearly not happy with this marriage. Raja Raghuvanshi would have been alive if Sonam had said No to the marriage. She had the courage to hire contract killers but didn't had… — Incognito (@Incognito_qfs) June 9, 2025 Murder Investigation And Arrests Meghalaya Police accused Sonam of contracting killers, including her suspected paramour Raj Kushwaha, to kill Raja on their honeymoon in Sohra, East Khasi Hills. Raja's body, discovered in a gorge by Weisawdong Falls, had two head injuries from a sharp instrument, probably a bloodied machete recovered in the area. A missing gold chain and ring worth Rs 10 lakh heightened suspicions of criminality. Four others—Akash Rajput, Vishal Singh Chauhan, Raj Kushwaha, and Anand Patel—were detained in Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. On Monday, an Indore court gave seven-day transit remand to Rajput, Chauhan, and Kushwaha, who were also medically examined before being handed over to Meghalaya Police for further interrogation. Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police Rajesh Dandotia confirmed the suspects did indeed know one another, two of whom were friends of Kushwaha, Sonam's alleged accomplice. Sonam's Innocence Claims Sonam insisted that she was a victim, not the offender, alleging she was kidnapped and looted, waking up in Ghazipur without any recollection of what happened over the previous days. Her father, Devi Singh, vouches for her innocence, blaming Meghalaya Police for lying about the case and requesting a CBI investigation. But police point to CCTV images, call details, and Sonam's supposed collaboration with Kushwaha as proof of a premeditated conspiracy. Family And Public Responses Raja's mother, Uma Raghuvanshi, disclosed that Sonam demanded Raja be dressed in costly jewellery, valued at Rs 10 lakh, for the journey, fueling rumours about her motives. Raja's brother Vipul mentioned the quick change of plans by the couple from going to Kamakhya Temple in Guwahati to Shillong, which Sonam organized. On X, there has been public outrage, with users blaming Sonam's supposed betrayal and wondering why she could not have rejected the arranged marriage. Investigation Continues Meghalaya Police, with SP Vivek Syiem leading the charge, are bringing Sonam to Shillong for a crime scene reenactment. A Special Investigation Team (SIT) continued investigating the case, and one suspect remained on the loose. Chief Minister Conrad Sangma commended the police action, which was taken quickly, highlighting Meghalaya's safety as a tourist destination despite the high-profile crime.


Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Office ke bahar 10 bande le aaunga': Delhi employer's hiring nightmare as new recruit demands one-day salary
Hiring someone for the first time is supposed to be exciting, but for one man in Delhi, it turned into a terrifying experience. In a post shared on Reddit, a young employer working at his father's furniture shop claimed a new employee made excuses, disappeared with money, and later threatened him with violence. The employer had hired the man through a popular job portal. But the employee didn't turn up on the agreed joining date. 'He delayed joining for 3–4 days, saying he was unwell,' the employer wrote. When he finally arrived, the employer wasn't in the office. The employee called, saying he came only to talk to him. The next day, he worked a little and asked for Rs 500, saying he needed it for an ultrasound. Then came the money demands After receiving the Rs 500, the employee vanished again. Later, he started demanding more money. When the employer refused, he allegedly threatened him, saying, 'Office ke bahar 10 bande le aaunga kal' (I'll bring 10 men outside your office tomorrow). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Kulkas yang belum Terjual dengan Harga Termurah (Lihat harga) Cari Sekarang Undo The threat deeply unsettled the employer. Though he believed the man was bluffing, the thought of him showing up with people was scary. 'He said I worked one day. You promised Rs 25,000/month, so I'm owed Rs 850,' the post added. Social media users react People on Reddit quickly responded. One user wrote, 'Don't think someone threatening over Rs 350 can do much. But always stay cautious.' Another asked if the employer had a signed contract with terms and conditions. 'In the future, always get a written agreement,' they advised. Live Events A helpful user suggested reporting the man's profile on the job portal. 'Send him a formal email saying he was paid Rs 500 for the hours he worked. Let him know his employment is terminated. Tell him that if he threatens again, you'll file a police complaint.' Another said, 'He's clearly a fraud. Don't be scared. Block him and move on. Just do a proper background check next time.' Inputs from agencies