Native leaders blast construction of Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' on land they call sacred
Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis ' administration is racing ahead with construction of a makeshift immigration detention facility at an airstrip in the Everglades over the opposition of Native American leaders who consider the area their sacred ancestral homelands.
A string of portable generators and dump trucks loaded with fill dirt streamed into the site on Thursday, according to activist Jessica Namath, who witnessed the activity. The state is plowing ahead with building a compound of heavy-duty tents, trailers and other temporary buildings at the county-owned airfield located in the Big Cypress National Preserve, about 45 miles (72 kilometers) west of downtown Miami.
A spokesperson for the Florida Division of Emergency Management, which is helping lead the project, did not respond to requests for comment.
State officials have characterized the site as an ideal place to hold migrants, saying there's 'not much' there other than pythons and alligators.
Indigenous leaders who can trace their roots to the area back thousands of years dispute that — and they're condemning the state's plans to build what's been dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz ' on their homelands.
For generations, the sweeping wetlands of what is now South Florida have been home to Native peoples who today make up the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida and the Seminole Tribe of Florida, as well as the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma.
'Rather than Miccosukee homelands being an uninhabited wasteland for alligators and pythons, as some have suggested, the Big Cypress is the Tribe's traditional homelands. The landscape has protected the Miccosukee and Seminole people for generations,' Miccosukee Chairman Talbert Cypress wrote in a statement on social media.
There are 15 remaining traditional Miccosukee and Seminole villages in Big Cypress, as well as ceremonial and burial grounds and other gathering sites, Cypress testified before Congress in 2024.
'We live here. Our ancestors fought and died here. They are buried here,' he said. 'The Big Cypress is part of us, and we are a part of it.'
Critics have condemned the facility and what they call the state's apparent reliance on alligators as a security measure as a cruel spectacle, while DeSantis and other state officials have defended it as part of Florida's muscular efforts to carry out President Donald Trump 's immigration crackdown.
Tribal leaders and environmentalists are urging the state to change course, noting billions of dollars in state and federal funds have been poured into Everglades restoration in recent years, an investment they say is jeopardized by plans to house some 1,000 migrants at the site for an undetermined amount of time.
Indigenous leaders and activists are planning to gather at the site again on Saturday to stage a demonstration highlighting why the area is 'sacred' and should be 'protected, not destroyed.'
'This place became our refuge in time of war. It provides us a place to continue our culture and traditions,' Miccosukee leader Betty Osceola wrote in a social media post announcing the demonstration.
'And we need to protect it for our future generations,' she added.
___ Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump's justice department sues entire bench of Maryland judges over order restricting deportations
Donald Trump's justice department has sued the federal judiciary in Maryland over an order that bars the government from deporting undocumented immigrants for at least one day after they file a legal challenge to their detention. Chad Gilmartin, a spokesperson for Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, said in a post on X on Wednesday: 'This is just the latest action by @AGPamBondi's DOJ to rein in unlawful judicial overreach.' The state's federal court issued an order last month aimed at managing a wave of lawsuits challenging the Trump administration's moves to swiftly deport undocumented migrants. Maryland's federal court was the site of one of the most contentious cases under Trump's deportation policy when Kilmar Ábrego García, a Salvadoran national, was deported and later sent back to the US after the supreme court ordered the administration to 'facilitate' his return. Ábrego García is currently facing federal charges of unlawfully trafficking undocumented immigrants. Last week, the supreme court also ruled that the administration can resume deporting migrants to countries they are not from without additional due process requirements. The Department of Justice lawsuit against Maryland's federal judges includes Paula Xinis, the judge overseeing Ábrego García's case. Xinis is considering whether to sanction government officials for their initial refusal to facilitate Ábrego García's release from custody. The legal back-and-forth is part of an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and the federal judiciary over primacy in immigration matters, with some legal experts describing the move as an attack on judicial independence. Government lawyers argue in the lawsuit that the action 'involves yet another regrettable example of the unlawful use of equitable powers to restrain the executive'. The complaint alleges that Maryland's chief judge, George Russell, issued an 'unlawful, antidemocratic' order granting a two-day stay of deportation to any detainee in immigration custody who files a petition alleging wrongful detention. But the move to sue an entire bench of federal judges in a single district illustrates pressure coming from the Trump administration on the judiciary to fall in line with the administration's policies. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion 'A sense of frustration and a desire for greater convenience do not give defendants license to flout the law,' justice department attorneys wrote. 'Nor does their status within the judicial branch.' But the lawsuit was quickly condemned by Wes Moore. 'After blatantly violating judicial orders, and directing personal attacks on individual judges, the White House is turning our Constitution on its head by suing judges themselves,' the governor of Maryland said in a statement. 'Make no mistake: this unprecedented action is a transparent effort to intimidate judges and usurp the power of the courts.'
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Iran's top diplomat says talks with US 'complicated' by American strike on nuclear sites
Iran 's top diplomat said the possibility of new negotiations with the United States on his country's nuclear program has been 'complicated' by the American attack on three of the sites, which he conceded caused 'serious damage." The U.S. was one of the parties to the 2015 nuclear deal in which Iran agreed to limits on its uranium enrichment program in exchange for sanctions relief and other benefits. That deal unraveled after U.S. President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out unilaterally during his first term. Trump has suggested he is interested in new talks with Iran, and said that the two sides would meet next week. In an interview on Iranian state television broadcast late Thursday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi left open the possibility that his country would again enter talks on its nuclear program, but suggested it would not be anytime soon. 'No agreement has been made for resuming the negotiations,' he said. 'No time has been set, no promise has been made, and we haven't even talked about restarting the talks.' The American decision to intervene militarily 'made it more complicated and more difficult' for talks on Iran's nuclear program, Araghchi said. Israel attacked Iran on June 13, targeting its nuclear sites, defense systems, high-ranking military officials and atomic scientists in relentless attacks. In 12 days of strikes, Israel said it killed some 30 Iranian commanders and hit eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. More than 1,000 people were killed, including at least 417 civilians, according to the Washington-based Human Rights Activists group. Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted but those that got through caused damage in many areas and killed 28 people. The U.S. stepped in on Sunday to hit Iran's three most important strikes with a wave of cruise missiles and bunker-buster bombs dropped by B-2 bombers, designed to penetrate deep into the ground to damage the heavily-fortified targets. Iran, in retaliation, fired missiles at a U.S. base in Qatar on Monday but caused no known casualties. Trump said the American attacks 'completely and fully obliterated' Iran's nuclear program, though Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday accused the U.S. president of exaggerating the damage, saying the strikes did not 'achieve anything significant.' There has been speculation that Iran moved much of its highly-enriched uranium before the strikes, something that it told the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, that it planned to do. Even if that turns out to be true, IAEA Director Rafael Grossi told Radio France International that the damage done to the Fordo site, which was built into a mountain, 'is very, very, very considerable.' Among other things, he said, centrifuges are 'quite precise machines' and it's 'not possible' that the concussion from multiple 30,000-pound bombs would not have caused 'important physical damage.' 'These centrifuges are no longer operational,' he said. Araghchi himself acknowledged that 'the level of damage is high, and it's serious damage.' He added that Iran had not yet decided upon whether to allow IAEA inspectors in to assess the damage, but that they would be kept out 'for the time being.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Hegseth defends Iran strike amid doubts over Trump's ‘obliteration' claims
The US secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, has defended the US strikes on Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities and said that Donald Trump had 'decimated … obliterated' the country's nuclear program despite initial intelligence assessments that last week's strikes had failed to destroy key enrichment facilities and they could resume operations within just months. But he and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Gen Dan Caine, largely based that assessment on AI modeling, showing test videos of the 'bunker buster' bombs used in the strikes and referred questions on a battle damage assessment of Fordow to the intelligence community. Speaking from the Pentagon briefing room, Hegseth cast doubt on an initial assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency, noting it was 'preliminary' and 'leaked because someone had an agenda to try to muddy the waters and make it look like this historic strike wasn't successful'. Hegseth also said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said that Iran's 400kg stock of 60% enriched uranium could no longer be accounted for. 'I'm not aware of any intelligence … that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise,' Hegseth said. Hegseth also targeted the press for using leaked information in reports, as the Trump administration has indicated that it could target or even depose individual reporters for publishing the results of the initial assessment. 'Time and time again, classified information is leaked or peddled for political purposes to try to make the president look bad, and what's really happening is you're undermining the success of our incredible pilots,' Hegseth said. Caine said the strikes were successful insofar as the attack matched a model developed by the Pentagon that he said predicted the destruction of the Fordow site. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, claimed that the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites 'did not achieve anything' and Donald Trump had 'exaggerated' their impact, in his first public comments since the ceasefire with Israel was declared. The country's foreign minister later called the damage 'serious' but added that a detailed assessment was under way. Abbas Araghchi also shut down what he said was 'speculation' that Tehran would come to the table for new talks with the US and said it 'should not be taken seriously'. He also said a bill suspending cooperation with the IAEA was now 'binding' after being passed by Iranian lawmakers and approved by a top vetting body. During the US briefing on Thursday, Caine said that the strikes targeted two ventilation shafts leading into the Fordow underground complex. The first weapons were used to demolish concrete caps designed to prevent a similar attack, and then successive 'bunker buster' bombs were aimed down the shafts on each side in order to target the 'mission space', where Iranian centrifuges were located. The weapons were 'built, tested, and loaded properly'; they were 'released on speed and on parameters'; and the 'weapons all guided to their intended targets and to their intended aim points for the weapons function as designed, meaning they exploded'. 'The majority of the damage we assess based on our extensive modeling of the blast,' Caine said. 'The primary kill mechanism in the Mission Space was a mix of over-pressure and blast ripping through the open tunnels and destroying critical hardware.' Hegseth and Caine's appearance came one day after Trump faced questions over the strike at a Nato summit at The Hague and lashed out at reporters for publishing the results of the initial intelligence assessment that he claimed had denigrated the pilots of the B-2 bombers that led the attack. The report, which was published by the Defense Intelligence Agency, said that the US strike using 14 30,000lb 'bunker buster' GBU-57 bombs did not destroy the key components at the nuclear enrichment sites and probably only set back the Iranian nuclear program by a few months. Senior Trump intelligence officials on Wednesday claimed that there was 'new evidence' that showed the sites had been destroyed. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each. The CIA director, John Ratcliffe, in a statement said that new intelligence from a 'historically reliable' source indicated that 'several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' The director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, also said that 'new intelligence' showed that three nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan would take years to rebuild. Trump announced that Hegseth would give the press briefing to 'fight for the Dignity of our Great American Pilots'. 'These Patriots were very upset!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'After 36 hours of dangerously flying through Enemy Territory, they landed, they knew the Success was LEGENDARY, and then, two days later, they started reading Fake News by CNN and The Failing New York Times. They felt terribly!' Caine called operation Midnight Hammer, the codename for the strike against the Iranian nuclear sites, the 'culmination of 15 years of incredible work' by officers at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. 'In the case of Fordow, the Dtra team understood with a high degree of confidence the elements of the target required to kill its functions, and the weapons were designed, planned and delivered to ensure that they achieve the effects in the mission space,' Caine said. Yet the Guardian has previously reported that Dtra had briefed senior Pentagon officials that using conventional bombs, even as part of a wider strike package of several GBU-57s, would not penetrate deep enough underground and that it would only do enough damage to collapse tunnels and bury the Fordow enrichment site under rubble.
