Just Five Submissions Drip In On Tasman's Water Plan
Three Waters reform dominated headlines and generated public backlash for years but now only five Tasman residents have had their say on the future of the district's water.
The previous Labour Government's scrapped water policy, which would have rolled Tasman into larger regional water entities, received stiff opposition and 'Stop Three Waters' banners can still occasionally be seen across the wider region.
Tasman is now undertaking the necessary work to determine how its three waters services will be delivered under the Coalition Government's replacement policy, Local Water Done Well.
Consultation has been open on Tasman District Council's proposal for four weeks and closes at 4pm on Friday, but just five people have had their say, as of Monday morning.
Currently, the council is looking to manage its water in an internal business unit.
That approach would keep the council in control of its water infrastructure but wouldn't take advantage of the potential economies of scale that could be achieved if Tasman teamed up with its neighbours.
Despite the low engagement and importance of water services, the council's group manager for community infrastructure wasn't worried and thought the 'silent majority' had given the plan the thumbs up.
'I feel as though there's been no kind of angst in the community because, essentially, council's still running it,' Richard Kirby said.
Whatever option the council chooses will have a financial impact on residents when they receive their water bills in the future.
A multi-council organisation with Buller and Marlborough would be the cheapest option for water users, but financial modelling of the different options showed yearly water fees would only vary by $335 after a decade and so the council opted to retain direct control.
Reduced costs became more evident beyond 10 years under a combined approach, but Kirby said there are other opportunities to share services and reduce costs across the region in the future.
'We're still going to be having discussions with our neighbours.'
The proposed in-house approach will place 'a bit of stress' on the council as it upgrades its systems and changes its procedures, and water will no longer be subsidised by the hundreds of thousands in dividends from Port Nelson, he added.
Council's preferred approach will require Governmental approval and is expected to be implemented on 1 July 2027.
Nelson City Council only received 12 responses to its own Local Water Done Well consultation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
7 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Joint CCO best water option: Infometrics
A leading economist has voiced strong support for Southern Water Done Well's preferred water services delivery model, saying it offers the best pathway to safe, reliable water services and long-term financial benefits for the southern region. At a recent meeting of Southern Water Done Well (SWDW), political leaders and senior staff heard from Infometrics chief executive Brad Olsen and his views on water reforms. Southern Water Done Well project leader Andrew Strahan said Infometrics was provided with documents to review. Those included the latest Morrison Low report, which included work last year for the group of eight Southland and Otago councils, a peer review of the benefits, briefings for elected members and consultation documents. SWDW's four partner councils — Waitaki, Gore, Central Otago and Clutha district councils — are consulting on three options for the future delivery of water services to meet the government's Local Water Done Well legislation. Their preferred delivery model is a jointly owned council-controlled organisation (CCO). The Infometrics chief executive and principal economist agreed, saying it provided a strategic, carefully considered approach to meeting future water services challenges. "Status quo is just not going to cut it any more. And if it does, it'll become so expensive that the community won't tolerate it ... the government clearly isn't tolerating it already. "So, effectively, things needs to change." One of the most compelling advantages of SWDW's preferred model was the leap in bargaining power it delivered. Individually, the four councils each represented just 1% to 2% of the South Island's population, placing them 13th to 18th out of 23 South Island councils, in terms of scale. By forming a jointly owned CCO, they collectively moved into the fourth-largest position, representing 6.6% of the South Island's population. "That shift in scale is transformative," said Mr Olsen. "It gives councils and their communities far greater influence when negotiating with contractors, accessing skilled staff and securing funding. In a tight infrastructure market, scale gives you options and leverage." Even greater efficiencies would be gained if other councils were accepted into a jointly owned CCO at some point in the future. Mr Olsen noted SWDW's deliberately conservative approach to financial modelling for the jointly owned CCO and emphasised the importance of looking long-term. While short-term financial gains might be modest, water assets were long-term (20 years+) and by year 20, modelling for other joint water services delivery entities had shown potential savings of up to 20% compared to going it alone, he said. Just as significantly, the joint approach improved resilience, attracted talent and helped councils meet more demanding compliance standards without overburdening local ratepayers. Mr Olsen believed there was potential for even greater gains beyond initial projections. "We've reviewed the assumptions, and they're conservative. That's appropriate, given the significant changes that have to happen, but even under these conservative assumptions, the numbers still stack up." The conservative modelling still projected 15%-16% operating and capital efficiencies being achieved over "roughly a decade", which was "a similar timeframe to achieve efficiencies as seen in other spaces". Morrison Low's modelling of the benefits of a jointly owned CCO shows SWDW consumers would save $44 million by 2033-34 compared to where costs would otherwise increase to. In its first 10 years, the jointly owned CCO would deliver $82 million in savings to consumers. Olsen also highlighted that the proposed model retained community ownership while delivering greater long-term benefits through scale and co-ordination. Southern Water Done Well's preferred delivery model gave councils the scale, flexibility and financial sustainability they simply could not get on their own while retaining community ownership and voice, Mr Olsen said. Southern Water Done Well consultation closes this Friday.
NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Incumbent Phil Nixon announces bid to retain South Taranaki mayoralty
Phil Nixon says he is not aware of any challengers for the South Taranaki mayoralty. Photo / NZME Incumbent Phil Nixon is the first to throw his name in the hat for the South Taranaki mayoralty at this year's local elections. Nixon, first elected in 2019, said there was still work to be done, especially around the Government's Local Water Done Well legislation.
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
North Canterbury Council Approves In-House Water Plan
Article – David Hill – Local Democracy Reporter The Waimakariri District Council has adopted its draft water services delivery plan. Ratepayers can expect ''low cost and efficient'' water services, says Waimakariri District Council chief executive Jeff Millward. The council approved a draft water services delivery plan at a meeting on Tuesday, June 3, as it begins work on beefing up its in-house water services business unit. Councils are required to submit water service delivery plans with the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) by September 3 to comply with the Government's Local Water Done Well legislation. Mr Millward said the plan is designed to demonstrate to the DIA that the ''council continues to deliver water services efficiently and at low cost to the community''. The legislation requires councils to set out a 10-year plan for the delivery of water services, but the council will continue its practice of preparing asset management plans for 100 years and beyond, he said. While changes are required to comply with the legislation, Mr Millward said he is confident the council is already 90 percent compliant. ''The remaining 10% will still require significant effort, particularly as the council moves to demonstrate that it meets the expectations of both the economic regulator (Commerce Commission) and the drinking water regulator (Taumata Arowai). ''This will be an ongoing test of the council's capacity to comply with new regulatory requirements.'' Mr Millward said the council already rates directly for water services, which is one of the objectives of the legislation. But further work is required, such as accounting for cost allocations which relate to water services across all council functions. ''These arrangements must be robust and able to withstand scrutiny, as required under the new framework.'' The council is proposing to retain its existing governance arrangements, with its utilities and roading committee and audit and risk committee having oversight over different water service functions. Mayor Dan Gordon said this could be reviewed after October's local government elections and he suggested a water services portfolio holder could be appointed. Waimakariri has a long history of collaborating with the Hurunui and Kaikōura councils and Mr Millward said the plan leaves room for this to continue. The Hurunui and Kaikōura councils have voted to form a joint water services council controlled organisation (CCO). The Hurunui District Council supplies water to households in the Ashley and Loburn areas, while Waimakariri offers design and IT services to the Hurunui and Kaikōura council's water units when needed. Future collaboration will be up to the new CCO and will require more formal arrangements to comply with the new legislation, Mr Millward said. Mr Millward and Mr Gordon have been delegated authority to approve the final plan before it is submitted. Once a water services delivery plan has been approved by the DIA, councils have until June 30, 2028, to demonstrate they are financially sustainable. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
